Feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary malignancies in the hands of the surgeon.

AIM: To assess the feasibility of percutaneous pulmonary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) executed by a single surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2010, 15 procedures were performed in 11 patients during 13 sessions. Sex, age, pulmonary localisation and tumor diameter are discussed. Metastatic lesions as well as pulmonary primitive malignancies were treated. For metastatic lesions, the primitive tumor was considered as completely treated. Surgery was refused because of impaired pulmonary function or due to patient's refusal. All interventions were carried out by a single thoracic surgeon under CT-guidance in the department of radiology. RESULTS: RFA was completed in all patients without perprocedural complications. There was no significant perioperative morbidity. Pneumothorax was the most frequent complication but none of the patients needed thoracic drainage. Hospital stay decreased progressively since the start of this series. Follow-up was complete. Most lesions were stable or diminishing in size. CONCLUSION: These early results show that pulmonary RFA is a safe and feasible technique in the hands of the surgeon. Longer follow-up and larger series will be welcome to confirm the results and position of this procedure which might become an important tool for the surgeon and not only for radiologists.

Palmar fasciitis and arthritis: association with endometrial adenocarcinoma.

A 74-year-old woman was referred because of rheumatic symptoms consisting of pain, swelling of the hands, contracture and flexion of the fingers and severe palmar erythrosis. One year earlier she had undergone a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for uterine adenocarcinoma. A paraneoplastic syndrome with palmar fasciitis and arthritis was then suspected and an evolutive peritoneal carcinomatosis was confirmed by abdominal CT scan. The patient was first treated with hormonal therapy (progestagen) and then with chemotherapy. This, associated with calcitonin, corticosteroids and physiotherapy, allowed a temporary recovery, but the patient died 10 months later from progressive peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Radiotherapy of pelvic malignancies: impact of two types of rigid immobilisation devices on localisation errors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of set-up errors for patients treated with and without two rigid partial immobilisation devices for pelvic malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 patients receiving pelvic irradiation with a four field technique underwent a total of 524 portal films. The patients are divided into 3 cohorts of 10 patients. The first cohort is treated on a standard treatment couch without immobilisation device (NI); the second and third cohorts are treated with a custom-made immobilisation device used in an attempt to improve set-up accuracy: an Alpha-Cradle mattress (AM) or an Orfit cast (OC). Set-up deviations are analysed in the X, Y, Z directions of a fixed coordinate system, corresponding to the lateral, cranio-caudal and antero-posterior direction, respectively. RESULTS: Considering the percentage of discrepancies < or = 5 mm between the simulation films and the portal films as a measure of set-up accuracy, immobilisation devices seem to increase accuracy: 88.5% (X) 79% (Y) and 100% (Z) with AM; 84% (X-Y), 97.5% (Z) with OC and only 76.5% (X), 40% (Y) and 65.5% (Z) for NI. The distribution of the systematic set-up errors for the three patient cohorts, defined as the mean patient displacement for the treatment course, had a mean and a standard deviation of (0.7 +/- 2.7) mm in the X-axis, (-5.5 +/- 2.6) mm in the Y-axis and (-0.9 +/- 2.2) mm in the Z-axis when no immobilisation is added; (0.8 +/- 1.7) mm, (-2 +/- 2.7) mm and (0.3 +/- 0.4) mm for the Alpha-Cradle group; (0.3 +/- 1.4) mm, (0.5 +/- 1.1) mm and (0.5 +/- 0.6) mm for the Orfit cast group. The distribution of random errors about the mean approximated a normal distribution and the standard deviations are 4.4 mm (X), 4.2 mm (Y) and 4.8 mm (Z) for NI; 3.3, 3.5 and 2.5 mm for the AM; 3.4, 3.3 and 2.7 mm for the OC. CONCLUSIONS: The two rigid immobilisation devices improve the reproducibility of a given pelvic field but there is a small benefit comparative to the cost and the cumbersome place of the devices.

Is there potential for granulocyte or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors in radiotherapy?

The purpose of this communication was to explore which situations in radiotherapy might benefit from concomitant administration of haematopoietic growth factors (HGF). Only large-field radiotherapy is likely to induce bone marrow depression, such as irradiation of Hodgkin's disease. Therefore, we studied 122 patients irradiated for Hodgkin's disease, looking at peripheral blood cell count before, during and after the treatment. One hundred and four treatments were preceded by chemotherapy (MOPP and/or ABVD) and the radiation dose was between 36 and 44 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction sessions. Severe leucopenia (grade III WHO) was very uncommon and justified treatment interruption only twice. In both cases, it was paired with thrombocytopenia. No infection developed. It is concluded that when radiotherapy is used alone, prophylactic use of HGFs does not seem justified. This, of course, does not apply to radiochemotherapy combinations, although thorough investigations in this field are still awaited.

Black and white in accuracy assessment of megavoltage images: the medical decision is often grey.

Using different criteria for acceptance of the portal film taken at the first treatment session, a comparison was made of the relevance of the information obtained from such a single check for the subsequent irradiations. A total number of 234 verification films have been taken on 29 fields for 27 head and neck patients. Patients were immobilised with individual plastic masks fixed to the couch and treated on a 6-MV linac fitted with an automatic verification system. Field alignment was checked with a measurement in the anteroposterior (AP) and craniocaudal (CC) direction on each film. Referring to the simulated field, this group of patients was treated with excellent average precision (mean, -0.7 mm) and reasonable spread (s = 5 mm). The percentage of 'large' deviations (> or = 6 mm) occurring during the whole treatment course is proportional to the upper limit of deviation accepted in the first assessed field (for an upper limit < 6 mm): it goes progressively up from 5% (AP-CC direction) to 17% (AP) and 13% (CC) for accepted magnitudes of deviation going from 2 mm to 6 mm in the first film. As the reproducibility of the different treatment series (s = 2 mm) is independent of the upper level of error accepted on the first film, this means that errors are mainly systematic errors coming from the transfer of the simulation unit to the treatment unit. Precision in a series of set-ups is always expressed by a Gaussian curve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tangential breast irradiation: influence of technique of set-up on transfer errors and reproducibility.

Using conventional portal films, the influence of the technique of set-up on the transfer error from simulator to treatment couch and on the subsequent reproducibility was made for the irradiated volume in the treatment of breast cancer. A total number of 376 portal films have been performed on 14 patients. All the patients were treated on a 6 MV Linac supplied with an automatic verification system excluding, however, the couch parameters. The overall precision of the treatment delivery is evaluated by the global analysis of the discrepancies between the simulator films and the different portal films. For the patient group lying on a inclined plane with (group 2) or without (group 1) fixed arm support, a narrow gaussian distribution is obtained in the anteroposterior (AP) direction with a SD of 4 mm. In the craniocaudal (CC) direction, the frequency of distribution of the patients treated without fixed arm support is much larger than in the other group: the SD is respectively 15.5 mm for the first and 5.5 mm for the second one. The reproducibility of the series of set-ups of the two groups estimated by reference to the mean value are similar in the AP direction. The SD within the series of portal films in the CC direction is 5.8 mm for the first group and 3.7 mm for the second group. Their comparison with the discrepancies of 15.5 mm and 5.5 mm when assessing the deviation between the simulated and portal films shows the importance of systematic errors. The localisation of the irradiation port can be improved by using support systems with fixed arm indicators.

Is it necessary to repeat quality control procedures for head and neck patients?

Using serial verification films for detection of localization errors and in vivo measurements of the delivered dose, a comparison was made of the information obtained from a single check on the first treatment session or from repeated checks in subsequent irradiations, leading to an assessment of the predictive value of a single check. A total number of 215 films and 261 entrance dose measurements have been performed on 34 fields for 10 head and neck patients. The patients are immobilized with individual plastic masks fixed on the couch and treated on a 6 MV linac, supplied with an automatic verification system excluding the couch parameters. The global results show Gaussian frequency distributions with standard deviations of 4 mm for port film measurements and 3.4% for the dose measurements. Large errors (greater than 5 mm displacement and greater than 4% deviation from the expected dose) have been detected in 16% in the cranio-caudal direction and 24% in the antero-posterior direction with port films and in 15% of the in vivo measurements. In order to identify the nature of the errors, which can be random or systematic, the first measurement is taken as the reference value and shows that consecutive measurements on the same field were reproducible with standard deviations of respectively 2.5 mm and 1.8%. This means that a large part of the spread of the global results can be explained by systematic errors in the treatment preparation chain. With the first check, 6 out of 10 systematic localization errors and 7 out of 7 systematic errors leading to erroneous dose delivery have been detected. Therefore, most of the systematic errors, which affect the overall quality of the treatment, can be identified with the first check. The four systematic localization errors, missed with the first film, were of rather limited size: only one of them showed a mean displacement larger than 7 mm. Because the first measurement is an acceptable indication of the overall quality of the treatment delivery, the authors propose a code of practice for checking the treatment quality at the patient level.