Antidepressant effects of ketamine and ECT: A pilot comparison.

BACKGROUND: To compare the antidepressant effects and cognitive adverse effects of intravenous ketamine infusion and Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) in persons with severe depressive episodes. METHODS: This assessor-blinded randomized control trial included 25 patients (either sex; 18-65 years) meeting ICD-10 criteria for severe depression (bipolar or unipolar). Patients received either ECT (n = 13) or intravenous infusions of ketamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg over 45 min; n = 12) for six alternate day sessions over a period of two weeks. Severity of depression was assessed at baseline and on every alternate day of intervention using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and self-reported Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). RESULTS: Baseline socio-demographic and clinical variables including HDRS (ECT: 25.15±6.58; Ketamine: 23.33±4.05, p = 0.418) and BDI (ECT: 37.07±6.58; Ketamine: 33.33±9.29; p = 0.254) were comparable. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that ECT patients showed significantly greater reduction in HDRS (group*time interaction effect; F = 4.79; p<0.001) and BDI scores (group*time interaction effect; F = 3.83; p<0.01). ECT patients had higher response rate than ketamine patients [HDRS: ECT- 13/13(100%) vs ketamine- 8/12 (66.70%); p = 0.04]. This was true for remission as well [ECT- 12/13(92.30%) vs ketamine- 6/12(50%), p = 0.030; both HDRS and BDI]. Performance on Digit Symbol Substitution Test (as part of the Battery for ECT-Related Cognitive Deficits scale) significantly improved in ketamine patients (p = 0.02) while that in ECT patients worsened non significantly (p = 0.30). LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size; higher proportion of dropouts in the Ketamine arm. CONCLUSION: This study favoured ECT over ketamine for a better efficacy over six treatment sessions in severe depression. The results need to be replicated in larger studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2019/09/021184.

Adverse childhood experiences in families with multiple members diagnosed to have psychiatric illnesses.

OBJECTIVE: Adverse childhood experiences are linked to the development of a number of psychiatric illnesses in adulthood. Our study examined the pattern of adverse childhood experiences and their relation to the age of onset of major psychiatric conditions in individuals from families that had ⩾2 first-degree relatives with major psychiatric conditions (multiplex families), identified as part of an ongoing longitudinal study. METHODS: Our sample consisted of 509 individuals from 215 families. Of these, 268 were affected, i.e., diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n = 61), obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 58), schizophrenia (n = 52), substance dependence (n = 59) or co-occurring diagnoses (n = 38), while 241 were at-risk first-degree relatives who were either unaffected (n = 210) or had other depressive or anxiety disorders (n = 31). All individuals were evaluated using the Adverse Childhood Experiences - International Questionnaire and total adverse childhood experiences exposure and severity scores were calculated. RESULTS: It was seen that affected males, as a group, had the greatest adverse childhood experiences exposure and severity scores in our sample. A Cox mixed effects model fit by gender revealed that a higher total adverse childhood experiences severity score was associated with significantly increased risk for an earlier age of onset of psychiatric diagnoses in males. A similar model that evaluated the interaction of diagnosis revealed an earlier age of onset in obsessive-compulsive disorder and substance dependence, but not in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that adverse childhood experiences were associated with an earlier onset of major psychiatric conditions in men and individuals diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder and substance dependence. Ongoing longitudinal assessments in first-degree relatives from these families are expected to identify mechanisms underlying this relationship.