RESUMO
Objective Visual impairment in vestibular schwannomas is an underreported entity. The plethora of literature focuses primarily on facial and hearing preservation. This study aims to describe our experience and find the possible reasons for visual impairment. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective observational study. We evaluated 114 patients with vestibular schwannoma, operated during 2015 to 2020. Eight parameters were studied-age, gender, maximum tumor size, hydrocephalus, economic status, duration of symptoms, visual loss, and ease of access to the tertiary neurosurgical facility. JASP software (version 0.14.1, Amsterdam) was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 42/114 (36.84%) patients had a varying degree of impairment. Patients with impaired vision had significantly larger tumors (4.31 vs. 4.12 cm, p = 0.02), longer duration of symptoms (19.14 vs. 16.45 months, p = 0.02), hydrocephalus ( p = 0.03), and were from remote areas ( p = 0.009). In stepwise logistic regression analysis, longer duration of symptoms and difficult access to neurosurgical facility stand out as decisive factors for visual impairment. The follow-up data were available for 35/42 (83.33%) cases of visual impairment. Vision improved in 14/35 (40%) of cases. Vision improved in a significantly higher number of patients when a preoperative ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed ( p = 0.03). Conclusion The visual handicap occurs in a significant number of patients with vestibular schwannoma. Delayed arrival at the neurosurgical facility due to difficult access appears to be the primary factor leading to blindness. Strengthening our healthcare systems in rural areas would go a long way in the timely detection and prevention of blindness in such cases.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Brain Trauma Foundation issued level III evidence guidelines for surgical management of compound depressed fractures. However, some patients undergo successful conservative treatment. This study compares these 2 treatment modalities. METHODS: This prospective study included 67 patients with compound depressed skull fractures with surgical indications and a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Depressed fractures in front of the hairline (operated on for cosmetic reasons) and associated with significant intracranial injuries were excluded. Those who gave consent for surgery were included in the surgical group, and those who denied were included in the conservative group. RESULTS: The surgical group had 38 patients and the conservative group had 29. Both groups were comparable in mean age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale score, head injury severity, depth of fractures, and follow-up duration. Focal neurologic deficits were observed in 19 patients at presentation and were higher in the surgical group. Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the conservative group. Mean Glasgow Outcome Scale score at follow-up was statistically similar in both groups (P = 0.13). Focal neurologic deficits improved equally in both groups (P = 0.67). The severity of traumatic brain injury (P = 0.004) and the presence of focal neurologic deficits (P < 0.001) affected the neurologic outcomes. The age, gender, mode of treatment (surgery vs. conservative), surgical site infections, and seizures did not affect neurologic outcomes. The overall complication rates were similar among groups (P = 0.50). New-onset focal neurologic deficits, seizures, and infection rates were not significantly different among the groups (P = 0.98, P = 0.72, P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management has equivalent neurologic outcomes and complications compared with surgical management.