Comparison of safety between high and low doses of sulbactam/ampicillin: A retrospective observational study in Japanese patients with pneumonia.

Although 12 g/day sulbactam/ampicillin (SBT/ABPC) is approved in Japan, differences in the frequency of adverse effects induced by conventional (≤6 g/day) and high (≥9 g/day) doses remain unclear. We performed a retrospective observational study on SBT/ABPC-treated hospitalized adult patients with pneumonia from October 2015 to January 2018 to compare the safety between high and low doses. Patients were divided into high-dose (≥9 g/day, n = 200) and low-dose (≤6 g/day, n = 246) groups. We used logistic regression to determine propensity scores for the high-dose and low-dose groups and compared the incidence of adverse effects after propensity score adjustment (n = 200 in each group). Following propensity score adjustment, the frequency of elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level was still significantly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group (21% versus 11%, p = 0.006). In contrast, the frequencies of elevated alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum creatinine levels and decreased white blood cell and platelet counts, and incidence of anemia, were not. Changes in blood urea nitrogen levels, erythrocyte count, and hematocrit were not significantly different between the two dose groups. There were two cases of rash reported to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency as an adverse effect in the high-dose group. Thirty-day mortality rates were not significantly different after propensity score adjustment. Our analysis suggests that an increase in the ALT grade was more frequent in patients treated with a daily dose of SBT/ABPC of ≥9 g.

Individual differences in rate-limiting reactions during metabolism of irinotecan hydrochloride.

UNLABELLED: Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) is converted to SN-38 by carboxylesterase, SN-38 is conjugated by UDP-glucuronosyl- transferase (UGT) to SN-38G. Individual differences in enzyme activity influence the efficacy of this anticancer agent and the adverse reactions it induces. In this study, individual differences in the metabolism of this drug were determined by calculating its c 1 on version (CPT-11 to SN-38) and conjugation ratios (SN-38 to SN-38G) from blood concentrations of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G at immediately and 60 min after a 90-min intravenous infusion of CPT-11. Changes in conversion and conjugation during long-term infusion of CPT-11 were also investigated. The median conversion and conjugation ratios were 0.0155 and 2.812, respectively (n=48). Based on these values, the patients were classified into four types: low-low type (10.4%), low-high type (31.2%), high-low type (31.2%), and high high type (27.1%). Prolongation of infusion time resulted in an increase in the conversion ratio in the low-high type and an increase in the conjugation ratio in the high-low type. These changes, however, were very slight in the high-high type. Thus, a longer infusion time made it possible to increase the number of doses in the low-high type and minimize adverse reactions in the high-low type. CONCLUSION: In patients found to have a low SN-38 conversion ratio or SN-38G conjugation ratio based on simple assessment of data obtained by 2-point blood sampling, modification of infusion time may allow pharmacokinetic changes that confer a clinical benefit.

[Significance of urinary uracil measurement following administration of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidine(DIF)products].

Individual differences in 5-FU metabolism are mainly attributed to individual differences in the activity of DPD, an enzyme that can metabolize more than 85% of 5-FU. Because urinary uracil is a reflection of DPD activity, it is measured to predict and prevent the occurrence of side effects caused by pyrimidine-type chemotherapeutic agents. From urinary uracil values measured in 84 gastrointestinal cancer patients, 0-60 mmol/g.creatinine was set as a standard. In patients whose urinary uracil values exceeded the standard, 5-FU tended to be accumulated when S-1, a DIF product, was administered and side effects, such as anorexia, vomiting and diarrhea occurred immediately after the start of S-1 administration. If an appropriate DIF product is selected and its dosage set based on the patient's urinary uracil value, the occurrence of side effects would be reduced. Subsequently, a continuation of medication would be possible.

[Determining S-1 dosage at hospitals prioritizing cancer chemotherapy].

Although it is recommended that the standard S-1 dosage should be based on how large the body surface area is, an on-site setting of the appropriate dosage is often lower than the standard one, depending on the individual's condition and considering possible side effects and so, on. Here, we investigated usage conditions for S-1 as a part of field training for expert pharmacists at our hospital that performs total clinical treatments. Decreases in dosage per day for elderly patients were although the standard dosage is generally determined according to the amount of a patient's body surface. We conducted a retrospective survey with a total 90 patients by creating a tree-diagram to identify a reduction standard. It was found that the S-1 dosage was decreased when there were side effects, aggravation in performance status, decrease in kidney function, old age, combined injection chemotherapy, and a decrease in radiation therapy performance. The dosage decreases without such medical reasons were seen in only 4 of the 90 patients. The individual target dosage on the basis of daily medical examination.

[Equalization of spread of breast cancer chemotherapy regimen at general hospitals--with EC and FEC regimens].

We investigated the differences in safety and management of adverse events of chemotherapy among three hospitals, Sakai Municipal Hospital, Takarazuka Municipal Hospital and National Hospital Organization Osaka-minami Medical Center. The main purpose of this study was to equalize the spread of breast cancer chemotherapy regimen. The following three regimens were evaluated; epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) /cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) (EC75), epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) /cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) /5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) (FEC75) and epirubicin (100 mg/m(2)) / cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) /5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) (FEC100). Sixty-three patients were evaluated. We studied the level of myelosuppression after each regimen. As a result, there was no significant difference in neutrocyte counts at nadir after chemotherapy among hospitals and regimens. However, the values tended to be ranked EC75>FEC75>FEC100. In addition, we examined the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) according to the multi- national association for supportive care in cancer (MASCC) scoring system. Almost all patients (61/63) were in the low risk group of FN, and only two patients had developed FN. At one hospital, patients receiving chemotherapy were prescribed ciprofloxacin tablets prophylactically for prexia over 38 deg C, and the patients learned from it. Thus, no marked difference in the safety (side effects such as myelosuppression) was recognized. However, management of side effects was different among these hospitals. In conclusion, it is very important to provide patients with adequate information on side effects.