[A Case of Duodenal Cancer with Advanced Lymph Node Metastasis Treated with mFOLFOX6 Preoperative Chemotherapy].

A 60-year-old man underwent surgical distal gastrectomy 10 years prior to receiving treatment for stomach cancer. He visited our hospital with complaints of abdominal fullness and weight loss. Abdominal computed tomography(CT)revealed intestinal blockage starting at the duodenum near the Treitz ligament. During upper alimentary canal endoscopy, a type 2 tumor coveringthe entire circumference of the horizontal duodenum was found, and biopsy results indicated that the tumor was a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Although no distant metastasis was observed in the abdominal CT scan, multiple attached bulky lymph nodes were observed leadingto a suspicion of metastasis. Finally, the patient was diagnosed as having progressive duodenal cancer accompanied with advanced lymph node metastasis. A gastrojejunal bypass surgery with laparoscopy was performed. When the patient's overall condition improved, mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy was started, and 6 courses were completed. As the sizes of the primary tumor and bulky lymph nodes decreased, surgery to completely remove the cancer was performed. UFT/UZEL supplemental postoperative chemotherapy was administered for 6 months. The patient remained alive, with no remissions 3 years post-surgery.

Site-specific tumor grading system in colorectal cancer: multicenter pathologic review of the value of quantifying poorly differentiated clusters.

The study aimed to determine the value of a novel site-specific grading system based on quantifying poorly differentiated clusters (PDC; Grade(PDC)) in colorectal cancer (CRC). A multicenter pathologic review involving 12 institutions was performed on 3243 CRC cases (stage I, 583; II, 1331; III, 1329). Cancer clusters of ≥5 cancer cells and lacking a gland-like structure (PDCs) were counted under a ×20 objective lens in a field containing the maximum clusters. Tumors with <5, 5 to 9, and ≥10 PDCs were classified as grades G1, G2, and G3, respectively. According to Grade(PDC), 1594, 1005, and 644 tumors were classified as G1, G2, and G3 and had 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of 91.6%, 75.4%, and 59.6%, respectively (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that Grade exerted an influence on prognostic outcome independently of TNM staging; approximately 20% and 46% of stage I and II patients, respectively, were selected by Grade(PDC) as a population whose survival estimate was comparable to or even worse than that of stage III patients. Grade(PDC) surpassed TNM staging in the ability to stratify patients by recurrence-free survival (Akaike information criterion, 2915.6 vs. 2994.0) and had a higher prognostic value than American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) grading (Grade(AJCC)) at all stages. Regarding judgment reproducibility of grading tumors, weighted κ among the 12 institutions was 0.40 for Grade(AJCC) and 0.52 for Grade(PDC). Grade(PDC) has a robust prognostic power and promises to be of sufficient clinical value to merit implementation as a site-specific grading system in CRC.