Awareness of Complications of Dental Treatment in Patients Treated with Drugs Affecting the Immune System : A Nationwide Questionnaire Survey of Dental Practitioners in Japan.

The aim of this study was to investigate the awareness and experience, among dental practitioners, of adverse events resulting from dental treatment of patients undergoing therapy with drugs that affect the immune system [angiogenesis inhibitors, biological agents, immunosuppressants, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)]. For this purpose, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted. Questionnaires were sent to 2,050 dentists, of which 206 (10.1%) were completed and returned. The results showed that most dentists were aware of complications associated with dental treatment of patients treated with drugs that affect the immune system, and about half had actually experienced such complications. Delayed wound healing, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), and postoperative infections were reported. Whereas approximately 50% of dentists did not discontinue the drugs during dental treatment, about 18% did. During temporary drug discontinuation, some patients experienced aggravation of the primary disease, such as worsening of rheumatism, growth of tumors, and rejection reactions of transplanted organs. As for medical cooperation, only less than half of the dentists were asked for oral hygiene management by a physician prior to starting the drug treatment. Prospective studies are needed because evidence for dental treatments in patients treated with these drugs remains limited.

Questionnaire survey of angiogenesis inhibitor-related oral complications based on a nation-wide study in Japan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The prevalence of oral adverse events and dental treatments related complications during the molecular targeted drugs therapy remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contents of dental treatment-related complications in Japanese patients during molecular targeted therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nation-wide survey of dental treatment related complications was performed by the Japanese Society of Dentistry for Medically Compromised Patient as retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Among 212 dentists, 87.3% recognized the possibility of dental treatments related complications in patients with angiogenesis inhibitors. The oral adverse events including dental treatment-related complications associated with angiogenesis inhibitors were 79 cases. In patients with angiogenesis inhibitors, 73.4% of patients were administrated with bevacizumab. The average administration period of angiogenesis inhibitors was 14.0 ±â€¯10.0 months. As the dental treatment related complications, delayed wound healing was most commonly seen in 45 patients (57.0%), followed by osteonecrosis of the jaw in 25 (31.6%). The triggered factor of complications was tooth extraction in 51 cases (96.2%). CONCLUSION: The extraction of the tooth with pre-existing inflammation may be suggested as one of risk factors for angiogenesis inhibitor-related dental treatment complications.

Evaluation of postextraction bleeding incidence to compare patients receiving and not receiving warfarin therapy: a cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated incidence and risk factors for postextraction bleeding in patients receiving warfarin and those not receiving anticoagulation therapy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study. SETTING: 26 hospitals where an oral surgeon is available. PARTICIPANTS: Data on 2817 teeth (from 496 patients receiving warfarin, 2321 patients not receiving warfarin; mean age (SD): 62.2 (17.6)) extracted between 1 November 2008 and 31 March 2010, were collected. Warfarin-receiving patients were eligible when prothrombin time-international normalised ratio (PT-INR) measured within 7 days prior to the extraction was less than 3.0. INTERVENTIONS: Simple dental extraction was performed, and incidence of postextraction bleeding and comorbidities were recorded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Postextraction bleeding not controlled by basic haemostasis procedure was clinically significant. RESULTS: Bleeding events were reported for 35 (7.1%) and 49 (2.1%) teeth, of which 18 (3.6%) and 9 (0.4%) teeth were considered clinically significant, in warfarin and non-warfarin groups, respectively, the difference between which was 3.24% (CI 1.58% to 4.90%). The incidence rates by patients were 2.77% and 0.39%, in warfarin and non-warfarin groups, respectively (incidence difference 2.38%, CI 0.65% to 4/10%). Univariate analyses showed that age (OR 0.197, p=0.001), PT-INR (OR 3.635, p=0.003), mandibular foramen conduction anaesthesia (OR 4.854, p=0.050) and formation of abnormal granulation tissue in extraction socket (OR 2.900, p=0.031) significantly correlate with bleeding incidence. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 0.126, p=0.001), antiplatelet drugs (OR 0.100, p=0.049), PT-INR (OR 7.797, p=0.001) and history of acute inflammation at extraction site (OR 3.722, p=0.037) were significant risk factors for postextraction bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is slight but significant increase in the incidences of postextraction bleeding in patients receiving warfarin. Although absolute incidence was low in both groups, the bleeding risk is not negligible.

Multicenter phase 2 study of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and nedaplatin for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical and hisotological efficacy and toxicities of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel (DOC) and nedaplatin (CDGP) for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the preoperative setting. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with locally advanced but operable OSCC were enrolled. Combination induction chemotherapy consisted of DOC 60 mg/m2 followed by CDGP 100 mg/m2. RESULTS: All patients received one cycle of chemotherapy. In the clinical assessment, ten patients achieved partial response for an overall response rate of 33.3% (95% CI, 16.4-50.2%). Histological assessment of surgical specimens showed an overall response rate of 56.6% (95% CI, 38.9-74.3%). Although severe neutropenia was observed in 90% of patients, only one patient (3.3%) experienced severe infection. Toxicities associated with this regimen did not interfere with planned radical surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A single cycle of preoperative combination chemotherapy with DOC and CDGP showed moderate histological activity with an acceptable safety profile for the planned radical surgery. Further studies testing more cycles before surgery might be more appropriate.

Controversy of surgical treatment for severe cerebellar infarction.

Treatment for severe cerebellar infarction has been controversial. Clinical outcomes of patients with external ventricular drainage (EVD) and decompression as the first treatment for the infarction were compared. A total of 25 patients with severe cerebellar infarction were subdivided into two groups to compare outcome of the group (group A) with EVD with that of the group (group B) with decompressive surgery as the first surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in age between group A with 71 +/- 6 years and group B with 61 +/- 15 years. The preoperative status was Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 6 in all the patients in group A. It was GCS score 4 in one patient, GCS score 6 in 9 patients, GCS score 7 in 8 patients, and GCS score 9 in two patients in group B. The preoperative neurologic background was almost the same for both groups. In group A, one patient had a good recovery. However, 3 patients became severely disabled and one patient died. In group B, 10 patients had a good recovery and 6 patients became moderately disabled, although two patients were disabled and two patients died. The outcome was good in one patient of group A and in 16 patients of group B, although it was poor in 4 patients each in both groups. Patients in group B had a significantly better prognosis than those in group A. No clear evidence of surgical indications for EVD or suboccipital decompression from neurologic signs or symptoms and from neuroimaging has been reported. Our results seem to suggest that pre-emptive suboccipital decompression with or without resection of necrosis is warranted in the patients with severe cerebellar infarction.