Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 2024 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39223381

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine the association between physical, sexual, or physiological harm in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in a large, contemporary birth cohort. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used California-linked vital statistics and hospital discharge data from 2016 to 2020. We included singleton, non-anomalous births with a gestational age of 23-42 weeks. Violence in pregnancy was identified using International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Chi-square tests and multivariable Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations of violence in pregnancy with perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,728,478 pregnancies met inclusion criteria, of which 3,457 (0.2%) had reported violence in pregnancy. Compared to those without violence in pregnancy, individuals who experienced violence had an increased risk of non-severe hypertensive disorders (aRR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.22, 1.51), preeclampsia with severe features (aRR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.11, 1.61), chorioamnionitis (aRR = 1.68; 95% CI 1.48, 1.91), anemia (aRR = 1.59; 95% CI 1.50, 1.68), antepartum hemorrhage (aRR = 2.17; 95% CI 1.19, 3.95), and postpartum hemorrhage (aRR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.48, 1.85). Violence in pregnancy was also associated with increased risk of Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (aRR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.11, 1.71) and neonatal hypoglycemia (aRR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.07, 1.48). CONCLUSION: Violence experienced in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Understanding how universal screening and early recognition of violence in pregnancy may reduce disparities in maternal morbidity for this understudied population is critical.

2.
Contraception ; 137: 110491, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763275

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the availability of mifepristone and misoprostol at pharmacies in a state with protective abortion legislation and variation in access by rurality. STUDY DESIGN: Using a secret shopper survey, researchers attempted to contact all community pharmacies in Oregon and evaluate their mifepristone and misoprostol provisions. RESULTS: Among the 444 pharmacies surveyed, mifepristone was planned at 19.2%. Misoprostol was available at 77.5%, but stocking issues and medication ordering impact access, without significant differences by rurality. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy engagement and support are key to increasing access to these essential medicines, which may be improved through education and referral programs.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Mifepristona , Misoprostol , Misoprostol/provisão & distribuição , Misoprostol/administração & dosagem , Oregon , Mifepristona/provisão & distribuição , Mifepristona/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Feminino , Farmácias/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Abortivos não Esteroides/provisão & distribuição , Abortivos não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , População Urbana , Abortivos Esteroides/provisão & distribuição , Abortivos Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA