Effects of Kilohertz Frequency, Burst Duty Cycle, and Burst Duration on Evoked Torque, Perceived Discomfort and Muscle Fatigue: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: Kilohertz-frequency alternating current is used to minimize muscle atrophy and muscle weakness and improve muscle performance. However, no systematic reviews have evaluated the best Kilohertz-frequency alternating current parameters for this purpose. We investigated the effects of the carrier frequency, burst duty cycles, and burst durations on evoked torque, perceived discomfort, and muscle fatigue. A search of eight data sources by two independent reviewers resulted in 13 peer-reviewed studies being selected, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and rated using the PEDro scale to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Most studies showed that carrier frequencies up to 1 kHz evoked higher torque, while carrier frequencies between 2.5 and 5 kHz resulted in lower perceived discomfort. In addition, most studies showed that shorter burst duty cycles (10%-50%) induced higher evoked torque and lower perceived discomfort. Methodological quality scores ranged from 5 to 8 on the PEDro scale. We conclude that Kilohertz-frequency alternating current develops greater evoked torque for carrier frequencies between 1 and 2.5 kHz and burst duty cycles less than 50%. Lower perceived discomfort was generated using Kilohertz-frequency alternating currents between 2.5 and 5 kHz and burst duty cycles less than 50%.

The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on strength, pain, and function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis / Efeitos da estimulação elétrica neuromuscular na força, dor e função em indivíduos com osteoartrite de joelho: uma revisão sistemática com meta-análise / Efectos de la electroestimulación neuromuscular sobre la fuerza, el dolor y la función en personas con osteoartritis de la rodilla: una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis

ABSTRACT We aimed to investigate the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle strength, pain relief, and improvement in function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Databases were searched from December 2017 to July 2020 and included PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A manual search was also performed by checking the reference lists of eligible articles. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The studies selected compared NMES with an exercise program on isometric muscle strength as a primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were pain and function. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias assessment and PEDro scale, and the overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Eight studies were included in this systematic review. A total of 571 patients were analyzed. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation associated with exercise promoted an increase in isometric strength of the quadriceps muscle compared to the active control group, demonstrating heterogeneity and statistical difference (95% CI=1.16 to 5.10, I2=97%, p=0.002; very low-certainty evidence). NMES associated with exercise did not improve physical function (95% CI=−0.37 to 0.59, I2=0%, p=0.67; low-certainty evidence) and showed controversial results for pain compared to an active control group (qualitative assessment). In conclusion, NMES induces an increase in muscle strength in patients with osteoarthritis compared to an active control group. No differences were found for physical function and pain outcomes. Further research is needed due to the uncertain level of evidence.

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os efeitos da estimulação elétrica neuromuscular (EENM) na força muscular, alívio da dor e melhora da função em pacientes com osteoartrite de joelho. Realizou-se uma pesquisa em diferentes bases de dados, como PubMed, Embase, LILACS e o Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, no período de dezembro de 2017 até julho de 2020. Procedeu-se a uma busca manual com o intuito de verificar as listas de referências dos artigos elegíveis. As diretrizes PRISMA foram seguidas. Os estudos selecionados comparavam a estimulação elétrica neuromuscular com um programa de exercícios de força muscular isométrica como desfecho primário. Os resultados secundários foram dor e função. A qualidade dos estudos foi avaliada usando avaliação de risco de viés e a escala PEDro e a qualidade geral das evidências foi avaliada usando a abordagem GRADE. Oito estudos foram incluídos nesta revisão sistemática com um total de 571 pacientes analisados. A EENM associada ao exercício promoveu o aumento da força isométrica do músculo quadríceps em relação ao grupo controle ativo, demonstrando heterogeneidade e diferença estatística (IC 95%=1,16 a 5,10, I2=97%, p=0,002; evidência de muito baixa certeza), mas não melhorou a função física (IC 95%=−0,37 a 0,59, I2=0%, p=0,67; evidência de baixa certeza) e mostrou resultados controversos para dor em comparação ao grupo de controle ativo (avaliação qualitativa). Conclui-se que a EENM induz o aumento da força muscular em pacientes com osteoartrite, porém não foram encontradas diferenças nos resultados de funcionalidade e dor em comparação com o grupo de controle ativo. Devido à incerteza das evidências, são necessárias mais pesquisas sobre o assunto.

RESUMEN El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar los efectos de la electroestimulación neuromuscular (NMES) sobre la fuerza muscular, el alivio del dolor y la mejora de la función en pacientes con osteoartritis de la rodilla. Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos PubMed, Embase, LILACS y Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, en el periodo de diciembre de 2017 y julio de 2020. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda manual para verificar las listas de referencias de los artículos elegibles. Se aplicó las pautas PRISMA. Los estudios seleccionados compararon la electroestimulación neuromuscular con un programa de ejercicio de fuerza muscular isométrica como resultado primario. Los resultados secundarios fueron el dolor y la función. La calidad de los estudios se evaluó mediante la evaluación del riesgo de sesgo y la escala PEDro, y la calidad general de la evidencia se estimó con el uso del sistema GRADE. Ocho estudios con un total de 571 pacientes compusieron esta revisión sistemática. La EENM asociada con el ejercicio aumentó la fuerza isométrica del músculo cuádriceps en comparación con el grupo control activo, demostrando una heterogeneidad y diferencia estadística (IC 95%=1,16 a 5,10, I2=97%, p=0,002; evidencia con muy baja seguridad), pero no mejoró la función física (IC 95%=−0,37 a 0,59, I2=0%, p=0,67; evidencia con baja seguridad) y mostró resultados controvertidos para el dolor en comparación con el grupo control activo (evaluación cualitativa). Se concluyó que la EENM indujo un aumento de la fuerza muscular en pacientes con osteoartritis, pero no se encontraron diferencias en los resultados de función y dolor en comparación con el grupo control activo. Debido a la incertidumbre de la evidencia, se necesitan más estudios sobre el tema.

Effects of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on submaximal and maximum torque, efficiency, and discomfort: a randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an important therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. However, best stimulation parameters remain to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on torque, efficiency, and discomfort. METHODS: Using a cross-over design, kHz frequency alternating currents (KFAC) and pulsed currents (PC) with narrow (200 µs) or wide (500 µs) phase durations were randomly applied on knee extensor muscles of healthy participants with a minimum of seven days between sessions. The NMES-evoked torque, NMES-efficiency, and discomfort (visual 0-10 cm analogue scale) were measured for each stimulation intensity increments (10 mA). Statistics were conducted using a three-way analysis of variances (phase duration x current x intensity), followed by Tukey post-hoc. RESULTS: Twenty-four males (age 22.3 ±â€¯3.5years) were included. No effect of NMES current was observed for torque, efficiency, and discomfort. For wide phase durations (500 µs), torque significantly increased for all stimulation intensities. For narrow phase durations (200 µs) evoked torque significantly increased only after 40% of maximal stimulation intensity. Phase durations of 500 µs produced greater torque than 200 µs. Discomfort was greater with 500 µs when compared to 200 µs. Submaximal relative torque, for example 40% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), was obtained with ∼ 60% and ∼ 80% of the maximal current intensity for 500 µs and 200 µs, respectively. CONCLUSION: KFAC and PC current applied with the same phase duration induced similar relative submaximal and maximum evoked-torque, efficiency, and perceived discomfort. However, currents with 500 µs induced higher evoked-torque, current efficiency, and perceived discomfort.

Russian and Low-Frequency Currents Induced Similar Neuromuscular Adaptations in Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

CONTEXT: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is widely used to induce muscular strength increase; however, no study has compared Russian current (RC) with pulsed current (PC) effects after a training program. OBJECTIVES: We studied the effects of different neuromuscular electrical stimulation currents, RC, and PC on the neuromuscular system after a 6-week training period. DESIGN: Blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS: A total of 27 male soccer players (age 22.2 [2.2] y, body mass 74.2 [10.0] kg, height 177 [0] cm, and body mass index 23.7 [2.9] kg/cm2 for the control group; 22.1 [3.1] y, 69.7 [5.7] kg, 174 [0] cm, and 23.0 [2.5] kg/cm for the PC group; and 23.0 [3.4] y, 72.1 [10.7] kg, 175 [0] cm, and 23.5 [3.4] kg/cm for the RC group) were randomized into 3 groups: (1) control group; (2) RC (2500 Hz, burst 100 Hz, and phase duration 200 µs); and (3) PC (100 Hz and 200 µs). INTERVENTION: The experimental groups trained for 6 weeks, with 3 sessions per week with neuromuscular electrical stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximal voluntary isometric contraction and evoked torque, muscle architecture, sensory discomfort (visual analog scale), and electromyographic activity were evaluated before and after the 6-week period. RESULTS: Evoked torque increased in the RC (169.5% [78.2%], P < .01) and PC (248.7% [81.1%], P < .01) groups. Muscle thickness and pennation angle increased in the RC (8.7% [3.8%] and 16.7% [9.0%], P < .01) and PC (16.1% [8.0%] and 27.4% [11.0%], P < .01) groups. The PC demonstrated lower values for visual analog scale (38.8% [17.1%], P < .01). There was no significant time difference for maximal voluntary isometric contraction and root mean square values (P > .05). For all these variables, there was no difference between the RC and PC (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Despite the widespread use of RC in clinical practice, RC and PC training programs produced similar neuromuscular adaptations in soccer players. Nonetheless, as PC generated less perceived discomfort, it could be preferred after several training sessions.

Training Effects of Alternated and Pulsed Currents on the Quadriceps Muscles of Athletes.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks training with different neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) currents (medium alternated and low-frequency pulsed current) on muscle architecture and neuromuscular performance of competitive athletes. A double-blind controlled and randomized experimental study was carried out with 33 athletes (22.2±2.6 yrs, 74.7±9.8 kg, 176.8±6.0 cm), divided into 3 groups: mid-frequency current (MF, n=12), pulsed current (PC, n=11) and the control group (CG, n=10). Quadriceps maximal voluntary peak torque (PT) and corresponding vastus lateralis electromyographic activity, evoked torque (PT-NMES), vastus lateralis muscle thickness, fascicle length, pennation angle, and level of discomfort were assessed before and after the interventions. NMES training was performed 3 times per week and consisted of 18 sessions, 15 min/session, 6 s duration in each contraction interspersed with 18 s rest. After the training period, muscle thickness increased in the MF and PC groups (p<0.05). PT-NMES increased only in the PC group (p<0.05). All currents produced similar levels of discomfort (p>0.05). Quadriceps NMES training applied through alternated or pulsed currents produced similar effects in architecture and neuromuscular performance in competitive athletes.

Neuromuscular fatigue after low- and medium-frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low-frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium-frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical-like session. METHODS: Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15-minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured. RESULTS: Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P > 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P < 0.05). No difference was observed in mean evoked torque and discomfort (P > 0.05). DISCUSSION: Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293-299, 2018.

Kilohertz and Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation With the Same Pulse Duration Have Similar Efficiency for Inducing Isometric Knee Extension Torque and Discomfort.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that, as compared with pulsed current with the same pulse duration, kilohertz frequency alternating current would not differ in terms of evoked-torque production and perceived discomfort, and as a result, it would show the same current efficiency. DESIGN: A repeated-measures design with 4 stimuli presented in random order was used to test 25 women: (1) 500-microsecond pulse duration, (2) 250-microsecond pulse duration, (3) 500-microsecond pulse duration and low carrier frequency (1 kHz), (4) 250-microsecond pulse duration and high carrier frequency (4 kHz). Isometric peak torque of quadriceps muscle was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer. Discomfort was measured using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Currents with long pulse durations induced approximately 21% higher evoked torque than short pulse durations. In addition, currents with 500 microseconds delivered greater amounts of charge than stimulation patterns using 250-microsecond pulse durations (P < 0.05). All currents presented similar discomfort. There was no difference on stimulation efficiency with the same pulse duration. CONCLUSIONS: Both kilohertz frequency alternating current and pulsed current, with the same pulse duration, have similar efficiency for inducing isometric knee extension torque and discomfort. However, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with longer pulse duration induces higher NMES-evoked torque, regardless of the carrier frequency. Pulse duration is an important variable that should receive more attention for an optimal application of NMES in clinical settings.