Measurement of social norms for entertainment-education.

BACKGROUND: While there has been a marked increase in measurement and scholarship surrounding social norms in recent years, there is little evidence related to social norms measurement in the context of health campaigns utilizing entertainment-education. Entertainment-education goals and objectives have shifted over time to include social norms and an update is needed to merge contemporary practice with the most recent measures from the literature. The aim of the present study was to analyze commonly used quantitative measures and their properties for social norms and entertainment-education, specifically on the topic of family planning, to bolster ongoing research and practice efforts by validating items for social norms measurement in entertainment-education programs. METHODS: The study used data from a survey conducted with 438 married women aged 19-34 in the Central Province of Zambia in 2019 who were exposed to the entertainment-education initiative Kwishilya (Over the Horizon), a Bemba-language, 156-episode radio program designed to shift social norms on family planning. Multiple items were included to measure descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and outcome expectations. Exploratory factor analysis and estimates of scale reliability were conducted to understand the properties and structure of the social norms items. RESULTS: Results showed a five-factor solution best fit the data, which accounted for 45.7% of the variance, exhibited fair reliability, and loaded largely as expected. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a useful tool for practitioners and scholars to use globally to measure important social norms constructs in entertainment-education.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of risk factors in patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease.

Background: Effective control of risk factors in patients with ASCVD is important to reduce recurrent cardiovascular events. However, many ASCVD patients do not have their risk factors controlled, and this may have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated risk factor control among 24,760 ASCVD patients who had at least 1 outpatient encounter both pre-pandemic and during the first year of the pandemic. Risk factors were uncontrolled if the blood pressure (BP) ≥ 130/80 mm Hg, LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL, HgbA1c ≥ 7 for diabetic patients, and patients were current smokers. Results: During the pandemic, many patients had their risk factors unmonitored. BP control worsened (BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg, 64.2 vs 65.7%; p = 0.01), while lipid management improved with more patients on a high-intensity statin (38.9 vs 43.9%; p<0.001) and more achieving an LDL-C < 70 mg/dL, less patients were smoking (7.4 vs 6.7%; p<0.001), and diabetic control was unchanged pre vs during the pandemic. Black (OR 1.53 [1.02-2.31]) and younger aged patients (OR 1.008 [1.001-1.015]) were significantly more likely to have missing or uncontrolled risk factors during the pandemic. Conclusions: During the pandemic risk factors were more likely to be unmonitored. While measured blood pressure control worsened, lipid control and smoking improved. Although some cardiovascular risk factor control improved during the COVID-19 pandemic, overall control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with ASCVD was suboptimal, especially in Black and younger patients. This puts many ASCVD patients at increased risk of a recurrent cardiovascular event.

External validation of the COVID-19 4C mortality score in an urban United States cohort.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients at risk for mortality from COVID-19 is crucial to triage, clinical decision-making, and the allocation of scarce hospital resources. The 4C Mortality Score effectively predicts COVID-19 mortality, but it has not been validated in a United States (U.S.) population. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the 4C Mortality Score accurately predicts COVID-19 mortality in an urban U.S. adult inpatient population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted to a single-center, tertiary care hospital (Philadelphia, PA) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR from 3/01/2020 to 6/06/2020. Variables were extracted through a combination of automated export and manual chart review. The outcome of interest was mortality during hospital admission or within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: This study included 426 patients; mean age was 64.4 years, 43.4% were female, and 54.5% self-identified as Black or African American. All-cause mortality was observed in 71 patients (16.7%). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of the 4C Mortality Score was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may use the 4C Mortality Score in an urban, majority Black, U.S. inpatient population. The derivation and validation cohorts were treated in the pre-vaccine era so the 4C Score may over-predict mortality in current patient populations. With stubbornly high inpatient mortality rates, however, the 4C Score remains one of the best tools available to date to inform thoughtful triage and treatment allocation.

Measuring family planning norms in Zambia: A mixed methods vignette study.

Vignettes have increasingly been used in social norms research, but it is unknown whether vignettes are a valid, culturally appropriate, and effective approach for measuring family planning norms in Zambia. In this mixed methods, cross-sectional study, surveys (n = 438) and focus groups (n = 135) were conducted with married women in two, purposively selected districts in the Central Province, the rural district of Mkushi and the urban district of Kabwe. Social norms constructs measured included: reference groups, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, collective norms, and outcome expectations. Vignettes covered reaching desired family size, using modern contraception for birth spacing, and seeking family planning services. The results complemented each other suggesting vignettes may indeed be a valid approach for measuring family planning norms in this setting, although further research is needed. Successful vignette administration requires translating and back-translating, pretesting in the local language, adapting to the local context, and training. The findings hold implications for future family planning norms measurement, both in Zambia and across global settings.

Dynamic Volumetric Assessment of the Aortic Root: The Influence of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Competence.

BACKGROUND: Aortic root evaluation is conventionally based on 2-dimensional measurements at a single phase of the cardiac cycle. This work presents an image analysis method for assessing dynamic 3-dimensional changes in the aortic root of minimally calcified bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) with and without moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. METHODS: The aortic root was segmented over the full cardiac cycle in 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images acquired from 19 patients with minimally calcified BAVs and from 16 patients with physiologically normal tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). The size and dynamics of the aortic root were assessed using the following image-derived measurements: absolute mean root volume and mean area at the level of the ventriculoaortic junction, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction, as well as normalized root volume change and normalized area change of the ventriculoaortic junction, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction over the cardiac cycle. RESULTS: Normalized volume change over the cardiac cycle was significantly greater in BAV roots with moderate to severe regurgitation than in normal TAV roots and in BAV roots with no or mild regurgitation. Aortic root dynamics were most significantly different at the mid-level of the sinuses of Valsalva in BAVs with moderate to severe regurgitation than in competent TAVs and BAVs. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic reconstruction of the aortic root demonstrates significant differences in dynamics of BAV roots with moderate to severe regurgitation relative to physiologically normal TAVs and competent BAVs. This finding may have implications for risk of future dilatation, dissection, or rupture, which warrant further investigation.

Instabilities in Aortic Length After TEVAR and Reoperation: 12 Years of Follow-Up Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains an important minimally invasive tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aneurysm. The long-term effects of these repairs in reduction of the aneurysmal sac size as well as stability of the stented portion require study. We report the results of 12 years of radiographic follow-up. METHODS: All patients who underwent TEVAR for descending thoracic aneurysms from January 2005 to December 2017(n = 371) were evaluated for immediate postoperative and follow-up computed tomographic scans suitable for 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aorta (excluding those with an interim reoperation). We found 62 patients who met these criteria (median duration of radiographic follow-up, 1.8 years). Measurements were taken of centerline, greater and lesser curvatures from the most distal patent brachiocephalic vessel to the first uncovered mesenteric vessel, and between proximal and distal edges of the stented portion of the aorta. RESULTS: All measured segments, except covered length, were significantly increasing in length for centerline, greater and lesser curvatures, with a median increase of 7.6 mm (interquartile range, 1.7-16 mm). Cox regression for mortality and reoperation found no significant correlation between these changes and mortality and a significant correlation between stented segment greater curvature increase and reoperation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in the centerline and greater curve length of the aorta were found to be occurring. This appears to be primarily driven by growth in the nonstented segments. However, changes in the outer curve length of the stented segment were associated with a greater risk of reoperation.

Outcome After Operation for Aortic Dissection Type A in Morbidly Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: The number of obese patients is increasing, and more obese patients are likely to present for surgical repair of aortic dissection type A (ADA). We evaluated the effect of this procedure on the postoperative outcome of patients based on their body mass index (BMI; calculated as kg/m2). METHODS: A total of 667 patients who underwent surgical repair of ADA between 2003 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into four groups according to BMI: normal weight (BMI: 18 to <25, n = 186), overweight (BMI: 25 to <30, n = 238), obese (BMI: 30 to <35, n = 144), and morbidly obese (BMI ≥35, n = 99). We compared clinical features and outcomes. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found regarding clinical presentation or proximal or distal aortic repair. Postoperative complications were similar among all groups. Although the rate for reintubation, tracheotomy, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit tended to be similar, the time to extubation (p = 0.010) and the total length of hospital stay (p = 0.017) were significantly longer in morbidly obese patients. Significantly more blood was transfused and replaced in the normal weight patients compared with the obese patients: in median 69% of the calculated blood volume was replaced in the normal weight patients compared with 32% in the morbidly obese patients (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality and late survival were similar among all weight groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the comorbidities that are associated with obesity, obese patients undergoing surgical repair of ADA are not at greater risk of death or other adverse outcomes. An immediate surgical approach should be considered in all patients independent of weight.

Central cannulation strategy for extent I thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair of chronic type B aortic dissection.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the safety profile of a central cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) cannulation strategy for repair of extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) with chronic type B dissection in comparison to traditional peripheral CPB cannulation strategies. METHODS: Patients undergoing extent I TAAA repair for chronic type B dissection from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped by their CPB cannulation strategy. Patients in Group I underwent central aortic cannulation (n = 28) through a left thoracotomy incision. The true lumen of the descending thoracic aorta was cannulated using an echocardiogram-guided Seldinger wire technique. The right atrium was directly accessed for venous drainage. In Group II (n = 31), arterial and venous cannulation of the femoral vessels was achieved using a left-sided groin incision. All patients underwent deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for proximal aortic reconstruction. RESULTS: Preoperative aortic dimensions (6.5 ± 0.79 cm in Group I vs 7.0 ± 1.15 cm in Group II p = 0.8) were similar between groups. CPB time (240 ± 37 min in Group I vs 174 ± 68 min in Group II p < 0.01) was significantly higher in the central cannulation group whereas circulatory arrest times (43 ± 5 min Group I vs 37 ± 7 min in Group II p = 0.1) were similar between the two groups. In-hospital 30-day mortality (N = 0, 0% in Group I; N = 2, 6.5% in Group II), stroke (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 0, 0% in Group II), paraplegia (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 1, 3.2% in Group II), reoperation for bleeding (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 1, 3.2% Group II), tracheostomy rate (N = 2, 7% in Group I; N = 3, 9.7% Group II), and mean length of stay (19 days in Group I vs 17 days in Group II) were similar (p > 0.05). Median follow-up was 3.6 ± 2.0 in Group I and 5.6 ± 2.6 years in Group II. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 84.6 % for Group I and 77.6% for Group II (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Central true lumen cannulation through a left thoracotomy incision for repair of extent I TAAA with chronic type B dissection is an acceptable approach with equivalent early and midterm outcomes compared to more standard femoral cannulation techniques. It may provide a safe alternative cannulation site for patients with diseased femoral vessels.

At the Root of the Repair Debate: Outcomes After Elective Aortic Root Replacements for Aortic Insufficiency With Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in aortic valve-sparing and valve repair operations, but the ideal operation and timing of intervention in these generally younger patients undergoing operations for aortic insufficiency (AI) and dilated ascending aorta remains controversial. METHODS: Root replacements at a single institution from 2002 to 2014 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age younger than 70 and presence of moderate or greater aortic insufficiency (AI), with or without aortic aneurysm. Of 1,425 root replacements, 220 patients were considered in the final analysis. RESULTS: Moderate AI was present in 87 patients and severe AI in 133 patients. The 30-day mortality was 0% in moderate AI patients and 2% (n = 3) in severe AI patients (p = 0.3). Freedom from reoperation was 95% at 10 years. Severe preoperative AI was associated with worse long-term survival compared with moderate AI (hazard ratio, 2.6; p = 0.04). Patients undergoing root replacement with moderate AI had similar survival compared with the age- and gender-matched United States population (log-rank p = 0.93), whereas patients with severe AI had significantly worse survival (log-rank p = 0.02). Other multivariable predictors of decreased long-term survival were age (hazard ratio, 1.1; p = 0.01) and preoperative renal failure (hazard ratio, 6.9; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Elective root replacement operations in patients younger than 70 are associated with low rates of mortality and reoperation, which should be considered the benchmark operation for aortic valve-sparing or repair operations in similar patients. Worse survival was associated with severe AI and older age, suggesting earlier intervention may be an appropriate therapeutic strategy in selected patients.

Impact of timing on major complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been shown to have survival benefit in patients with complicated type B dissection compared with open surgery or medical therapy. We analyze the impact of timing of intervention from the onset of symptoms to TEVAR, and its relation to complications. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, we performed 132 TEVARs for acute and subacute (<6 weeks) type B dissection; 186 other patients were managed with medical therapy only. Patients were followed in a clinical registry. Standard univariate and survival methods were used. RESULTS: Of the 132 TEVARs for type B dissection, 70 were performed within 48 hours of presentation (Acute-Early); 44 between 48 hours and 14 days from presentation (Acute-Delayed); and 18 between 14 days and 6 weeks of presentation (Subacute). Demographic characteristics were similar among groups. Severe complications were more common in the Early-Acute and Delayed-Acute patients than in the Subacute patients (P = .04) Retrograde type A dissection tended to be more common in the Acute-Early group. Overall survival was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed intervention appears to lower the risk of complications of TEVAR for aortic dissection in patients who are stable enough to wait. Among patients initially managed medically, new TEVAR indications were not uncommon, and such patients must be followed closely.

Results of type II hybrid arch repair with zone 0 stent graft deployment for complex aortic arch pathology.

OBJECTIVE: To review the early results of a less invasive, single-stage hybrid arch procedure involving replacement of the ascending aorta, arch debranching, and zone 0 antegrade stent graft deployment. METHODS: Between May 2007 and January 2012, 20 patients with both acute and chronic aortic pathology were managed at 2 institutions with a type 2 hybrid arch procedure. Indications included diffuse atherosclerotic aneurysm, false lumen expansion of chronic aortic dissections, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and acute type A dissection. Mean age was 67 ± 16.8 years with a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score of 29.5 ± 19.4. Postoperative clinical and imaging follow-up was complete to a mean 18.5 ± 15.3 months. RESULTS: Successful zone 0 stent graft deployment was achieved in all cases. There was 1 in-hospital mortality (5%). A second death occurred at 40 days postoperation. Other complications included a permanent neurologic deficit in 1 patient (5%), transient paraplegia in 4 patients (20%), and 3 patients had respiratory complications (15%). There were no cases of renal failure requiring dialysis. Stent-related complications were identified in 4 patients (20%), including 3 type I endoleaks, none of which were at zone 0. There was 1 type II endoleak and a case of stent infolding. Two patients required a second successful endografting procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This single-stage hybrid arch procedure offers an alternative approach to complex diffuse aortic pathology involving the arch. Replacement of the ascending aorta provides a safe location for zone 0 stent graft deployment, eliminating complications of proximal deployment in a native diseased aorta.

Emergency endovascular stent grafting in acute complicated type B dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess midterm results of emergency endovascular stent grafting for patients with life-threatening complications of acute type B aortic dissection. METHODS: Between March 1999 and November 2011, 110 patients (86 men, 24 women) with complications of acute type B aortic dissection (mean age, 61 years; range, 19-87 years) were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for malperfusion (55.5%) or aortic rupture (53.6%) in five major European referral centers and one U.S. referral center. Additional comorbidities included hypertension in 90 patients (82%), diabetes in 14 patients (13%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in six patients (6%). Eleven patients (10%) had undergone previous aortic surgery. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 12% (n = 13), with 14 late deaths after hospital discharge. In-hospital complications occurred in 32 patients (36%); 10 patients developed postoperative renal failure, five patients experienced new permanent neurologic symptoms, and six patients (5.4%) experienced retrograde type A aortic dissection. Furthermore, nine patients (8%) developed an early type I endoleak. Actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was 85% and 73%, respectively. Postprocedural computed tomography angiography showed complete or partial thrombosis of the false lumen at the stent graft level in 61% and 23% of all patients, respectively. Freedom from treatment failure according to the Stanford classification was 82%, 75%, and 59% at 1, 3, and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissection is proven to be a technically feasible and effective treatment modality in this relatively difficult patient cohort. Short-term and midterm results are persuasive; however, the long-term efficacy needs to be further evaluated.

Moderate mitral regurgitation in aortic root replacement surgery: comparing mitral repair with no mitral repair.

OBJECTIVES: Patients often present for aortic root replacement surgery with concomitant mitral valve pathology. Moderate mitral regurgitation is the point of clinical equipoise where the benefits of intervention compared with observation are currently unknown. This study compares outcomes in patients undergoing aortic root replacement surgery who did or did not receive a mitral valve repair for their preoperative moderate mitral regurgitation. METHODS: A total of 1316 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery between 2000 and 2011 were evaluated, with 104 patients meeting the inclusion criteria by presenting with moderate preoperative mitral regurgitation. A total of 73 patients (70%) received no mitral intervention, and 31 patients (30%) received a mitral repair. Patients underwent preoperative, postoperative, and greater than 6-month follow-up echocardiograms. Average clinical follow-up was 6.5 years. RESULTS: The mitral repair group had increased preoperative New York Heart Association III/IV and heart failure, longer crossclamp times, and more postoperative renal failure (P = .0003, P = .04, P < .0001, and P = .03, respectively). The improvement in mitral regurgitation was greater for the mitral repair group (-2.1 ± 0.3 vs -1.1 ± 0.8, P < .0001), and mitral regurgitation remained significantly lower on follow-up at 6 months or more (0.6 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.2, P = .002). A significantly greater percentage of patients undergoing mitral repair compared with patients with no repair had improvement of at least 1 grade in mitral regurgitation postoperatively (100% vs 70%, P = .001) and on follow-up at 6 months or more (90% vs 61%, P = .006). There was no difference in long-term survival, freedom from 2+ or greater mitral regurgitation, or mitral reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral repair along with aortic root replacement has acceptable operative risk. Aortic root replacement surgery alone improved mitral regurgitation, but the addition of mitral repair further reduced mitral regurgitation, suggesting that repairing moderate mitral regurgitation should generally be considered along with aortic root replacement.

Antegrade thoracic stent grafting during repair of acute Debakey type I dissection promotes distal aortic remodeling and reduces late open distal reoperation rate.

OBJECTIVE: Previously, we showed that antegrade stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta during DeBakey type I dissection repair improves distal aortic remodeling. We assessed midterm outcomes of this reconstructive strategy compared with standard open repair. METHODS: DeBakey type I dissections (non-Marfan, nontotal arch cases only) from 2005 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred eighty patients underwent standard open repair (standard group), and 62 patients underwent open repair plus stenting (stented group). Open repair entailed ascending aorta plus transverse hemiarch reconstruction under circulatory arrest, with variable aortic root work. Data was prospectively maintained. RESULTS: Preoperative parameters were similar. Patients in the stented group had longer circulatory arrest time and higher utility of antegrade cerebral perfusion (P < .001). In-hospital/30-day mortality (10% vs 14%; P = .51), stroke (5% vs 8%; P = .6), and paraplegia (0% vs 1%; P = 1) were similar in the stented versus standard groups. Mean follow-up was 2.7 ± 2.3 and 2.2 ± 2.1 years. Actuarial survival in stented versus standard groups at 1 and 7 years was 86% versus 81% and 76% versus 60% (P = .5). Thoracic aorta false lumen obliteration was improved in the stented group (82% vs 39%; P < .001), along with improved freedom from open distal aortic reoperation rate (98% vs 90% at 6 years, P = .1). Endovascular distal aortic reintervention rate was higher in the stented group (18% vs 3%; P = .008), with zero mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade stent graft deployment during acute DeBakey type I dissection repair is safe method to promote distal aortic remodeling without increasing postoperative or midterm mortality. This technique provides increased freedom from open distal aortic reoperations compared with standard open repair.

Reintervention for endograft failures after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has emerged as an effective therapy for a variety of thoracic aortic pathologic entities. However, endograft failure remains a concern, and its treatment is often challenging. We examined our experience with endograft failure and its treatment by endovascular and open repair. METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2012, 680 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair at the University of Pennsylvania, and their charts were reviewed for the late outcomes and follow-up data. RESULTS: Of the 680 patients, 73 underwent 80 reinterventions (11.7%) during follow-up. The indications for index thoracic endovascular aortic repair were thoracic aortic aneurysms in 381, type A dissection with frozen elephant trunk in 52, type B dissection in 111, hybrid arch repair in 46, traumatic transection in 37, infection in 10, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer in 25, and others in 18. The median interval from index thoracic endovascular aortic repair to reintervention was 210 days. Endograft failures included endoleak in 45, proximal aortic events in 11, distal aortic events in 15, endograft infection in 3, and others in 6. Endovascular reintervention (n = 80) was performed in 60 patients. In 20 patients, open aortic reconstructive procedures were performed. The overall 30-day mortality was 8.7% (7/80). During follow-up, 10 late deaths occurred. The overall survival in all patients was 81%, 60%, and 52% at 1, 5, and 7 years, respectively. The late survival for patients after reintervention for endograft failure was similar that for the patients who did not require reintervention (P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention for endograft failure can be performed with acceptable early outcomes. The mid-term survival for patients requiring reintervention for endograft failure was similar to that of the patients without endograft failure. Thus, reintervention for endograft failure should be aggressively considered when indicated.

Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The combined open surgical and endovascular approach for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms has emerged as a safe treatment modality. This platform may have an especially important role in treating patients of old age and with a greater comorbid burden. We describe our institutional experience with the hybrid aortic arch approach, with midterm outcomes. METHODS: From 2005 to the present, 685 patients have undergone thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR); 104 had a hybrid arch repair (open plus endovascular approach). Of these, 47 patients had treatment for an aortic arch aneurysm with or without a proximal ascending aortic aneurysm. All these patients had a median sternotomy approach for arch vessel debranching and antegrade with or without retrograde TEVAR stent grafting of the arch. Results from a prospectively maintained database are reported. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients had type I repair, 8 patients had type II repair, and 11 patients had type III arch hybrid repair. Those with type III repair were excluded from the analysis. Stent graft deployment rate was 100% after arch vessel debranching. Mean age was 71 ± 8 years. Fourteen percent of cases involved a redo sternotomy. Average cardiopulmonary bypass time was 215 ± 64 minutes, with a crossclamp time of 70 ± 55 minutes and a circulatory arrest time of 19 ± 10 minutes. The paraplegia rate was 5.5% (n = 2), with a stroke rate of 8% (n = 3). In-hospital mortality was 8% (n = 3). There were no postoperative endoleaks. The mean length of stay was 17.2 ± 14 days. The median follow-up was 30 ± 21 months. Freedom from all-cause mortality was 71%, 60%, and 48% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The aortic reoperation rate was 2.7% (n = 1). No patient has a type 1 or 3 endoleak at latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid approach to aortic arch aneurysm involving a zone 0 stent graft landing can be safely adopted with good midterm results in a cohort of old patients with significant comorbidity. This procedure can be performed with no type 1 or 3 endoleaks and may represent a technical advancement in the field of aortic arch surgery.

Thoracic endografting reduces morbidity and remodels the thoracic aorta in DeBakey III aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of endovascular treatment of aneurysms secondary to chronic DeBakey type III aortic dissection (CD3) remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes from open and endovascular treatment of CD3 aneurysms, and to determine the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in remodeling the chronically dissected thoracoabdominal aorta. METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 58 patients underwent open aortic replacement (open) and 31 patients underwent endovascular therapy (TEVAR) for the treatment of CD3 aneurysms. The TEVAR patients were divided into CD3a (n = 12) or CD3b (n = 19) subgroups based upon the DeBakey classification of aortic dissection. Total aortic, true and false lumen diameters were measured at different anatomic locations. True lumen and false lumen indices were calculated to evaluate the impact of TEVAR on remodeling. RESULTS: In the open group, operative mortality was 10.3% and the incidence of pulmonary failure, renal failure, and paraplegia was 13.8%, 10.3%, and 12.1%, respectively. There were no operative mortalities in TEVAR patients, and no cases of pulmonary failure, renal failure, or paraplegia. Endovascular therapy stabilized aneurysm size and remodeled the thoracic aorta in 87% of patients. The TEVAR significantly expanded the true lumen and reduced the false lumen within the stent graft in CD3a and CD3b patients (p < 0.001). Thoracic false lumen thrombosis was achieved in 100% of CD3a and in 68% of CD3b patients. CONCLUSIONS: In these early results, TEVAR reduces operative morbidity and mortality compared with open aortic replacement in the treatment of CD3 aneurysms. The TEVAR is effective in remodeling the chronically dissected thoracic aorta. Abdominal false lumen patency is maintained in patients with thoracoabdominal dissection-related aneurysms.

Comparing aortic root replacements: porcine bioroots versus pericardial versus mechanical composite roots: hemodynamic and ventricular remodeling at greater than one-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Stentless porcine bioroots and pericardial composite roots were developed as prostheses that avoid the anticoagulation necessary for mechanical composite roots. Data on the hemodynamics of all root replacements are lacking and questions remain regarding comparative performance. METHODS: This study evaluated patients receiving a stentless porcine bioroot, a pericardial, or a mechanical composite root at a single institution from January 2000 to December 2008. All patients underwent preoperative, postoperative and greater than 1-year echocardiograms. All root replacements were performed for aortic insufficiency or aneurysm. Median follow-up was 3.3 years (1 to 8 years). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, aortic valve peak gradient, mean gradient, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, and left ventricular end systolic diameter. Postoperative peak and mean gradients in mechanical composite roots were significantly higher than stentless porcine bioroots. At greater than 1 year, stentless porcine bioroots had significantly lower peak and mean gradients than both mechanical composite roots and pericardial composite roots. The end diastolic diameter was also significantly smaller in stentless porcine bioroots at greater than 1 year than mechanical composite roots. CONCLUSIONS: All prostheses resulted in favorable hemodynamic and ventricular remodeling. Stentless porcine bioroots had the lowest gradients at greater than 1 year of all root replacements, with significantly better ventricular remodeling when compared with mechanical composite roots. Pericardial roots also had favorable hemodynamics and ventricular remodeling, suggesting that they are a viable alternative.

Targeting landing zone 0 by total arch rerouting and TEVAR: midterm results of a transcontinental registry.

BACKGROUND: Landing zone 0, defined as a proximal landing zone in the ascending aorta, remains the last frontier to be taken. Midterm results of total arch rerouting and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) extending into landing zone 0 remain to be determined. METHODS: From 2003 to 2011, 66 patients (mean age, 70 years; 68% men) presenting with pathologic conditions affecting the aortic arch (atherosclerotic aneurysms [n = 48], penetrating ulcers [n = 6], type B dissections [n = 6], type B after type A dissections [n = 5], and anastomotic aneurysm [n = 1]) were treated in 5 participating centers. Of these 66 patients, only 12% would have been deemed suitable for any kind of conventional surgical repair because of multisegmental aortic disease or comorbidities. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 9%. Retrograde type A dissection was observed in 3% of patients. The assisted type I and type III endoleak rate was 0%. Stroke was seen in 5% of patients. Permanent paraplegia was observed in 3% of those studied. Median follow-up was 25 months (8-41 months). There was 1 late type Ib endoleak, which was followed by watchful waiting. Five-year survival was 72%. Five-year aorta-related survival was 96%. No aorta-related reintervention had to be performed in the segments treated. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results of total arch rerouting and TEVAR extending into landing zone 0 are excellent in regard to aorta-related survival and freedom from aorta-related reintervention. Retrograde type A dissection, potentially related to compliance mismatch between the ascending aorta and the stent-graft, warrants further attention. Extended application of this strategy augments therapeutic options in a group of patients who are not suitable candidates for conventional therapy.

Graft selection for aortic root replacement in complex active endocarditis: does it matter?

BACKGROUND: Endocarditis affecting the aortic valve, with abscess formation and root destruction, remains a challenge to treat. Aortic root homografts have been advocated because of a perceived lower risk of infective complications than with other root replacement grafts. However, the theoretical advantage of homografts has not been re-evaluated in the modern era. This report is based on an examination of our results for all aortic root replacements in complex, active endocarditis affecting the aortic valve. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 134 patients (70.9% male; mean age 58.3±14.8 years) at our institution underwent aortic root replacement for active endocarditis. Ninety of the patients (67.2%) had a previously implanted prosthetic aortic valve. Our findings for these patients included one or more of the following: abscess (n=110, 82.1%), valve vegetation (n=98, 73.1%), and pseudoaneurysm or rupture or both (n=62, 46.3%). We retrospectively reviewed data for the patients from hospital records and the social security data base. RESULTS: A mechanical composite graft (MC) was used in 43 of the patients (32.1%), a non-homograft biologic valve conduit (BC) in 55 patients (41.0%), and a homograft (HG) valve in 36 patients (26.9%). There was no significant difference among the groups in the incidence of major complications or in-hospital mortality. During a mean follow-up of 32.1±29.4 months, the rates of readmission, reinfection, and reoperation were similar for the three groups. The mean 5-year survival in the study was 58±9% for the MC group, 62±7% for the BC group, and 58 ± 9% for the HG group, respectively (p=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement in the presence of complex active infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report that the rates of major complications and late mortality were similar among MC, BC, and HG groups in our study.