Osteochondral Fresh Allograft Transfer to Address Osteochondral Defect of the First Metatarsal Head in Early Hallux Limitus.

Osteochondral fresh allograft transfer of the first metatarsal can be an accepted surgical management option for early stages of hallux limitus. This study consisted of evaluating clinical outcomes with patients who underwent this procedure. Thirteen (N=13) patients were included in this study, 10 (76.9%) were female and 3 (23.1%) were male. The mean age was 52.2 (range, 27-61) years and the mean body mass index was 25.3 (range, 33.8-19.4) kg/m2. Intraoperative evaluation of osteochondral defects of the first metatarsal demonstrated a mean diameter size of 8.2 mm. Ten (76.9%) patients had a concomitant cheilectomy procedure performed. The mean follow-up was 41.0 (range, 3.5-89.1) months. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale questionnaire and patient satisfaction survey were completed. The mean AOFAS Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal score, which was determined postoperatively, was 71.2 (range, 55-85) of 100. Four (30.8%) patients with overall scores below 60 (range, 55-59) reported moderate daily pain at the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Mean AOFAS pain score was 26.9 (range, 20-30) of 40. Mean AOFAS function score was 30.8 (range, 24-35) of 45. Mean AOFAS alignment score was 13.4 (range, 8-15) of 15. There was statistical significance in mean AOFAS total score when comparing hallux limitus grade 1 versus grade 2, as well as when comparing grade 1 versus grade 3, p < .05. There was no significance in mean AOFAS total score when comparing number of plugs used, body mass index, and size of defect. However, an overall improvement in preoperative symptoms and patient satisfaction was documented and therefore osteochondral fresh allograft transfer can be considered a reasonable option in treating defects found at the first metatarsal head.

Surgical Treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common complaint among patients. Oftentimes, conservative treatment is inadequate, and surgical treatment is required. However, there is no published consensus regarding surgical intervention in reference to insertional Achilles tendinopathy. METHODS: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the surgical management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy and report which surgical procedures provide the greatest pain reduction and improvement in functional outcome. A review of PubMed, OVID, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed using a defined search strategy and inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Of 2,863 articles identified using the defined strategy, 20 met the inclusion criteria (three prospective and 17 retrospective). Operative interventions included Achilles tendon debridement, reattachment with suture anchors, reconstruction with flexor hallucis longus tendon autograft or bone-patellar tendon autograft, and gastrocnemius recession. All of the studies, regardless of intervention, showed generalized improvement after surgery. Wide variation in outcome scoring systems prevented direct comparison between studies and interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review did not identify a superior treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy but rather found that the surgical treatment should be based on the extent of tendon injury.