Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38156228

RESUMO

We tested 85 isolates of ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. against trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), clindamycin, and doxycycline by broth microdilution (BMD) and BD Phoenix. Susceptibility rates via BMD for TMP/SMX, clindamycin, and doxycycline were 100%, 85.5%, and 56.6%, respectively. TMP/SMX is a potential monotherapy agent for ß-hemolytic Streptococcus skin and soft tissue infections.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771740

RESUMO

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel beta-lactam allergy assessment algorithm managed by an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) team. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: One quaternary referral teaching hospital and one tertiary care teaching hospital in a large western Pennsylvania health network. Patients or participants: Patients who received a beta-lactam challenge dose under the beta-lactam allergy assessment algorithm. Interventions: A beta-lactam allergy assessment protocol was designed and implemented by an ASP team. The protocol risk stratified patients' reported allergies to identify patients appropriate for a challenge with a beta-lactam antibiotic. This retrospective analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of this protocol among patients receiving a challenge dose from November 2017 to July 2021. Results: Over a 45-month period, 119 total patients with either penicillin or cephalosporin allergies entered the protocol. Following a challenge dose, 106 (89.1%) patients were treated with a beta-lactam. Eleven patients had adverse reactions to a challenge dose, one of which required escalation of care to the intensive care unit. Of the patients with an unknown or low-risk reported allergy, 7/66 (10.6%) had an observed adverse reaction compared to 3/42 (7.1%) who had an observed reaction with a reported high-risk or anaphylactic allergy. Conclusions: Our implemented protocol was safe and effective, with over 90% of patients tolerating the challenge without incident and many going on to receive indicated beta-lactam therapy. This protocol may serve as a framework for other inpatient ASP teams to implement a low-barrier allergy assessment led by ASP teams.

3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(9): ofac458, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36168548

RESUMO

Background: Telehealth-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (TeleASPs) have led to reduced broad-spectrum antimicrobial utilization. Data on factors associated with acceptance of stewardship recommendations are limited. Methods: A TeleASP, facilitated by remote infectious disease physicians and local pharmacists, was implemented in 2 community hospitals from February 2018 through July 2020. Variables potentially affecting acceptance of TeleASP recommendations were tracked. Odds ratios of acceptance were determined utilizing multiple logistic regression. Results: During the 30-month period, 4863 (91.2%) of the total 5333 recommendations were accepted. Factors associated with a higher odds of acceptance in multivariable analysis were recommendations for antimicrobial dose/frequency adjustment (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% CI, 1.6-4.3) and order for labs/tests (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.1-5.2), while recommendations for antimicrobial de-escalation (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) and antimicrobial discontinuation (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.76) were associated with lower odds of acceptance. Female physicians were more likely to accept recommendations compared with males (93.1% vs 90.3% acceptance; OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2). Compared with physicians with <3 years of experience, who had the highest acceptance rate (96.3%), physicians with ≥21 years of experience had the lowest (87.1%; OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.45). Conclusions: TeleASP recommendations were accepted at a high rate. Acceptance rates were higher among female physicians, and recommendations to stop or de-escalate antimicrobials led to lower acceptance. Recommendations made to the most experienced physicians were the least accepted, which may be an important factor for stewardship programs to consider in education and intervention efforts.

4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(9): ofac438, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36092825

RESUMO

Background: Limited descriptive data exist regarding the clinical characteristics of hospitalizations due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron variant based on vaccination status. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between 15 January 2022 and 15 February 2022 across 9 hospitals in a large health network. Data were extracted by manual records review. Results: A total of 351 of 452 (77.7%) unvaccinated, 209 of 331 (63.1%) fully vaccinated, and 107 of 163 (65.6%) boosted patients hospitalized with a COVID-19 diagnosis were determined to be admitted specifically due to COVID-19 (P < .001). Most (85%) boosted patients admitted due to COVID-19 were at least 65 years old and/or had severe immunosuppression, compared to 72.2% of fully vaccinated and 60.7% of unvaccinated patients (P < .001). Significantly more unvaccinated patients (34.2%) required >6 L/minute of supplemental oxygen compared to fully vaccinated (24.4%) and boosted (25.2%) patients (P = .027). The age-adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 was estimated to be 81.1% and 94.1% for full vaccination and boosted status, respectively, whereas VE against mortality related to COVID-19 was estimated to be 84.7% and 94.8%, respectively. Conclusions: During the Omicron BA.1 sublineage wave, unvaccinated patients hospitalized with a COVID-19 diagnosis were more likely than vaccinated patients to be admitted specifically due to COVID-19. Despite being younger with fewer comorbidities, unvaccinated patients required higher levels of care. Vaccination with a booster provides the greatest protection against hospitalization and death from COVID-19.

5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(4): ofac014, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35308487

RESUMO

This analysis describes clinical characteristics and outcomes of 128 fully vaccinated patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prior to booster vaccines. We found that 27% were asymptomatic, 52% required intensive care, and 15% died from COVID-19. Most (89.2%) fully vaccinated patients hospitalized with symptomatic COVID-19 were ≥65 years old and/or severely immunosuppressed.

6.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(2): ofab589, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35071682

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that the effectiveness of dalbavancin may be similar to current standard-of-care (SoC) treatment options for osteomyelitis with an advantageous dosing schedule. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. Patients were matched 1:2 to dalbavancin (administered as 2 doses separated by 1 week) or SoC treatment for osteomyelitis according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, site of infection, and causative pathogen. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of treatment failure after a 1-year follow-up period. Secondary objectives included hospital length of stay (LOS), infection-related 1-year readmission rates, and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients received dalbavancin (n = 42) or SoC (n = 90). Baseline characteristics, including rates of surgical intervention, were similar between the 2 treatment groups. Treatment failure was similar between those who received dalbavancin and SoC (21.4% vs 23.3%; P = .81). Patients who received dalbavancin had a shorter hospital LOS (5.2 days vs 7.2 days; P = .01). There was no difference in the rates of infection-related readmission between the dalbavancin and the SoC group (31% vs 31.1%; P = .99). There were numerically fewer adverse events in the dalbavancin group compared with the SoC group (21.4% vs 36.7%; P = .08). Peripherally inserted central catheter line-related complications were reported in 17.8% of patients in the SoC group. CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin administered as a 2-dose regimen is a safe and effective option for the treatment of osteomyelitis.

8.
Infection ; 49(3): 511-519, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528813

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a leading cause of bloodstream infections (BSI) and management is complicated by antibiotic resistance. The Accelerate Pheno™ system (ACC) can provide rapid organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). METHODS: A retrospective, pre-intervention/post-intervention study was conducted to compare management of non-critically ill patients with GNB BSI before and after implementation of a bundled initiative. This bundled initiative included dissemination of a clinical decision algorithm, ACC testing on all GNB isolated from blood cultures, real-time communication of results to the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP), and prospective audit with feedback by the ASP. The pre-intervention period was January 2018 through December 2018, and the post-intervention period was May 2019 through February 2020. RESULTS: Seventy-seven and 129 patients were included in the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. When compared with the pre-intervention group, the time from Gram stain to AST decreased from 46.1 to 6.9 h (p < 0.001), and the time to definitive therapy (TTDT) improved from 32.6 to 10.5 h (p < 0.001). Implementation led to shorter median total duration of antibiotic therapy (14.2 vs 9.5 days; p < 0.001) and mean hospital length of stay (7.9 vs 5.3 days; p = 0.047) without an increase in 30-day readmissions (22.1% vs 14%; p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ASP-bundled approach incorporating the ACC aimed at optimizing antibiotic therapy in the management GNB BSI in non-critically ill patients led to reduced TTDT, shorter duration of antibiotic therapy, and shorter hospital length of stay without adversely affecting readmission rates.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(2): 297-304, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316878

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages may negatively impact outcomes in hospitalized patients. A cefepime dosing regimen of 1 gram every 6 hours (1 g q6h) has shown to provide similar exposures above target minimum inhibitory concentrations compared to the regimen of 2 g q8h approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for febrile neutropenia. Our objective was to determine if the dosing regimen of 1 g q6h amidst a cefepime shortage is an appropriate alternative for the treatment of febrile neutropenia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients who received cefepime for febrile neutropenia over a two-year period was performed. Patients were grouped based on cefepime dosing strategy: 2 g q8h vs. 1 g q6h. The primary objective was to compare time to defervescence after cefepime initiation. Secondary objectives included all-cause 30-day mortality, duration of antibiotic therapy, and inpatient length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients in each arm were included. There were no differences in baseline age or severity of illness between groups. There was no difference in the primary objective as median time to defervescence was similar between the 2 g q8h and 1 g q6h groups (69.0 vs. 65.3 h: p= 0.67). Additionally, no differences were found in the secondary objectives of all-cause 30-day mortality (10.7% vs. 9.3%: p = 0.79), duration of therapy (80.8 vs. 88.0 h: p = 0.34), or length of stay (9 vs. 7 days: p = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified no differences in clinical outcomes with cefepime 1 g q6h compared to the traditional FDA-approved 2 g q8h regimen for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cefepima/administração & dosagem , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Cefepima/provisão & distribuição , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
10.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 9(6)2020 May 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32466378

RESUMO

Patients admitted from the community with a suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection require prompt diagnostic evaluation and correct antimicrobial treatment. A retrospective, multicenter, pre/post intervention study was performed to evaluate the impact that the BioFire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel run in-house had on the clinical management of adult patients admitted from the community with a lumbar puncture (LP) performed for a suspected CNS infection. The primary outcome was the effect that this intervention had on herpes simplex virus (HSV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) turnaround time (TAT). Secondary outcomes included the effect that this intervention had on antiviral days of therapy (DOT), total antimicrobial DOT, and hospital length of stay (LOS). A total of 81 and 79 patients were included in the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. The median HSV PCR TAT was significantly longer in the pre-intervention group (85 vs. 4.1 h, p < 0.001). Total antiviral DOT was significantly greater in the pre-intervention group (3 vs. 1, p < 0.001), as was total antimicrobial DOT (7 vs. 5, p < 0.001). Pre-intervention hospital LOS was also significantly longer (6.6 vs. 4.4 days, p = 0.02). Implementing the ME panel in-house for adults undergoing an LP for a suspected community-onset CNS infection significantly reduced the HSV PCR TAT, antiviral DOT, total antimicrobial DOT, and hospital LOS.

11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(3): 539-545, 2020 07 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) facilitated via telehealth in the community hospital setting are limited. METHODS: A telehealth-based ASP was implemented in 2 community hospitals (285 and 176 beds). Local pharmacists without residency or prior antimicrobial stewardship training were trained to conduct prospective audit and feedback. For approximately 60 minutes 3 times weekly at the 285-bed hospital and 2 times weekly at the 176-bed hospital, infectious diseases (ID) physicians remotely reviewed patients on broad-spectrum antibiotics and those admitted with lower respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infections with local pharmacists. Recommendations for ASP interventions made by ID physicians were relayed to primary teams and tracked by local pharmacists. Antimicrobial utilization was collected in days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days (PD) for a 12-month baseline and 6-month intervention period, and analyzed with segmented linear regression analysis. Local ID consultations were tracked and antimicrobial cost savings were estimated. RESULTS: During the 6-month intervention period, 1419 recommendations were made, of which 1262 (88.9%) were accepted. Compared to the baseline period, broad-spectrum antibiotic utilization decreased by 24.4% (342.1 vs 258.7 DOT/1000 PD; P < .001) during the intervention period. ID consultations increased by 40.2% (15.4 consultations per 1000 PD vs 21.5 consultations per 1000 PD; P = .001). Estimated annualized savings on antimicrobial expenditures were $142 629.83. CONCLUSIONS: An intense ASP model, facilitated in the community hospital setting via telehealth, led to reduced broad-spectrum antimicrobial utilization, increased ID consultations, and reduced antimicrobial expenditures.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Telemedicina , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Farmacêuticos
12.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(7): 1377-1382, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31119574

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to identify potential false-positive urine Legionella pneumophila (Legionella) enzyme immunoassay test results. A total of 107 consecutive patients with positive EIA tests were retrospectively analyzed over a 34-month period. Concurrent blood, urine, and sputum cultures, as well as chest radiographic findings, were reviewed in these patients. Twenty patients (19%) had no radiographic evidence of pulmonary disease despite a positive EIA test. In those 20 patients, 14 also had growth of non-Legionella bacteria. Of patients with an infiltrate or opacity on chest imaging, only 27 had Legionella sputum cultures obtained, with Legionella culture growth occurring in 7 (26%). Nine other patients had negative Legionella sputum cultures but the growth of another pathogenic organism in blood, sputum, and/or urine cultures. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism isolated, found in 20% of patients in the entire cohort. Twenty-five patients (23%) were characterized as having probable false-positive Legionella urinary antigen EIA testing, and an additional 17 patients (16%) were characterized as having possible false-positive Legionella EIA tests. Our findings suggest that urine Legionella EIA tests may lead to a substantial number of cases being misdiagnosed as Legionaries' disease in patients with non-Legionella bacterial colonization or infection.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/urina , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Doença dos Legionários/diagnóstico , Doença dos Legionários/urina , Urinálise , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Erros de Diagnóstico , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Escarro/microbiologia , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Tórax/microbiologia
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(5): 725-730, 2019 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29982350

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) often are prescribed antibiotics. Studies have shown that the use of procalcitonin (PCT) to guide the decision to initiate antibiotic therapy in AECOPD has resulted in less antibiotic use and similar outcomes compared with standard of care. We evaluated patients with AECOPD and low PCT concentrations to determine whether antibiotic therapy was associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated adult patients admitted with AECOPD who had a peak PCT concentration <0.25 µg/mL. Patients were evaluated based on their antibiotic exposure: ≤24 hours vs >24 hours. We also evaluated outcomes based upon the duration of azithromycin therapy: ≤24 hours vs >24 hours. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and COPD-related 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one and 195 patients received ≤24 hours vs >24 hours of antibiotic therapy, respectively. The cohort with ≤24 hours of antibiotics had a shorter LOS (2.8 vs 3.7 days; P = .01). There were no differences in all-cause 30-day readmissions (15.5% vs 17.4%; P = .63) or COPD-related 30-day readmissions (11.2% vs 12.3%; P = .74). Additionally, patients receiving ≤24 hours of azithromycin had a shorter LOS (3.0 vs 3.8 days; P = .002) and there were no differences in all-cause 30-day readmissions (16.2% vs 17.1%; P = .82) or COPD-related 30-day readmissions (11.9% vs 11.6%; P = .94). CONCLUSIONS: For adult patients hospitalized with nonsevere AECOPD and low PCT concentrations, antibiotic therapy beyond 24 hours did not improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
Med Clin North Am ; 102(5): 955-963, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30126584

RESUMO

Because of the increasing plague of antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic misuse, antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are now a mandatory entity in all US hospitals. ASPs can use technological advances, such as the electronic medical record and clinical decision support systems, to impact a larger patient population with more efficiency. Additionally, through the use of mobile applications and social media, ASPs can highlight and propagate educational information regarding antimicrobial utilization to patients and providers in a widespread and timely manner. In this article, the authors describe how technology can play an important role in antimicrobial stewardship.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/organização & administração , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/organização & administração , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Aplicativos Móveis , Mídias Sociais/organização & administração
15.
J Infect Prev ; 19(4): 191-194, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30013624

RESUMO

We conducted a pre-intervention/post-intervention study to assess the rate of healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infections (HA-CDI) before and after the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Upon implementation of our ASP, the usage of targeted antimicrobials, including ceftriaxone, clindamycin, fluoroquinolones and carbapenem antibiotics, were significantly reduced. There was also a significant reduction in HA-CDI/1000 patient-days following ASP implementation (0.84 vs. 0.28; P = 0.035).

16.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(5): 692-697, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404940

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are often prescribed for hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. The use of procalcitonin (PCT) in the management of pneumonia has safely reduced antibiotic durations, but limited data on the impact of PCT guidance on the management of COPD exacerbations remain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of PCT guidance on antibiotic utilization for hospitalized adults with exacerbations of COPD. DESIGN: A retrospective, pre-/post-intervention cohort study was conducted to compare the management of patients admitted with COPD exacerbations before and after implementation of PCT guidance. The pre-intervention period was March 1, 2014, through October 31, 2014, and the post-intervention period was March 1, 2015, through October 31, 2015. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with hospital admissions during the pre- and post-intervention period with COPD exacerbations were included. Patients with concomitant pneumonia were excluded. INTERVENTION: Availability of PCT laboratory values in tandem with a PCT guidance algorithm and education. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was duration of antibiotic therapy for COPD. Secondary objectives included duration of inpatient length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rates. KEY RESULTS: There were a total of 166 and 139 patients in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. There were no differences in mean age (66.2 vs. 65.9; P = 0.82) or use of home oxygenation (34% vs. 39%; P = 0.42) in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. PCT guidance was associated with a reduced number of antibiotic days (5.3 vs. 3.0; p = 0.01) and inpatient LOS (4.1 days vs. 2.9 days; P = 0.01). Respiratory-related 30-day readmission rates were unaffected (10.8% vs. 9.4%; P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing PCT guidance in the management of COPD exacerbations was associated with a decreased total duration of antibiotic therapy and hospital LOS without negatively impacting hospital readmissions.


Assuntos
Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/sangue , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Am J Med ; 131(2): 201.e1-201.e8, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28947168

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia and healthcare-associated pneumonia are often treated with prolonged antibiotic therapy. Procalcitonin (PCT) has effectively and safely reduced antibiotic use for pneumonia in controlled studies. However, limited data exist regarding PCT guidance in real-world settings for management of pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective, preintervention/postintervention study was conducted to compare management for patients admitted with pneumonia before and after implementation of PCT guidance at 2 teaching hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The preintervention period was March 1, 2014 through October 31, 2014, and the postintervention period was March, 1 2015 through October 31, 2015. RESULTS: A total of 152 and 232 patients were included in the preintervention and postintervention cohorts, respectively. When compared with the preintervention group, mean duration of therapy decreased (9.9 vs 6.0 days; P < .001). More patients received an appropriate duration of 7 days or less (26.9% vs 66.4%; P < .001). Additionally, mean hospital length of stay decreased in the postintervention group (4.9 vs 3.5 days; P = .006). Pneumonia-related 30-day readmission rates (7.2% vs 4.3%; P = .26) were unaffected. In the postintervention group, patients with PCT levels <0.25 µg/L received shorter mean duration of therapy compared with patients with levels >0.25 µg/L (4.6 vs 8.0 days; P < .001), as well as reduced hospital length of stay (3.2 vs 3.9 days; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, PCT guidance led to shorter durations of total antibiotic therapy and abridged inpatient length of stay without affecting hospital readmissions.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/sangue , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/sangue , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pennsylvania , Pneumonia Bacteriana/sangue , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/sangue , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 1(1): 91-99, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30225405

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP)-bundled initiative on the appropriate use of antibiotics for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (uSSTIs) at 2 academic medical centers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective preintervention and postintervention study was conducted to compare management of patients admitted with uSSTIs before and after the implementation of the bundled initiative. The preintervention period was from August 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015, and the postintervention period was from August 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included in the preintervention cohort, and 163 were included in the postintervention cohort. Compared with the preintervention group, the mean duration of therapy decreased (12.5 days vs 8.8 days; P<.001) and an appropriate duration of less than 10 days increased in more patients (20.6% [33 of 160] vs 68.7% [112 of 163]; P<.001) in the postintervention period. Fewer patients were exposed to antimicrobials with extended gram-negative (44.4% [71 of 160] vs 9.2% [15 of 163]; P<.001), anaerobic (39.4% [63 of 160] vs 9.8% [16 of 163]; P<.001), and antipseudomonal (16.3% [26 of 160] vs 1.8% [3 of 163]; P<.001) coverage. The mean length of stay decreased from 3.6 to 2.2 days (P<.001) without an increase in 30-day readmissions (6.3% [10 of 160] vs 4.9% [8 of 163]; P=.64). The ASP made recommendations for 125 patients, and 96% were accepted. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ASP-bundled approach aimed at optimizing antibiotic therapy in the management of uSSTIs led to shorter durations of narrow-spectrum therapy as well as shorter hospital length of stay without adversely affecting hospital readmissions.

19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16(1): 721, 2016 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27899072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a leading cause for hospitalizations in the United States. Few studies have addressed the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy in the management of SSTIs without complicating factors. We aimed to determine the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration for hospitalized adult patients with uncomplicated SSTIs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis performed at two academic medical centers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on patients aged 18 years and older with primary ICD-9 code for SSTIs admitted August 1st, 2014-March 31st, 2015. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration for uncomplicated SSTIs. Secondary objectives included the appropriateness of antibiotic agent spectrum, duration of inpatient length of stay (LOS), utilization of blood cultures and advanced imaging modalities, and re-hospitalization for SSTI within 30 days of discharge from the index admission. RESULTS: A total of 163 episodes were included in the cohort. The mean duration of total antibiotic therapy was 12.6 days. Appropriate duration was defined as receipt of total antibiotic duration of less than 10 days and occurred in 20.2% of patients. Twenty eight percent of patients received antibiotics for greater than 14 days. Seventy three (44.8%) patients received greater than 24 h of inappropriate extended spectrum gram-negative coverage; 65 (39.9%) received anaerobic coverage. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of patients, treatment duration was excessive. Inappropriate broad spectrum antibiotic selection was utilized with regularity for SSTIs without complicating factors. The management of uncomplicated SSTIs represents a significant opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Pennsylvania , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(1): 79-87, 2015 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25246597

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Existing surveillance mechanisms may underestimate the incidence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections (CRGNIs). Although carbapenem resistance increases the risk of death, the trend in mortality over time is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at 40 academic medical centers using a discharge database to identify adult hospital admissions without cystic fibrosis in 2006-2012 and received intravenous colistin for >3 consecutive days or died during therapy (termed colistin cases). The primary outcomes were the number of colistin cases per 100,000 admissions per year and change in the hospital mortality rate over time compared with the rate of discharges to home. Secondary outcomes included median overall and intensive care unit lengths of stay. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2012, a total of 5011 unique patients were identified as colistin cases. The number per 100,000 admissions per year increased from 35.56 to 92.98 during the 7-year study (P < .001). The odds of in-hospital death among colistin cases (compared with discharge to home) decreased by a mean of 5.2%/y (P = .04), whereas discharge to an institution (P = .24) or hospice (P = .89) remained steady over time. The median overall and intensive care unit lengths of stay decreased by 7.5 and 6 days, respectively (P < .001). In a 4-hospital chart review, 81.6% of colistin cases were found to have culture-positive CRGNIs. Conversely, 53% of extensively drug-resistant bloodstream CRGNIs at 2 of these hospitals met colistin case criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Colistin cases represent a severely ill population with a high probability of having culture-confirmed CRGNIs. Colistin tracking is a novel strategy for monitoring the incidence and mortality of CRGNIs, particularly those caused by extensively drug-resistant bacteria. Although the incidence of colistin cases nearly tripled within 7 years, more of these patients are surviving hospitalization and going home.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Resistência beta-Lactâmica , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...