Perioperative Mortality and the Long-Term Outcome of Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): A Single-Centre Experience.

Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dangerous disorder characterised by abnormal enlargement of the abdominal aorta. The severity of the aneurysm and the presence of symptoms determine the necessary monitoring or treatment to prevent potential fatalities. The objective of this study is to estimate the perioperative mortality and long-term outcome of endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR). Patients and methods This is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study. We retrieved the data of the AAA patients who underwent EVAR at Glan Clwyd Hospital from January 2015 to January 2023. The study sample consisted of patients diagnosed with isolated AAA, with or without iliac branch involvement, who were deemed suitable for EVAR based on factors such as advanced age, presence of comorbidities, the complexity of the condition, history of prior surgery, fulfillment of indication criteria, and patient desire. The data was analysed using SPSS statistical software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Two hundred and twenty-two patients were studied. The outcome of the EVAR among the patients was endo-leak 28.4% (n = 63); migration 1.4% (n = 3); blockage 0.5% (n = 1); infolding 0.5% (n = 1); perioperative mortality 1.4% (3); and other complications like access site or acute kidney injury were 1.4% (n = 3). However, no complications were reported in most of the patients, 66.7% (n = 148). Upon evaluating the variables that could affect the outcome, we observed that the ASA grade, comorbidities, and the indication of the intervention had a significant effect on the outcome (P values = 0.000, 0.048, and 0.014, respectively). Conclusion The findings demonstrate that when EVAR is performed by a skilled team adhering to proper criteria, the results are optimal. The mortality rate during the perioperative period was 1.4%. Furthermore, we have shown a satisfactory rate of complications when compared to international data.

Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Admitted to the Surgical Ward: Clinical Audit.

Background: Hospital-acquired thrombosis (HAT) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and financial burden globally. Following trusted guidelines for VTE prevention has shown effective, safe, and satisfactory results. This prompts national collaborative efforts to maintain a consensus approach for the safe risk assessment of inpatients and the prescription of thromboprophylaxis. Objective: This study aimed to detect and estimate deviations from international thromboprophylaxis protocols. The study also aimed to raise the quality of practice and adherence to evidence-based protocols in Alshuhada Teaching Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional audit of general surgical inpatients was performed from October 2021 to May 2022. The first cycle was from 1/10/2021 to 21/10/2021, and the second cycle was from 13/5/2022 to 31/5/2022. The target population was adults aged >18 years. Data were collected via an online checklist on two separate occasions. The criteria were based on the NICE guideline for venous thromboembolism in individuals aged over 16 years: "Reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism NG89". Results: Forty-five surgical inpatients were included in this study: 20 in the first cycle and 25 in the second cycle. The first-cycle report showed that only 25% of VTE candidates received this regimen. In the second cycle, practice significantly improved, with 92% of admitted patients having their risk assessment tool completed within 24 h of admission. 79% of VTE prophylaxis candidates were prescribed adequate pharmacological prophylaxis within 14 h of admission. Conclusion: The rate of adequate thromboprophylaxis for inpatients undergoing surgery was very low before clinicians received education on VTE prevention, whereas was evidently high after they had received them. The cause of non-adherence in the pre-intervention phase was a lack of adequate knowledge regarding the magnitude and burden of HAT and the importance of thromboprophylaxis, which has a potential role in preventing the majority of HAT.

Indications and Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA): A Single Centre Experience.

Background Stroke is a prevalent ailment that impacts a substantial number of individuals globally, resulting in both physical impairment and mortality. One of its major causes is carotid artery stenosis. The symptoms and degree of stenosis are key indications for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this study, we highlight the indications and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in our center. Methods This is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study. Data of patients who underwent CEA at Glan Clwyd Hospital from January 2018 to January 2023 was retrieved. The study sample consisted of patients diagnosed with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis who had CEA at Glan Clwyd Hospital. The data was analyzed using statistical software SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Results A total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study. A majority of the patients were male, accounting for 69.3% (n = 104), and had a mean age of 71.1 ± 9.9 standard deviation. A majority of the patients were smokers (48.7%) and had additional medical conditions, including hypertension (34%), ischemic heart disease (17.3%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (73.3%), and diabetes (46.7%). Nevertheless, the remaining comorbidities were less common. The outcome of the CEA among the patients was cardiac event 3.3% (n = 5); transient ischemic attack (TIA) 3.3% (n = 5); stroke 0.6% (n = 1); hemorrhage 2.6% (n = 4); surgical site infection 2% (n = 3); perioperative mortality 1.3% (n = 2); and cranial nerve injury 1.3% (n = 2). However, no complications were reported in most of the patients, 85.6% (n = 128). Conclusion An endarterectomy is quite advantageous for treating symptomatic stenosis. The findings can be applied to patients who are physically suitable for surgery. The efficacy of endarterectomy is contingent upon not only the severity of carotid stenosis but also various other parameters, such as the time elapsed between the presenting event and the surgical intervention, as well as the patient's overall medical condition. However, the CEA is the gold standard in surgical management for symptomatic carotid disease.