Cardiorenal disease management in type 2 diabetes: An expert consensus.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The interplay between cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) is well established. We aim at providing an evidence-based expert opinion regarding the prevention and treatment of both heart failure (HF) and renal complications in people with T2D. METHOD: ology: The consensus recommendations were developed by subject experts in endocrinology, cardiology, and nephrology. The criteria for consensus were set to statements with ≥80% of agreement among clinicians specialized in endocrinology, cardiology, and nephrology. Key expert opinions were formulated based on scientific evidence and clinical judgment. RESULTS: Assessing the risk factors of CVD or CKD in people with diabetes and taking measures to prevent HF or kidney disease are essential. Known CVD or CKD among people with diabetes confers a very high risk for recurrent CVD. Metformin plus lifestyle modification should be the first-line therapy (unless contraindicated) for the management of T2D. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists can be preferred in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or with high-risk indicators, along with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), whereas SGLT2i are the first choice in HF and CKD. The GLP-1 agonists can be used in people with CKD if SGLT2i are not tolerated. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests SGLT2i as preferred agents among people with T2D and HF, and for those with T2D and ASCVD. SGLT2i and GLP-1RA also lower CV outcomes in those with diabetes and ASCVD, and the treatment choice should depend on the patient profile.

Machine learning based model for risk prediction after ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from the North India ST elevation myocardial infarction (NORIN-STEMI) registry.

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction following ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in resource limited countries is critical to identify patients at an increased risk of mortality who might benefit from intensive management. METHODS: North India ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NORIN-STEMI) is an ongoing registry that has prospectively enrolled 3,635 STEMI patients. Of these, 3191 patients with first STEMI were included. Patients were divided into two groups: development (n=2668) and validation (unseen) dataset (n=523). Various ML strategies were used to train and tune the model based on validation dataset results that included 31 clinical characteristics. These models were compared in sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and overall accuracy to predict mortality at 30 days. ML model decision making was analyzed using the Shapley Additive exPlanations (ShAP) summary plot. RESULTS: At 30 days, the mortality was 7.7%. On the validation dataset, Extra Tree ML model had the best predictive ability with sensitivity: 85%, AUC: 79.7%, and Accuracy: 75%. ShAP interpretable summary plot determined delay in time to revascularization, baseline cardiogenic shock, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, age, serum creatinine, heart failure on presentation, female sex, and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation to be major predictors of all-cause mortality at 30 days (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: ML models lead to an improved mortality prediction following STEMI. ShAP summary plot for the interpretability of the AI model helps to understand the model's decision in identifying high-risk individuals who may benefit from intensified follow-up and close monitoring.

Management of American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology-Defined Stage 2 Hypertension by Cardiologists in India.

Uncontrolled hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor and therefore requires effective approaches to patient management. This study assessed approaches to the management of patients with Stage 2 hypertension by cardiologists in India. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational, case-based questionnaire study. Data on demographic characteristics, risk factors associated with Stage 2 hypertension, use of antihypertensive medications, side effects, and approaches to education for 2,540 patients were extracted from questionnaire responses provided by 508 cardiologists. The study population of patients with Stage 2 hypertension had a mean age of 55.0 years. Most of the patients (62.6%) were aged 30 to 60 years and diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent comorbidity (48.9%). Triple antihypertensive therapy was being used by 760 patients, and 634 and 1,146 patients were receiving 4 and 5 different antihypertensive medications, respectively. Telmisartan, amlodipine, chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, metoprolol, and prazosin were the commonly prescribed drugs. Ankle edema (27.7%) was the most frequent side effect of therapy. Pharmacotherapy was supported by patient education and lifestyle modifications for better blood pressure control. The standardized approach to the collection and assessment of these contemporary data provides useful insights into the characteristics and treatment of patients with Stage 2 hypertension in India.

Effectiveness and Effect on Renal Parameters of Amlodipine vs. Other Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers in Patients with Essential Hypertension: Retrospective Observational Study Based on Real-World Evidence from Electronic Medical Records.

INTRODUCTION: The renoprotective effects of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been established as non-inferior to other classes of antihypertensive drugs. Studying their effect on renal outcome parameters, specifically for amlodipine as monotherapy, in real-world settings can further help in expanding its usage among Indian patients. This study was performed to assess the effects of amlodipine and other dihydropyridine CCBs (cilnidipine, benidipine and azelnidipine) on renal parameters and effectiveness in blood pressure reduction in Indian patients. METHODS: The retrospective data of adult patients (> 18 years) with essential hypertensive who were prescribed amlodipine (n = 92), cilnidipine (n = 91), benidipine (n = 70) or azelnidipine (n = 71) as monotherapy were analyzed. The renal outcomes, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), microalbumin, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), sodium and potassium levels, and mean changes in BP were analyzed from baseline to 12 months. Appropriate statistical methods were used to determine the significance (p value < 0.05). RESULTS: From baseline to the end of the study, mean serum creatinine changed from 0.98 ± 0.17 to 1.07 ± 0.28 mg/dL with amlodipine, 0.97 ± 0.18 to 1.13 ± 0.50 mg/dL with cilnidipine, 0.98 ± 0.30 to 0.97 ± 0.27 mg/dL wi th benidipine, and 0.99 ± 0.23 to 0.98 ± 0.25 mg/dL with azelnidipine (p = 0.01). The mean microalbumin and UACR were reduced from baseline to the end of the study (p = 0.06 and p > 0.05). No significant changes were observed in BUN, sodium or potassium levels. Overall, for all CCBs, the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values were reduced from baseline to the end of the study (p = 0.002). At the end of the study, the average dose of amlodipine was 7.25 mg, and the average reduction in SBP and DBP per mg dose was 1.54 and 0.57 mmHg. The corresponding numbers for the other CCBs were as follows: cilnidipine, 14.28 mg, 0.26 and 0.01; benidipine, 5.71 mg, 0.41 and 0.11; azelnidipine, 15.88 mg, 0.13 and 0.06. CONCLUSION: Amlodipine and other CCBs demonstrated good efficacy and similar effects on renal parameters from baseline to end of study. Amlodipine also showed higher potency by demonstrating greater BP reduction at a lower dose. Thus, amlodipine can remain a preferred choice among CCBs, even with the advent of the newer CCBs.

Resource and Infrastructure-Appropriate Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

The 143 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) of the world constitute 80% of the world's population or roughly 5.86 billion people with much variation in geography, culture, literacy, financial resources, access to health care, insurance penetration, and healthcare regulation. Unfortunately, their burden of cardiovascular disease in general and acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in particular is increasing at an unprecedented rate. Compounding the problem, outcomes remain suboptimal because of a lack of awareness and a severe paucity of resources. Guideline-based treatment has dramatically improved the outcomes of STEMI in high-income countries. However, no such focused recommendations exist for LMICs, and the unique challenges in LMICs make directly implementing Western guidelines unfeasible. Thus, structured solutions tailored to their individual, local needs, and resources are a vital need. With this in mind, a multicountry collaboration of investigators interested in LMIC STEMI care have tried to create a consensus document that extracts transferable elements from Western guidelines and couples them with local realities gathered from expert experience. It outlines general operating principles for LMICs focused best practices and is intended to create the broad outlines of implementable, resource-appropriate paradigms for management of STEMI in LMICs. Although this document is focused primarily on governments and organizations involved with improvement in STEMI care in LMICs, it also provides some specific targeted information for the frontline clinicians to allow standardized care pathways and improved outcomes.

One-year outcomes of a BioMime™ Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System with a biodegradable polymer in all-comers coronary artery disease patients: The meriT-3 study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the merit-3 study was to determine the safety and performance of the BioMime Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System (SES) in all-comer patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in one-year clinical follow-up period. METHODS: The meriT-3 was a multi-centre, observational, post-marketing study conducted in 1161 patients with CAD who were implanted with BioMime SES at 15 sites in India. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at one year defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Clinical follow-up was performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. Major adverse cardiac event occurred at 30 days and subsequently at 6 months and at long-term follow-up of 1 year was analyzed. RESULTS: MACE observed at 1 and 6 months follow-up was 16 (1.38%) and 21 (1.83%) respectively. Cumulative 1 year MACE was 26 (2.35%) with 16 (1.39%) all cause death, 4 (0.35%) MI and 6 (0.52%) TLR. In addition, ST was observed in 1 (0.09%) patient. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the BioMime SES is safe and effective in a "real-world", all-comers CAD patients, indicating low rates of MACE. CTRI ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NO: REF/2016/07/011808.