Nurses' knowledge, beliefs and practices regarding the screening and treatment of postpartum depression in maternal and child health clinics: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) affects 10-15% of women worldwide, and screening is recommended by clinical guidelines. In Malaysia, nurses in maternal and child health (MCH) clinics provide postpartum care. AIM: To determine nurses' level of knowledge, beliefs and practices regarding PPD and factors associated with screening practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using universal sampling was conducted on nurses from seven government MCH clinics in Malaysia. Data was collected from March until April 2016 through a self-reported questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with having ever performed PPD screening. RESULTS: Of the 108 nurses, 55.6% scored above the median total knowledge score (17 out of 24 points). Despite a high proportion of nurses believing that they were responsible for PPD screening (72.2%), counselling depressed mothers (72.2%) and referring mothers for further treatment (87.0%), only 64.8% and 51.9% were confident in recognizing PPD and counselling depressed mothers, respectively. Only 25.9% had ever practiced PPD screening, which was associated with beliefs concerning screening taking too much time (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.02-0.74, P=0.022) and that screening is their responsibility (AOR=14.12, 95%CI=1.65-120.75, P=0.016). CONCLUSION: More than half of the nurses scored above the median total knowledge score and had positive beliefs towards PPD screening. However, PPD screening practices were poor, and this outcome was associated with their beliefs regarding time and responsibility.

Prevalence and documented causes of hyponatraemia among geriatric patients attending a primary care clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Hyponatraemia is the commonest electrolyte abnormality and has major clinical implications. However, few studies of hyponatraemia in the primary care setting has been published to date. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, potential causes and management of hyponatraemia and to identify factors associated with severity of hyponatraemia among older persons in a primary care setting. METHODS: Electronic records were searched to identify all cases aged ≥60 years with a serum sodium <135mmol/l, attending outpatient clinic in 2014. Patients' medical records with the available blood test results of glucose, potassium, urea and creatinine were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 21,544 elderly, 5873 patients (27.3%) had electrolyte profile tests. 403 (6.9%) had hyponatraemia in at least one blood test. Medical records were available for 253, mean age 72.9±7.3 years, 178 (70.4%) had mild hyponatraemia, 75 (29.6%) had moderate to severe hyponatraemia. Potential causes were documented in 101 (40%). Patients with moderate to severe hyponatraemia were five times more likely to have a cause of hyponatraemia documented (p<0.01). Medications were the commonest documented cause of hyponatraemia (31.7%). Hydrochlorothiazide use was attributed in 25 (78.1%) of 32 with medication-associated hyponatraemia. Repeat renal profile (89%) was the commonest management of hypotonic hyponatraemia. CONCLUSION: Whilst hyponatraemia was common in the clinic setting, many cases were not acknowledged and had no clear management strategies. In view of mild hyponatraemia has deleterious consequences, future studies should determine whether appropriate management of mild hyponatraemia will lead to clinical improvement.

Cost-effectiveness of and satisfaction with a Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" strategy compared with prompt endoscopy in young Asians with dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare a Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" strategy with prompt endoscopy in young Asians with dyspepsia. METHODS: A randomised, prospective study was carried out on uninvestigated dyspeptics aged <45 years in a single (academic) primary care centre. Patients were randomised to either a [(13)C]urea breath test (UBT) or prompt endoscopy (oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and followed-up for 12 months. RESULTS: 432 patients (mean (SD) age 30 (8) years, male 46%, ethnicity: Malays 33.3%, Chinese 30.6%, Indians 34.7%) were randomised to UBT (n = 222) or OGD (n = 210). 387 (89.6%) patients completed the study. At 12 months, there was no difference in symptom change (measured by the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire) between the two groups, but more patients were very satisfied (40.0% vs 21.6%, p<0.0001) in the OGD group. More additional endoscopy was performed in the UBT group (25 vs 10, p = 0.03), but medication consumption was higher in the OGD group (proton pump inhibitor 3.6 (8.8) vs 2.0 (7.5) weeks, p<0.001; H2 receptor antagonist 5.3 (9.7) vs 3.9 (9.2) weeks, p = 0.017; prokinetics 1.4 (4.7) vs 0.4 (2.5) weeks, p<0.001) and no differences in medical consultation were noted. The median cost of the initial prompt endoscopy approach at 12 months was significantly higher than a "test and treat" strategy (US$179.05 vs US$87.10, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: A H. pylori "test and treat" strategy is more cost-effective but less satisfying than prompt endoscopy in the management of young Asian patients with uncomplicated dyspepsia.