Congenital fibrinogen disorders: a retrospective clinical and genetic analysis of the Prospective Rare Bleeding Disorders Database.

ABSTRACT: Congenital fibrinogen deficiency (CFD) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by mutations in FGA, FGB, and FGG. We sought to comprehensively characterize patients with CFD using PRO-RBDD (Prospective Rare Bleeding Disorders Database). Clinical phenotypes, laboratory, and genetic features were investigated using retrospective data from the PRO-RBDD. Patients were classified from asymptomatic to grade 3 based on their bleeding severity. In addition, FGA, FGB, and FGG were sequenced to find causative variants. A total of 166 CFD cases from 16 countries were included, of whom 123 (30 afibrinogenemia, 33 hypofibrinogenemia, 55 dysfibrinogenemia, and 5 hypodysfibrinogenemia) were well characterized. Considering the previously established factor activity and antigen level thresholds, bleeding severity was correctly identified in 58% of the cases. The rates of thrombotic events among afibrinogenemic and hypofibrinogenemic patients were relatively similar (11% and 10%, respectively) and surprisingly higher than in dysfibrinogenemic cases. The rate of spontaneous abortions among 68 pregnancies was 31%, including 86% in dysfibrinogenemic women and 14% with hypofibrinogenemia. Eighty-six patients received treatment (69 on-demand and/or 17 on prophylaxis), with fibrinogen concentrates being the most frequently used product. Genetic analysis was available for 91 cases and 41 distinct variants were identified. Hotspot variants (FGG, p.Arg301Cys/His and FGA, p.Arg35Cys/His) were present in 51% of dysfibrinogenemia. Obstetric complications were commonly observed in dysfibrinogenemia. This large multicenter study provided a comprehensive insight into the clinical, laboratory, and genetic history of patients with CFDs. We conclude that bleeding severity grades were in agreement with the established factor activity threshold in nearly half of the cases with quantitative defects.

Diagnostic utility of bleeding assessment tools in congenital fibrinogen deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of clinical history is crucial before referring a patient for further laboratory testing. Bleeding assessment tools (BAT) are developed to standardize clinical evaluation. A small number of patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiencies (CFDs) have been evaluated with these tools without definitive results. AIMS: We compared the adequacy of the ISTH-BAT and the European network of rare bleeding disorders bleeding score system (EN-RBD-BSS) to identify patients with CFDs. The correlation between the two BATs and fibrinogen levels and patient clinical grade severity was further analyzed. METHODS: We included 100 Iranian patients with CFDs. Routine coagulation and fibrinogen-specific tests (fibrinogen antigen [Fg:Ag] and activity [Fg:C]) were performed. The ISTH-BAT and EN-RBD-BSS were used to assess the bleeding score (BS) of all patients. RESULTS: The ISTH-BAT and EN-RBD-BSS median (range) were 4 (0-16) and 2.21 (-1.49 to 6.71), with a statistically significant moderate correlation between the two systems (r = .597, P < .001). In patients with quantitative deficiencies (afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia), the correlation between Fg:C and the ISTH-BAT was moderately negative (r = -.4, P < .001), while the correlation between Fg:C and the EN-RBD-BSS was weakly negative (r = -.38, P < .001). Overall, 70% and 72% of patients with fibrinogen deficiencies were correctly identified by both the ISTH-BAT and EN-RBD-BSS, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that in addition to the ISTH-BAT, the EN-RBD-BSS may also be useful in identifying CFD patients. We found a significant level of sensitivity for detecting fibrinogen deficiency in the two BATs, and bleeding severity classification correctly identified severity grades in almost two-thirds of patients.

Clinical and molecular characterization of Iranian patients with congenital fibrinogen disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital fibrinogen disorders (CFDs) are caused by mutations in the FGA, FGB and FGG genes and are classified as quantitative and qualitative fibrinogen defects. This study sought to determine the genetic background of CFDs in Iran and to examine the genotype-phenotype correlation. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a CFD diagnosis were included. Fibrinogen antigen and activity were measured by the immunoturbidimetric and Clauss methods respectively. Gene sequencing was performed following a polymerase chain reaction amplification of fibrinogen's genes. The ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool was also evaluated for all cases. RESULTS: Patients were diagnosed with dysfibrinogenemia (n = 10), hypodysfibrinogenemia (n = 2) and afibrinogenemia (n = 2). Seven different mutations located on FGA exon 2 (57 %), exon 4 (7%), exon 5 (7%) and FGG exon 8 (29 %) were identified. In patients with qualitative deficiencies, mutations were including p.Arg38Thr, p.Arg35His, p.Arg35Cys, p.Val145Asp, and p.Arg301Cys and were including p.Gly316GlufsX105 and p.Trp52stop in afibrinogenemic patients. In dysfibrinogenemia, two hotspot mutations, FGA Arg35 and FGG Arg301 were identified in 60 % of patients and the remaining (40 %) had p.Arg38Thr mutation. The p.Val145Asp and two hotspot mutations, p.Arg35His, p.Arg35Cys, were identified for the first time in Iran. The overall median (range) bleeding score (BS) was 4 (0-6) in all patients and it was 3.5 (0-5) in dysfibrinogenemia. Cutaneous bleeding and menorrhagia were the most common bleeding manifestations. CONCLUSION: There was a weak genotype-phenotype correlation in CFDs and patients with dysfibrinogenemia were more symptomatic than in previous studies. Despite ethnic's differences, the prevalence of hotspot mutations in dysfibrinogenemia was similar to the other studies.