The need for surgery in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biologicals.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in childhood often presents with a more extensive and more aggressive disease course than adult-onset disease. We aimed to evaluate if biological treatment started in childhood decreases the need for intestinal surgery over time. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. All pediatric patients with IBD initiated to biological therapy at the Children's Hospital, were included in the study and followed up to the first surgical procedure or re-operation in their adulthood or until 31.12.2021 when ≥ 18 of age. Data were collected from the pediatric registry of IBD patients with biologicals and medical charts. RESULTS: A total of 207 pediatric IBD patients were identified [150 with Crohn´s disease (CD), 31 with ulcerative colitis (UC), 26 with IBD unclassified (IBDU)] of which 32.9% (n = 68; CD 49, UC 13, IBDU 6) underwent intestinal surgery. At the end of a median follow-up of 9.0 years (range 2.0-25.9), patients reached a median age of 21.4 years (range 18-36). Patients who had intestinal surgery in childhood were more likely to have IBD-related surgery also in early adulthood. The duration of the disease at induction of the first biological treatment emerged as the only risk factor, with a longer duration in the surgical group than in patients with no surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite initiation of biological treatment, the risk of intestinal surgery remains high in pediatric IBD patients and often the need for surgery emerges after the transition to adult IBD clinics.

Tofacitinib real-world experience in ulcerative colitis in Finland (FinTofUC): a retrospective non-interventional multicenter patient chart data study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to define the effectiveness of tofacitinib and to characterize the patient population receiving tofacitinib in a real-world cohort clinical setting for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Finland. METHODS: This is a retrospective non-interventional multicenter patient chart data study conducted in 23 Finnish Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) centers. Baseline demographic and clinical data, clinical remission, steroid-free remission rate and time to tofacitinib discontinuation, colectomy or UC-related hospitalization were studied. RESULTS: The study included 252 UC patients of which 69% were male. Most patients had extensive disease (71%) and were bio-experienced (81%). Tofacitinib demonstrated positive treatment outcomes with clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission at one year in 33%, 34% and 31% of patients, respectively. Moreover, 64% of patients in pMayo remission at week 16 from the start of tofacitinib were still in remission at one year. Only no or mild disease activity compared to moderate activity at baseline was associated with a higher probability of achieving remission according to pMayo at six months, p = .008. Hospitalizations and/or colectomies during the study period (before treatment discontinuation/end of follow-up) were low (n = 24), with less than 5 colectomies. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, including a majority of bio-experienced UC patients, tofacitinib was effective in achieving steroid-free clinical remission in a third of the population at one year. A majority of patients in remission at week 16 were also in remission at one year. Results are in line with earlier published real-world studies. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05082428.

A New Digital Health Program for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Preliminary Program Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) causes chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. IBD is characterized by an unpredictable disease course that varies greatly between individuals and alternates between the periods of relapse and remission. A low energy level (fatigue) is a common symptom, whereas stress and reduced sleep quality may be the triggering factors. Therapeutic guidelines call for effective disease assessment, early intervention, and personalized care using a treat-to-target approach, which may be difficult to achieve through typical time- and resource-constrained standard care. Providing patients with a digital health program that incorporates helpful self-management features and patient support to complement standard care may be optimal for improving the disease course. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a preliminary program evaluation, analyzing engagement and preliminary effectiveness and the effect on participants' energy levels (fatigue), stress, and sleep quality, of a newly developed 16-week digital health program (SK-311 and SK-321) for patients with IBD. METHODS: Adults with IBD were recruited to participate in a real-world, live, digital health program via Finnish IBD patient association websites and social media. No inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied for this study. Baseline characteristics were entered by the participants upon sign-up. Platform engagement was measured by tracking the participants' event logs. The outcome measures of stress, energy levels (fatigue), and quality of sleep were reported by participants through the platform. RESULTS: Of the 444 adults who registered for the digital health program, 205 (46.2%) were included in the intention-to-treat sample. The intention-to-treat participants logged events on average 41 times per week (5.9 times per day) during the weeks in which they were active on the digital platform. More women than men participated in the intervention (126/205, 88.7%). The mean age of the participants was 40.3 (SD 11.5) years, and their mean BMI was 27.9 (SD 6.0) kg/m2. In total, 80 people provided the required outcome measures during weeks 12 to 16 (completers). Treatment completion was strongly predicted by the number of active days in week 1. Analysis of the completers (80/205, 39%) showed significant improvements for stress (t79=4.57; P<.001; percentage change=-23.26%) and energy levels (t79=-2.44; P=.017; percentage change=9.48%); however, no significant improvements were observed for quality of sleep (t79=-1.32; P=.19). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the feasibility of a digital health program for patients with IBD (SK-311 and SK-321) and suggest that treatment completion might have a substantial positive effect on patient-reported stress and energy levels in a real-world setting. These findings are promising and provide initial support for using the Sidekick Health digital health program to supplement standard care for patients with IBD.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies. RESULTS: In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%. CONCLUSION: TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times.

Effectiveness of Third-Class Biologic Treatment in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have described the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) failing anti- Tumor necrosis factors (TNFs); however, the effectiveness of VDZ or UST as a third-class biologic has not yet been described. AIMS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of VDZ and UST as a third-class biologic in patients with CD. RESULTS: Two-hundred and four patients were included; 156/204 (76%) patients received VDZ as a second- and UST as a third-class therapy (group A); the remaining 48/204 (24%) patients received UST as a second- and VDZ as a third-class therapy (group B). At week 16-22, 87/156 (55.5%) patients and 27/48 (56.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, responded to treatment (p = 0.9); 41/156 (26.2%) and 15/48 (31.2%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). At week 52; 89/103 (86%) patients and 25/29 (86.2%) of the patients with available data had responded to third-class treatment in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.9); 31/103 (30%) and 47/29 (24.1%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Third-class biological therapy was effective in more than half of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of VDZ and UST as a third-class agent.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the workflow of endoscopy units: an international survey.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a challenge to healthcare. Staff and patients are at increased risk during an examination or intervention, so certain restrictions ought to be introduced. Hence, we aimed to measure the effect of the pandemic on endoscopy units in real-life settings. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out between 7 April and 15 June 2020. Responds came from many countries, and the participation was voluntary. The survey contained 40 questions, which evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy units and assessed the infection control. RESULTS: A total of 312 questionnaires were filled, 120 from Hungary, and 192 internationally, and 54 questionnaires (17.3%) were sent from high-risk countries; 84.9% of the gastroenterologists declared that they read the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) statement, while only 32.1% participated in any advanced training at their workplace. Overall, 92.1% of gastroenterologists realized risk stratification, and 72.1% claimed to have enough protective equipment. In 52.6% of the endoscopy units, at least one endoscopist had to discontinue the work due to any risk factor, while 40.6% reported that the reduced staff did not affect the workflow. Gastroenterologists considered that the five most important examinations both in low and high-risk patients are the following: lower/upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with hemodynamic instability, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in obstructive jaundice, foreign body in the esophagus, ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis, and iron deficiency anemia with hemodynamic instability, which correlates well with the ESGE recommendation. Significant correlation was found in the usage of the necessary protective equipment in high-risk patients depending on the countries (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survey found weak correlation in preliminary training depending on countries; nevertheless, in Hungary during the examined period, endoscopists considered the recommendations more strictly than in other countries. Although many physicians left the endoscopy lab, the workflow was not affected, probably due to the reduced number of examinations.

Ulcerative Colitis Narrative Global Survey Findings: The Impact of Living With Ulcerative Colitis-Patients' and Physicians' View.

BACKGROUND: The Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Narrative is a global patient and physician survey aimed at identifying the impact of UC and comparing and contrasting perceptions of UC burden and management approaches. METHODS: Surveys of patients with UC (self-reported diagnosis; n = 2100) and physicians (n = 1254) were completed across 10 countries by The Harris Poll between August 2017 and February 2018. Questionnaires covered multiple aspects of UC, including diagnosis, treatment, and impact on patient quality of life, in addition to standard demographic information. Descriptive statistics are reported. RESULTS: The majority of patients (82%) had moderate to severe UC (based on medication history; those who had only ever taken 5-aminosalicylates were excluded); 67% described their UC as controlled with few to no symptoms. On average, patients experienced 4.3 flares (standard deviation, 7.4) in the past year. Diagnostic delay was on average 2.0 years (standard deviation, 5.4); 42% of patients waited ≥1 year. Most patients (65%) felt that UC controlled their life rather than them controlling their disease. Because of the fear of repercussions, many patients had not disclosed their UC to their employer. Discussion of the emotional impact of UC during routine appointments was less of a priority for physicians, compared with patients. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this global survey highlight that patients with UC experience diagnostic delay, poor disease control, and adverse impact on their quality of life. Patients report UC to be a mentally exhausting condition; however, emotional and mental health issues are infrequently discussed at routine appointments.

Long-term deep remission during maintenance therapy with biological agents in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Background and aims: A multicentre, retrospective, non-interventional, patient chart review study was conducted to investigate deep (DR) and histological remission rates during maintenance therapy with biological agents in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Methods: We reviewed clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings, and laboratory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) on average of nine years after the initiation of anti-TNF-therapy. DR was defined as no clinical symptoms (The physicians' global assessment scores; PGA = 0) with endoscopic remission (the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ≤ 2 or Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1). Histological activity was defined as normal if only architectural alterations without cellularity changes occurred.Results: Of 117 IBD patients on maintenance therapy, 72 (62%; CD n = 55 [56%], UC n = 17 [85%]) patients were in DR. Of patients in DR, 76% were also in histological remission. 77% of patients remained on initiated biological treatment. UC patients achieved DR significantly more often than CD patients (p = .016). Both median CRP and FC levels were significantly lower in patients with DR.Conclusion: Reassuringly, almost two thirds of the IBD patients on maintenance therapy with biological agents maintained DR in the long-term, and more than two thirds of patients in DR achieved also histological remission. CD patients in DR had fewer surgical operations due to CD than patients not achieving DR.

Impact of ulcerative colitis on patients' lives: results of the Finnish extension of a global ulcerative colitis narrative survey.

Introduction: The Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Narrative is a global initiative to engage patients with UC, in order to help identify the impact of UC on patients' lives. The aim of the UC Narrative extension survey in Finland was to identify and describe the unmet needs in quality care. Methods: Seventeen Finnish physicians were surveyed in the original UC Narrative survey between 7 December 2017 and 24 January 2018. In the extension phase, Finnish UC patients, recruited through the Finnish patient association, were surveyed from 15 November to 3 December 2018, covering questions on disease characteristics, impact on life, most common challenges in communication with health care professionals (HCPs) and access to care. Results: Five hundred and eight patients with self-reported UC diagnosis participated (137 male [27.0%]). Diagnostic delay was, on average, 2.3 (SD 5.5) years; 14.4% had waited five years or more for diagnosis. Most patients (396; 78.0%) considered themselves to be in remission and rated their overall state of health as 'excellent' or 'good' (303; 59.7%). Most patients (79.6%) were satisfied with the communication with their HCPs, and the majority (74.2%) felt comfortable raising concerns and fears with HCPs. However, the satisfaction in discussing mental and emotional health impacts of UC was lower (44.3%). A relatively large number of patients (38.5%) felt that they would be a more successful person without UC. Conclusions: The UC Narrative survey highlighted the diagnostic delay in UC, challenges in communication with HCPs and the impact of UC on life from the patients' perspective.

Characterization of inflammatory bowel disease management by vedolizumab and concomitant treatments in real-life clinical practice.

Limited data is available on vedolizumab combination therapies in real-world clinical practice. Here, we evaluated the concomitant corticosteroid, immunosuppressive, and 5-aminosalicylic acid utilization of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with vedolizumab in a nationwide, retrospective, non-interventional, multi-centre chart review study. All adult patients from 27 Finnish gastroenterology centres with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who had at least one vedolizumab infusion since it's availability in Finland were included in the study. Data were collected from medical charts at baseline (vedolizumab treatment initiation), week 14, and month 6. The majority of patients who used corticosteroids at the baseline and persisted on vedolizumab treatment for 6 months were taken off corticosteroid treatment by the 6-month time point (CD, 54.5%; UC, 69.8%). Modest corticosteroid dose reductions were observed among treatment persistent CD patients from the baseline until month 6. Corticosteroid users had less vedolizumab discontinuations due to primary ineffectiveness and more discontinuations due to adverse events than patients not using corticosteroids. Vedolizumab may have a corticosteroid sparing effect in real-world clinical practice. Concomitant corticosteroid use may lead to a lower rate of vedolizumab discontinuation due to primary ineffectiveness, but a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events.

Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-Naïve Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Multicenter Retrospective European Study.

Background: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is effective for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). In GEMINI trials, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-naïve patients had a superior response compared with anti-TNF-exposed patients. In real-world experience (RWE), the number of included anti-TNF-naïve patients was low. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in anti-TNF-naïve patients in an RWE setting. Methods: This retrospective multicenter European pooled cohort study included consecutive active anti-TNF-naïve IBD patients treated with VDZ. The primary end point was clinical response at week 14. Patients with follow-up beyond week 14 and those discontinuing VDZ at any time were included for maintenance outcomes analysis. Results: Since January 2015, 184 anti-TNF-naïve patients from 23 centers initiated VDZ treatment (Crohn's disease [CD], 50; ulcerative colitis [UC], 134). In CD, 42/50 (82%) patients responded by week 14 and 32 (64%) were in clinical remission; 26/50 (52%) achieved corticosteroid-free remission (CSFR). At last follow-up (44 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 30-52 weeks), 27/35 (77.1%) patients with available data responded to treatment; 24/35 (68.6%) were in clinical remission, 21/35 (60%) were in CSFR. For UC, 116/134 (79.1%) responded to treatment by week 14, including 53 (39.5%) in clinical remission; 49/134 (36.6%) achieved CSFR. At last follow-up (42.5 weeks; IQR, 30-52 weeks), 79/103 (76.7%) patients responded to treatment, 69/103 (67.0%) were in remission, and 61/103 (59.2%) were in CSFR. Adverse effects were reported in 20 (11%) of the patients, leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 (3.3%). Conclusions: VDZ is similarly effective in ant-TNF-naïve CD and UC patients. The efficacy is higher than reported in anti-TNF-experienced patients and is comparable to that of anti-TNF biologics in this population.

The impacts of an inflammatory bowel disease nurse specialist on the quality of care and costs in Finland.

INTRODUCTION: A specialized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) nurse is considered a valuable and cost-effective member of a multidisciplinary team, not all clinics responsible for IBD care employ such nurses. We evaluated IBD nurse resources, quality of care and cost effects on IBD patients care in a nationwide study in Finland. METHODS: A healthcare professional electronic survey was conducted in order to assess the impact of an IBD nurse on the quality of care. To study the cost effects, we obtained nationwide comprehensive data covering years between 2008 and 2016 from major administrative healthcare districts of Finland. Patients with a diagnosis of IBD (ICD-code K50 or K51) were identified from the data and their personal contacts and hospitalization were analyzed. The results were compared between healthcare districts with an IBD nurse and healthcare districts without an IBD nurse. RESULTS: Forty-nine physicians and 88 nurses responded to the survey. Of the physicians, 92% reported that an established IBD nurse had released physician's resources. The most important IBD nurse contributions listed were patient support and follow-up (79-81% of the respondents). Healthcare district, which had an established IBD nurse, produced more patient contacts. A larger proportion of the contacts was managed by the IBD nurse. Clinics with an IBD nurse reported less patient hospitalization (4-9% vs 11-19%, p < .001). Estimated annual cost savings while employing an IBD nurse may be significant. CONCLUSION: The introduction of an IBD nurse led to better quality of care and potentially significant cost savings by reducing hospitalization rates and reallocating physician's time resources.

High treatment persistence rate and significant endoscopic healing among real-life patients treated with vedolizumab - a Finnish Nationwide Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study (FINVEDO).

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and tolerability of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has been demonstrated in an extensive GEMINI clinical trial programme. Clinical trials represent highly selected patient populations and, therefore, it is important to demonstrate effectiveness in real-life clinical practice. We set out to assess real-world treatment outcomes of vedolizumab in a nationwide cohort of treatment refractory Finnish Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. METHODS: This was a nationwide, retrospective, non-interventional, multi-centre chart review study. All adult patients from 27 Finnish gastroenterology centers with a diagnosis of UC or CD who had at least one vedolizumab infusion since the availability of the product in Finland, were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from medical charts at baseline, week 14, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was treatment persistence 24 weeks post-vedolizumab initiation. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were included (108 CD, 139 UC). A total of 75.0% (n = 81) of all CD patients and 66.2% (n = 92) of all UC patients, were persistent on vedolizumab therapy for 6 months post treatment initiation. At month 6, 41.8% (28/67) of the treatment persistent CD patients and 73.3% (63/86) of the treatment persistent UC patients achieved clinical remission. Significant improvement in endoscopic scores were observed among treatment persistent patients (CD, n = 17, ΔSES-CD=-5.5, p = .008; UC, n = 26, ΔMayo endoscopic score =-0.5, p = .003) at month 6. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab provides an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in real-world clinical practice even among treatment refractory IBD patients.

Long-term outcome of inflammatory bowel disease patients with deep remission after discontinuation of TNFα-blocking agents.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist on the long-term prognosis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after stopping TNFα-blocking therapy in deep remission. Existing data indicate that approximately 50% of patients on combination therapy who discontinued TNFα-blockers are still in remission 24 months later. The aims of this follow-up analysis were to evaluate the long-term remission rate after cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy, the predicting factors of a relapse and the response to restarting TNFα blockers. METHODS: The first follow-up data of 51 IBD patients (17 Crohn's disease [CD], 30 ulcerative colitis [UC] and four inflammatory bowel disease type unclassified [IBDU]) in deep remission at the time of cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy have been published earlier. The long-term data was collected retrospectively after the first follow-up year to evaluate the remission rate and risk factors for the relapse after a median of 36 months. RESULTS: After the first relapse-free year, 14 out of the remaining 34 IBD patients relapsed (41%; 5/12 [42%] CD and 9/22 [41%] UC/IBDU). Univariate analysis indicated no associations with any predictive factors. Re-treatment was effective in 90% (26/29) of patients. CONCLUSION: Of IBD patients in deep remission at the time of cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy, up to 60% experience a clinical or endoscopic relapse after a median follow-up time of 36 months (95% CI 31-41 months). No individual risk factors predicting relapse could be identified. However, the initial response to a restart of TNFα-blockers seems to be effective and well tolerated.

Does fecal calprotectin predict short-term relapse after stopping TNFα-blocking agents in inflammatory bowel disease patients in deep remission?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This prospective multicenter study examined whether elevated fecal calprotec tin (FC) concentrations after stopping TNFα-blocking therapy can predict clinical or endoscopic relapse. In addition, we evaluated the impact of histological remission on the relapse risk. METHODS: We enrolled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who were in clinical, endoscopic, and FC-based (< 100 µg/g) remission after a minimum 11 months of TNFα-blocking therapy. The patients were followed-up for 12 months after the discontinuation of TNFα-blocking therapy. FC was collected monthly for the first 6 months and thereafter every second month. Ileocolonoscopy was performed at inclusion, at 4 months, at the study end, and at the time of clinical relapse. RESULTS: Of 52 enrolled patients, 49 (16 Crohn's disease, 33 ulcerative colitis/IBD unclassified) provided the stool samples requested and comprised the study group. During the follow-up, 15/49 (31%) relapsed, whereas 34 (69%) remained in remission. Patients relapsing showed constantly elevated FC levels for a median of 94 (13-317) days before the relapse. Significant increase in median FC levels was seen 2 (p = 0.0014), 4 (p = 0.0056), and 6 (p = 0.0029) months before endoscopic relapse. Constantly normal FC concentrations during the follow-up were highly predictive for clinical and endoscopic remission. Normal FC concentrations in patients with remission were associated with histological remission. CONCLUSION: FC seems to increase and remain elevated before clinical or endoscopic relapse, suggesting that it can be used as a surrogate marker for predicting and identifying patients requiring close follow-up in clinical practice.

Outcome after discontinuation of TNFα-blocking therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in deep remission.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the disease course in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in deep remission after discontinuing tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-blocking therapy. In this prospective multicenter study, we evaluated the relapse rate, predictive factors, and the response to retreatment after discontinuation of TNFα-blocking therapy in patients with IBD in deep remission. METHODS: We recruited 52 patients (17 Crohn's disease, 30 ulcerative colitis, and 5 IBD unclassified) in clinical, endoscopic, and fecal calprotectin-based (<100 µg/g) remission after at least 1 year of TNFα-blocking therapy. Clinical and endoscopic remission and relapse were defined according to validated indices. After discontinuation of therapy, the patients were followed up with endoscopic assessment at 4 and 12 months. In the event of a clinical relapse with endoscopically active disease or minor clinical symptoms but severe endoscopic relapse, TNFα-blocking therapy was restarted. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 13 (range, 12-15) months, 17/51 (33%) patients relapsed (5/17 Crohn's disease, 12/34 ulcerative colitis/IBD unclassified, 1 patient lost to follow-up at 6 mo). Ten experienced clinical and endoscopic relapse, 5 clinical relapse with mild endoscopic activity, and 2 severe endoscopic relapse. No specific predictive factors were associated with the relapse. Retreatment was effective in 94% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After cessation of TNFα-blocking therapy in patients with IBD in deep remission, up to 67% remained in clinical remission during the 12-month follow-up. Importantly, 85% of these patients sustained endoscopic remission. The response to restart of TNFα antagonists was effective and well tolerated.

Achievement of deep remission during scheduled maintenance therapy with TNFα-blocking agents in IBD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Deep remission, meaning clinical remission with mucosal healing (MH), with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents is a new target for therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to study how often patients on TNF-α blocking therapy actually achieve deep remission. METHODS: The total of 252 IBD patients retrospectively included (183 Crohn's disease (CD), 62 ulcerative colitis (CU) or 7 inflammatory bowel disease unclassified-type colitis (IBDU)) received TNFα-antagonists (177 infliximab, 75 adalimumab) for at least 11 months and underwent ileocolonoscopy. We reviewed endoscopic and histological findings, clinical symptoms, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels, and data on TNF-α blocking therapy. Defining deep remission as no clinical symptoms with endoscopic remission (the simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease, SES-CD 0-2 or Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1). RESULTS: Of the 252 patients, 168 (67%) were in clinical remission and 122 (48%) in deep remission after a median of 23 months of maintenance therapy. Of the 183 CD patients, 117 (64%) reached clinical remission and 79 (43%) deep remission. Of the UC patients, 52 (75%) were in clinical remission and 43 (62%) in deep remission. The majority of patients in deep remission (n=99, 81%) also had histologically inactive disease. Both median CRP and FC levels were significantly lower in patients with deep remission. CONCLUSION: Reassuringly, half of the IBD patients on the TNFα-blocking maintenance therapy achieved deep remission. The majority of patients in deep remission also achieved histological remission.

Fecal calprotectin concentration predicts outcome in inflammatory bowel disease after induction therapy with TNFα blocking agents.

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) concentration is a useful surrogate marker for mucosal healing (MH) during tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-blocking therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to evaluate whether a normal FC after induction therapy with TNFα antagonist predicts the outcome of IBD patients during maintenance therapy. METHODS: Sixty IBD patients (34 Crohn's disease [CD], 26 ulcerative colitis [UC]), treated with TNFα antagonists, either infliximab (n = 42) or adalimumab (n = 18), and having a documented FC level at baseline and after induction therapy were included. Disease activity was evaluated by partial Mayo score without endoscopy or Harvey-Bradshaw index at baseline, after induction, and at 12 months during maintenance therapy. RESULTS: After induction, FC was normalized (≤ 100 µg/g) in 31 patients (52%, median 42 µg/g, range 0-97), whereas the level remained elevated in 29 patients (48%, median 424 µg/g, range 116-5859). At ≈12 months, 26/31 (84%, 18 CD, 8 UC) of the patients with normal FC after induction were in clinical remission, whereas only 11/29 (38%, 9 CD, 2 UC) of those with an elevated (≥ 100 µg/g) postinduction FC were in clinical remission, P < 0.0001. After induction therapy with TNFα antagonists, a cutoff concentration of 139 µg/g for FC had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 80% to predict a risk of clinically active disease after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: A normal FC after induction therapy with TNFα antagonists predicts sustained clinical remission in the majority of patients on scheduled therapy with active luminal disease.