Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(6): E486-E490, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29132195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has many uses in medicine; notable in the management of paracetamol toxicity, acute liver failure and liver surgery. The aim of this review was to critically appraise the published literature for the routine use of NAC in liver resection surgery. METHODS: An electronic search was performed of EBSCOhost (Medline and CINAHL database), PubMed and the Cochrane Library for the period 1990-2016. MeSH headings: 'acetyl-cysteine', 'liver resection' and 'hepatectomy' were used to identify all relevant articles published in English. RESULTS: Following the search criteria used, three articles were included. Two of these studies were randomized controlled trials. All the studies collated data on morbidity and mortality. All three studies did not show a significant difference in overall complications rates in patients that underwent hepatic resection that had NAC infusion compared with patients that did not. In one study, NAC administration was associated with a higher frequency of grade A post-hepatectomy liver failure. In another study, a significantly higher incidence of delirium was observed in the NAC group, which led to the trial to be terminated early. CONCLUSION: The current published data do not support the routine use of NAC following liver resection.


Assuntos
Acetilcisteína/uso terapêutico , Hepatectomia/métodos , Falência Hepática/cirurgia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Falência Hepática/mortalidade , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Prognóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
World J Surg ; 36(9): 2060-7, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22538391

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on outcomes of patients who underwent emergency laparotomy (EML) are limited. This prospective observational study examined aspects of inpatient care and outcomes following EML with a view to identifying predictors of mortality. METHODS: Data collected from consecutive inpatients who underwent EML in a UK teaching hospital over a 3-month period included perioperative physiology, treatment, morbidity, and mortality (30-day, in-hospital, 12-month, and 24-month). Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (44 male) with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 18 years were studied. Postoperatively, 51 % of patients were admitted to the intensive care (ICU) or the high-dependency unit (HDU). 30-day, in-hospital, 12-month, and 24-month mortality was 14, 16.5, 22.4, and 25.9 %, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, age ≥70 years (odds ratio [OR] = 9.2, P = 0.004) and a need for postoperative ICU/HDU (OR = 15.0, P = 0.014) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were age ≥70 years (OR = 18.2, P = 0.016), ASA ≥III (OR = 22.1, P = 0.034), preoperative sepsis (OR = 20.6, P = 0.045), and need for postoperative ICU/HDU (OR = 21.5, P = 0.038). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were preoperative urea >7.5 mmol/L (OR = 3.5, P = 0.038) and need for postoperative ICU/HDU (OR = 3.7, P = 0.044). Age ≥70 years was the only independent predictor of 24-month mortality (OR = 4.5, P = 0.014). Almost all deaths recorded in the 24 months following surgery resulted from disseminated malignancy. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent EML had favourable outcomes, with 2-year survival close to 75 %. Age ≥70 years and the need for postoperative ICU/HDU care were independent predictors of mortality.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparotomia/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Emergências , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
3.
Aust Fam Physician ; 35(7): 553-4, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16820834

RESUMO

General practitioners are the first point of contact for many acutely ill patients requiring emergency treatment. Although relatively infrequent, providing the correct treatment in a timely fashion may be crucial. Yet GPs are often inadequately prepared to deal with acutely ill patients, being limited mainly by the availability of emergency equipment (Table 1) and a lack of emergency drugs.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica , Medicina de Emergência/instrumentação , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Austrália Ocidental
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...