Pharmacological Modulation of Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury during Pringle Maneuver in Hepatic Surgery. A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The Pringle maneuver, which is performed during liver surgery to reduce blood loss, may result in liver ischemia/reperfusion injury resulting in metabolic, immunological, and microvascular changes, which may lead to hepatocellular damage. The aim of this study was the investigation of the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and methylprednisolone (MET) in the modulation of liver warm ischemia during hepatic resection. METHODS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled in a pilot double-blind, randomized clinical trial. The patients received either NAC, MET, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the reduction in postoperative alanine aminotransferase and bilirubin. The secondary endpoint was the difference in morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: All the 48 patients had liver resection with no mortality. Morbidity was observed in 8 (16 %) patients equally distributed among the groups. There was a significant favorable recovery of liver function tests in patients treated with NAC or MET compared with the placebo when the Pringle maneuver exceeded 70 min. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of NAC or MET prior to the Pringle maneuver during hepatic resection is associated with lower postoperative aberration in liver function tests compared with placebo when the Pringle maneuver exceeded 70 min. Larger studies are required to validate our findings and to investigate the specific role of NAC and MET in liver surgery.

Inhalation versus endovenous sedation in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: effects on regional cerebral blood flow.

OBJECTIVE: Isoflurane is a volatile anesthetic that has a vasodilating effect on cerebral vessels producing a cerebral blood flow increase. Furthermore, it has been shown in animal studies that isoflurane, when used as a preconditioning agent, has neuroprotective properties, inducing tolerance to ischemia. However, it is not routinely used in neurointensive care because of the potential increase in intracranial pressure caused by the rise in cerebral blood flow. Nevertheless, subarachnoid hemorrhage patients who are at risk for vasospasm may benefit from an increase in cerebral blood flow. We measured regional cerebral blood flow during intravenous sedation with propofol and during sedation with isoflurane in patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage not having intracranial hypertension. DESIGN: The study is a crossover, open clinical trial (NCT00830843). SETTING: Neurointensive care unit of an academic hospital. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage, (median Fisher scale 4), monitored on clinical indication with intracranial pressure device and a thermal diffusion probe for the assessment of regional cerebral blood flow. An intracranial pressure>18 mm Hg was an exclusion criterion. INTERVENTIONS: Cerebral and hemodynamic variables were assessed at three steps. Step 1: sedation with propofol 3-4 mg/kg/hr; step 2: after 1 hr of propofol discontinuation and isoflurane 0.8%; step 3: after 1 hr of propofol at the same previous infusion rate. Cerebral perfusion pressure and arterial PCO2 were maintained constant. Mean cerebral artery flow velocity and jugular vein oxygen saturation were measured at the end of each step. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Regional cerebral blood flow increased significantly during step 2 (39.3±29 mL/100 hg/min) compared to step 1 (20.8±10.7) and step 3 (24.7±8). There was no difference in regional cerebral blood flow comparing step 1 vs. step 3. No significant difference in intracranial pressure, mean cerebral artery transcranial Doppler velocity, PaCO2, cerebral perfusion pressure between the different steps. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane increases regional cerebral blood flow in comparison to propofol. Intracranial pressure did not change significantly in the population not affected by intracranial hypertension.