Be Prepared: A Pediatric Simulation Center's Early Pandemic Contributions.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic forced healthcare institutions to rapidly adapt practices for patient care, staff safety, and resource management. We evaluated contributions of the simulation center in a freestanding children's hospital during the early stages of the pandemic. METHODS: We reviewed our simulation center's activity for education-based and system-focused simulation for 2 consecutive academic years (AY19: 2018-2019 and AY20: 2019-2020). We used statistical control charts and χ 2 analyses to assess the impact of the pandemic on simulation activity as well as outputs of system-focused simulation during the first wave of the pandemic (March-June 2020) using the system failure mode taxonomy and required level of resolution. RESULTS: A total of 1983 event counts were reported. Total counts were similar between years (994 in AY19 and 989 in AY20). System-focused simulation was more prevalent in AY20 compared with AY19 (8% vs. 2% of total simulation activity, P < 0.001), mainly driven by COVID-19-related simulation events. COVID-19-related simulation occurred across the institution, identified system failure modes in all categories except culture, and was more likely to identify macro-level issues than non-COVID-19-related simulation (64% vs. 44%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation center pivoted to deliver substantial system-focused simulation across the hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our experience suggests that simulation centers are essential resources in achieving safe and effective hospital-wide improvement.

The Effectiveness of Simulation Use in Transition to Practice Nurse Residency Programs: A Review of Literature From 2009 to 2018.

Representatives of three international associations reviewed literature published from 2009 to 2018 to ascertain the effectiveness of simulation use in transition to practice programs for newly licensed registered nurses (NLRNs). A review of nine quantitative studies demonstrated that simulation positively influences NLRN self-perception of skills, competence, readiness for practice, and confidence. However, evidence of objective measures of NLRN competence and the impact of simulation on patient and organizational outcomes was lacking.

Medical Emergencies in the Primary Care Setting: An Evidence Based Practice Approach Using Simulation to Improve Readiness.

BACKGROUND: Simulation is an evidenced based strategy which has been shown to impact office-based readiness to respond in a medical emergency. Medical emergencies occur in the primary care setting on a less frequent basis than in the inpatient setting. Clinicians working in primary care may benefit from an opportunity to refresh their skills. METHODS: This descriptive pre and post survey design evidenced based project examined staff reported levels of competence and confidence when responding to an emergency in a pediatric primary care office. Simulation educators partnered with ambulatory nursing and medical leaders to create a mock code program for staff in a care network. During a 14-month period, simulations were conducted in 30 primary care sites. Staff completed pre- and post-simulation surveys to assess levels of confidence in decision-making skills and competence when managing medical emergencies. FINDINGS: A statistically significant increase in the mean scores for both confidence and competence was demonstrated when comparing pre- and post-simulation survey results. DISCUSSION AND APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Simulation as an educational technique resulted in an increased level of competence and confidence of primary care office staff to respond to an emergency. Additionally, staff developed an overall heightened awareness of emergency processes and recognized of the value of simulation as an educational tool.

A randomized, controlled trial of in situ pediatric advanced life support recertification ("pediatric advanced life support reconstructed") compared with standard pediatric advanced life support recertification for ICU frontline providers*.

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidence shows poor retention of Pediatric Advanced Life Support provider skills. Frequent refresher training and in situ simulation are promising interventions. We developed a "Pediatric Advanced Life Support-reconstructed" recertification course by deconstructing the training into six 30-minute in situ simulation scenario sessions delivered over 6 months. We hypothesized that in situ Pediatric Advanced Life Support-reconstructed implementation is feasible and as effective as standard Pediatric Advanced Life Support recertification. DESIGN: A prospective randomized, single-blinded trial. SETTING: Single-center, large, tertiary PICU in a university-affiliated children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Nurses and respiratory therapists in PICU. INTERVENTIONS: Simulation-based modular Pediatric Advanced Life Support recertification training. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Simulation-based pre- and postassessment sessions were conducted to evaluate participants' performance. Video-recorded sessions were rated by trained raters blinded to allocation. The primary outcome was skill performance measured by a validated Clinical Performance Tool, and secondary outcome was behavioral performance measured by a Behavioral Assessment Tool. A mixed-effect model was used to account for baseline differences. Forty participants were prospectively randomized to Pediatric Advanced Life Support reconstructed versus standard Pediatric Advanced Life Support with no significant difference in demographics. Clinical Performance Tool score was similar at baseline in both groups and improved after Pediatric Advanced Life Support reconstructed (pre, 16.3 ± 4.1 vs post, 22.4 ± 3.9; p < 0.001), but not after standard Pediatric Advanced Life Support (pre, 14.3 ± 4.7 vs post, 14.9 ± 4.4; p =0.59). Improvement of Clinical Performance Tool was significantly higher in Pediatric Advanced Life Support reconstructed compared with standard Pediatric Advanced Life Support (p = 0.006). Behavioral Assessment Tool improved in both groups: Pediatric Advanced Life Support reconstructed (pre, 33.3 ± 4.5 vs post, 35.9 ± 5.0; p = 0.008) and standard Pediatric Advanced Life Support (pre, 30.5 ± 4.7 vs post, 33.6 ± 4.9; p = 0.02), with no significant difference of improvement between both groups (p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: For PICU-based nurses and respiratory therapists, simulation-based "Pediatric Advanced Life Support-reconstructed" in situ training is feasible and more effective than standard Pediatric Advanced Life Support recertification training for skill performance. Both Pediatric Advanced Life Support recertification training courses improved behavioral performance.

Pediatric code readiness: practice is the key.

Nurses caring for children in an acute care setting may be faced with a pediatric emergency. Being prepared is essential. This article describes the development of a program that gives nurses the opportunity to transfer their knowledge and skill into practice. Nurses who participate in this program report feeling more confident to provide lifesaving measures.