Return to Soccer After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair: A 2-Year Minimum Follow-up Study of 50 Amateur Players.

BACKGROUND: Return to sport (RTS) after treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a critical parameter to assess the outcome of a surgical procedure. However, few studies have investigated RTS after ACL repair. PURPOSE: To evaluate RTS of a group of amateur soccer players at a minimum follow-up of 2 years after ACL repair. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients treated with acute ACL repair was conducted. A total of 50 amateur soccer players were included in the study. Patients were examined clinically or contacted to complete postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, namely the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire, the ACL-Return to Sport After Injury scale, and the Forgotten Joint Score-12. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 25.8 ± 7.7 years (range, 14-47 years), and the mean follow-up was 34.3 ± 10.7 months (range, 24-51.3 months). The median Tegner Activity Scale score was 9. The ACL repair failure rate was 16% (8/50). The mean time from repair to failure was 23.1 ± 12.7 months (range, 6-44 months), and the mean age of patients who sustained ACL repair failure was 19.9 ± 3.3 years (range, 14-24 years), significantly lower compared with patients who did not experience ACL repair failure (26.9 ± 7.9 years; range, 16-47 years; P = .017). Multivariate analysis showed that age ≤21 years was the only significant risk factor for ACL repair failure (odds ratio, 5.45; confidence interval, 1.24-27.91; P = .041). Excluding the 8 patients who experienced repair failure, 31 of 42 patients (73.8%) returned to soccer after ACL repair, with 29 of the 31 (93.5%) returning at their preinjury level of play. Moreover, patients who played competitive soccer and returned to their preinjury level of play were significantly younger than those who did not return to their preinjury level of play (mean, 21.1 ± 3.4 vs 29.2 ± 9.5 years, respectively; P = .002) and had significantly better ACL-Return to Sport After Injury scores (mean, 96.6 ± 4 vs 87.8 ± 11, respectively; P = .044). CONCLUSION: In this study, 73.8% (n = 31) of patients returned to playing soccer, of whom 93.5% (n = 29) returned to their preinjury level after ACL repair. The failure rate was 16% (n = 8) and mainly involved patients ≤21 years old.

Arthroscopic Physeal Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries among young patients have increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to present a physeal-sparing intra- and extra-articular reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons autograft. In recent years, the management of these injuries in the pediatric population has become increasingly surgical to restore knee function and reduce the risk of meniscal and chondral injury due to persistent knee instability. However, this is a population at high risk for ACL graft rupture, but it can be lowered by an addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). This study shows the pearls and pitfalls of an arthroscopic physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction combined with a concomitant LET using hamstrings autograft.

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Devices for All-Inside ACL Reconstruction: A Time-Zero Full-Construct Model.

Background: Little is known about the stability of adjustable-loop devices (ALDs) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To evaluate the stabilization behavior of 3 different types of ALDs for all-inside ACLR in a full-construct surgical technique-based manner. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The femoral and tibial devices of Ultrabutton (Smith & Nephew), Infinity (Conmed), and TightRope II (Arthrex) were applied to quadrupled bovine tendon grafts (n = 8 each) with tibial-sided traction applied (350 N) for graft tensioning in a simulated fully extended knee. Knotless femoral graft fixation was based on either a suture-locking device (SLD; Ultrabutton), button-locking device (BLD; Infinity), or dual-locking device (DLD; TightRope II). All constructs were progressively loaded (50 N/500 cycles) from 50 to 300 N for 3000 cycles (0.75 Hz), including complete unloading situations and pull to failure (50 mm/min). Construct elongation, stiffness, and ultimate load were analyzed. Results: BLD showed significantly greater initial elongation (-2.69 ± 0.15 mm) than DLD (-3.19 ± 0.21 mm; P < .001) but behaved similarly to SLD (-2.93 ± 0.23 mm). While DLD and SLD had the smallest initial elongation at the same significance level, they behaved opposite to each other with gradually increasing peak loading. At the end of testing, DLD had the lowest (-0.64 ± 0.32 mm) and SLD the highest (3.41 ± 1.01 mm) total elongation (P < .003 for both). SLD displayed significantly higher dynamic elongation (6.34 ± 0.23 mm) than BLD (3.21 ± 0.61 mm) and DLD (2.56 ± 0.31 mm) (P < .001 for both). The failure load of BLD (865.0 ± 183.8 N) was significantly lower (P < .026) compared with SLD and DLD (>1000 N). The predominant failure mode was suture rupture and tibial bone breakage with button subsidence (SLD, n = 4). No significant difference in stiffness between constructs was found. Conclusion: While DLD successfully restricted critical construct elongation, BLD partially and SLD completely exceeded the clinical failure threshold (>3 mm) of plastic elongation with loop lengthening during increasing cyclic peak loading with complete unloading. Higher failure loads of SLD and DLD implants (>1000 N) were achieved at similar construct stiffness to BLD. Clinical Relevance: A detailed biomechanical understanding of the stabilization potential is pertinent to the continued evolution of ALDs to improve clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Structures to Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis at 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Lateral extra-articular procedures have been effective in reducing graft rupture rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), but the evidence supporting their role in ACL repair is sparse. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of ACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) (ACLR+LET) against combined repair of the ACL and anterolateral (AL) structures (ACL+AL Repair). It was hypothesized that patients undergoing ACL+AL Repair would have noninferior clinical and radiological outcomes with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, knee laxity parameters, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that patients undergoing repair would have significantly better Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) values and shorter times to return to the preinjury level of sport, without any increase in the rate of ipsilateral second ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Consecutive patients evaluated with an acute ACL tear were considered for study eligibility. ACLR+LET was only performed when intraoperative tear characteristics contraindicated ACL repair. Patient-reported outcome measures such as the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); reinjury rates; anteroposterior side-to-side laxity difference; and MRI characteristics were reported at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The noninferiority study was based on the IKDC subjective score; side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference; and signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ). The noninferiority margins were defined using the existing literature. An a priori sample size calculation was performed using the IKDC subjective score as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (47 ACLR+LET, 53 ACL+AL Repair) with a mean follow-up of 25.2 months (range, 24-31 months) were enrolled and underwent surgery within 15 days of injury. At the final follow-up, the differences between groups with respect to the IKDC score, anteroposterior side-to-side laxity difference, and SNQ did not exceed noninferiority thresholds. ACL+AL Repair was associated with a shorter time to return to the preinjury level of sport (ACL+AL Repair: mean, 6.4 months; ACLR+LET: mean, 9.5 months; P < .01), better FJS-12 values (ACL+AL Repair: mean, 91.4; ACLR+LET: mean, 97.4; P = .04), and a higher proportion of patients achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the KOOS subdomains studied (Symptoms: 90.2% vs 67.4%, P = .005; Sport and Recreation: 94.1% vs 67.4%, P < .001; Quality of Life: 92.2% vs 73.9%, P = .01). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to ipsilateral second ACL injury rates (ACL+AL Repair group, 3.8% and ACLR+LET group, 2.1% [n = 1]; P = .63). CONCLUSION: ACL+AL Repair yielded clinical outcomes that were noninferior to (or not significantly different from) ACLR+LET with respect to IKDC subjective, Tegner activity level, and Lysholm scores; knee laxity parameters; graft maturity; and rates of failure and reoperation. However, there were significant advantages of ACL+AL Repair, including a shorter duration of time to return to the preinjury level of sport, better FJS-12 values, and a higher proportion of patients achieving PASS for KOOS subdomains studied (Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, Quality of Life).

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part III-indications for different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

PURPOSE: The aim of the ESSKA 2022 consensus Part III was to develop patient-focused, contemporary, evidence-based, guidelines on the indications for revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery (ACLRev). METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) was used to provide recommendations on the appropriateness of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment in different clinical scenarios based on current scientific evidence in conjunction with expert opinion. A core panel defined the clinical scenarios with a moderator and then guided a panel of 17 voting experts through the RAM tasks. Through a two-step voting process, the panel established a consensus as to the appropriateness of ACLRev for each scenario based on a nine-point Likert scale (in which a score in the range 1-3 was considered 'inappropriate', 4-6 'uncertain', and 7-9 'appropriate'). RESULTS: The criteria used to define the scenarios were: age (18-35 years vs 36-50 years vs 51-60 years), sports activity and expectation (Tegner 0-3 vs 4-6 vs 7-10), instability symptoms (yes vs no), meniscus status (functional vs repairable vs non-functional meniscus), and osteoarthritis (OA) (Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade 0-I-II vs grade III). Based on these variables, a set of 108 clinical scenarios was developed. ACLRev was considered appropriate in 58%, inappropriate in 12% (meaning conservative treatment is indicated), and uncertain in 30%. Experts considered ACLRev appropriate for patients with instability symptoms, aged ≤ 50 years, regardless of sports activity level, meniscus status, and OA grade. Results were much more controversial in patients without instability symptoms, while higher inappropriateness was related to scenarios with older age (51-60 years), low sporting expectation, non-functional meniscus, and knee OA (KL III). CONCLUSION: This expert consensus establishes guidelines as to the appropriateness of ACLRev based on defined criteria and provides a useful reference for clinical practice in determining treatment indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Spontaneous healing of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament: a case series and literature review.

PURPOSE: The anterior cruciate ligament is probably one of the ligaments with the lowest healing potential. Many authors have reported cases of spontaneous healing but nowadays it is difficult to predict successful healing of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture and, even more, residual functionality and capability to return to sport. The aim of this study was to investigate cases of spontaneous healing in a population that received non-surgical treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and to perform an updated review of contemporary literature. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who suffered from an acute complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture and underwent non-surgical treatment. No specific rehabilitation protocol was prescribed. A new magnetic resonance imaging study was conducted 6 months after the injury for all patients. A literature review was conducted regarding spontaneous healing of the anterior cruciate ligament. The papers included in the analysis were reports of any level of evidence, written in English, Italian, or French languages; articles were excluded if they reported non-human studies, histological studies, studies conducted without magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopic second look, or partial anterior cruciate ligament tear. RESULTS: Case series: Six patients were enrolled in the study. All patients had a proximal anterior cruciate ligament lesion. The minimum follow-up was 13 months (range 6-20 months). At the last follow-up the mean score on the Lysholm scale was 97, the mean IKDC score was 94, and the mean KOOS score was 96. All patients returned to their own sport activities; no one reported significant differences. The magnetic resonance imaging study at 6 months revealed an end-to-end continuous anterior cruciate ligament with homogeneous signal. No one had any new knee injury at last follow-up. LITERATURE REVIEW: A search of comprehensive databases retrieved 1057 articles; 8 full-text articles met the eligibility criteria. The studies were heterogeneous regarding the populations analysed, sport activity level, treatment applied, healing definition, and follow-up. The failure rate of non-surgical management ranged among the papers from 0 to 73%. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings show that spontaneous anterior cruciate ligament healing is possible and there are chances of clinical recovery for patients not suitable for surgery. However, there is still a lack of evidence about predictors, clinical outcomes, and adequate rehabilitation protocols.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Plus Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure Results in Superior Stability and Lower Failure Rates Than Does Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision but Shows No Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes or Return to Sports.

PURPOSE: To determine whether comparative clinical studies demonstrate significant advantages of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR) combined with a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP), with respect to graft rupture rates, knee stability, return to sport rates, and patient-reported outcome measures, compared with isolated RACLR. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses Guidelines. A PubMed search was conducted using the key words "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" combined with any of the following additional terms, "lateral extra-articular tenodesis" OR "anterolateral ligament reconstruction" OR "Lemaire." All relevant comparative clinical studies were included. Key clinical data were extracted and evaluated. RESULTS: Eight comparative studies (seven Level III studies and a one Level IV study) were identified and included. Most studies reported more favorable outcomes with combined procedures with respect to failure rates (0%-13% following RACLR+LEAP, and 4.4%-21.4% following isolated RACLR), postoperative side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference (1.3-3.9 mm following RACLR+LEAP and 1.8-5.9 mm following isolated RACLR), and high-grade pivot shift (0%-11.1% following RACLR+LEAP and 10.2%-23.8% in patients following isolated RACLR). There were no consistent differences between isolated and combined procedures with respect to return to sport or patient-reported outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that the addition of a LEAP to RACLR was associated with an advantage with respect to ACL graft failure rates and avoidance of high-grade postoperative knee laxity across almost all included studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Systematic review of level III to IV studies.

The role of virtual reality in knee arthroscopic simulation: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Surgical training is crucial for orthopedics residents during their educational careers. Residents who follow classic training courses are less skilled than those trained with simulators. Virtual simulators are reported to be global learning tools for knee arthroscopy. The primary purpose of our study is to evaluate the current state of use of arthroscopic knee simulators and their actual effectiveness in transfer the skills learned in training to the operating theatre. The secondary purpose is to evaluate if the virtual simulators are better than the others in improve arthroscopic skills. METHODS: Studies involving knee arthroscopy training with virtual reality simulators were included: a search of the literature from 2009 to September 2019 was performed on MEDLINE(PubMed) using PRISMA guidelines. Exclusion criteria were systematic review articles, aims and topics not related to the purpose of the study, single case and technical reports, biomechanical analysis, articles not in the English language, and editorial commentaries. RESULTS: The literature review selected, nine studies and they included results on 93 residents, three expert surgeons and 189 medical students. All studies report improved arthroscopic skills after training with a simulator. Only four studies evaluated the transfer of arthroscopic skills of knee simulators to the operating theatre. CONCLUSIONS: Benchtop and Virtual Reality simulators are excellent tools for accelerating and improving arthroscopic training and skills acquisition. The second ones, high-cost, and fidelity simulators, seem to be the best of the two. A greater diffusion of Virtual Reality in universities is to be considered to improve residents' training and patients' clinical outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Procedures in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Systematic Review From the SANTI Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the pediatric population has changed significantly in the past few decades. Pediatric patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have a high risk of rerupture of up to 32%. The addition of lateral extra-articular procedures [lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET)], already shown to be effective in reducing the risk of rerupture in adults, may also be effective in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the clinical outcomes of ACLR+LET tenodesis in pediatric patients. METHODS: Data were collected from Pubmed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus Databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting the clinical outcomes of ACLR+LET in the pediatric population using autograft, return to play, growth disturbances, failure rate, and surgical complications were included. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies comprising 381 pediatric patients were included. Three main surgical techniques with common features were used. The mean age of all pediatric patients in the included studies was 11.73 years (range, 5.6 to 16) with a mean follow-up of 50.1 months. The overall graft failure rate of the included studies was 4.65%. The return to play was 95.11%. The mean Lysholm score was 94.51 and the mean Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) was 93.39. In all, 1.9% of the patients had a coronal plane deformity and 0.8% had a limb length discrepancy. 4.6% of the patients had a contralateral ACL tear. CONCLUSIONS: A combined ACLR+LET in pediatric patients showed a graft failure ranging from 0% to 13.6% at a mean follow-up of 50.1 months. This low graft failure rate is consistent with ACLR+LET in adults. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings and the potential role of LET in reducing graft rupture rates in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-systematic review of level IV studies.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Gracilis Tendon Graft and "All Suture" Knotless Anchors for Patellar Fixation.

Patellar dislocation is a frequent sports-related knee injury. The primary restraint to lateral translation of patella is medial patellofemoral ligament. Several treatments for patella dislocation have been described in the literature. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using gracilis tendon and 2 knotless soft anchors, avoiding patella tunneling.

In-Office Needle Arthroscopic Synovial Biopsy Is an Effective Diagnostic Tool in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis.

Purpose: To assess the utility, safety, and accuracy of in-office needle arthroscopic (IONA) synovial biopsy as a diagnostic tool during treatment of drug-resistant monoarticular inflammatory arthritis of the knee. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis with treatment-resistant monoarticular knee involvement who underwent in-office needle arthroscopic synovial biopsy were considered for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were any current malignancies or infection. All patients underwent systematic physical and laboratory examination. IONA was undertaken to inspect the macroscopic appearance of the joint, choose the biopsy site, and classify synovial inflammation. Once collected, synovial tissue specimens were examined histologically using the Krenn scoring system. Results: In total, 12 patients (9 male and 3 female, median age 57 [interquartile range {IQR} 8] years, median disease duration 156 [IQR 201] months) affected by psoriatic arthritis (n = 6) or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 6) were included in this study. Median operating time was 12 (IQR 11) minutes. Three biopsies per patient were collected. The success rate of specimen collection was 97%, the median postoperative 0-10 visual analog scale pain score was 2 (IQR 3), and only one minor complication occurred. Conclusions: Knee IONA with synovial biopsy is an effective and well-tolerated procedure that can help clinicians formulate specific treatment strategies in patients with refractory pain in the setting of rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Level of Evidence: IV, Therapeutic case series.

Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus ACL Reconstruction Combined With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Young patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) are at a particularly high risk of graft ruptures compared with adults. Recent studies have demonstrated significant reductions in ACL graft rupture rates in high-risk adult populations when a lateral extra-articular procedure is performed, but comparative studies in pediatric and adolescent populations are currently lacking in the literature. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of isolated ACLR versus combined ACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) when using the Arnold-Coker modification of the MacIntosh procedure in early adolescent patients. The hypothesis was that combined procedures would be associated with a significantly reduced risk of graft ruptures. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive early adolescent patients who underwent ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft with or without the Arnold-Coker modification of the MacIntosh procedure was conducted. Patients with ≥1 additional risk factors for a graft rupture were offered LET in addition to ACLR (pivot-shift grade 2 or 3, high level of sporting activity defined as Tegner activity score ≥7, participation in pivoting sports, and Segond fractures). Clinical outcomes including graft rupture rates, patient-reported outcome measure scores (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee), knee stability, return-to-sports rates, reoperation rates, and complications were assessed. Comparisons between variables were assessed with the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student or Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables. Multivariate analyses were undertaken to evaluate risk factors for a graft rupture. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients with a mean follow-up of 43.8 ± 17.6 months (range, 24-89 months) were included in the study; 40 patients underwent isolated ACLR, and 71 underwent ACLR + LET. The addition of LET to ACLR was associated with a significantly lower graft rupture rate compared with isolated ACLR (0.0% vs 15.0%, respectively; odds ratio, 15.91 [95% CI, 1.81-139.44]; P = .012). It was also associated with significantly better knee stability (pivot-shift grade 3: 0.0% vs 11.4%, respectively; P = .021) (side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference >5 mm: 0.0% vs 17.1%, respectively; P = .003) and Tegner activity scores (7 vs 6, respectively; P = .010). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the patient-reported outcome measures, nor for any of the other outcome measures evaluated, and no differences in the rate of non-graft rupture related reoperations or complications. The ACLR + LET group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference with respect to the Tegner activity scale. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective comparative cohort study of adolescents, combined ACLR and LET was associated with a significantly lower graft rupture rate and no difference in non-graft rupture related reoperations or complications compared with isolated ACLR.

In-office needle arthroscopic assessment after primary ACL repair: short-term results in 15 patients.

PURPOSE: In-office needle arthroscopy has been reported as a diagnostic tool for different knee pathologies. In addition, ACL repair has seen a resurgence with the advent of innovative orthopedic devices. The aim of this study was to assess clinical, radiological, and in-office needle arthroscopic findings in 15 adult patients who underwent acute (within 14 days from injury) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. METHODS: Fifteen patients voluntarily participated in the study. A second-look arthroscopy was performed with an in-office needle arthroscopy at an average of 7.2 months after the primary repair. The parameters included in the investigation were the continuity of the anatomical footprint of the repaired ACL, subjective assessment of the ACL tension with the probe, and synovial coverage of the ACL. All patients had a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 6 months after repair and an arthrometric evaluation with the KT-1000. Clinical evaluation with the scores, Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) was performed at the final follow-up of 2 years. Moreover, a correlation between the characteristics of ACL appearance at the time of the second look in-office needle arthroscopy, MRI and KT-1000 was performed. RESULTS: The mean TLKSS was 97.86, the mean KOOS was 98.08 and the mean subjective IKDC was 96.71. The objective IKDC was A in 10 patients and B in 5 patients. ACL healing was graded as A in 11 patients and B in 4 patients. Synovial coverage was graded as good in 10 patients and fair in 5 while MRI assessment showed a type I ACL in 10 patients, type II in 4 patients and type III in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: In-office needle arthroscopy is a reliable tool to assess the condition of a repaired ACL. In addition, ACL repair performed in acute proximal tears demonstrated excellent clinical results.

Current Trends in Knee Arthroplasty: Are Italian Surgeons Doing What Is Expected?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate Italian surgeons' behavior during knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All orthopedic surgeons who specialized in knee replacement surgeries and were members of the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) between January 2019 and August 2019 were asked to complete a survey on the management of knee arthroplasty. Data were collected, analyzed, and presented as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: One-hundred and seventy-seven surgeons completed the survey and were included in the study. Ninety-five (53.7%) surgeons were under 40 years of age. Eighty-five surgeons (48%) worked in public hospitals and 112 (63.3%) were considered "high volume surgeons", with more than 100 knee implants per year. Postero-stabilized total knee arthroplasty was the most commonly used, implanted with a fully cemented technique by 162 (91.5%) surgeons. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was a rarer procedure compared to TKA, with 77% of surgeons performing less than 30% of UKAs. Most common TKA pre-operative radiological planning included complete antero-posterior (AP) weight-bearing lower limb radiographs, lateral view and patellofemoral view (used by 91%, 98.9% and 70.6% of surgeons, respectively). Pre-operative UKA radiological images included Rosenberg or Schuss views, patellofemoral view and magnetic resonance imaging (66.1%, 71.8% and 46.3% of surgeons, respectively). One hundred and thirty-two surgeons (74.6%) included an AP weight-bearing lower limb X-ray one year after surgery in the post-operative radiological follow-up. Furthermore, 119 surgeons (67.2%) did not perform a post-operative patellofemoral view because it was not considered useful for radiological follow-up. There was no uniformity in the timing and features of post-operative follow-up, with 13 different combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Italian surgeons perform TKA more commonly than UKA. Pre-operative TKA planning is quite uniform rather than UKA planning. Despite literature evidence, there is no agreement on follow-up. It may be useful to create a uniform checklist, including correct timing and exams needed. This analysis is also part of a society surgical educational project for training doctor.

Towards Precision Medicine for Osteoarthritis: Focus on the Synovial Fluid Proteome.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint degenerative disease that most affects old age. The study of proteomics in synovial fluid (SF) has the task of providing additional elements to diagnose and predict the progress of OA. This review aims to identify the most significant biomarkers in the study of OA and to stimulate their routine use. Some of the major components of the ECM, such as proteoglycan aggrecan and decorin, were found considerably reduced in OA. Some biomarkers have proved useful for staging the temporality of OA: Periostin was found to be increased in early OA, while CRTA1 and MMPs were found to be increased in late OA. In its natural attempt at tissue regeneration, Collagen III was found to be increased in early OA while decreased in late OA. Some molecules studied in other areas, such as ZHX3 (oncological marker), LYVE1, and VEGF (lymph and angiogenesis markers), also have been found to be altered in OA. It also has been recorded that alteration of the hormonal pathway, using a dosage of PPAR-γ and RETN, can influence the evolution of OA. IL-1, one of the most investigated biomarkers in OA-SF, is not as reliable as a target of OA in recent studies. The study of biomarkers in SF appears to be, in combination with the clinical and radiological aspects, an additional weapon to address the diagnosis and staging of OA. Therefore, it can guide us more appropriately towards the indication of arthroplasty in patients with OA.

Primary Repair versus Reconstruction in Patients with Bilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: What Do Patients Prefer?

Purpose: The purpose is to evaluate knee preference and functional outcomes of patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair in one knee and ACL reconstruction in the contralateral side. Methods: All patients who underwent both procedures were retrospectively reviewed at minimum two-year follow-up. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding their operated knees' preferences during rehabilitation, daily activities, sports activities, and overall function. Furthermore, the Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Forgotten Joint Score-12, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury were completed. Results: Twenty-one patients were included. All patients underwent ACL reconstruction first, which was displayed at younger age at surgery (24 vs. 33 years, p = 0.010) and longer follow-up (10.2 vs. 2.3 years, p < 0.001), respectively. Thirty-three percent preferred the repaired knee, 11% the reconstructed knee, and 56% had no preference; however, 78% indicated that their repaired knee was less painful during rehabilitation and 83% reported earlier range of motion (ROM) return following repair, which was similar for both knees in 17%. Eighty-three percent of patients indicated better function and progression during rehabilitation with their repaired knee and 11% with their reconstructed knees. No statistical differences were found in patient-reported outcomes between both procedures (all p > 0.4). Objective laxity assessment showed mean side-to-side difference of 0.6 mm between both sides in favor of the reconstructed knee. Conclusion: This study showed that ACL repair and ACL reconstruction lead to similar functional outcomes. However, patients undergoing both procedures may have less pain, earlier ROM return, and faster rehabilitation progression following primary repair.

Injuries During Return to Sport After the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Epidemiologic Study of Italian Professional Soccer Players.

Background: The injury rate in professional soccer players may be influenced by match frequency. Purpose: To assess how changes in match frequency that occurred because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) influenced training and match injuries in the Italian Serie A league. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Three phases in the Serie A league, each 41 days long, were evaluated: phase A was the beginning of the 2019-2020 season; phase B was a period after the COVID-19 lockdown was lifted, when the remaining matches of the season were played with greater frequency; and phase C was the beginning of the 2020-2021 season. All male professional soccer players who were injured during the 3 phases were included. Player age, height, position, injury history, and return to play (RTP) were retrieved from a publicly available website. Training- and match-related injuries during each of the 3 phases were collected and compared. Moreover, match injuries that occurred after the lockdown phase (phase B), in which there were 12 days designated for playing matches ("match-days"), were compared with injuries in the first 12 match-days of phases A and C. Results: When comparing 41-day periods, we observed the injury burden (per 1000 exposure-hours) was significantly lower in phase B (278.99 days absent) than in phase A (425.4 days absent; P < .05) and phase C (484.76 days absent; P < .05). A longer mean RTP period was recorded in phase A than in phase B (44.6 vs 23.1 days; P < .05). Regarding 12-match day periods (81 days in phase A, 41 days in phase B, and 89 days in phase C), there was a significantly higher match injury rate (0.56 vs 0.39 injuries/1000 exposure-hours; P < .05) and incidence (11.8% vs 9.3%; P < .05) in phase B than in phase A and a longer mean RTP period in phase A than in phase B (41.8 vs 23.1 days; P < .05). Finally, the rate and incidence of training-related injuries were significantly higher in phase B (4.6 injuries/1000 exposure-hours and 6.5, respectively) than in phase A (1.41 injuries/1000 exposure-hours and 2.04, respectively) (P < .05). Conclusion: Both training- and match-related injuries were greater during the abbreviated period after the COVID-19 lockdown. These may be linked to the greater match frequency of that period.

Impact of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on European Professional Soccer Players.

BACKGROUND: The impact of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on the performance and career of professional soccer players has not been extensively investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate in professional European soccer players (1) the ACL injury incidence, (2) the return-to-play (RTP) rate and time after ACLR, (3) career survival and athlete performance in the first 3 postoperative seasons after RTP, (4) factors likely related to different outcomes after ACLR, and (5) any related differences between the top 8 European soccer leagues. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Included were professional soccer players in the top 8 European Soccer leagues (Serie A [Italy], Premier League [England], Ligue 1 [France], LaLiga [Spain], Bundesliga [Germany], Jupiler Pro League [Belgium], Liga NOS [Portugal], and Premier Liga [Russia]) who sustained an ACL injury during seasons 2014 to 2015, 2015 to 2016, and 2016 to 2017. Data were retrieved from publicly available online sources. Outcomes were evaluated based on player age (<25 years, 25-30 years, and >30 years), position (goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, and forward), affected side (dominant vs nondominant), and league. RESULTS: Overall, 195 players sustained an ACL injury, for a mean annual ACL injury incidence of 1.42%. The RTP rate was 95%, with a mean RTP time of 248 ± 136 days. Within the third postoperative season, 66 players (36%) competed in a lower level national league, and 25 (13.6%) ended their careers; a significant reduction in the mean minutes played per season was found in all 3 postoperative seasons. Player age correlated significantly with reduction in performance or recovery from an ACL injury. No significant correlation was found between postoperative player performance and affected side, position, league, or time to RTP. CONCLUSION: A substantial ACL injury incidence was found in top European elite soccer players; however, a high RTP rate in a reasonable time was seen after ACLR. Nevertheless, professional soccer players experienced a short-term decline in their performance.