Evaluating emergency department transfers from urgent care centres: insights for paramedic integration with subacute healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: Paramedics redirecting non-emergent patients from emergency departments (EDs) to urgent care centres is a new and forthcoming strategy to reduce overcrowding and improve primary care integration. Which patients are likely not suitable for paramedic redirection are unknown. To describe and specify patients inappropriate for urgent care centres, we examined associations between patient characteristics and transfer to the ED after patients initially presented to an urgent care centre. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study of all adult (≥18 years) visits to an urgent care centre from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2020 in Ontario, Canada. Binary logistic regression was used to determine unadjusted and adjusted associations between patient characteristics and being transferred to an ED using OR and 95% CIs. We calculated the absolute risk difference for the adjusted model. RESULTS: A total of 1 448 621 urgent care visits were reported, with 63 343 (4.4%) visits transferred to an ED for definitive care. Being 65 years and older (OR 2.29, 95% CI 2.23 to 2.35), scored an emergent Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale of 1 or 2 (OR 14.27, 95% CI 13.45 to 15.12) and higher comorbidity count (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.58) had added odds of association with being transferred out to an ED. CONCLUSION: Readily available patient characteristics were independently associated with interfacility transfers between urgent care centres and the ED. This study can support paramedic redirection protocol development, highlighting which patients may not be best suited for ED redirection.

The COVID-19 impact and characterization on substance use-related emergency department visits for adolescents and young adults in Canada: Practical implications.

RATIONALE: Coronavirus (COVID-19)-related stressors precipitated the mental health crisis and increased substance use in Canada and worldwide. As the pandemic continues to evolve, monitoring and updating substance use-related ED visit trends is essential to ensure the stability and quality of ED services under the prolonged pandemic timeline. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the trends and characterization of substance use-related ED visits during the pandemic among adolescents and young adults (aged 13-25 years) in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted using population-based, repeated cross-sectional data. The volume, patient characteristics (age and sex) and hospital/ED visit features (triage to end time, timing of the visit, triage level and referral source) were compared before (2019) and during COVID-19 (2020 and 2021) by each substance type (alcohol, opioid, cannabis, sedatives, cocaine, stimulants and multiple psychoactive substances). RESULTS: Substance use-related ED visits decreased by 1.5 times during the pandemic compared to the prepandemic level. However, opioid-related ED visits continued to show an increasing trend and did not recover to the prepandemic level in 2021. Moreover, a significant increase in emergent/life-threatening triage levels (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scales 1 and 2) in substance-related ED visits is alarming (2019 = 36.8%, 2020 = 38.7% and 2021 = 38.4%). We also found a general decrease in weekend visits, overnight visits and visits on statutory holidays, and substance use-related ED patients tended to stay longer (over 6 h) in the ED during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate unmet substance use treatment needs due to the limited accessibility and heightened threshold for ED visits during the pandemic. Providing access to substance treatment/programs outside ED is critical to reducing substance use-related complications presenting in the ED. Also, policies addressing the pandemic-related complexities in the ED and Health Human Resource challenges are warranted.

Storage conditions, sample integrity, interferences, and a decision tool for investigating unusual high-sensitivity cardiac troponin results.

The current definition of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays is laboratory-based and their analytical attributes and characteristics have drawn significant attention in the literature at least partly due to the lower concentration cut-offs and changes in concentrations (i.e., deltas) employed in different algorithms and pathways to manage patient care. We propose that pre-analytical conditions such as sample type, storage conditions, and other interferences may also have a significant impact on hs-cTn concentrations and clinical management. The purpose of this literature review is to provide a summary of important pre-analytical and interference studies affecting hs-cTn concentrations. A breakdown of the literature for the major diagnostic companies providing core laboratory instrumentation (i.e., Abbott, Beckman, Ortho, Roche, and Siemens) is also provided. Finally, three cases are highlighted where knowledge of pre-analytical factors aids the hs-cTn clinically discordant investigations. This review highlights the importance of pre-analytical variables, especially storage condition, sample handling, and blood tubes used (i.e., sample type) when interpreting hs-cTn assays. Additional studies are needed to further elaborate on pre-analytical variables (i.e., centrifugation, sample type, stability) and interferences for all hs-cTn assays in clinical use, as knowledge of these variables may aid in hs-cTn clinically discordant investigations.

Can the Addition of NT-proBNP and Glucose Measurements Improve the Prognostication of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Measurements for Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Guidelines published in 2021 have supported natriuretic peptide (NP) testing for the prognostication in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and for the diagnosis of chronic and acute heart failure (HF). Our objective was to determine if the addition of N-terminal pro B-type NP (NT-proBNP) and glucose to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) could better identify emergency department (ED) patients with potential ACS at low- and high-risk for a serious cardiovascular outcome over the next 72 h. The presentation sample in two different ED cohorts which enrolled patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS within six hours of pain onset (Cohort-1, n = 126 and Cohort-2, n = 143) that had Abbott hs-cTnI, Roche hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP and glucose were evaluated for NT-proBNP alone and combined with hs-cTn and glucose for the primary outcome (composite which included death, myocardial infarction, HF, serious arrhythmia and refractory angina) via receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses with area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic estimates derived. The AUC for NT-proBNP for the primary outcome was 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.76) and 0.75 (95%CI: 0.67-0.82) in Cohort-1 and 2, respectively, with the 125 ng/L cutoff yielding a higher sensitivity (≥75%) as compared to the 300 ng/L cutoff (≥58%). Using the 125 ng/L cutoff for NT-proBNP with the published glucose and hs-cTn cutoffs for risk-stratification produced a new score (GuIDER score for Glucose, Injury and Dysfunction in the Emergency-setting for cardiovascular-Risk) and yielded higher AUCs as compared to NT-proBNP (p < 0.05). GuIDER scores of 0 and 5 using either hs-cTnI/T yielded sensitivity estimates of 100% and specificity estimates > 92% for the primary outcome. A secondary analysis assessing MI alone in the overall population (combined Cohorts 1 and 2) also achieved 100% sensitivity for MI with a GuIDER cutoff ≥ 2, ruling-out 48% (Roche) and 38% (Abbott) of the population at presentation for MI. Additional studies are needed for the GuIDER score in both the acute and ambulatory setting to further refine the utility, however, the preliminary findings reported here may present a pathway forward for inclusion of NP testing for ruling-out serious cardiac events and MI in the emergency setting.

Diagnostic Performance of Serial High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Measurements in the Emergency Setting.

Serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) testing in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive cardiac care unit may assist physicians in ruling out or ruling in acute myocardial infarction (MI). There are three major algorithms proposed for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) using serial measurements while incorporating absolute concentration changes for MI or death following ED presentation. We sought to determine the diagnostic estimates of these three algorithms and if one was superior in two different Canadian ED patient cohorts with serial hsTnI measurements. An undifferentiated ED population (Cohort-1) and an ED population with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS; Cohort-2) were clinically managed with non-hsTn testing with the hsTnI testing performed in real-time with physicians blinded to these results (i.e., hsTnI not reported). The three algorithms evaluated were the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the High-STEACS pathway, and the COMPASS-MI algorithm. The diagnostic estimates were derived for each algorithm for the 30-day MI/death outcome for the rule-out and rule-in arm in each cohort and compared to proposed diagnostic benchmarks (i.e., sensitivity ≥ 99.0% and specificity ≥ 90.0%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In Cohort-1 (n = 2966 patients, 15.3% had outcome) and Cohort-2 (n = 935 patients, 15.6% had outcome), the algorithm that obtained the highest sensitivity (97.8%; 95% CI: 96.0-98.9 and 98.6%; 95% CI: 95.1-99.8, respectively) in both cohorts was COMPASS-MI. Only Cohort-2 with both the ESC and COMPASS-MI algorithms exceeded the specificity benchmark (97.0%; 95% CI: 95.5-98.0 and 96.7%; 95% CI: 95.2-97.8, respectively). Patient selection for serial hsTnI testing will affect specificity estimates, with no algorithm achieving a sensitivity ≥ 99% for 30-day MI or death.

Disagreement between Cardiac Troponin Tests Yielding a Higher Incidence of Myocardial Injury in the Emergency Setting.

Differences in patient classification of myocardial injury between high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have largely been attributed to assay design and analytical sensitivity aspects. Our objective was to compare Ortho Clinical Diagnostics' (OCD) hs-cTnI assay to OCD's contemporary/conventional assay (cTnI ES) and another hs-cTnI assay (Abbott hs-cTnI) in samples obtained from different emergency departments (EDs). Two different sample types were evaluated (lithium heparin and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma) in a non-selected ED population (study 1, n = 469 samples) and in patients for which ED physicians ordered cardiac troponin testing (study 2, n = 1147 samples), from five different EDs. The incidence of injury in study 1 was higher with the OCD hs-cTnI assay (30.9%; 95% CI: 26.9 to 35.2) compared to that of the Abbott hs-cTnI (17.3%; 95% CI: 14.1 to 21.0) and the OCD cTnI ES (15.4%; 95% CI: 12.4 to 18.9) assays, with repeat testing identifying 4.8% (95% CI: 3.0 to 7.5) of the OCD hs-cTnI results with poor reproducibility. In study 2, 4.6% (95% CI: 3.5 to 6.0) of the results were not reported for the OCD hs-cTnI assay (i.e., poor reproducibility) with 12.7% (95%CI: 8.7 to 17.8) of the OCD hs-cTnI results positive for injury being negative for injury with the Abbott hs-cTnI assay. In summary, the OCD hs-cTnI assay yields higher rates of biochemical injury with a higher rate of poor reproducible results in different ED populations.

Using the clinical chemistry score in the emergency department to detect adverse cardiac events: a diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: The ability to rule out or in a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome at emergency department (ED) presentation would be beneficial to patient care and the health care system. The clinical chemistry score (CCS) was evaluated in this context. METHODS: This diagnostic accuracy study evaluated 2 different ED cohorts with suspected acute coronary syndrome. For patients in cohort 1, who presented to the ED of 3 hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, between May and August 2013, retrospective measurements were taken using the Ortho Clinical Diagnostics high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay; for patients in cohort 2, who presented to the ED of the same 3 hospitals in Hamilton between November 2012 and February 2013, an ED cardiac presentation blood test panel was performed with the Abbott Diagnostics hs-cTnI assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the CCS (cut-offs of ≥ 1 and 5) and hs-cTnI alone (published cut-offs) were compared for MACE (composite of death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization) at 30 days for both cohorts and at 90 days for cohort 2. RESULTS: The incidence of MACE at 30 days was higher in cohort 1 (n = 1058) (19.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8%-22.2%) than in cohort 2 (n = 5974) (14.6%, 95% CI 13.6%-15.6%). In cohort 1, a CCS of 1 or above yielded a sensitivity of 99.5% (95% CI 97.3%-99.9%). The sensitivity with an Ortho hs-cTnI cut-off of 1 ng/L or above was 91.2% (95% CI 86.5%-95.7%). The specificity of a CCS of 5 (97.8%, 95% CI 96.5%-98.7%) was higher than when the overall 99th-percentile cut-off for the Ortho hs-cTnI assay (> 11 ng/L; 90.1%, 95% CI 87.9%-92.0%) was used. A similar pattern was observed in cohort 2 at 30 days and persisted at 90 days with the Abbott hs-cTnI assay. INTERPRETATION: The CCS derived with 2 different hs-cTnI assays and ED populations yielded higher sensitivity and specificity estimates for MACE than hs-cTnI alone. An intervention study is needed to evaluate the impact of the CCS at both the patient and hospital levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01994577.

Risk Stratification for Patients with Chest Pain Discharged Home from the Emergency Department.

For patients with chest pain who are deemed clinically to be low risk and discharged home from the emergency department (ED), it is unclear whether further laboratory tests can improve risk stratification. Here, we investigated the utility of a clinical chemistry score (CCS), which comprises plasma glucose, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (I or T) to generate a common score for risk stratification. In a cohort of 14,676 chest pain patients in the province of Ontario, Canada and who were discharged home from the ED (November 2012-February 2013 and April 2013-September 2015) we evaluated the CCS as a risk stratification tool for all-cause mortality, plus hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina (primary outcome) at 30, 90, and 365 days post-discharge using Cox proportional hazard models. At 30 days the primary outcome occurred in 0.3% of patients with a CCS < 2 (n = 6404), 0.9% of patients with a CCS = 2 (n = 4336), and 2.3% of patients with a CCS > 2 (n = 3936) (p < 0.001). At 90 days, patients with CCS < 2 (median age = 52y (IQR = 46-60), 59.4% female) had an adjusted HR = 0.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.32-0.82) for the composite outcome and patients with a CCS > 2 (median age = 74y (IQR = 64-82), 48.0% female) had an adjusted HR = 2.80 (95%CI = 1.98-3.97). At 365 days, 1.3%, 3.4%, and 11.1% of patients with a CCS < 2, 2, or >2 respectively, had the composite outcome (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the CCS can risk stratify chest pain patients discharged home from the ED and identifies both low- and high-risk patients who may warrant different medical care.

Comparison of two biomarker only algorithms for early risk stratification in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We developed a biomarker algorithm encompassing the clinical chemistry score (CCS; which includes the combination of a random glucose concentration, an estimated glomerular filtration rate and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin; hs-cTn) with the Ortho Clinical Diagnostics hs-cTnI assay (CCS-serial) and compared it to the cutoffs derived from Ortho Clinical Diagnostics 0/1 h (h) algorithm for 7-day myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiovascular (CV)-death. METHODS: The study cohort was an emergency department (ED) population (n = 906) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had two Ortho hs-cTnI results approximately 3 h apart. Diagnostic parameters (sensitivity/specificity/negative predictive value; NPV/positive predictive value; PPV) were derived for the CCS-serial and the 0/1 h algorithm for 7-day MI/CV-death. A safety analysis was performed for patients in the rule-out arms of the algorithms for 30-day MI/death. RESULTS: The CCS-serial algorithm yielded 100% sensitivity/NPV (32% low-risk) and 95.7% specificity/65% PPV (11% high-risk). The 0/1 h algorithm-cutoffs yielded sensitivity/NPV/specificity/PPV of 97.8%/99.4%/91.3%/50%, which classified 38% of patients as low-risk and 16% of patients as high-risk. Four patients (1.2%) in the 0/1 h algorithm-cutoff rule-out arm had a 30-day MI/death outcome as compared to zero patients in the CCS-serial rule-out arm (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Both the CCS-serial and 0/1 h algorithm cutoffs yield high NPVs with a similar proportion of patients identified as low-risk. These data may be useful for sites who are unable to collect samples at 0/1 h in the emergency department.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I vs a Clinical Chemistry Score for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in an Emergency Department Population.

BACKGROUND: For patients investigated for suspected acute coronary syndrome, there is uncertainty if a single measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) at emergency department (ED) presentation can identify patients at both low and high risk for mortality. METHODS: We included consecutive adult patients in the ED who had a Clinical Chemistry Score (CCS) taken at presentation (ie, combination of glucose, creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate determination, and hs-cTnI assay) in a Canadian city between 2012 and 2013. Outcomes were 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality using the provincial death registry. Mortality rates and test performance (eg, sensitivity and specificity) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for the CCS or hs-cTnI assay alone using established cutoffs for these tests. RESULTS: Our cohort included 5974 patients with a 1-year mortality rate of 17.2% (95% CI, 16.2-18.3). A CCS ≥ 1 yielded a sensitivity of 99.2% (95% CI, 98.4-99.6) compared with the hs-cTnI ≥ 5 ng/L cutoff sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI, 86.3-90.3), with the mortality rate being significantly lower for patients with CCS < 1 (2.0%; 95% CI, 0.9-4.0) vs patients with hs-cTnI < 5 ng/L (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.2-6.0) at 1 year (P = 0.01). A CCS of 5 also yielded a higher specificity (88.5%; 95% CI, 87.5-89.3) compared with hs-cTnI > 26 ng/L (83.9%; 95% CI, 82.9-84.9), with no difference in mortality rates (37.4% vs 36.3%; P = 0.66). This trend was consistent at 3-month and 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients in the ED with a potential cardiac issue, using the CCS cutoffs can better identify patients at low and high risk for mortality than using published cutoffs for hs-cTnI alone.

CONTEXTE: Dans le cas des patients chez qui l'on soupçonne un syndrome coronarien aigu, des doutes subsistent à savoir si la mesure de la troponine I cardiaque à haute sensibilité (TnIc-hs) à l'arrivée au service des urgences peut, à elle seule, permettre de repérer les patients présentant un risque de mortalité faible ou élevé. MÉTHODOLOGIE: L'étude portait sur les patients adultes qui se sont présentés consécutivement au service des urgences dans une ville canadienne entre 2012 et 2013 et pour lesquels un score CCS (Clinical Chemistry Score, ou score des paramètres biochimiques cliniques, c'est-à-dire glycémie, créatininémie [aux fins du calcul du débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé] et dosage de la TnIc-hs) a été établi à leur arrivée. Les critères d'évaluation étaient la mortalité toutes causes confondues à 3 mois, à 1 an et à 5 ans, déterminée à partir des actes de décès inscrits au registre provincial. Les taux de mortalité et la fiabilité des tests (sensibilité et spécificité) avec des intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 % ont été déterminés pour le score CCS et pour le dosage de la TnIc-hs seulement au moyen des valeurs seuils établies pour ces tests. RÉSULTATS: La cohorte réunissait 5 974 patients, et le taux de mortalité à 1 an s'établissait à 17,2 % (IC à 95 % : 16,2-18,3). Un score CCS ≥ 1 a été associé à une sensibilité de 99,2 % (IC à 95 % : 98,4-99,6) comparativement à 88,4 % (IC à 95 % : 86,3-90,3) pour une valeur seuil de TnIc-hs ≥ 5 ng/l, le taux de mortalité à 1 an étant significativement plus bas chez les patients ayant un score CCS < 1 (2,0 %; IC à 95 % : 0,9-4,0) que chez ceux ayant un taux de TnIc-hs < 5 ng/l (5,0 %; IC à 95 % : 4,2-6,0) (p = 0,01). Un score CCS de 5 a en outre été associé à une plus grande spécificité (88,5 %; IC à 95 % : 87,5-89,3) qu'un taux de TnIc-hs > 26 ng/l (83,9 %; IC à 95 % : 82,9-84,9); il n'y avait pas de différence entre les taux de mortalité (37,4 % vs 36,3 %; p = 0,66). Les résultats relatifs à la mortalité à 3 mois et à 5 ans concordaient avec cette tendance. CONCLUSION: Dans le cas des patients admis au service des urgences en raison d'un problème cardiaque potentiel, les valeurs seuils du score CCS peuvent permettre de mieux repérer les patients qui présentent un risque de mortalité faible ou élevé, comparativement aux seules valeurs seuils publiées des taux de TnIc-hs.

Clinical evaluation of Ortho Clinical Diagnostics high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin I assay in patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: As more companies obtain regulatory approval for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays there is an urgent need for independent analytical and clinical evaluations. To this end, we have evaluated Ortho Clinical Diagnostics' hs-cTnI assay and compared it to their contemporary cTnI-ES assay in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: The study cohort consisted of ED patients (n = 906) with symptoms suggestive of ACS who had Ortho hs-cTnI and cTnI-ES results at presentation and 3 h (with calculated delta (0-3 h) defined as the absolute concentration difference between paired results). The primary composite outcome was 7-day myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiovascular death, with secondary analyses performed for 7-day MI and index-MI. Analytical imprecision testing (i.e., coefficient of variation; CV), receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses with area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic parameters (sensitivity/specificity/predictive values) were calculated. RESULTS: The hs-cTnI assay had superior precision compared to the cTnI-ES assay below 5 ng/L in EDTA plasma (hs-cTnI CV ≤ 15% versus cTnI-ES CV ≥ 85%). The AUCs were higher for hs-cTnI as compared to cTnI-ES at 0 h (0.88 vs. 0.85), 3 h (0.94 vs. 0.92), and the delta (0-3 h) value (0.91 vs. 0.85) for the primary composite outcome (p < 0.05). At 3 h, the sensitivity/specificity for index-MI was ≥97%/≥82%, for 7-day MI was ≥89%/≥84%, and for the primary composite outcome was ≥90%/≥85% using the manufacturer's sex-specific 99th-percentile cutoffs. CONCLUSION: The Ortho hs-cTnI assay has superior analytical and clinical performance over their contemporary cTnI-ES assay in evaluating ED patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS.

How do emergency departments and emergency leaders catalyze positive change through quality improvement collaborations?

OBJECTIVES: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QIPS) plays an important role in addressing shortcomings in optimal healthcare delivery. However, there is little published guidance available for emergency department (ED) teams with respect to developing their own QIPS programs. We sought to create recommendations for established and aspiring ED leaders to use as a pathway to better patient care through programmatic QIPS activities, starting internally and working towards interdepartmental collaboration. METHODS: An expert panel comprised of ten ED clinicians with QIPS and leadership expertise was established. A scoping review was conducted to identify published literature on establishing QIPS programs and frameworks in healthcare. Stakeholder consultations were conducted among Canadian healthcare leaders, and recommendations were drafted by the expert panel based on all the accumulated information. These were reviewed and refined at the 2018 CAEP Academic Symposium in Calgary using in-person and technologically-supported feedback. RESULTS: Recommendations include: creating a sense of urgency for improvement; engaging relevant stakeholders and leaders; creating a formal local QIPS Committee; securing funding and resources; obtaining local data to guide the work; supporting QIPS training for team members; encouraging interprofessional, cross-departmental, and patient collaborations; using an established QIPS framework to guide the work; developing reward mechanisms and incentive structures; and considering to start small by focusing on a project rather than a program. CONCLUSION: A list of 10 recommendations is presented as guiding principles for the establishment and sustainable deployment of QIPS activities in EDs throughout Canada and abroad. ED leaders are encouraged to implement our recommendations in an effort to improve patient care.

OBJECTIF: L'amélioration de la qualité et la sécurité des patients (AQSP) joue un rôle important dans la correction des lacunes observées dans la prestation optimale de soins. Toutefois, les équipes de soins au service des urgences (SU) disposent de peu de documentation sur la conception de leurs propres programmes d'AQSP. L'étude avait donc pour objectif l'élaboration de recommandations conçues à l'intention des chefs de file, nouveaux ou confirmés, au SU, et présentées comme une voie à emprunter pour améliorer les soins aux patients, par l'application d'activités programmatiques d'AQSP, tout d'abord au sein du service, puis entre services, grâce à la collaboration. MÉTHODE: Un groupe d'experts composé de 10 cliniciens en médecine d'urgence, ayant des compétences particulières en AQSP et en pouvoir d'influence, a été mis sur pied. Un examen de cadrage a été entrepris à la recherche de publications sur l'établissement de programmes d'AQSP et de cadres de travail s'y rapportant, en soins de santé. Des consultations ont été menées avec les parties intéressées parmi les chefs de file en soins de santé au Canada, et le groupe d'experts a rédigé une version préliminaire de recommandations fondées sur l'ensemble de l'information recueillie. Celles-ci ont été examinées et améliorées durant le Symposium sur les affaires universitaires 2018 de l'ACMU, à Calgary, à la suite de rétroactions communiquées en personne ou par voie électronique. RÉSULTATS: Les recommandations portaient sur : l'éveil d'un sentiment d'urgence à l'égard de l'amélioration; la mobilisation d'intervenants et de chefs de file compétents; la mise sur pied d'un comité local structuré d'AQSP; l'obtention de financement et de ressources; la disponibilité de données locales pour orienter le travail; le soutien de la formation des membres d'équipe en AQSP; la promotion de la collaboration entre professions, entre services et avec les patients; l'utilisation d'un cadre de travail d'AQSP déjà établi afin d'orienter le travail; l'élaboration d'un système de récompenses et de structures incitatives; la possibilité d'entreprendre, au début, des initiatives à petite échelle, soit des projets plutôt que des programmes. CONCLUSION: Les dix recommandations ont été présentées à titre de principes directeurs en vue de l'élaboration d'activités d'AQSP et de leur mise en œuvre durable dans les SU, au Canada et ailleurs dans le monde. Les chefs de file dans les SU sont invités à appliquer ces recommandations dans le but d'améliorer les soins aux patients.

Teaching M&M rounds skills: enhancing and assessing patient safety competencies using the Ottawa M&M model.

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate medical education bodies and national patient safety institutes recommend that trainees develop patient safety competencies such as those for Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) rounds, yet there exists no model for their educational delivery. OBJECTIVE: We studied the effect of a single educational intervention on emergency medicine residents' aptitudes in selecting and analysing M&M rounds cases. METHODS: In this before-and-after study, participants attended an 1 h educational session based on the previously described Ottawa Morbidity and Mortality Model (OM3). Residents were asked to submit a case suitable for M&M rounds both preintervention and postintervention. A novel M&M rounds case critique tool was developed based on OM3 and used to assign a numerical score to each submitted case. Our primary outcome was an increase in mean scores between phases using the case critique tool. An a priori score increase of 1 was defined as educationally significant. Data were analysed using a paired Student's t test. RESULTS: A total of 19 residents were recruited for our pre-intervention and 15 residents for the post-intervention analysis. Mean M&M rounds case critique scores increased from 5.53 to 8.67 (p<0.01) between phases. Residents reported higher comfort with structured case selection and analysis, with an increase in five-point Likert scale means of 2.32 and 3.69 (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found that residents were more effective at M&M rounds case selection and analysis after our focused 1 h educational intervention. Training programmes should consider an M&M rounds training model to ensure future physicians have these skills for 21st-century practice.