Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with a novel temperature-controlled CF-sensing catheter: Q-FFICIENCY clinical and healthcare utilization benefits.

INTRODUCTION: The prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter Q-FFICIENCY study demonstrated the safety and 12-month efficacy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with the novel QDOT MICRO temperature-controlled, contact force-sensing, radiofrequency (RF) catheter. Participants underwent pulmonary vein isolation with very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) mode (90 W, ≤4 s) alone or combined with conventional-power temperature-controlled (CPTC) mode (25-50 W). This study aimed to assess quality-of-life (QOL) and healthcare utilization (HCU) benefits experienced by Q-FFICIENCY study participants. METHODS: Besides evaluating procedural efficiency, QOL and HCU were assessed through 12 months postablation via Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life Tool (AFEQT) score, antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use, and incidence of cardioversion and cardiovascular hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 191 participants enrolled, 166 were ablated with the new catheter. Compared to baseline, statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in composite and subcategories of AFEQT scores were observed at 3 months and sustained through 12 months (12-month increase, 29.3-44.2 points). Class I/III AAD use decreased from 97.6% (162/166) at baseline to 19.6% (31/158) during Months 6-12, representing a significant 79.9% reduction. The cardioversion rate significantly declined by 93.9% from 31.3% (12 months preablation) to 1.9% (evaluation period). One-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalization were 80.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.8%-86.9%) and 88.8% (95% CI, 84.0%-93.7%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxysmal AF ablation with the novel temperature-controlled RF catheter in vHPSD mode, alone or with CPTC mode, led to clinically meaningful improvement in QOL and significant reduction in AAD use, cardioversion, and cardiovascular hospitalization.

Very High-Power Short-Duration, Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The Prospective Multicenter Q-FFICIENCY Trial.

BACKGROUND: QDOT MICRO (QDM) is a novel contact force-sensing catheter optimized for temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation. The very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) algorithm modulates power, maintaining target temperature during 90 W ablations for ≤4 seconds. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate safety and 12-month effectiveness of the QDM catheter in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using the vHPSD mode combined with conventional-power temperature-controlled (CPTC) mode. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study, patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with QDM catheter with vHPSD as primary ablation mode, with optional use of the CPTC mode (25 to 50 W) for PV touch-up or non-PV ablation. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of primary adverse events within ≤7 days of ablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from documented atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and acute procedural, repeat ablation, and antiarrhythmic drug failure. RESULTS: Of 191 enrolled participants, 166 had the catheter inserted, received RF ablation, and met eligibility criteria. Median procedural, RF application for ablating PVs, and fluoroscopy times were 132.0, 8.0, and 9.1 minutes, respectively. The primary adverse event rate was 3.6%. Imaging conducted in a subset of participants (n = 40) at 3 months did not show moderate or severe PV stenosis. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 12-month rate for primary effectiveness success was 76.7%; freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was 82.1%; clinical success (freedom from symptomatic recurrence) was 86.0%; and freedom from repeat ablation was 92.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Temperature-controlled paroxysmal AF ablation with the novel QDM catheter in vHPSD mode (90 W, ≤4 seconds), alone or with CPTC mode (25 to 50 W), is highly efficient and effective without compromising safety. (Evaluation of QDOT MICRO Catheter for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Subjects With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [Q-FFICIENCY]; NCT03775512).

Composite Index Tagging for PVI in Paroxysmal AF: A Prospective, Multicenter Postapproval Study.

BACKGROUND: VISITAG SURPOINT (VS)-guided ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation has demonstrated good short- and long-term success rates with low rates of complications in recent, predominantly European, studies. However, there is a lack of multicenter data from the United States. OBJECTIVES: This U.S. study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VS ablation using a contact force-sensing catheter for the treatment of drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The prospective, nonrandomized VS postapproval study was conducted at 32 U.S. sites. Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation with recommended VS index targets (anterior, roof, or ridge: 550; posterior or inferior: 380). Additional non-pulmonary vein triggers were ablated at the investigators' discretion. Subjects were followed for 12 months, including a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was the primary adverse event rate up to 7 days postablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and an additional set of failure modes based on stringent monitoring (weekly transtelephonic monitoring [TTM] [day 91 through month 5], monthly TTM [months 6 to 12], and any symptomatic cardiac episode using TTM, plus electrocardiogram [at discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months] with 24-hour Holter monitoring [12 months]). RESULTS: Of 283 patients enrolled, 261 had the catheter inserted and underwent ablation (safety cohort); 246 met all eligibility criteria (effectiveness cohort). Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.2 minutes. Mean amount of catheter-delivered fluid was 671 mL; only 18.0% of patients utilized a Foley catheter. Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met. The raw primary adverse event rate was 4.3% (14 events, n = 11). At 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from primary effectiveness failure was 76.4%; estimates of 12-month freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or atrial flutter recurrence were 81.5% and 92.7% per stringent monitoring and standard-of-care monitoring (excluding TTM), respectively. The first-pass isolation rate was 83.1%, represented by no acute reconnection after the 30-minute waiting period. Freedom from repeat ablation at 12 months was 94.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The VS postapproval study confirms reproducibility of clinical safety and effectiveness of the standardized VS paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation workflow with >80% 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and first-pass isolation rate of 83.1%. Procedures were performed with minimal fluoroscopy. (Evaluation of VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module With External Processing Unit [EPU]; NCT03624881).

Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial.

PURPOSE: The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported. METHODS: Ablations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF.

Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our review was to systematically assess available evidence on the effectiveness, safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force (CF) catheter (THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter (ST)) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with other ablation catheters, or with the ST with the operator blinded to CF data. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes of AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters; however, reviews to date have included data from multiple, distinct CF technologies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing the use of ST versus other ablation catheters for the treatment of AF. A comprehensive search of electronic and manual sources was conducted. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) at 12 months. Procedural and safety data were also analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies enrolling 5004 patients were eligible. The use of ST was associated with increased odds of freedom from AT at 12 months (71.0%vs60.8%; OR 1.454, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.88, p=0.004) over the comparator group, and the effect size was most evident in paroxysmal AF patients (75.6%vs64.7%; OR 1.560, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.24, p=0.015). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were shorter with ST (p=0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, vs comparator groups). The reduction in procedure time is estimated at 15.5 min (9.0%), and fluoroscopy time 4.8 min (18.7%). Complication rates, including cardiac tamponade, did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of other catheters, AF ablation using the CF-sensing ST catheter for AF is associated with improved success rates, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and similar safety profile.

Safety and efficiency of porous-tip contact-force catheter for drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: results from the SMART SF trial.

Aims: THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® SF Catheter is a new contact-force (CF)-sensing catheter with 56-hole porous tip designed for improved cooling and reduced fluid delivery compared with a standard 6-hole open-irrigated catheter. The SMART SF study examined the periprocedural safety, acute effectiveness, and procedural efficiency of the catheter for drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation. Methods and results: The prospective, open-label, non-randomized SMART-SF was conducted at 17 US sites. Circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was performed with confirmation of entrance block in all PVs. Stable ablation sites were identified using CARTO VISITAG™ Module. Primary adverse events (AEs; ≤1 week of index procedure), periprocedural AEs within 30 days of ablation procedure, acute effectiveness (confirmation of entrance block for targeted PVs), CF, and procedural parameters were assessed. Overall, 165 patients were enrolled (mean age, 62.7 years; male, 57.9%; white, 97%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 60.1 ± 7%; left atrium diameter, 38.8 ± 6 mm); 159 underwent radiofrequency ablation and comprised the safety cohort. Primary safety performance criteria were met: primary AE rate was 2.5% (4/159; cardiac tamponade [n = 2], thrombo-embolism [n = 1], transient ischaemic attack [n = 1]). All primary AEs resolved/improved within the 1-month follow-up period. Acute procedural effectiveness was attained in 96.2% (95% confidence interval: 92.0-98.6%) of patients. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and fluid delivered were observed in comparison to predecessor catheters. Conclusion: In the SMART-SF trial, the predetermined safety performance goal was met, demonstrating the safety and acute effectiveness of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® SF Catheter for PAF ablation.

Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is important for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Limited animal and human studies suggest a correlation between electrode-tissue contact and radiofrequency lesion generation. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of an irrigated, contact force (CF)-sensing catheter in the treatment of drug refractory symptomatic PAF. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study was conducted. Enrollment criteria included: ≥3 symptomatic episodes of PAF within 6 months of enrollment and failure of ≥1 antiarrhythmic drug (Class I to IV). Ablation included pulmonary vein isolation with confirmed entrance block as procedural endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were enrolled at 21 sites, where 161 patients had a study catheter inserted and 160 patients underwent radiofrequency application. Procedural-related serious adverse events occurring within 7 days of the procedure included tamponade (n = 4), pericarditis (n = 3), heart block (n = 1, prior to radiofrequency application), and vascular access complications (n = 4). By Kaplan-Meier analyses, 12-month freedom from atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was 72.5%. The average CF per procedure was 17.9 ± 9.4 g. When the CF employed was between investigator selected working ranges ≥80% of the time during therapy, outcomes were 4.25 times more likely to be successful (p = 0.0054; 95% confidence interval: 1.53 to 11.79). CONCLUSIONS: The SMART-AF trial demonstrated that this irrigated CF-sensing catheter is safe and effective for the treatment of drug refractory symptomatic PAF, with no unanticipated device-related adverse events. The increased percent of time within investigator-targeted CF ranges correlates with increased freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. Stable CF during radiofrequency application increases the likelihood of 12-month success. (THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® Catheter for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation; NCT01385202).

Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction. Effective lesion creation necessitates adequate contact force between the ablation catheter and myocardium. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to study the utility of contact force-guided ablation on immediate and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent wide circumferential PVI using an irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter. In 25 patients, ablation was guided by real-time contact force measurements (CF group; SmartTouch, Biosense Webster). A control group of 50 patients underwent PVI using a standard nonforce sensing catheter (standard group; ThermoCool, Biosense Webster). After PVI, all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and by transtelephonic monitoring as well. RESULTS: Dormant conduction was unmasked and subsequently eliminated in 4 PV pairs (8%; 16% of patients) in the CF group and 35 PV pairs (35%; 52% of patients) in the standard group (P = .0004 per PV pair; P = .0029 per patient). The single-procedure, off-antiarrhythmic drug freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 1 year was 88% in the CF group vs 66% in the standard group (P = .047). Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the CF group (P = .0038 and P = .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of real-time contact force guidance results in a significant reduction in the prevalence of dormant conduction with improved long-term freedom from recurrent arrhythmias. The utility of a contact force-guided approach requires evaluation in a long-term prospective randomized study.

Pulmonary vein isolation using a pace-capture-guided versus an adenosine-guided approach: effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction. We prospectively studied the use of 2 procedural techniques designed to facilitate identification of residual gaps within the index ablation line. METHODS AND RESULTS: After wide circumferential PV isolation, 40 patients received additional ablation targeted at locations of left atrial capture during high-output pacing (pace-capture group), while 40 patients underwent adenosine testing with targeted ablation at sites of dormant conduction (adenosine group). Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. After PV isolation, high-output pace-capture was documented in 39 PVs (25%; 50% of patients) in the pace-capture group. Dormant conduction was unmasked in 34 PVs (22%; 53% of patients) in the adenosine group. A subset of 25 patients in the pace-capture group underwent adenosine testing without targeted ablation of dormant conduction. In these patients, only 10 out of 86 PVs (11.6%; 24% of patients) demonstrated dormant conduction after the elimination of local pace-capture. At a follow-up of 329±124 days, the single procedure off antiarrhythmic drug freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation was 67.5% in the adenosine group and 65.0% in the pace-capture group (P=0.814). Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the pace-capture group (P=0.002 and P<0.001), whereas radiofrequency ablation time was comparable (P=0.192). CONCLUSIONS: The use of high-output pacing post-PV isolation results in a significant reduction in the incidence of dormant conduction with a comparable long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation (versus adenosine-guided ablation). The use of these approaches requires evaluation in a long-term prospective randomized study. [corrected].

Automated vulnerability testing identifies patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system efficacy is tested at implant by induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Defibrillation safety margin can be assessed without VF induction using upper limit of vulnerability methods, but these methods have required manual determination of T-wave timing. METHODS AND RESULTS: To test the feasibility of an inductionless system of implant testing, a multicenter prospective study of an automated vulnerability safety margin system was conducted, which measured T-wave timing using an intracardiac electrogram during a ventricular pacing train. The system delivered up to 4 T-wave shocks of 18 J. Lack of VF induction by all 4 shocks was considered evidence of defibrillation adequacy. Patients subsequently underwent conventional defibrillation testing to meet a standard implant criterion. The 95% lower CI for defibrillation success at 25 J for noninduced patients was found using Bayesian statistics. Sixty patients were enrolled at 6 centers. Vulnerability testing and defibrillation success results were obtained from 54 patients. Vulnerability testing induced VF in 10 (19%) patients, of whom 2 required system revision. All patients not induced by vulnerability testing were successfully defibrillated twice at ≤25 J. The Bayesian credible interval was 97% to 100% for the population success rate of defibrillation at 25 J for automated vulnerability safety margin noninduced patients. CONCLUSIONS: An automated system identified all patients who failed conventional safety margin testing, while inducing only 19% of patients. Although limited by sample size, this study suggests the feasibility of automated implant testing that substantially reduces the need for VF induction in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Detection of inadvertent catheter movement into the coronary sinus ostium or middle cardiac vein by real-time impedance monitoring prior to radiofrequency ablation in the right atrial posteroseptal region.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of continuous catheter impedance monitoring prior to ablation to facilitate differentiation of the coronary sinus ostium (CSO) and the middle cardiac vein (MCV) from the right atrial posteroseptal region (RPS). BACKGROUND: Empiric observations have suggested that continuous catheter impedance monitoring could differentiate the CSO and MCV from the RPS region. Radiofrequency ablation in the MCV or coronary sinus has been associated with coronary artery injury. Differentiation of these areas may be difficult with either fluoroscopy or electrogram characteristics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Continuous impedance measurements using a 4-mm Navistar (Biosense Webster) ablation catheter were conducted in 17 consecutive patients undergoing ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. The average impedance value was recorded at the right atrial septum (RS) posterior to the bundle of His, the RPS region, within 1 cm inside the CSO and in the MCV. These areas were confirmed and demarcated with 3-D mapping and biplane fluoroscopy. A significant increase in impedance was observed between the CSO (X = 146.6 ± 24.8) and RPS [Formula: see text] regions (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant rise in impedance was seen between the MCV [Formula: see text] and RPS and CSO, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant change in impedance was found between the RS [Formula: see text] and RPS regions. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous impedance measurements during mapping can facilitate differentiation of catheter locations inside the CSO and MCV from extracoronary sinus regions. This may reduce the risk of inadvertent coronary artery damage during the ablation procedure.

Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of periprocedural dabigatran during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. BACKGROUND: AF ablation requires optimal periprocedural anticoagulation for minimizing bleeding and thromboembolic complications. The safety and efficacy of dabigatran as a periprocedural anticoagulant for AF ablation are unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, observational study from a prospective registry including all consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation in 8 high-volume centers in the United States. All patients receiving dabigatran therapy who underwent AF ablation on periprocedural dabigatran, with the dose held on the morning of the procedure, were matched by age, sex, and type of AF with an equal number of patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted warfarin therapy over the same period. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients, including 145 taking periprocedural dabigatran and an equal number of matched patients taking uninterrupted periprocedural warfarin, were included in the study. The mean age was 60 years with 79% being male and 57% having paroxysmal AF. Both groups had a similar CHADS(2) score, left atrial size, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Three thromboembolic complications (2.1%) occurred in the dabigatran group compared with none in the warfarin group (p = 0.25). The dabigatran group had a significantly higher major bleeding rate (6% vs. 1%; p = 0.019), total bleeding rate (14% vs. 6%; p = 0.031), and composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (16% vs. 6%; p = 0.009) compared with the warfarin group. Dabigatran use was confirmed as an independent predictor of bleeding or thromboembolic complications (odds ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 6.25; p = 0.01) on multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing AF ablation, periprocedural dabigatran use significantly increases the risk of bleeding or thromboembolic complications compared with uninterrupted warfarin therapy.

Consistency of the CFAE phenomena using custom software for automated detection of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) in the left atrium during atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) have been described as a potential target for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study is to assess the consistency of the CFAE phenomena using custom software for automated detection of CFAEs in the left atrium during AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study included 10 patients referred for catheter ablation of symptomatic drug-refractory AF. Ten consecutive points at a single location (cluster) were acquired as electroanatomical points every 3 seconds. Atrial signals were automatically classified as CFAEs by the software algorithm. The number of intervals between 50 ms and 110 ms and in the voltage range 0.05-0.15 mV during the 2.5-second recordings was determined and referred to as the interval confidence level (ICL). A total of 2,226 points were acquired during mapping of AF. A dominant group of ICL using one of two different configurations of ICL fractionation was identified. A dominant group was defined as the ICL categorization occurring with greatest frequency in a given cluster of points. The results show the consistency ranged from 73%+/- 21 for the three-group configuration (ICL < or = 4; 4 < ICL < or = 7; ICL > 7) to 84%+/- 16 for the two-group configuration (ICL < or = 5; ICL > 5). CONCLUSION: This novel software offers an objective method for CFAE analysis during atrial fibrillation. CFAE consistency ranged from 73% to 84% with wide standard deviation. Automated detection of CFAEs may remove the pitfalls associated with subjective visual detection, thus removing one variable in comparative studies of using CFAEs as AF ablation targets.

Novel imaging techniques of the esophagus enhancing safety of left atrial ablation.

This report describes different imaging techniques of the esophagus in four patients during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the left atrium. A novel use of a mixture of barium cream and gadolinium diglutamate allowed esophageal imaging during magnetic resonance angiography of the left atrium and pulmonary veins. Barium cream used during computer tomography angiographic imaging of the left atrium and pulmonary veins allowed esophageal imaging. The esophagus was also imaged with an electroanatomic mapping system. Esophageal and left atrial imaging helped to avoid catheter ablation in left atrial tissue overlapping the esophagus.