Immunophenotyping in routine clinical practice for predicting treatment response and adverse events in patients with MS.

Background: Recent studies proposed cellular immunoprofiling as a surrogate for predicting treatment response and/or stratifying the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, applicability in real-world circumstances is not sufficiently addressed. Objective: We aimed to explore whether standard routine clinical leukocyte phenotyping before treatment initiation could help stratify patients according to treatment response or AEs in a real-world MS cohort. Methods: In this retrospective study, 150 pwMS were included, who had been newly initiated on a disease-modifying drug (DMD) and had been assessed for standard immunophenotyping before DMD initiation (baseline) and at least once during the following year. Multivariate models were used to assess an association of immune subsets and the association between immune cell profiles regarding treatment response and AEs. Results: We found that the composition of T cell subsets was associated with relapse activity, as an increased proportion of CD8+ lymphocytes at baseline indicated a higher likelihood of subsequent relapse (about 9% per 1% increase in CD8+ proportion of all CD3+ cells). This was particularly driven by patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy, where also EDSS worsening was associated with a higher number of CD8+ cells at baseline (3% increase per 10 cells). In the overall cohort, an increase in the proportion of NK cells was associated with a higher risk of EDSS worsening (5% per 1% increase). Occurrence of AEs was associated with a higher percentage of T cells and a lower number of percentual NKT cells at baseline. Conclusion: Immune cell profiles are associated with treatment response and the occurrence of AEs in pwMS. Hence, immunophenotyping may serve as a valuable biomarker to enable individually tailored treatment strategies in pwMS.

Real-world use of natalizumab in Austria: data from the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Registry (AMSTR).

INTRODUCTION: With the approval of natalizumab in Europe in 2006, the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Registry (AMSTR) was established. Here, we present data from this registry about effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in patients treated up to 14 years. PATIENTS/METHODS: Data retrieved from the AMSTR contained baseline characteristics and biannual documentation of annualised relapse rate (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as well as adverse events and reasons for discontinuation on follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 1596 natalizumab patients (71% women, n = 1133) were included in the analysis and the observed treatment duration ranged from 0 to 164 months (13.6 years). The mean ARR was 2.0 (SD = 1.13) at baseline, decreasing to 0.16 after 1 year and 0.01 after 10 years. A total of 325 patients (21.6%) converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) during the observational period. Of 1502 patients, 1297 (86.4%) reported no adverse events (AE) during follow-up visits. The most common reported AEs were infections and infusion-related reactions. John Cunningham virus (JCV) seropositivity was the most common specified reason for treatment discontinuation (53.7%, n = 607). There were five confirmed cases of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) with 1 death. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of natalizumab in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) could be confirmed in our real-world cohort even after follow-up of up to 14 years, though after year 10, there were less than 100 remaining patients. A low number of AE were reported in this nationwide registry study, establishing Natalizumab's favourable safety profile during long-term use.

The effect on blink frequency of a selective blue-filtering photochromic lens in patients with benign essential blepharospasm.

Objective: The aim of this clinical study was to assess the impact of a non-invasive selective blue-filtering photochromic lens coating Crizal Prevencia on the treatment and response of benign essential blepharospasm (BEB). Patients and methods: Twenty-four patients were recruited in the outpatient clinic of the Medical University of Vienna in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study design. Blink frequencies were assessed in patients with BEB before and 14 days after intervention with either a filtering ophthalmic lens or a placebo lens, respectively. Outcome parameters include sub-group analysis of a blink frequency under six different conditions: three photopic conditions, one resting condition, one reading condition, and one video game condition. Results: From 24 recruited patients, 15 patients were available for final analysis. Comparing the optical blue filtering lens to placebo, showed a reduced blink frequency in specific subtests, but not compared to baseline. Discussion: In conclusion, optical filtering glasses might have a beneficial effect on BEB and provide a non-invasive therapeutic add-on option, in addition to botulinum neurotoxin therapy, for patients with BEB and should necessarily be further investigated in a multicenter setting, resulting in larger sample sizes to gain valid information about the effect of photochromic blue filter glasses in BEB.Clinical trial registration: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032135, DRKS00032135.

Feasibility of a smartphone app to monitor patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis: The haMSter interventional trial.

Background: Monitoring of patient outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) is fundamental for individualized treatment decisions. So far, these decisions have been motivated by conventional outcomes, i.e., relapses or clinical disability supported by radiological disease activity. Complementing this concept, patient reported outcomes (PROs) assess individual health-related quality of life, among other constructs. Their inclusion in clinical routine, however, has been challenging as assessing them requires resources of time and personnel. Objective: This interventional feasibility study investigated the haMSter app, a mobile health solution for remote and longitudinal monitoring of PROs in a sample of people with MS (pwMS). Methods: The core feature of haMSter is the provision of three PRO questionnaires relevant to MS (anxiety/depression, MS-related quality of life, and fatigue) that patients can fill out once a month. For this feasibility trial, we offered 50 volunteers to use the haMSter app over six months and to take part in a haMSter study visit. This consultation concluded the study and participants had the opportunity to discuss their graphically plotted PRO results with their treating physician. Results: The main outcome was overall patient adherence to monthly completion of the PRO questionnaires, which remained high up to 4 months (98%) and dropped over time (months 5: 83% and 6: 66%). Exploratory outcomes included patient satisfaction as estimated on the Telemedicine Perception Questionnaire (TMPQ, 17-85 points). The mean TMPQ score was 64 (95%CI: 62-66) points, indicating a high degree of approval. Ancillary tests included subgroup analyses of participants with particularly high or low satisfaction and upper extremity disability as a potential obstacle to utility or acceptance. We found no distinct characteristics separating participants with high or low satisfaction. Conclusions: In this first feasibility trial, the haMSter app for longitudinal PRO monitoring was well received in terms of adherence and satisfaction. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04555863.

[The corona pandemic and multiple sclerosis: vaccinations and their implications for patients-Part 2: vaccine technologies]. / Die Corona-Pandemie und Multiple Sklerose: Impfungen und deren Implikationen für Patienten ­ Teil 2: Impfstofftechnologien.

Along with the challenges posed by the globally circulating COVID-19 pandemic, there have been some epochal advances in the field of vaccine technologies. In addition to the traditionally used dead, live and protein-based vaccines, vector-based and gene-based vaccines gained enormous attention in the course of this health crisis. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of multiple sclerosis (MS) and vaccination, recent advances in the SARS-CoV­2 vaccine landscape as well as a detailed discussion of the various vaccine technologies. Finally, clear recommendations in the context of disease-modifying treatment and vaccination in MS are highlighted.

[The corona pandemic and multiple sclerosis: vaccinations and their implications for patients-Part 1: recommendations]. / Die Corona-Pandemie und Multiple Sklerose: Impfungen und deren Implikationen für Patienten ­ Teil 1: Empfehlungen.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis. New challenges are constantly emerging especially for the healthcare system, not least with the emergence of various viral mutations. Given the variety of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the immense developments in vaccine production, there is a high need of information for people with MS. The aim of this article is therefore to provide an overview of MS and COVID-19 as well as to clarify the implications for patients with MS, especially regarding vaccination and to formulate appropriate recommendations.

The Smartphone App haMSter for Tracking Patient-Reported Outcomes in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment and monitoring decisions in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are based commonly on clinician-reported outcomes. These reflect physical and radiological disease activity and are the most relevant endpoints in clinical trials. Over the past few years, the number of studies evaluating so-called patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been increasing. PROs are reports from patients concerning their own health perception. They are typically obtained by means of questionnaires and aim to quantify symptoms such as fatigue, depression, and sexual dysfunction. The emergence of PROs has made a tremendous contribution to understanding the individual impact of disease in people with MS and their health-related quality of life. However, the assessment of PROs consumes resources, including time and personnel. Thus, useful ways to conveniently introduce PROs into clinical practice are needed. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a rationale and pilot study protocol for a mobile health (mHealth) solution named "haMSter" that allows for remote monitoring of PROs in people with MS. METHODS: The core function of haMSter is to provide three scientifically validated PRO questionnaires relevant to MS for patients to fill out at home once a month. Thereby, longitudinal and remote documentation of PROs is enabled. A scoring algorithm graphically plots PRO scores over time and makes them available at the next visit. RESULTS: The pilot study is currently ongoing and will evaluate adherence to this mHealth solution in 50 patients over a period of 6 months. Results from the haMSter pilot study are expected in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: haMSter is a novel mHealth-based solution for modern PRO research, which may constitute the first step in achieving the ability to integrate PROs in clinical practice. This allows for a more problem-oriented approach in monitoring visits, which addresses patient needs and ultimately saves time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04555863; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04555863. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25011.

Restless Legs Syndrome in Multiple Sclerosis: Risk factors and effect on sleep quality - a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggested an association between MS and Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). Data on the prevalence of RLS in Austrian MS patients and on the influence of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) on RLS are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate (1) the prevalence of RLS in Austria compared to control persons (CP), (2) risk factors for RLS in MS, and (3) influence of DMTs on RLS prevalence and/or severity. METHODS: Adult MS patients and CP were screened for RLS by face-to-face interviews, including questionnaires for RLS severity, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness. RESULTS: 23.9% of MS patients (n=117) had RLS compared to 3.4% (p<0.001) of CP (n=119). The MS+RLS group (n=28) had a higher rate of sleep impairment (78.6% vs 21.3%, p<0.001) and excessive daytime sleepiness (32.1% vs 15.7%, p=0.045) compared to the MS-RLS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed higher Expanded Disability Status Scale and spinal lesions in MRI as risk factors for RLS in MS, while DMTs had no impact on RLS. CONCLUSION: Roughly a quarter of MS patients suffers from RLS, significantly impacting quality of life by poor sleep quality and excessive daytime sleepiness. RLS risk increases with physical disability and spinal lesions but is independent of DMT.

Sexuality and Multiple Sclerosis: Patient and Doctor Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on how to address sexuality in clinical care for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). AIM: To describe and contrast the perception of sexuality and associated aspects of communication in pwMS and their treating neurologists ("MSologists") and provide a standard of care. METHODS: Patients were surveyed using a 13-item questionnaire investigating perception on their own sexuality and opinions on communication about sexuality in context with MS. Certified MSologists in Austria received an 18-item survey regarding their approach to taking a sexual history of their patients. OUTCOMES: We report the frequency of answers given in this survey and propose a possible standard of care how sexuality could be addressed in clinical routine. RESULTS: Ninety-three pwMS (mean age 39 ± 11 years, 57% female) and 75 MSologists (mean age 43 ± 9 years, 63% male) completed this survey. Seventy-six percent of patients report their own sexuality as being (very) important to them and 95% think that sexual dysfunction would influence their quality of life. 84% would like to be asked about their sexuality by their MSologist. In contrast, only 15% of MSologists reported discussing sexuality with every patient. The most common reason for not doing so was a fear of crossing personal borders (34%). There is a strong desire for further medical education on this subject (76%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Discussing sexuality is important to pwMS and MSologists should consider their patients' wishes and needs to talk about it. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This is the largest survey contrasting the views of patients and their treating physicians on the topic of communication about sexuality. The use of an empirical unvalidated questionnaire may have introduced bias. Moreover, patients that are open to talk about their sexuality may be potentially overrepresented in this study. CONCLUSION: MSologists should offer their patients an open opportunity and appropriate framework to discuss their sexuality during a consultation. Altmann P, Leithner K, Leutmezer F, et al. Sexuality and Multiple Sclerosis: Patient and Doctor Perspectives. J Sex Med 2021;18:743-749.

Predisposing Factors for Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis.

Sexual dysfunction (SD) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) has a detrimental impact on individual health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It is not clear whether SD in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an independent symptom or merely a byproduct of other symptoms such as depression or anxiety. This cross-sectional study of 93 pwMS determines risk factors for SD in MS based on prevalence, HRQoL, and associated disease outcomes. Diagnosis of SD was determined based on the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19 (MSISQ-19) and correlated with physical disability (measured by Expanded Disability Status scale, EDSS), depression and anxiety [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)], and HRQoL [Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQoL-54)]. Multivariate regression models were performed to determine independent risk factors for SD in pwMS. Almost half of the participants in this study (46%) reported SD. HRQoL was significantly poorer in patients with MS suffering from SD (median [IQR] MSQoL-54 scores: physical subscale 52 [41-68] vs. 81 [69-89], p < 0.001; mental subscale 50 [38-82] vs. 86 [70-89], p < 0.001). In the multivariate model, EDSS was the only independent risk factor for SD (OR 18.1 for EDSS ≥4 [95% CI 3.3-31.4, p < 0.001]), while depression and anxiety were not. We conclude that the risk for SD is growing with increasing EDSS and is independent of depression or anxiety. Screening for SD becomes particularly relevant in patients with growing disability.

Quantifying the risk of disease reactivation after interferon and glatiramer acetate discontinuation in multiple sclerosis: The VIAADISC score.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a lack of evidence guiding discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Thus, the objective of this study was to generate and validate a risk score for disease reactivation after DMT discontinuation in RMS. METHODS: We drew a generation and validation dataset from two separate prospectively collected observational databases including RMS patients who received interferon-ß or glatiramer acetate for ≥12 months, then discontinued DMT for ≥6 months and had ≥2 years of follow-up available. In the generation sample (n = 168), regression analysis was performed to identify clinical or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables independently predicting disease reactivation after DMT discontinuation. A predictive score was calculated using the variables included in the multivariable model and applied to the validation sample (n = 98). RESULTS: The variables included in the final model as independent predictors of disease reactivation were age at discontinuation, MRI activity at discontinuation, and duration of clinical stability (all p < 0.001). The resulting score was able to robustly identify patients at high (83%-85%), moderate (36%-38%), and low risk (7%) of disease reactivation within 5 years after DMT discontinuation in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The composite VIAADISC score is a valuable tool to inform and support patients and neurologists in the process of decision making to discontinue injectable DMTs.

Should I stop or should I go on? Disease modifying therapy after the first clinical episode of multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) represents standard care in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients nowadays. Since a proportion of patients may show no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) after some time of treatment, the question might arise about the risks of stopping DMT. METHODS: We present a cohort of 49 patients who started DMT immediately after CIS and had no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) for at least five years before discontinuation of therapy. Thereafter, patients underwent clinical and MRI follow-up for at least five consecutive years. RESULTS: Of 49 patients discontinuing DMT, 53% (n = 26) had NEDA for at least further five years, while 47% (n = 23) showed either a relapse/disease progression (18.4%, n = 9), MRI activity (14.3%, n = 7) or both (14.3%, n = 7). The main predictive factor for sustained NEDA was age at DMT termination. Patients aged > 45 years had a significantly lower risk of disease reactivation (13% vs. 54% in patients aged < 45 years, p < 0.001) after DMT discontinuation. DISCUSSION: In CIS patients with immediate DMT after their first clinical episode, older age at the time of DMT discontinuation is the main predictive factor for sustained NEDA status.