Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the USA from 2019 to 2060.

INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has consistently risen over time, and while various forecasts differ in magnitude, future projections suggest a continued increase in these procedures. Differences in future United States projections may arise from the modeling method selected, the nature of the national arthroplasty registry employed, or the representativeness of the specific hospital discharge records utilized. In addition, many models have not accounted for ambulatory surgery as well as all payer types. Therefore, to attempt to make a more accurate model, we utilized a national representative sample that included outpatient arthroplasties and all insurance types to predict the volumes of primary TJA in the USA from 2019 to 2060. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried. All patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, were identified using international classification of disease Ninth Revision (9) and Tenth Revision (10) codes and current procedure terminology codes. Absolute frequencies and incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 for both THA and TKA procedures, with 95% confidence intervals. Mean growth in absolute frequency and incidence rates were calculated for each procedure from 2010 to 2014, and 2010 to 2019, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The overall increase in THA and TKA procedures are expected to grow + 10 and + 36%, respectively, using linear regressions and + 9 and + 37%, respectively. The most positive mean growth in procedure frequency occurred from 2010 to 2014 for THA (+ 24, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): + 21, + 27) and 2010-2019 for TKA (+ 11%, 95% CI: + 9, + 14). There positive trend patterns in incidence rate growth for both procedures, with similar 2010-2019 incidence rates + 6%) for THA (+ 3%, 95% CI: + 0, + 6%) and TKA (+ 3%, 95% CI: + 1%, + 6%). CONCLUSION: Utilizing a nationally representative database, we demonstrated that TJA procedures would continue with an increased growth pattern to 2060, though slightly decreased from the surge from 2014 to 2019. While this finding applies to the representativeness of the population at hand, the inclusion of outpatient arthroplasty and all payer types validates an approach that has not been undertaken in previous projection studies.

The effect of fixation type on periprosthetic fractures in high-risk patients who have osteoporosis undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

Introduction: Minimizing the burden of periprosthetic fractures (PFF) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) with regard to morbidity and mortality remains an outcome of interest. Patient and surgical risk factors, including osteoporosis and fixation type, have not truly been optimized in patients undergoing TJA as a means to reduce the risk of PFF. As such, we examined: (1) What percentage of patients who underwent THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) met the criteria for osteoporosis screening? (2) How did the 5-year rate of PFF and fragility fracture differ in the high-risk and low-risk groups for osteoporosis between the cemented and cementless cohorts? (3) What percentage of the aforementioned patients received a dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan before THA or TKA? Methods: We queried an all-payer, national database from April 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021, to identify high-risk and low-risk patients who underwent TJA with a cementless or cemented fixation. High-risk patients met at least one of the following criteria: men at least 70 years old, women at least 65 years old, or patients at least 60 years old who have the following: tobacco use, alcohol abuse, body mass index <18.5, prior fragility fracture, chronic systemic corticosteroids, or genetic condition affecting sex hormones or bone mineral density. Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of malignancy, high-energy events (motor vehicle collision), those who underwent TJA indicated for fracture, patients less than 50 years old, those who had a prior diagnosis of or treatment for osteoporosis, and a minimum follow-up of less than 2 years. Results: There were 384,783 patients (67.1 %) who underwent cementless TKA and 67,774 patients (11.8 %) who underwent cementless TKA who were considered high risk. Additionally, there were 62,505 patients (10.9 %) who underwent cemented THA and 58,667 patients (10.2 %) who underwent cementless THA and were considered high risk. The cementless cohort had a 5-year periprosthetic fracture risk following TKA of 7.8 % (95 % CI, 5.56 to 10.98) in comparison to 4.30 % in the cemented cohort (85 % CI, 3.98 to 4.65), P < 0.0001. The high-risk cementless cohort had a 5-year periprosthetic fracture risk following THA of 7.9 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 6.87 to 9.19) in comparison to 7.78 % in the cemented cohort (85 % CI, 6.77 to 8.94), P < 0.0001. Conclusion: There is an increased risk of PFF at 5 years following TKA in patients at high risk for osteoporosis undergoing cementless fixation in comparison to cemented fixation. There is an increased risk of PFF at 5 years following THA in patients at high risk for osteoporosis for both cementless fixation and cemented fixation, but no clinically meaningful difference between the two groups. Addressing the shortcomings of the underutilization of bone density scans and better selecting appropriate patients for TJA based on bone quality and fracture risk can help expedite the process of improving the current state of practice.

Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Prior Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the outcomes of bariatric surgery followed by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus TKA alone in obese patients have disparate results. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare TKA with and without prior bariatric surgery in obese patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched from inception to April 9, 2023. There were twelve included studies that yielded 2,876,547 patients, of whom 62,818 and 2,813,729 underwent TKA with and without prior bariatric surgery, respectively. Primary outcomes were medical complications (ie, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, renal failure, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism [VTE], arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and stroke); surgical complications (ie, wound complications [eg, infection, hematoma, dehiscence, delayed wound healing, and seroma], periprosthetic joint infection, mechanical complications, periprosthetic fracture, knee stiffness, and failed hardware); revision, and mortality. Secondary outcomes were blood transfusion, length of stay (day), and readmission. RESULTS: The odds ratios (OR) of 90-day VTE (OR = 0.75 [0.66, 0.85], P < .00001), 90-day stroke (OR = 0.58 [0.41, 0.81], P = .002), and 1-year periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.74 [0.55, 0.99], P = .04) were lower in those who underwent bariatric surgery before TKA. Although the mean difference in hospital stays (-0.19 days [-0.23, -0.15], P < .00001) was statistically less in those who underwent bariatric surgery before TKA, it was not clinically relevant. The other outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery before TKA is beneficial in terms of a lower risk of VTE, stroke, and periprosthetic fracture. This analysis suggests surgeons consider discussing bariatric surgery before TKA in obese patients, especially those who are at risk of VTE and stroke.

Patients with Osteoporosis Are at Higher Risk for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures and Aseptic Loosening Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This report provides an updated analysis for patients with osteoporosis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The comorbidities of alcohol abuse, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis continue to be significant risk factors for periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFFx) and aseptic loosening in the population with osteoporosis. Patients with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric (DEXA) scans were at risk for PPFFx regardless of femoral fixation method, and patients with DEXA scans with cementless fixation were at risk of aseptic loosening after THA. The patient population with severe osteoporosis may have higher risks for aseptic loosening and PPFFx than previously recognized.

Characterizing Osteophyte Formation in Knee Osteoarthritis: Application of Machine Learning Quantification of a Computerized Tomography Cohort: Implications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Osteophytes are commonly used to diagnose and guide knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, but their causes are unclear. Although they are not typically the focus of knee arthroplasty surgeons, they can predict case difficulty and length. Furthermore, their extent and location may yield much information about the knee joint status. The aims of this computed tomography-based study in patients awaiting total or partial knee arthroplasty were to: (1) measure osteophyte volume in anatomical subregions and relative change as total volume increases; (2) determine whether medial and/or lateral OA affects osteophyte distribution; and (3) explore relationships between osteophytes and OA severity. METHODS: Data were obtained from 4,928 computed tomography scans. Machine-learning-based imaging analyses enabled osteophyte segmentation and quantification, divided into anatomical regions. Mean three-dimensional joint space narrowing was assessed in medial and lateral compartments. A Bayesian model assessed the uniformity of osteophyte distribution. We correlated femoral osteophyte volumes with B-scores, a validated OA status measure. RESULTS: Total tibial (25%) and femoral osteophyte volumes (75%) within each knee correlated strongly (R2 = 0.85). Medial osteophytes (65.3%) were larger than lateral osteophytes (34.6%), with similar proportions in both the femur and tibia. Osteophyte growth was found in all compartments, and as total osteophyte volume increased, the relative distribution of osteophytes between compartments did not markedly change. No evidence of variation was found in the regional distribution of osteophyte volume between knees with medial, lateral, both, or no three-dimensional joint space narrowing in the femur or tibia. There was a direct relationship between osteophyte volume and OA severity. CONCLUSIONS: Osteophyte volume increased in both medial and lateral compartments proportionally with total osteophyte volume, regardless of OA location. The peripheral position of femoral osteophytes does not appear to contribute to load-bearing. This suggests that osteophytic growth represents a 'whole-knee'/global response. This work may have broad applications for knee OA, both surgically and nonoperatively.

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-step Guide Part II: Study Execution.

Systematic reviews are the apex of the evidence-based pyramid, representing the strongest form of evidence synthesizing results from multiple primary studies. In particular, a quantitative systematic review, or meta-analysis, pools results from multiple studies to help answer a respective research question. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: (1) design, (2) execute, and (3) publish an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review. In Part II, we focus on methods to assess data quality through the Cochrane Risk of Bias, Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria, or Newcastle-Ottawa scale; enumerate various methods for appropriate data interpretation and analysis; and summarize how to convert respective findings to a publishable manuscript (providing a previously published example). Use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines is recommended and standard in all scientific literature, including that of orthopedic surgery. Pooled analyses with forest plots and associated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are common ways to present data. When converting to a manuscript, it is important to consider and discuss the inherent limitations of systematic reviews, including their inclusion and/or exclusion criteria and overall quality, which can be limited based on the quality of individual studies (eg, publication bias, heterogeneity, search/selection bias). We hope our papers will serve as starting points for those interested in performing an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review.

The Learning Curve From Converting From Fluoroscopic to Robotic-Assisted Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) provides an alternative to fluoroscopic guidance, thus reducing radiation exposure for orthopaedic surgeons. This study was performed to assess the learning curve associated with the adoption of RA-THA using the direct anterior approach (DAA) with regard to surgical time, use of fluoroscopy, and implant placement. In addition, we compared complication rates and patient-reported outcome scores between both cohorts. A case report of an RA-THA is also presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, non-randomized evaluation of the learning curve by assessing surgical time on a consecutive series of 89 DAA cases performed by a single surgeon. There were 53 cases that had manual THA with fluoroscopy and 36 cases with RA-THA. All cases had an acetabular component placement target of 40° inclination and 20° anteversion. An independent reviewer blinded to surgical technique used the Widmer method to measure acetabular inclination and version. Patient demographics were similar for both groups. RESULTS: The mean surgical time for the manual fluoroscopic group was 88 ± 21 minutes and 101 ± 14 minutes for the RA-THA group. After 15 RA-THA cases, surgical time reached time neutral compared to the manual fluoroscopic group. The first 17 RA-THA cases utilized fluoroscopy to verify implant position until the surgeon became comfortable with the accuracy of the RA-THA system. After case 17, fluoroscopy was abandoned in all subsequent RA-THA cases. The mean radiation dose delivered to the surgical field was 5.61 ± 5.71 mGy. Manual THA with fluoroscopy resulted in a mean acetabular inclination of 41.3 ± 4.4° and a mean anteversion of 22.4 ± 3.0°. The RA-THA resulted in a mean acetabular inclination of 42.0 ± 4.2° and a mean anteversion of 22.3 ± 3.9°. There was no noted change in RA-THA placement accuracy after case 17, when fluoroscopy was eliminated from the surgical workflow. There were no statistical differences between the manual fluoroscopic and robotic-assisted groups with respect to complications and clinical PROM outcomes. CONCLUSION: The DAA THA can be performed with RA-THA and achieve comparable acetabular placement without fluoroscopy. Surgical time was higher for the RA-THA group during the learning curve, but then decreased and was consistent with the manual fluoroscopic group after 15 cases.

The Perspectives of Robotic Surgeons.

Given recent advancements in artificial intelligence and robotic surgery, attention has now been paid to the concept of autonomous surgery. As robotic surgery has developed and matured, examples of autonomous surgery have arisen through the assistance of artificial intelligence. As with any new technology, ethical and legal considerations also arise, and there are special considerations that should be taken into account with the adaptation of new technology involving patient care. In this paper, we will describe autonomous surgery used in general surgery and lower extremity joint arthroplasty, and we will highlight the current ethical and legal considerations associated with this technology.

Evaluation of an Initial Robotic-Assisted Direct Anterior Approach Cohort Receiving a New Short Metaphyseal Filling Collared Femoral Implant.

BACKGROUND: Shorter, metaphyseal-filling collared stems have become popular with the direct anterior approach (DAA), based on their ease of broaching and insertion through less invasive surgical exposures. To aid with the DAA, robotic-assisted technology provides three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance to accurately assess stem version. With other femoral stems, this has been shown to provide more accurate implant planning and improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to understand femoral stem placement predictability and patient outcomes for a newly designed metaphyseal-filling collared stem system through a DAA in combination with a robotic-assisted system during a single surgeon's initial cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single high-volume surgeon, experienced with robotic-assisted DAA total hip arthroplasty (THA), adopted the use of a metaphyseal-filling collared stem. Intraoperative data and patient outcomes up to six months postoperative were collected prospectively during the surgeon's first 123 cases. Student's t-tests (α=0.05) were used for statistical comparisons. Intraoperative and radiographic assessments were performed for all 123 cases. RESULTS: The estimated version with neck-cut view of the robotic-assisted system was 13.81 ± 3.81°. The final version measurement captured with the robotic-assisted system was 16.56 ± 6.61°. The difference between the estimated version and robotic-assisted measured version was, on average, 2.68 ± 5.7° (p<0.001). The femoral stem sat at the level of the calcar in all but five cases. There were no intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fractures. Patients reported significant improvements in reduced Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS 10), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores throughout their six-month recovery process with no patients reporting a periprosthetic joint infection, fracture, or dislocation. CONCLUSION: The use of a metaphyseal-filling collared stem with robotic-assisted DAA resulted in adequate stem version when assessed visually and with CT scan assessments. Version estimation values were improved upon over visual assessments when using the robotic system that maps out the proximal femur and the improvement was also demonstrated when compared to the prior literature. This may also be related to the stem's collar providing a visual guide during stem placement posterior fill of this triple-tapered stem design. Although further follow up is needed to assess longer-term outcomes, at six months postoperatively, patients had significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes with all patients reporting minimal to no restrictions with their THA.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages associated with increased rates of revisions, readmissions, and complications after total joint arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Low socioeconomic status based on neighborhood of residence has been suggested to be associated with poor outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The area deprivation index (ADI) is a scale that ranks (zero to 100) neighborhoods by increasing socioeconomic disadvantage and accounts for median income, housing type, and family structure. We sought to examine the potential differences between high (national median ADI = 47) and low ADI among TJA recipients at a single institution. Specifically, we assessed: (1) 30-day emergency department visits/readmissions; (2) 90-day and 1-year revisions; as well as (3) medical and surgical complications. METHODS: A consecutive series of primary TJAs from September 21, 2015, through December 29, 2021, at a tertiary healthcare system were reviewed. A total of 3,024 patients who had complete ADI data were included. Patients were divided into groups below the national median ADI of 47 (n = 1,896) and above (n = 1,128). Multivariable regressions to determine independent risk factors accounting for ADI, race, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification grade, body mass index, diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, alcohol abuse, substance abuse, and tobacco use. The primary outcomes of interest include evaluation of the independent association of ADI with total postoperative complications (at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year) after adjusting for multiple relevant cofactors. RESULTS: After adjusting for multiple relevant cofactors, at 90 days, ADI > 47 (OR, 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.83, P = 0.04), men versus women (OR, 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99, P = 0.039), and CHF (OR, 1.90, 95% CI 1.18-3.06, P = 0.009) were independently associated with increased total complications. The ADI was not associated with increased total complications at 30 days or 1-year (All P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings of higher complications of the ADI > 47 cohort at 90 days, reaffirm the complex relationship between ADI, patient demographics, and additional socioeconomic parameters that may influence postoperative outcomes and complications after TJA. This study utilizing ADI demonstrates potential areas of intervention and further investigation for assessing arthroplasty outcomes.

Assessing social disparities in inpatient vs. outpatient arthroplasty: a in-state database analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Given the growing emphasis on patient outcomes, including postoperative complications, in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), investigating the rise of outpatient arthroplasty is warranted. Concerns exist over the safety of discharging patients home on the same day due to increased readmission and complication rates. However, psychological benefits and lower costs provide an incentive for outpatient arthroplasty. The influence of social determinants of health disparities on outpatient arthroplasty remains unexplored. One metric that assesses social disparities, including the following individual components: socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status, and housing and transportation, is the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). As such, we aimed to compare: (1) mean overall SVI and mean SVI for each component and (2) risk factors for total complications between patients undergoing inpatient and outpatient arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients who underwent TJA between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 were identified. Data were drawn from the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID). A total of 7817 patients had TJA within this time period. Patients were divided into inpatient arthroplasty (n = 1429) and outpatient arthroplasty (n = 6338). The mean SVI was compared between inpatient and outpatient procedures for each themed score. The SVI identifies communities that may need support cause by external stresses on human health based on four themed scores: socioeconomic status; household composition and disability; minority status and language; and housing and transportation. The SVI uses the United States Census data to rank census tracts for each individual theme, as well as an overall social vulnerability score. The higher the SVI, the more social vulnerability, or resources needed to thrive in that area. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for total complications following TJA after controlling for risk factors and patient comorbidities. Total complications included: infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, arthrofibrosis, mechanical complication, pain, and periprosthetic fracture. RESULTS: Patients who had inpatient arthroplasty had higher overall SVI scores (0.45 vs. 0.42, P < 0.001). The SVI scores were higher for patients who had inpatient arthroplasty for socioeconomic status (0.36 vs. 0.32, P < 0.001), minority status and language (0.76 vs. 0.74, P < 0.001), and housing and transportation (0.53 vs. 0.50, P < 0.001) compared to outpatient arthroplasty, respectively. There was no difference between inpatient and outpatient arthroplasty for household composition and disability (0.41 vs. 0.41, P = 0.99). When controlling for comorbidities, inpatient arthroplasty [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.91, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.23-2.95, P = 0.004], hypertension (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.23-3.62, P = 0.007), and housing and transportation (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.17-3.42, P = 0.012) were independent risk factors for total complications. CONCLUSION: Inpatient arthroplasty was associated with increased social disparities across several components of deprivation as well as an independent risk factor total complications following TJA. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the negative repercussions of inpatient arthroplasty through the lens of social disparities and can target specific areas for intervention.

Excellent 10-Year survivorship of robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Introduction: Robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent solution for patients suffering from single-compartment knee arthritis. While outcomes tend to be favorable for UKAs, revision operations, commonly due to component malpositioning and malalignment resulting in accelerated wear, are a major concern. Intraoperative technologies, such as robotic assistance, can help better ensure that implants are positioned based on a patient's specific anatomy and mechanical physiology. However, long-term survivorship and patient-reported satisfaction with robotic-assisted UKAs are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the 10-year outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Specifically, we evaluated: 1) 10-year survivorships; 2) patient satisfaction scores; and 3) re-operations. Methods: From a single surgeon and single institution, 185 patients who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 39 to 92) and a mean body mass index of 31.6 (range, 22.4 to 39) at a mean of 10 years follow-up were evaluated (range, 9 to 11). For all patients, the same robotic-assistive device was utilized intraoperatively, and all patients underwent standardized physical therapy and received standardized pain control management. Then 10-year survivorships with Kaplan-Meir curves, patient satisfaction evaluations with a 5-point Likert scale, and re-operations were assessed as primary outcomes. Results: Overall implant survivorship was 99%, with only two patients requiring revision surgery. There was one patient who was converted to a total knee arthroplasty, while the other patient underwent polyethylene exchange at 5 weeks for an acute infection with successful implant retention. Overall, 97% of the patients were satisfied with their postoperative outcomes, with 81% of patients reporting being very satisfied. There were two other patients who required arthroscopic intervention: one to remove a cement loose body, the other to remove adhered scar from the fat pad and the anterior cruciate ligament. Conclusion: This study is one of the first to provide longer-term (mean 10-year) survivorship and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes for robotic-assisted UKA patients. These data show strong support for utilizing this surgical technique, as nearly all patients maintained their original prostheses and reported being satisfied after a mean of 10 years. Therefore, based on these results, we recommend the use of robotic assistance when performing UKAs.

A Comparison Between Polyethylene Exchange and Full Revision for Arthrofibrosis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating postoperative complication and a major cause of patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness after TKA. For cases not amenable to manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), one component or full revision are both suitable options. In a value-based healthcare era, maximizing cost-effectiveness with optimized clinical outcomes for patients remains the ultimate goal. As such, we compared (1) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), (2) range of motion (ROM), as well as (3) complication rates, including MUA and lysis of adhesions (LOA), between polyethylene exchange and full component revision for TKA arthrofibrosis. METHODS: Patients were queried from an institutional database who underwent revision TKA for arthrofibrosis between January 1, 2015, and April 31, 2021. There were 33 patients who underwent full revision and 16 patients who underwent polyethylene exchange. Demographics and baseline characteristics between the cohorts were analyzed. Postoperative outcomes included MUA, LOA, and re-revision rates as well as KOOS, JR, and extension and flexion ROM at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. Baseline comorbidities, including age, body mass index, alcohol use, tobacco use, and diabetes, were comparable between the full revision and polyethylene exchange revision cohorts (P > .05). The one and full component revisions had similar preoperative KOOS, JR (43 versus 42, P = .85), and flexion (81 versus 82 degrees, P = .80) versus extension (11 versus 11 degrees, P = .87) ROM. RESULTS: The full component revision had higher KOOS, JR (65 versus 55, P = .04), and flexion (102 versus 92 degrees, P = .02), but similar extension (3 versus 3 degrees, P = .80) ROM at final follow-up compared to the polyethylene exchange revision, respectively. The MUA (18.2 versus 18.8%, P = .96) and LOA (2.0 versus 0.0%, P = .32) rates were similar between full component and polyethylene exchange revisions. There was one re-revision (3.0%) for the cohort of patients who initially underwent full revision. There were four full re-revisions (25.0%) and two polyethylene exchange re-revisions (12.5%) performed in the cohort of patients who initially underwent a polyethylene exchange revision. CONCLUSIONS: The full component revision for stiffness after TKA showed favorable KOOS, JR, ROM, and outcomes in comparison to the polyethylene exchange revision. While the optimal treatment for stiffness after TKA is without consensus, this study supports the use of the full component revision when applied to the institutional population at hand. It is imperative that homogeneity exists in preoperative definitions, preoperative baseline patient demographics, ROM and function levels, outcome measures, and preoperative indications, as well as the inclusion of clinical data that assesses complete exchange, single exchange, and tibial insert exchange.

Appropriateness of Frequently Asked Patient Questions Following Total Hip Arthroplasty From ChatGPT Compared to Arthroplasty-Trained Nurses.

BACKGROUND: The use of ChatGPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer), which is a natural language artificial intelligence model, has gained unparalleled attention with the accumulation of over 100 million users within months of launching. As such, we aimed to compare the following: 1) orthopaedic surgeons' evaluation of the appropriateness of the answers to the most frequently asked patient questions after total hip arthroplasty; and 2) patients' evaluation of ChatGPT and arthroplasty-trained nurses responses to answer their postoperative questions. METHODS: We prospectively created 60 questions to address the most commonly asked patient questions following total hip arthroplasty. We obtained answers from arthroplasty-trained nurses and from the ChatGPT-3.5 version for each of the questions. Surgeons graded each set of responses based on clinical judgment as 1) "appropriate," 2) "inappropriate" if the response contained inappropriate information, or 3) "unreliable" if the responses provided inconsistent content. Each patient was given a randomly selected question from the 60 aforementioned questions, with responses provided by ChatGPT and arthroplasty-trained nurses, using a Research Electronic Data Capture survey hosted at our local hospital. RESULTS: The 3 fellowship-trained surgeons graded 56 out of 60 (93.3%) responses for the arthroplasty-trained nurses and 57 out of 60 (95.0%) for ChatGPT to be "appropriate." There were 175 out of 252 (69.4%) patients who were more comfortable following the ChatGPT responses and 77 out of 252 (30.6%) who preferred arthroplasty-trained nurses' responses. However, 199 out of 252 patients (79.0%) responded that they were "uncertain" with regard to trusting AI to answer their postoperative questions. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT provided appropriate answers from a physician perspective. Patients were also more comfortable with the ChatGPT responses than those from arthroplasty-trained nurses. Inevitably, its successful implementation is dependent on its ability to provide credible information that is consistent with the goals of the physician and patient alike.

Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants for Complex Hip Revisions: A Case Series.

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents a formidable challenge when addressing extensive acetabular defects, particularly in severe cases classified under Paprosky types 3A and 3B and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons types 3 and 4. Traditional methods often fall short, prompting the potential use of custom triflange acetabular components or patient-specific acetabular implants (PSAIs). These implants are specifically designed to conform to an individual's anatomy, aiming to enhance defect reconstruction and pelvic stabilization. This case series describes the utilization of advanced 3-dimensional printing and rapid prototyping technologies to construct customized acetabular components, which can be instrumental in enabling precise preoperative planning and surgical execution for these difficult acetabular cases and potentially leading to improved surgical outcomes.