House dust mite sublingual immunotherapy is safe and appears to be effective in moderate, persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy in house dust mite-induced asthma have yet to be firmly established. We report the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial performed in mainland China. METHODS: After a three-month baseline period, 484 asthmatic adults were randomized 2 : 1 to 12 months of daily treatment with either an aqueous, standardized, 300 index of reactivity mixture of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae extracts or a placebo. The primary efficacy criterion was well-controlled asthma for at least 16 of the last 20 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: In the active (n = 308) and placebo (n = 157) groups, well-controlled asthma was achieved by 85.4% and 81.5% of the patients, respectively (P = 0.244). A subsequent post hoc analysis by asthma severity revealed significant clinical benefits in actively treated subjects with moderate, persistent asthma at baseline [401-800 µg budesonide/day (n = 175)], with greater achievement of well-controlled asthma (80.5% and 66.1% for the active treatment and placebo groups, respectively; P = 0.021) and totally controlled asthma (54.0% and 33.9%, respectively, P = 0.008), a higher percentage of patients with an asthma control questionnaire score < 0.75 (56.6% and 40.0%, respectively; P = 0.039) and a greater mean reduction in inhaled corticosteroid use (218.5 µg and 126.2 µg, respectively; P = 0.004). The active vs placebo differences in disease control and corticosteroid use were not significant for mild, persistent asthma. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual mite allergen immunotherapy was well tolerated in adult asthmatics and effectively controlled disease in patients with moderate (but not mild) persistent asthma (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00660452).

Changes in basophil activation during grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy do not correlate with clinical efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers predicting the safety and efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) remain to be established. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen received either a placebo or five-grass-pollen daily tablet sublingually for 4 months. Following exposure in an allergen challenge chamber, clinical responders and nonresponders were identified individually by evaluating their rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS). Activation of peripheral blood basophils was measured by cytofluorometry before and after 2 or 4 months of immunotherapy, based on CD203c surface expression following allergen stimulation. RESULTS: Patients receiving the grass-pollen tablet had a relative mean improvement of 29.3% vs placebo in the average RTSS after 4 months of SLIT (P < 0.0003). No significant changes in basophil activation were noticed after 2 or 4 months of SLIT despite induction of specific IgGs. Among individual clinical responders, basophil activation was either decreased, increased, or unmodified during SLIT. Levels of basophil activation prior to immunotherapy were not predictive of local adverse reactions associated with immunotherapy. A moderate association was found between basophil activation and allergen-specific IgE levels, skin reactivity, or RTSS, suggesting that the former is, to some extent, indicative of disease severity. As such, patients with the highest level of basophil activation before treatment were more likely to benefit clinically from SLIT. CONCLUSIONS: Allergen reactivity of peripheral blood basophils is not a biomarker for adverse events or early onset of clinical responses to SLIT.

The average Adjusted Symptom Score, a new primary efficacy end-point for specific allergen immunotherapy trials.

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, the efficacy of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms is often evaluated with the average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (ARTSS). Effective treatment is associated with a lower ARTSS vs. placebo but use of rescue medication to alleviate symptoms reduces the RTSS and decreases the mean difference between active treatment and placebo groups. OBJECTIVE: To develop and describe the average Adjusted Symptom Score (AdSS), a new end-point reflecting symptom severity and rescue medication use in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis trials. METHODS: To calculate the AdSS, the RTSS is adjusted as follows: if a patient takes rescue medication on day d, the day's AdSS (AdSS(d)) is defined as the value of RTSS(d) or AdSS(d-1), whichever is higher. The AdSS on the following day (AdSS(d+1)) is defined as the value of RTSS(d+1) or AdSS(d), whichever is higher. The average of the daily AdSSs (during the season) was calculated post hoc for two trials investigating the efficacy of five-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in adult and paediatric patients and compared with the ARTSS and three other outcome measures (the average Rescue Medication Score (ARMS), the ARTSS and the average Combined Score). RESULTS: The average AdSS clearly discriminated between active and placebo treatments and confirmed the original ARTSS results. Adjustment for rescue medication use decreased the observed placebo effect. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The average AdSS can be a valuable alternative to the ARTSS as a primary efficacy end-point in grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis trials. By adjusting the RTSS for rescue medication use, the AdSS can estimate symptom severity and the treatment effect more accurately. The AdSS is now being tested prospectively in large clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of 5-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in patients with different clinical profiles of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of grass pollen tablets for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients was previously established in a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 628 adults. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily 5-grass pollen sublingual tablets of 100 IR (index of reactivity), 300 IR or 500 IR, or placebo starting 4 months before the pollen season. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this complementary analysis was to determine whether 300 IR 5-grass pollen SLIT-tablets is effective in different subtypes of patients who are allergic to grass pollen. METHODS: Different subgroups could be identified regarding comorbidities (with or without asthma during the grass-pollen season), sensitization (mono/polysensitization) and symptom severity. An additional exploratory analysis was performed within four subgroups based on pre-treatment assessment: Group 1=high specific IgE; Group 2=high symptom scores; Group 3=high skin sensitivity; Group 4=any of Group 1, 2 or 3. RESULTS: Asthma and sensitization status were not significant covariates as the average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) was identical for patients with and without grass-pollen asthma, as well as for mono- and polysensitized patients. Across the four subgroups, average RTSSs (+/- SD) for the optimal dosage (300 IR) were 3.91 +/- 3.16, 3.83 +/- 3.14, 2.55 +/- 2.13 and 3.61 +/- 2.97, for subgroups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. ANCOVA showed that in Group 1 average RTSS did not differ significantly with different doses of SLIT. In Groups 2, 3 and 4, doses of 300 IR and 500 IR were significantly more effective than 100 IR and placebo (P< or =0.035). All doses of SLIT administered in this study can be considered safe in the patients investigated. CONCLUSIONS: The risk-benefit ratio validates the use of 300 IR tablets in clinical practice in all of these patient subgroups, regardless of severity profile, sensitization status and presence of asthma.

Agreement of efficacy assessments for five-grass pollen sublingual tablet immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of five-grass pollen sublingual tablet immunotherapy (SLIT) was established recently by the primary criteria Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) from the first treatment season. Secondary and exploratory criteria, such as RTSS at peak pollen season, exploratory combined symptom and rescue medication use score, quality of life and immunological markers are calculated and described in this analysis. METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-eight patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis (> or =2 years duration) were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Europe. Patients received once-daily SLIT (Stallergenes, Antony, France) of 100IR, 300IR, 500IR or placebo, starting 4 months before grass pollen season and throughout the 2005 season. Patients were instructed to take rescue medication only if symptoms were severe and record symptom severity on using the RTSS. RESULTS: Both 300IR and 500IR doses significantly reduced mean RTSS at pollen peak (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.0014, respectively) and the exploratory combined score (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0026, respectively) compared with placebo. Compared with patients in the placebo group, those who were taking the 300IR and 500IR doses reported significantly improved quality of life using the mean Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores during the peak of the pollen season (P < 0.0001) and at the end of the pollen season (P = 0.0031 and P < or = 0.0001, respectively). Specific immunoglobulin G4 increased significantly depending on the SLIT dose (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: All secondary efficacy criteria, including efficacy at pollen peak, combined score, quality of life and immunological changes, indicate that 300IR tablets represent the optimal dose and suggest it is appropriate for use in clinical practice.

[Inhaled corticotherapy sparing effect by sodium nedocromil in moderate to severe asthma]. / Epargne de la corticothérapie inhalée par le nédocromil sodique dans l'asthme modéré à sévère. Groupe Français d'Etude Tilade.

BACKGROUND: The increased use of high dose inhaled steroid in the treatment of asthma has revealed the risk of dose-dependent side effects. Nedocromil sodium is a non steroidal agent with anti-inflammatory properties. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate whether nedocromil sodium may have some therapeutic benefit in asthmatic patients treated with high dose inhaled steroids and whether it has an inhaled steroid sparing effect. PATIENTS: 134 adults with moderate to severe asthma not adequately controlled with high dose inhaled steroids (750 to 1,500 micrograms/day). METHOD: After a two week baseline period, patients were randomized to receive either nedocromil sodium (4 mg qid) or placebo for 24 weeks in a double blind fashion. During the first 12 weeks of treatment, the dose of inhaled steroid was maintained constant whereas it was altered during the last 12 weeks according to asthma scores. RESULTS: Among 108 patients reaching the reduction phase, a decrease of 250 micrograms of inhaled steroid or more was possible in 79% of patients on nedocromil sodium and in 60% of patients on placebo (p < 0.03). Symptoms scores were improved on both treatments during the 12 first weeks, more on nedocromil sodium than on placebo, treatment difference reaching significance for daytime asthma (p < 0.02). FEV1 improved during the trial for patients on nedocromil (from 69 +/- 18% to 74 +/- 21%; p < 0.005) whereas it did not for those on placebo. CONCLUSION: Nedocromil sodium is effective in improving moderate to severe asthma in addition to inhaled steroid and has some steroid sparing effect in patients treated with high dose inhaled steroid.