Pilot therapeutic education program in multiple system atrophy: Safety, quality of life and satisfaction from a national registry based longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic education programs are effective in several chronic conditions. However, evidence is lacking in multiple system atrophy (MSA). We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of a comprehensive therapeutic education program in people with MSA (PwMSA) and their caregivers. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal study we included 16 PwMSA and their main caregivers in 4 groups of 4 dyads each. The program consisted of eight 60-min interdisciplinary sessions: introduction, orthostatic hypotension, speech therapy, gait and respiratory physiotherapy, psychological support, urinary dysfunction, occupational therapy/social work. UMSARS, NMSS, PDQ39, EQ5 and Zarit scales were administered at baseline and 6 months later. After each session participants filled-out a modified EduPark satisfaction questionnaire and a Likert scale. Educational material was generated for each session after suggestions by participants. RESULTS: At baseline PwMSA and caregivers were comparable in age and sex, with significant correlation between UMSARS-IV (disability) and PDQ39 (quality of life). Adherence to sessions was of 94,92 %. Total modified EduPark scores and Likert scales did not differ in PwMSA vs. caregivers, mild-moderate vs. severe-advanced cases or between genders. The significant difference in satisfaction across sessions (p = 0.03) was driven by higher scores in speech, respiratory and occupational therapy sessions. Longitudinally there was no significant worsening in any scale, nor a significant increase post-vs. pre-program in the number of consultations. CONCLUSIONS: The healthcare education program in MSA was feasible, satisfactory, and safe for patients and caregivers. The educational material of the program is being forwarded to incident MSA cases attending our clinic.

Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia: Quantitative assessment tool.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is no tool to quantify buccophonatory apraxia to stratify, compare and monitor patients longitudinally in an objective manner. Our aim in this study is to create a quantitative scale for buccophonatory apraxia and evaluate it in patients with the non-fluent/grammatical variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and other neurodegenerative diseases that occur with speech and/or language problems. METHODS: The scale was designed based on useful elements in the assessment of buccophonatory apraxia and the total was quantified in seconds. The scale was administered to 64 participants with diagnoses of: nfvPPA, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, as well as a group of healthy controls. RESULTS: Patients showed a significantly higher score compared to controls. The nfvPPA group had the highest mean score on the scale (429 seconds ± 278). The scale was useful to differentiate vnfPPA from svPPA and Parkinson's disease (area under curve [AUC] of 0.956 and 0.989, respectively), but less to differentiate it from Huntington's disease (AUC = 0.67) and lvPPA. There was a statistically significant relationship between total score and disease severity in nfvPPA (P < .029). CONCLUSIONS: The Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia could be useful to quantitatively evaluate buccophonatory apraxia in different neurodegenerative diseases, and compare patients, especially in nfvPPA.

Decreased striatal dopamine transporter uptake in the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) may develop atypical parkinsonian syndromes. However, there is no current biomarker to assess which patients are at high risk of developing parkinsonism. 123I-2ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)-nortropane (123I-FP-CIT)-SPECT detects striatal dopamine dysfunction in vivo. The objective of the present study was to study whether non-fluent/agrammatic patients without parkinsonism at baseline present decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake. METHODS: Visual and semi-quantitative assessments of the striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake ratio were carried out in 15 patients with nfvPPA, eight patients with the logopenic variant of PPA (lvPPA) and 18 controls. To rule out progranulin mutations or underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD), serum progranulin levels and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD (Aß42 , total-tau, phosphorylated-tau181 ) were determined. A second 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT analysis in the biomarker-enriched groups was also carried out. RESULTS: Patients with nfvPPA presented reduced striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding, especially in the left hemisphere (P = 0.002), compared with controls. All lvPPA patients had normal striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake. 123I-FP-CIT striatal binding in nfvPPA patients with normal progranulin and CSF biomarker levels (nfvPPA/bio-) was also significantly reduced (P < 0.05) compared with lvPPA patients with positive AD biomarkers. Sixty-four per cent (9/14) of nfvPPA patients and 80% of nfvPPA/bio- patients (8/10) showed a diminished individual left striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake ratio. On follow-up, seven nfvPPA/bio- patients developed parkinsonism (median 1.9 years; range 1.2-2.9), six of them with baseline reduced 123I-FP-CIT uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced striatal tracer uptake in nfvPPA patients prior to clinical parkinsonism can be detected by 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT, especially in those with nfvPPA/bio-, suggesting subclinical nigrostriatal degeneration. Decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding might identify PPA patients at increased risk of developing atypical parkinsonian syndromes, probably related to tau-pathology.

Neuroimaging and biochemical markers in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate in variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) the association between current clinical and neuroimaging criteria and biochemical/genetic markers at the individual level. METHODS: Thirty-two PPA patients were classified as non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA), semantic (svPPA), or logopenic variant (lvPPA) or as unclassifiable (uPPA). In all patients, we evaluated the neuroimaging criteria (magnetic resonance imaging and/or single photon emission computed tomography/positron emission tomography) of each variant and studied serum progranulin levels, APOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Cases with a first-degree family history of early-onset dementia were genetically tested. RESULTS: Ten of 15 (66%) nfvPPA, 5/5 (100%) svPPA and 7/7 (100%) lvPPA patients showed at least one positive neuroimaging-supported diagnostic criterion. All lvPPA and 3/5 (60%) uPPA patients presented AD-CSF biomarkers, which were absent in nfvPPA and svPPA cases. Four (27%) nfvPPA patients had dementia-causing mutations: 2 carried a GRN mutation and 2 the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide expansion. CONCLUSIONS: There was an excellent association between clinical criteria and neuroimaging-supported biomarkers in svPPA and lvPPA, as well as with AD-CSF biochemical markers in the lvPPA. Neuroimaging, biochemical and genetic findings in nfvPPA were heterogeneous. Incorporating biochemical/genetic markers into the PPA clinical diagnosis would allow clinicians to improve their predictions of PPA neuropathology, especially in nfvPPA and uPPA cases.