What to Expect When Systemic Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Is Withdrawn?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment is to maintain clinical remission. It is also important to reduce drug exposure, whenever possible, in order to avoid or decrease potential side effects. We aimed to analyze remission survival after systemic treatment withdrawal and to determine which factors can influence it. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, longitudinal study. All patients included had a diagnosis of JIA. We analyzed remission survival using Kaplan-Meier curves according to the systemic treatment received (methotrexate [MTX] alone or in combination with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [bDMARDs]) and JIA subgroups (oligoarticular and polyarticular course, juvenile spondyloarthritis, and systemic JIA). In addition, risk factors were examined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We included 404 patients with JIA; 370 of them (92%) had received systemic treatment at some point and half of them (185 patients) had withdrawn on at least 1 occasion. There were 110 patients who flared (59%) with a median time of 2.3 years. There were no differences in remission survival between JIA subcategories. Twenty-nine percent of patients with JIA who received MTX and bDMARDs, in which MTX alone was withdrawn, flared; median time to flare of 6.3 years. However, if only the bDMARD was withdrawn, flares occurred 57% of the time; median time to flare of 1.1 years. CONCLUSION: Flares are frequent when systemic treatment is withdrawn, and uveitis or joint injections could be related risk factors. In MTX and biologic-naïve patients, the frequency of flares occurred in more than half of patients, although they were less frequent when clinical remission lasted for > 1 year.

Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

Objective: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991-1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980-1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979-1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976-1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959-1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961-0.993). Conclusion: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice.

Clinical impact of nailfold capillaroscopy in daily clinical practice. / Impacto clínico de la capilaroscopia periungueal en la práctica clínica diaria.

INTRODUCTION: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) is useful in the evaluation of Raynaud's phenomenon, associated with some connective tissue diseases and in the follow-up of patients with systemic sclerosis. Our study evaluates the impact of NC in the diagnosis, according to the reason for the request and profile of autoantibodies in daily clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients that undergone at least one NC between June 2012 and December 2017 were included. Clinical records were reviewed and analysed in a dichotomous way (yes/no), to see whether the NC contributed to a change of diagnosis in subsequent consultations. In addition, demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected, and the relationship with NC patterns evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 530 patients who had undergone at least one NC, 266 had Raynaud's phenomenon as primary indication for the technique. Of those, 20 patients (3.8%) had a diagnostic change in the post-NC consultation; 15 were diagnosed with systemic sclerosis, 4 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease and one with mixed connective tissue disease. All patients had, except for one patient diagnosed with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, positive antinuclear antibodies titres, 11 of them had disease specific antibodies (9 anti-centromere, one anti-Scl70 and other anti-RNPC). The positivity of antinuclear antibodies titres was associated with a higher probability of presenting a scleroderma pattern in the NC, and all patients with a specific rheumatological diagnosis had an abnormal NC. CONCLUSION: NC is a useful technique, but with limited impact in the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases. Autoantibody positivity is associated with a greater likelihood of presenting pathological NC patterns.

Can ultrasound-detected subclinical synovitis be an indicator of flare recurrence in juvenile idiopathic arthritis remission patients on tapered TNFi?

OBJECTIVES: Subclinical synovitis is often detected by musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients in clinical remission. The main objective of this prospective, observational, longitudinal, multicentre study was to evaluate the predictive value of MSUS-detected subclinical synovitis in relation to flares at 12 months following TNFi tapering in a JIA population in stable clinical remission. METHODS: We included 56 JIA patients in stable remission undergoing TNFi therapy tapered at baseline and in some cases at 6 months. We performed baseline and 6-month MSUS assessment on B-mode (BM) and power Doppler (PD) mode of 22 joints and 8 tendons. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (32.1%) experienced a flare during the 12-month study period. BM synovitis was frequent (83.9%) but PD synovitis was scarcely found (8.9%). There were no significant differences in MSUS findings between patients who experienced a flare and those who remained in remission. Only 5 patients had positive for PD synovitis, in joints with BM synovitis grades 2 or 3, and none experienced a flare. Concomitant methotrexate (MTX) was more frequent in patients who were successfully tapered (71.1% vs. 27.8%; p=0.002) and patients older than 12 experienced a greater number of flares and earlier onset. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical synovitis, as detected by MSUS, proved not to be a predictor of flares. Those patients on a TNFi-tapered concomitant methotrexate regimen experienced the fewest flares although flare risk increased with age.

Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis treated successfully with tumour necrosis factor alpha blocking agents (anti-TNF-α).

Idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP) is defined by 2 or more episodes of acute pericarditis of unknown etiology. Either auto-immune or auto-inflammatory diseases are suspected. Usually, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine or low dose steroid treatments are effective, however, side effects and/or non-response patients are frequent. We report on three paediatric patients with IRP from our paediatric rheumatology unit. The patients were non-responders to standard therapy and were treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha blocking agents (anti-TNF-α) and showed significant improvement. In two patients, the treatment was tapered and then stopped following several years of therapy. Symptoms flared in the last patient when therapy was tapered more quickly. We conclude that anti-TNF-α can be useful in selected cases of IRP.

Clinical remission and/or minimal disease activity in patients receiving adalimumab treatment in a multinational, open-label, twelve-week study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of adalimumab treatment on clinical remission and/or minimal disease activity (MDA) in 6,610 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were enrolled in the Research in Active RA trial, a multinational, open-label, 12-week study with an optional extension period. METHODS: Clinical remission was defined as a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)<2.6, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score

Adalimumab alone and in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: the Research in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (ReAct) trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab alone or in combination with standard disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active RA despite treatment with DMARDs or prior treatment with a tumour necrosis factor antagonist participated in a multicentre, open-label clinical study of adalimumab 40 mg every other week for 12 weeks with an optional extension phase. Patients were allowed to continue with pre-existing traditional DMARDs. Long-term safety results are reported for all patients (4210 patient-years (PYs) of adalimumab exposure). The observed effectiveness results at week 12 are reported using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. RESULTS: Among the 6610 treated patients, adalimumab was generally well tolerated. Serious infections occurred in 3.1% of patients (5.5/100 PYs, including active tuberculosis, 0.5/100 PYs). Demyelinating disease (0.06%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (0.03%) were rare serious adverse events. The standardised incidence ratio of malignancy was 0.71 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.01). The standardised mortality ratio was 1.07 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.49). At week 12, 69% of patients achieved an ACR20 response, 83% a moderate, and 33% a good EULAR response. Adalimumab was effective in combination with a variety of DMARDs. The addition of adalimumab to antimalarials was comparably effective to the combination of adalimumab and methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the limitations of an open-label study, adalimumab alone or in combination with standard DMARDs appeared to be well tolerated and effective in 6610 difficult-to-treat patients with active RA treated in clinical practice.