Comparison of Definitive Cervical Cancer Management With Chemotherapy and Radiation Between Two Centers With Variable Resources and Opportunities for Improved Treatment.

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer remains a major health challenge in low- to middle-income countries. We present the experiences of two centers practicing in variable resource environments to determine predictors of improved radiochemotherapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This comparative review describes cervical cancer presentation and treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy between 2014 and 2017 at the National Radiotherapy Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Center (NRONMC) in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, and Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC), Tampa, FL. RESULTS: Median follow-up for this study was 16.9 months. NRONMC patients presented with predominantly stage III disease (42% v 16%; P = .002). MCC patients received para-aortic node irradiation (16%) and interstitial brachytherapy implants (19%). Median treatment duration was longer for NRONMC patients compared with MCC patients (59 v 52 days; P < .0001), and treatment duration ≥ 55 days predicted worse survival on multivariable analysis (MVA; P = .02). Stage ≥ III disease predicted poorer local control on MVA. There was a difference in local control among patients with stage III disease (58% v 91%; P = .03) but not in survival between MCC and NRONMC. No significant difference in local control was observed for stage IB, IIA, and IIB disease. CONCLUSION: Although there were significant differences in disease presentation between the two centers, treatment outcomes were similar for patients with early-stage disease. Longer treatment duration and stage ≥ III disease predicted poor outcomes.

High-dose intensity-modulated chemoradiotherapy in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Outcome and toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate clinical outcomes, pattern of failure, and toxicity after high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for advanced vulvar cancer. METHODS: In this IRB approved retrospective study, the charts of women with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic vulvar cancer consecutively treated at our institution from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed to identify patients that received high-dose IMRT with curative intent. The treatment compliance, toxicities, and patterns of failure were investigated. Actuarial local, regional and distant recurrence and survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were identified, 23 were unresectable, and 3 refused surgery. Fifteen patients (58%) had inguinal node metastases; 10(38%) had pelvic node metastases. Elective surgical staging of groins was performed in 9-patients. Median tumor dose was 65.4Gy. Concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy was administered in 22(84.6%) patients. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 21/26 (80.7%) patients. Five patients had persistent disease following treatment and one sustained recurrence 5-months following radiotherapy. All persistent or recurrent disease occurred inside the irradiated volume. Median follow-up was 19 months (3-52 months). Actuarial 1-year local, regional and distant controls were 72.4%, 85.4%, and 86%, respectively. One and 2-year overall survivals were 91% and 62%, respectively. Complete response at 3-months was a strong predictor for overall survival (1-yr OS 73% vs 27%, HR 7.1 (95% CI 1.2-44); p = 0.01). Lymph node metastases adversely affected overall survival (2-yr OS 49% vs. 83%, p = 0.09). Grade 3-4 late urinary and soft-tissue toxicity was seen in 5 patients. Tumor doses >66 Gy (p = 0.03) and prior pelvic radiotherapy (p = 0.002) predicted grade 3-4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: High-dose IMRT for vulvar cancer achieves high rates of local control with acceptable dose dependent long-term toxicity.

Using the Radiosensitivity Index (RSI) to Predict Pelvic Failure in Endometrial Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Variability exists in the adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) based on surgical pathology and institutional preference. The radiosensitivity index (RSI) is a previously validated multigene expression index that estimates tumor radiosensitivity. We evaluate RSI as a genomic predictor for pelvic failure (PF) in EC patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using our institutional tissue biorepository, we identified EC patients treated between January 1999 and April 2011 with primarily endometrioid histology (n = 176; 86%) who received various adjuvant therapies. The RSI 10-gene signature was calculated for each sample using the previously published algorithm. Radiophenotype was determined using the previously identified cutpoint where RSI ≥ 0.375 denotes radioresistance (RR) and RSI < 0.375 describes radiosensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were identified, of which 83 (41%) were treated with adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 38.5 months. All patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with the majority undergoing lymph node dissection (n = 181; 88%). In patients treated with radiation, RR tumors were more likely to experience PF (3-year pelvic control 84% vs 100%; P = .02) with worse PF-free survival (PFFS) (3-year PFFS 65% vs 89%; P = .04). Furthermore, in the patients who did not receive RT, there was no difference in PF (P = .87) or PFFS (P = .57) between the RR/radiosensitive tumors. On multivariable analysis, factors that continued to predict for PF included the RR phenotype (hazard ratio [HR], 12.2; P = .003), lymph node involvement (HR, 4.4; P = .02), and serosal or adnexal involvement (HR, 5.3; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: On multivariable analysis, RSI was found to be a significant predictor of PF in patients treated with adjuvant RT. We propose using RSI to predict which patients are at higher risk for failing in the pelvis and may be candidates for treatment escalation in the adjuvant setting.

Radiotherapy for early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with or without double or triple hit genetic alterations.

We investigated whether adding radiation (RT) to systemic therapy improved outcomes in early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with or without double- or triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL) biology. This analysis included 183 patients profiled with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for alterations in MYC, BLC2, and/or BCL6. A total of 146 (80%) were non-DHL/THL, 27 (15%) were DHL, and 10 (6%) were THL. Systemic therapy without RT resulted in inferior freedom from relapse (FFR) (HR: 2.28; 95% CI, 1.10-4.77; p = .02). The median FFR for non-DHL/THL was not reached and was 33 and 22.3 months for DHL and THL, respectively; p < .001. Low-risk (R-IPI <2) DHL/THL patients treated with rituximab-based therapy had 3-year FFR rates of 11% and 71% for systemic therapy without and with RT, respectively; p = .04. No differences in overall survival were observed between the treatment groups. Treatment intensification with RT may improve early stage DHL/THL outcomes.

Personalizing Radiation Treatment Delivery in the Management of Breast Cancer.

Long-term data establishes the efficacy of radiotherapy in the adjuvant management of breast cancer. New dose and fractionation schemas have evolved and are available, each with unique risks and rewards. Current efforts are ongoing to tailor radiotherapy to the unique biology of breast cancer. In this review, we discuss our efforts to personalize radiotherapy dosing using genomic data and the implications for future clinical trials. We also explore immune mechanisms that may contribute to a tumor's unique radiation sensitivity or resistance.

Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.

Site-specific investigations of the role of radiomics in cancer diagnosis and therapy are emerging. We evaluated the reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from 18 Flourine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) PET images for three parameters: manual versus computer-aided segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and PET image reconstruction algorithms. Our cohort consisted of pretreatment PET/CT scans from 88 cervical cancer patients. Two board-certified radiation oncologists manually segmented the metabolic tumor volume (MTV1 and MTV2 ) for each patient. For comparison, we used a graphical-based method to generate semiautomated segmented volumes (GBSV). To address any perturbations in radiomic feature values, we down-sampled the tumor volumes into three gray-levels: 32, 64, and 128 from the original gray-level of 256. Finally, we analyzed the effect on radiomic features on PET images of eight patients due to four PET 3D-reconstruction algorithms: maximum likelihood-ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) iterative reconstruction (IR) method, fourier rebinning-ML-OSEM (FOREIR), FORE-filtered back projection (FOREFBP), and 3D-Reprojection (3DRP) analytical method. We extracted 79 features from all segmentation method, gray-levels of down-sampled volumes, and PET reconstruction algorithms. The features were extracted using gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM), gray-level size zone matrices (GLSZM), gray-level run-length matrices (GLRLM), neighborhood gray-tone difference matrices (NGTDM), shape-based features (SF), and intensity histogram features (IHF). We computed the Dice coefficient between each MTV and GBSV to measure segmentation accuracy. Coefficient values close to one indicate high agreement, and values close to zero indicate low agreement. We evaluated the effect on radiomic features by calculating the mean percentage differences (d¯) between feature values measured from each pair of parameter elements (i.e. segmentation methods: MTV1 -MTV2 , MTV1 -GBSV, MTV2 -GBSV; gray-levels: 64-32, 64-128, and 64-256; reconstruction algorithms: OSEM-FORE-OSEM, OSEM-FOREFBP, and OSEM-3DRP). We used |d¯| as a measure of radiomic feature reproducibility level, where any feature scored |d¯| ±SD ≤ |25|% ± 35% was considered reproducible. We used Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate the mean, standard deviation (SD), and upper/lower reproducibility limits (U/LRL) for radiomic features in response to variation in each testing parameter. Furthermore, we proposed U/LRL as a method to classify the level of reproducibility: High- ±1% ≤ U/LRL ≤ ±30%; Intermediate- ±30% < U/LRL ≤ ±45%; Low- ±45 < U/LRL ≤ ±50%. We considered any feature below the low level as nonreproducible (NR). Finally, we calculated the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate the reliability of radiomic feature measurements for each parameter. The segmented volumes of 65 patients (81.3%) scored Dice coefficient >0.75 for all three volumes. The result outcomes revealed a tendency of higher radiomic feature reproducibility among segmentation pair MTV1 -GBSV than MTV2 -GBSV, gray-level pairs of 64-32 and 64-128 than 64-256, and reconstruction algorithm pairs of OSEM-FOREIR and OSEM-FOREFBP than OSEM-3DRP. Although the choice of cervical tumor segmentation method, gray-level value, and reconstruction algorithm may affect radiomic features, some features were characterized by high reproducibility through all testing parameters. The number of radiomic features that showed insensitivity to variations in segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms was 10 (13%), 4 (5%), and 1 (1%), respectively. These results suggest that a careful analysis of the effects of these parameters is essential prior to any radiomics clinical application.

Frequency of whole breast radiation therapy after intraoperative radiation therapy due to criteria identified by lumpectomy.

PURPOSE: For selected early breast cancers, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) at the time of lumpectomy can be an efficient alternative to fractionated whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT). However, some patients are later recommended WBRT after IORT due to surgical pathologic findings. To understand risk factor identification rates triggering WBRT recommendation, we analyzed adverse prognostic features based on multiple international criteria for suitability for accelerated partial breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of all 200 nonrecurrent invasive breast carcinomas that received IORT in 20 Gy to the tumor cavity using a 50 kV photon applicator between January 2011 and December 2015. IORT eligibility was based on the 2009 accelerated partial breast irradiation Consensus Statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). IORT was offered as the sole radiation modality to patients meeting 0-1 "cautionary" and no "unsuitable" criteria before lumpectomy. WBRT was recommended after IORT when 2+ cautionary and/or 1+ unsuitable criteria were met after accounting for resection pathology. We recalculated WBRT recommendation rates using initial and reresection margins for ASTRO consensus, Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology recommendations, and TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy vs. Postoperative Radiotherapy trial "prepathology" stratum protocol. RESULTS: Depending on the selection criteria chosen, rates of WBRT recommendation can vary from 4.5% to 33%. CONCLUSIONS: WBRT recommendation rates of 30-33% after lumpectomy and IORT are observed when the WBRT indication is a single ASTRO cautionary/unsuitable, Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology intermediate/high-risk criterion, or TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy vs. postoperative radiotherapy trial protocol recommendation. Alternatively, allowing for re-excision to clear margins and accepting one ASTRO cautionary factor lowered the rate of WBRT recommendation to 9.5%.

IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of accelerated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 2003 and May 2008, 43 consecutive patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma received accelerated chemoradiation with concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab. The doses for intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost were 67.5, 60.0, and 54 Gy in 30 daily fractions of 2.25, 2.0, and 1.8 Gy to the planning target volumes for gross disease, high-risk nodes, and low-risk nodes, respectively. RESULTS: Of the patients, 90.7% completed chemoradiotherapy as prescribed. The median treatment duration was 43 days (range, 38-55 days). The complete response rate was 74.4%. With median follow-up of 36.7 months (range, 16.8-78.1 months) in living patients, the estimated 1-, 2-, and 5-year locoregional control, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates were 82%, 82%, and 82%; 73%, 65%, and 61%; and 73%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. One treatment-related death occurred from renal failure. Grade 3 mucositis and dermatitis occurred in 13 patients (30.2%) and 3 patients (6.9%), respectively. Grade 2 xerostomia occurred in 12 patients (27.9%). In patients with adequate follow-up, 82% were feeding tube free by 6 months after therapy; 13% remained feeding tube dependent at 1 year. Grade 3 soft-tissue fibrosis, esophageal stricture, osteoradionecrosis, and trismus occurred in 3 patients (6.9%), 5 patients (11.6%), 1 patient (2.3%), and 3 patients (6.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost with concurrent chemotherapy improved local and regional control. Acute and late toxicities were tolerable and acceptable. A prospective trial of this fractionation regimen is necessary for further assessment of its efficacy and toxicity compared with other approaches.

Treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy: a review of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: To determine the biochemical outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center with an I-125 permanent seed implant without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Under an institutional review board approved protocol, the charts of 88 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and a minimum follow-up of 36 months treated with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy were reviewed. Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 57 months (range 37-121). Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. RESULTS: The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival for the cohort was 83%. Patients with perineural invasion had a worse biochemical outcome, which was statistically significant (perineural invasion vs. no perineural invasion, 5-year biochemical failure-free survival 64% vs. 89%, P = 0.004). None of the following factors were found significant in this subset of patients: Gleason scores 6 versus 7, primary Gleason grades 3 versus 4, percentage of core positive <20% versus >20%, number of cores positive <2 versus 2 versus >2, hormonal therapy versus no hormonal therapy, T1 versus T2, prostate-specific antigen <10 versus >10, or > or =2 intermediate risk factors versus 1 intermediate risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may be treated effectively with brachytherapy without supplemental pelvic radiotherapy. However, because of the limited nature of our study, we cannot exclude that patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may benefit from supplemental external beam radiotherapy.