Second Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Center Prospective Experience.

Immunosuppressive therapy is useful in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is the most effective immunosuppressive treatment in this setting. Information on the usefulness of a second aHSCT in patients with MS is scarce. In a group of 1225 individuals with MS prospectively managed with aHSCT, we analyzed the salient features of 4 patients who received 2 consecutive transplants. After a moderate initial response to the first aHSCT, the patients were transplanted again after deterioration of their neurologic status; the second transplant was well tolerated and, in all instances, was completed on an outpatient basis and with no associated undesired toxicity. The autograft protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02674217. After the second graft, the expanded disability status scale score stabilized in 2 patients; in 1, the post-transplant period was too short to assess the response, and in another, the development of associated Parkinson's disease precluded the assessment of the outcome. In conclusion, a second aHSCT in persons with MS is feasible, safe, and may lead to a positive response in some cases.

The consequences of delayed diagnosis and treatment in persons with multiple sclerosis given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: We have analyzed the association of delayed both diagnosis and treatment of persons with MS with the long-term results of patients given autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). METHODS: Patients with MS referred to the HSCT-Mexico program were included in the study; in 103, detailed pre- and post-transplant evolution could be recorded. Two groups of patients were analyzed according to the time of evolution between the onset of symptoms and the definite diagnosis of MS: more than 8 months (delayed diagnosis, DD), or less than 8 months (non-delayed diagnosis, NDD). The progression of MS was assessed by changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). RESULTS: The time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and the correct diagnosis was lower for the NDD group (1.55 vs. 35.87 months, p<0.05). Both groups of patients showed a similar EDSS score at diagnosis (1.5 vs. 1.5); however, the EDSS at the time of the transplant was higher in the DD group (4.5 vs. 3.0, p=0.3) and the response of the EDSS score to the transplant was significantly better for the NDD group, the last EDSS scores being 2.5 vs. 4.25 (p=0.03). Both groups of patients responded to aHSCT by diminishing the EDSS, but the response was significantly better in the NDD group. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that both the pre-transplant progression of the disease and the response to aHSCT were significantly worse in the DD group. An early diagnosis and an early aHSCT intervention are critical for a good prognosis, in terms of lowering and stabilizing the motor disability in MS patients given autografts.

In persons with CIDP, auto-HSCT can be conducted fully on an outpatient basis and induces significant clinical responses: A prospective study in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is one of the world's most common treatable neuropathy which usually responds to immunosuppressive treatment. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is an intense way of inducing immunosuppression. OBJECTIVE: We analyze the evolution of CIDP patients treated with aHSCT in our center. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2023, persons with CIDP were prospectively autografted employing the "Mexican method" to conduct grafts on an outpatient basis, employing cyclophosphamide 200 mg/Kg and rituximab 1000 mg. The protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02674217. RESULTS: In our center 21 autologous transplant cases were completed in 2018-2023. Seven patients provided data to assess the efficacy of the procedure. Positive responses (stabilization and/or improvement) were observed in all seven patients: Five reported improvements in the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) score and one reported stabilization. In the Inflammatory Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) score. Median INCAT score was 5 (range 1-9), whereas median I-RODS score was 24 (range 11-29). Five patients (71%) reported improvement in the INCAT score, one reported stabilization and one informed worsening; concerning the I-RODS score 5 (71%) informed improvement, whereas two reported stabilization. CONCLUSION: aHSCT conducted fully in an outpatient basis, employing the conditioning regimen of the "Mexican method" appears to be a feasible therapeutic option for persons with CIDP. Additional studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Can doses of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in haploidentical stem cell allografts be reduced?

Objectives: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the most important curative modality for several hematologic malignancies, but an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor is not always available, particularly for ethnic minorities and multiethnic families. We have shown that Haplo-HSCT can be conducted safely on an outpatient basis, using peripheral blood stem cells; this leading into substantial decreases in the costs. Methods: In this study twenty-one patients prospectively received the conventional dose of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy): (50 mg/Kg on days 3 and 4), whereas 10 were given reduced doses of the drug (25 mg/Kg on days 3 and 4). Results: According to the statistical analysis, the two comparative groups (PTCy 50 mg/kg vs PTCy 25 mg/kg) had no significant difference in terms of age, sex, hematological recovery, and type of conditioning regimen. The median OS for the group PTCy 50 mg/kg is 5.7 months meanwhile for the group PTCy 25 mg/kg the median is 6.4 months. The median follow up for entire group is 4.5 months (IQR: 1.1-18.9 mo). Conclusion: These results could indicate that the Cy-dependent hematological toxicity can be reduced without compromising its effectivity. This preliminary observation may be considered as an idea to conduct prospective randomized studies to explore the possibility of significantly reducing the doses of PT-Cy in the setting of Haplo-HSCT.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05780554.

Long-term results of autografting persons with multiple sclerosis are better in those not exposed to prior disease-modifying therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disabling disease that affects young adults. Treatments for MS have increased exponentially in number, efficacy and risk. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) can change the natural history of the disease. To analyze if aHSCT should be done early in the course of the disease or after failing of other therapies, we have studied the long-term results of aHSCT in a cohort of persons with MS who were given, or not, immunosuppressive drugs before the transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MS referred to our center for aHSCT between June 2015 and January 2023 were prospectively entered in the study. All phenotypes of MS were included (relapsing remitting, primary progressive and secondary progressive). The follow up was assessed with the patient reported EDSS score in an online form; only patients followed by three or more years were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: Given or not disease modifying treatments (DMT) before the aHSCT. RESULTS: 1132 subjects were prospectively enrolled. 74 patients were followed for more than 36 months, and the subsequent analysis was done in this cohort. The response rate (RR = improvement + stabilization) at 12, 24 and 36 mo was 84%, 84% and 58% respectively for patients not receiving prior DMT and 72%, 90% and 67% for patients receiving DMT. In the whole group, the EDSS score dropped from a mean of 5.5 to 4.5 at 12 mo, to 5.0 at 24 mo and to 5.5 at 36 mo, after the aHSCT. The EDSS score was on average worsening in patients before the aHSCT, but the transplant stabilized the EDSS score at 3 years in patients with prior exposure to DMT, whereas in persons not given DMT, the transplant resulted in a significant decrease (p = .01) of the EDSS score. This indicates a positive response in all patients given aHSCT, but significantly better in those not exposed to DMT before the graft. CONCLUSION: The response to aHSCT was better for persons not exposed to immunosuppressive DMT before the transplant, thus suggesting that aHSCT should be done early in the course of the disease and probably before the treatment with DMT. Additional studies are needed to further analyze the impact of the use of DMT therapies before the aHSCT in MS, as well as the timing of the procedure.