A qualitative study investigating knowledge and attitudes regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) and the HPV vaccine among parents of immunosuppressed children.

Barriers influencing the willingness of parents to vaccinate immunocompetent children include a lack of knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) and low perception of risk regarding their child's acquisition of HPV infection. However, it cannot be assumed that the facilitators and barriers of HPV vaccination are the same for parents/guardians of children who are immunocompromised, or who have chronic medical conditions. This study aimed to document the knowledge and attitudes of parents/guardians of immunosuppressed children and adolescents towards HPV infection and the vaccine. A study using qualitative methods which incorporated 27 semi-structured interviews was undertaken with parents/guardians of immunosuppressed children vaccinated against HPV at three hospitals in two states of Australia. Thematic analysis revealed that while participants acknowledged that they had heard of HPV, they did not have a strong sense of what it actually was. The level of concern held about their child acquiring an HPV infection (prior to vaccination) ranged from 'not at all' to 'extremely'. Some believed that their child was at increased risk of developing a severe HPV-related illness because of their underlying condition. The participants supported their child receiving the HPV vaccine, as they did not want to take a risk with a disease that may cause their child to return to hospital for treatment. The majority had little apprehension about the use of the HPV vaccine but expressed some concern that potential adverse effects would be more severe for immunosuppressed children. However, they stressed their belief in the safety of the vaccine and their trust in the child's health team. Our study results show that parents of children with impaired immunity would benefit from further information about the safety of the vaccine and about the important role of the vaccine for boys as well as girls.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in children and young people undergoing blood or marrow and solid organ transplantation.

AIMS: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and evaluate dose regimens using a simulation approach and accepted therapeutic drug monitoring targets in children and young people undergoing blood or marrow, kidney and liver transplantation. METHODS: MPA concentration-time data were collected using an age specific sampling protocol over 12h. Some patients provided randomly timed but accurately recorded blood samples. Total and unbound MPA were measured by HPLC. NONMEM was employed to analyze MPA pharmacokinetic data. Simulations (n= 1000) were conducted to assess the suitability of the MPA dose regimens to maintain total MPA AUC(0,12h) within the range 30 and 60mg l(-1) h associated with optimal outcome. RESULTS: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described MPA concentration-time data. Population mean estimates of MPA clearance, inter-compartmental clearance, volumes of distribution in the central and peripheral compartments, absorption rate constant and bioavailability were 6.42 l h(-1) , 3.74 l h(-1) , 7.24 l, 16.8l, 0.39h(-1) and 0.48, respectively. Inclusion of bodyweight and concomitant ciclosporin reduced the inter-individual variability in CL from 54.3% to 31.6%. Children with a bodyweight of 10kg receiving standard MPA dose regimens achieve an MPA AUC below the target range suggesting they may be at a greater risk of acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic model for MPA can be used to explore dosing guidelines for safe and effective immunotherapy in children and young people undergoing transplantation.

Population pharmacokinetics of melphalan in paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients.

AIM: To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for melphalan in children with malignant diseases and to evaluate limited sampling strategies for melphalan. METHODS: Melphalan concentration data following a single intravenous dose were collected from 59 children with malignant diseases aged between 0.3 and 18 years. The data were split into two sets: the model development dataset (39 children, 571 concentration observations) and the model validation dataset (20 children, 277 concentration observations). Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed with the NONMEM software. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to develop a limited sampling model for melphalan. RESULTS: A two-compartment model was fitted to the concentration-vs.-time data. The following covariate population pharmacokinetic models were obtained: (i) Clearance (l h(-1)) = 0.34.WT - 3.17.CPT + 0.0377.GFR, where WT = weight (kg), CPT = prior carboplatin therapy (0 = no, 1 = yes), and GFR = glomerular filtration rate (ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)); (ii) Volume of distribution (l) = 1.12 + 0.178.WT. Interpatient variability (coefficient of variation) was 27.3% for clearance and 33.8% for volume of distribution. There was insignificant bias and imprecision between observed and model-predicted melphalan concentrations in the validation dataset. A three-sample limited sampling model was developed which adequately predicted the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in the development and validation datasets. CONCLUSIONS: A population pharmacokinetic model for melphalan has been developed and validated and may now be used in conjunction with pharmacodynamic data to develop safe and effective dosing guidelines in children with malignant diseases.

Melphalan pharmacokinetics in children with malignant disease: influence of body weight, renal function, carboplatin therapy and total body irradiation.

AIM: To analyse the pharmacokinetics of melphalan in 52 children (0.3-18 years) and determine whether any clinical factors affect the pharmacokinetic parameters Additionally, to examine whether a test melphalan dose can predict the pharmacokinetics of a full dose, when there are 5 intervening days of carboplatin therapy. METHODS: Melphalan concentrations were measured in 14 blood samples collected from each child following doses ranging from 30 to 180 mg m(-2). The pharmacokinetics were analysed with Kinetica 4.0. RESULTS: Children who did not have carboplatin (n = 27) had median melphalan clearance (CL) of 15.5 l h(-1) m(-2) (interquartile range: 12.4-19.9 l h(-1) m(-2)) and steady state volume of distribution (Vss) of 14.9 l m(-2) (interquartile range: 12.7-18.3 l m(-2)). Children who had carboplatin (n = 25) had 34% lower median CL (10.2 l h(-1) m(-2)) and 18% lower median Vss (12.2 l m(-2)) (P < 0.001). Melphalan elimination was impaired in a separate group of three children given concomitant carboplatin and etoposide. Stepwise multiple linear regression indicated that weight, carboplatin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and total body irradiation (TBI) significantly affected CL, while weight and carboplatin influenced Vss. A test dose (10 mg m(-2)) tended to underpredict the area-under-the-concentration-vs.-time-curve for a full (180 mg m(-2)) dose in 19 individuals given carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: In children, melphalan CL is influenced by weight, carboplatin, TBI and GFR. Vss is influenced by weight and carboplatin.