Decision-making process, outcome, and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission.

OBJECTIVE: To describe triage decisions and subsequent outcomes in octogenarians referred to an ICU. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in the medical ICU in a tertiary nonuniversity hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Cohort of 180 patients aged 80 years or over who were triaged for admission. MEASUREMENTS: Age, underlying diseases, admission diagnoses, Mortality Probability Model score, and mortality were recorded. Self-sufficiency (Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living) and quality of life (modified Perceived Quality of Life scale and Nottingham Health Profile) were measured 1year after triage. RESULTS: In 132 patients (73.3%) ICU admission was refused, including 79 (43.8%) considered too sick to benefit. Factors independently associated with refusal were nonsurgical status, age older than 85 years, and full unit. Greater self-sufficiency was associated with ICU admission. Hospital mortality was 30/48 (62.5%), 56/79 (70.8%), 9/51 (17.6%), and 0/2 in the admitted, too sick to benefit, too well to benefit, and family/patient refusal groups, respectively; 1-year mortality was 34/48 (70.8%), 69/79 (87.3%), 24/51 (47%), and 0/2, respectively. Self-sufficiency was unchanged by ICU stay. Quality of life (known in only 28 patients) was significantly poorer for isolation, emotional, and mobility domains compared to the French general population matched on sex and age. CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds of patients aged over 80 years referred to our ICU were denied admission. One year later self-sufficiency was not modified and quality of life was poorer than in the general population. These results indicate a need to discuss patient preferences before triage decisions.

Decision making concerning life-sustaining treatment in paediatric nephrology: professionals' experiences and values.

BACKGROUND: In a previous article, we studied decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST) taken between 1995 and 2001 in 31 French-speaking paediatric nephrology centres. Files were available for 18 of the 31 centres. A grid was used to analyse the criteria on which decisions were based, and the results were enriched by an analysis of interviews with the doctors at these centres (31 interviews with doctors from the 18 centres). The goal was to describe in detail and to specify the criteria on which decisions to withhold or withdraw LST were based, in cases extracted from the files. The second paper deals exclusively with the interviews with doctors and analyses their lifetime's experience and perception. METHODS: We carried out semi-directed interviews with nephrologists from all the paediatric nephrology centres in France and the French-speaking regions of Switzerland and Belgium. RESULTS: We interviewed 46 paediatric nephrologists. Most were aware that decisions relating to LST are necessary and based on the assessment of the child's quality of life. According to them, decisions are not based on scientific criteria, but on the capacity to accept handicap, the family's past experiences and the doctor's own projections. They report that their task is particularly difficult when their action may contribute to death (withdrawal of treatment or acceleration of the process). They feel that their duty is to help the families in the acceptance of the doctors' decision rather than to encourage their participation in the decision-making process (DMP). CONCLUSIONS: This article shows that paediatric nephrologists differ in their opinions, mostly due to their own ethical convictions. This observation highlights the need to establish common rules taking into account the views held by doctors. This is the only way to establish an ethical code shared by professionals.

Predictors of intensive care unit refusal in French intensive care units: a multiple-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with granting or refusing intensive care unit (ICU) admission, to analyze ICU characteristics and triage decisions, and to describe mortality in admitted and refused patients. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, multiple-center study. SETTING: Four university hospitals and seven primary-care hospitals in France. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age, underlying diseases (McCabe score and Knaus class), dependency, hospital mortality, and ICU characteristics were recorded. The crude ICU refusal rate was 23.8% (137/574), with variations from 7.1% to 63.1%. The reasons for refusal were too well to benefit (76/137, 55.4%), too sick to benefit (51/137, 37.2%), unit too busy (9/137, 6.5%), and refusal by the family (1/137). In logistic regression analyses, two patient-related factors were associated with ICU refusal: dependency (odds ratio [OR], 14.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.27-38.25; p < .0001) and metastatic cancer (OR, 5.82; 95% CI, 2.22-15.28). Other risk factors were organizational, namely, full unit (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.88-5.31), center (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.27-6.39), phone admission (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14-0.40), and daytime admission (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.84). The Standardized Mortality Ratio was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.19-1.69) for immediately admitted patients, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.60-1.84) for refused patients, and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.28-1.75) for later-admitted patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICU refusal rates varied greatly across ICUs and were dependent on both patient and organizational factors. Efforts to define ethically optimal ICU admission policies might lead to greater homogeneity in refusal rates, although case-mix variations would be expected to leave an irreducible amount of variation across ICUs.

Decisions concerning potentially life-sustaining treatments in paediatric nephrology: a multicentre study in French-speaking countries.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have looked at how decisions are made to withhold or to withdraw potentially life-sustaining treatments (LST) in paediatric nephrology. The aim of this work was to evaluate such practices in all nephrology centres in French-speaking European countries, so that guidelines could be discussed and drawn up by professionals. METHODS: We used semi-directed interviews to question health care professionals prospectively. We also retrospectively analysed the medical files of all children (n = 50) for whom a decision to withhold or to withdraw LST had been made in the last 5 years. The doctors (n = 31) who had been involved in the decision-making process were interviewed. RESULTS: All 31 of the French-speaking paediatric nephrology centres in Europe were included in this study. Of these, 18 had made decisions in the previous 5 years about withholding or withdrawing LST. Resultant quality of life, based on long-term living conditions, was the principal criterion used to make the decisions. Relational aspects of life and the child's prognosis were also considered. The decision-making processes were not always collective, even though interactions between doctors and the rest of the medical team seemed to be key elements to them. The parents' involvement in the decision-making process differed between centres. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria used to decide whether to withhold or to withdraw LST are not standardized, and no specific guidelines exist.

[The free delivery of drugs during hospital consultations]. / Activité de délivrance gratuite des médicaments en consultation hospitalière.

INTRODUCTION: In France, the access to treatment has become a priority and a right. Hence, the supply of care has been reorganised in order to improve the management of the health scourges for all the patients, whether they can pay for what they need or not. The free delivery of drugs (FDD) is part of the services offered by the public hospitals for the low income patients or those who do not yet benefit from social security coverage. As such, it is inscribed within the context of the right to treatment and is a corner stone to a new mission of the public hospital services and care networks. METHOD: The polyclinic of the Max Fourestier hospital is one of hospitals in the Paris area that supplies medical and surgical consultations to the population and provides drugs free of charge. From April 1, 1999 to the end of June 2000, all the FDD were studied for all the non-hospitalised outpatients who came to the consultations with a prescription for drugs, which could not be supplied in a pharmacy because of lack of revenues or social security coverage. RESULTS: The diseases encountered in the context of FDD were the same as those of the general population. No specificity was revealed in the prescriptions related to vulnerability. If it were necessary, this would confirm the fact that the management of persons in difficulty should be integrated in the provisions of common rights. The treatments concerned were essential, and for some persons life saving, and justifying the interest of FDD without which the health of these individuals would rapidly decline. Furthermore, this study shows the need for careful management of FDD in order to avoid the anarchical and uncontrolled delivery of several prescriptions, source of deleterious drug interactions and iatrogenia. This is the reason for the recommendation to all the staff delivering free drugs that they systematically ask the patients to meet a referring physician and contact the hospital pharmacist when necessary. COMMENTS: The FDD request is an ideal occasion for a physician to meet the patient and, because of the professional secrecy, to learn more of the patient's life style, and reveal, other than the diseases, the patients risk factors or elements of vulnerability that interact with the general state of health. The access to rights, on the occasion of FDD, is a fundamental public health strategy, since it provides the patient with access to preventive and primary care health measures. This is why we propose that FDD, other than the medical consultation, become systematically coupled with a consultation with a social care worker, to permit the rapid return of the patients to their common rights. CONCLUSION: Free drug delivery should not be conceived as a traditional pharmaceutical delivery, it should be the pretext for the reintegration of persons to their social rights and with a strategy of improved medical care. Organised in this manner, FDD is a precious tool for access to care and prevention, but also to the construction of a social relationship.

Triaging patients to the ICU: a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the appropriateness of ICU triage decisions. DESIGN. Prospective descriptive single-center study. SETTING: Ten-bed, medical-surgical ICU in an acute-care 460-bed, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: All patients triaged for admission were entered prospectively. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age, underlying diseases, admission diagnoses, Mortality Probability Model (MPM0) score, information available to ICU physicians, and mortality were recorded. Of the 334 patients (96% medical), 145 (46.4%) were refused. Reasons for refusal were being too-sick-to-benefit (48, 14%) and too-well-to-benefit (93, 28%). Factors independently associated with refusal were patient location, ICU physician seniority, bed availability, patient age, underlying diseases, and disability. Hospital mortality was 23% and 27% for patients admitted to our ICU and other ICUs, respectively, and 7.5% and 60% for patients too well and too sick to benefit, respectively. In the multivariate Cox model, McCabe = 1 [hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.24-0.77), P=0.001], living at home without help (HR, 0.440, 95% CI, 0.28-0.68, P=0.0003), and immunosuppression (HR, 1.91, 95% CI, 1.09-3.33, P=0.02) were independent predictors of hospital death. Neither later ICU admission nor refusal was associated with cohort survival. MPM0 was not associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Refusal of ICU admission was related to the ability of the triaging physician to examine the patient, ICU physician seniority, patient age, underlying diseases, self-sufficiency, and number of beds available. Specific training of junior physicians in triaging might bring further improvements. Scores that are more accurate than the MPM0 are needed.