Low-volume walking HIIT: Efficient strategy to improve physical capacity and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in older women with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To compare the effect of a low-volume walking high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on risk of cardiovascular diseases and physical capacity in older women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Thirty inactive older women with T2D were randomized into either HIIT (75 min/week) or MICT (150 min/week). Cardiovascular risk profile (lipid profile; waist circumference and fat mass; resting, post-exercise and ambulatory blood pressure [BP]; VO2 peak; UKPDS score; ABC's) and physical capacity were assessed before and after a 12-week intervention. RESULTS: While resting systolic and diastolic BP (all p ≤ 0.01) were reduced, ambulatory BP (p ≥ 0.49) and lipid profile (p ≥ 0.40) remained unchanged after the intervention. Although VO2 peak increased to a similar extent in both groups (p = 0.015), the distance covered during the 6MWT (p = 0.01) and grip strength (p = 0.02) increased to a greater extend in HIIT. The UKPDS risk score decreased in both groups after the intervention (p = 0.03) and 31% of the participants reached the ABC's compared to 24% at baseline. CONCLUSION: Low-volume walking HIIT is an efficient exercise intervention for older women with T2D as it improved some CVD risk factors and physical capacity. Nevertheless, neither low-volume HIIT nor MICT is sufficient to affect ambulatory blood pressure in T2D patients.

Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.

Physical activity (PA) is a part of a healthy pregnancy. To date, no consumer-based activity monitors have been validated with this population. The aim of this study was to validate the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex monitors in free-living conditions with pregnant women using the ActiGraph GT3X as the ?gold standard?. We compared the accuracy of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex devices in measuring steps, sedentary time and time spent in different activity intensities. Sixteen women in their third trimester of pregnancy wore the ActiGraph GT3X (hip) plus one Fibit Zip (hip) and one Fitbit Flex (wrist) during seven consecutive days. The validity of Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex is good, depending on measured parameters. Fitbit Zip is accurate to measure steps whereas Fitbit Flex is precise for MVPA. When choosing between Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex monitors, pregnant women should take into account their preferred PA and the parameters they want to measure..