RESUMO
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal, outpatient neuromuscular protocol in treating remaining sensitization and myofascial pain in endometriosis patients post-surgical excision. Patients and Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted for women aged 22 to 78 with a history of surgically excised endometriosis. 60 women with an average duration of pain of 8.63 ± 7.65 years underwent a treatment protocol consisting of ultrasound guided trigger point injections, peripheral nerve blocks, and pelvic floor physical therapy for 6 weeks. Concomitant cognitive behavioral therapy once weekly for a total of 12 weeks was also undertaken. Pain intensity and pelvic functionality were assessed at new patient consults and 3-month follow ups using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Functional Pelvic Pain Scale (FPPS). Results: At new patient consults, average VAS and FPPS were 7.45 ± 2.11 (CI 6.92-7.98) and 14.35 ± 6.62 (CI 12.68 -16.02), respectively. At 3-month follow ups, average VAS and FPPS decreased to 4.12 ± 2.44 (CI 3.50-4.73; p < 0.001) and 10.3 ± 6.55 (CI 8.64-11.96; p < 0.001), respectively. Among FPPS categories, sleeping, intercourse, and working showed the highest statistical significance. Conclusion: Data suggests the multimodal protocol was effective in treating the remaining underlying sensitization and myofascial pain seen in Endometriosis patients post-surgical excision, particularly in decreasing pain and improving function during work and intercourse.
RESUMO
Objectives: Bladder pain syndrome (BPS)/interstitial cystitis (IC) is a debilitating condition characterised by bladder/pelvic pain and pressure as well as persistent or recurrent urinary symptoms in the absence of an identifiable cause. It is hypothesised that in addition to organ specific visceral hypersensitivity, contributions of the hypertonic pelvic floor, peripheral sensitisation, and central sensitisation exacerbate this condition. The aim of this paper is to investigate outcomes of treating underlying neuromuscular dysfunction and neuro-plastic mechanisms in BPS/IC patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 84 patients referred to an outpatient pelvic rehabilitation centre with a diagnosis of BPS/IC given to them by a urologist. All 84 patients failed to progress after completing 6 weeks of pelvic floor physical therapy and underwent an institutional review board approved protocol (IRB# 17-0761) consisting of external ultrasound-guided trigger point injections to the pelvic floor musculature, peripheral nerve blocks of the pudendal and posterior femoral cutaneous nerves and continued pelvic floor physical therapy once weekly for 6 weeks. Pelvic pain intensity and functionality were measured pretreatment and 3 months posttreatment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Functional Pelvic Pain Scale (FPPS). Results: Pretreatment, mean VAS was 6.23 ± 2.68 (95% CI 5.65 to 6.80). Posttreatment mean VAS was 3.90 ± 2.63 (95% CI 3.07-4.74). Mean FPPS before treatment was 11.98 ± 6.28 (95% CI 10.63 to 13.32). Posttreatment mean FPPS was 7.68 ± 5.73 (95% CI 6.45-8.90). Analysis of subcategories within FPPS indicated highest statistically significant improvement in the categories of bladder, intercourse and working. Conclusions: Analysis suggests the treatment was effective at ameliorating bladder pain and function including urinary urgency, frequency, and burning in BPS/IC patients.
RESUMO
Interventional procedures can be applied for diagnostic evaluation and treatment of the patient with pelvic pain, often once more conservative measures have failed to provide relief. This article reviews interventional management strategies for pelvic pain. We review superior and inferior hypogastric plexus blocks, ganglion impar blocks, transversus abdominis plane blocks, ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric and genitofemoral blocks, pudendal nerve blocks, and selective nerve root blocks. Additionally, we discuss trigger point injections, sacroiliac joint injections, and neuromodulation approaches.