Risk factors for templating mismatch of uncemented stems in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Preoperative templating needs to be precise to optimize hip arthroplasty outcomes. Unexpected implant mismatches can occur despite meticulous planning. We investigated the risk factors for oversized and undersized stem mismatch during uncemented hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered wedge rectangular stem for femoral neck fracture. Out of 154 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, 104 patients were divided into three groups: (1) oversized (n = 17; 16.3%), (2) matched (n = 80; 76.9%), and (3) undersized stem group (n = 7; 6.7%). A smaller femoral head offset (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.81-0.98, P = 0.017), smaller isthmus diameter (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92, P = 0.021), and smaller canal flare index (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.04-0.98, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with oversized stem insertion, while older age (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01-1.39, P = 0.037) was associated with undersized stem insertion in logistic regression. In conclusion, when performing hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture with a double-tapered wedge rectangular stem, surgeons must pay close attention to proximal femoral geometry and patient age during preoperative planning to avoid stem mismatch.

What Is the Best Treatment Choice for Concomitant Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Intertrochanteric Fracture? A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 115 Consecutive Patients.

PURPOSE: Although a concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture has been considered to be a rare type of injury, its incidence has been increasing, especially among elderly hip fracture patients. However, there is limited evidence on the optimal treatment option. This study surveys surgical outcomes of different implants in order to assist in selecting the best possible implant for a combined femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture. METHODS: The postoperative complications after the treatment of a concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture via cephalomedullary nail (CMN), dynamic hip screw (DHS), and hip arthroplasty groups were analyzed by retrospectively reviewing the electronic medical records of 115 consecutive patients. RESULTS: The patient demographics and perioperative details showed no significant discrepancies amongst different surgical groups, except for the operative time; a CMN had the shortest mean operative time (standard deviation) of 85.6 min (31.1), followed by 94.7 min (22.3) during a DHS, and 107.3 min (37.2) during an HR (p = 0.021). Of the 84 osteosynthesis patients, 77 (91.7%) achieved a fracture union. Only one (3.2%) of the 31 HR cases had a dislocation. The sub-analysis of the different osteosynthesis methods showed a higher incidence of excessive sliding and the nonunion of the fracture fragment in the DHS group than that in the CMN group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.022, respectively). The different surgical methods did not significantly vary in other outcome variables, such as the re-operation rate, mortality, and hip function. CONCLUSIONS: For the surgical treatment of combined femoral neck and trochanteric fractures, osteosynthesis did not differ significantly from an HR in terms of the overall postoperative complications, reoperation and mortality rate, and hip function, however, the risk of nonunion and more mechanical complications should be considered when choosing a DHS. Our suggestion for the treatment of a femoral neck and ipsilateral trochanteric fracture is that a surgeon should choose wisely between an HR and a CMN depending on the patient's age, the displacement of the femoral neck, and one's expertise.

Hidden osteonecrosis of the femoral head after healed femoral neck fractures: magnetic resonance imaging study of 58 consecutive patients.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies investigated the posttraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after femoral neck fracture (FNF). However, no study has investigated the hidden ONFH after FNF, which is missed by simple radiographs, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 58 consecutive patients who underwent implant removal surgery after internal fixation due to FNF. MRI was used to investigate the incidence of hidden ONFHs, which were not initially revealed on plain radiographs. The comparisons between hidden ONFH and other groups were performed for patent demographics and clinical variables including ONFH location, lesion size, the progression rate of ONFH collapse, and end-stage arthroplasty conversion rate. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients, 38 exhibited no evidence of ONFH on plain radiograph screening. However, 13 of the 38 patients were confirmed of hidden ONFH via MRI. The collapse progressed in four of the 13 patients, and one of them underwent total hip arthroplasty surgery. No significant differences were found between the hidden and definite ONFH groups in demographics and clinical variables. However, a significant difference exists between the hidden ONFH and the normally healed FNF groups in terms of the Garden type (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A large number of cases with hidden ONFH were confirmed using MRI following healed FNF, and most of them were initially displaced FNF. Thus, the treatment method between internal fixation and hip arthroplasty should be carefully selected, particularly with displaced FNF.

Additional Reduction Screw Fixation Technique for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Novel Method to Prevent Excessive Sliding in Cephalomedullary Nail Surgery.

Extramedullary (EM) reduction, defined as the medial cortex of the head-neck fragment located outside the medullary canal of the distal shaft fragment, has been introduced to prevent excessive postoperative sliding or failure of the lag screw in pertrochanteric fracture surgeries. Favorable EM reduction results have recently been reported in several clinical and biomechanical studies. Despite these efforts, maintaining the head-neck fragment in an EM position is periodically a difficult and challenging problem. Herein, the technique for reduction and maintenance of the head-neck fragment was introduced in an EM position using a Kirschner wire and partially threaded cannulated screw fixation via screw fixation from EM to the head-neck fragment, which was positioned inferior to the lag screw on the femoral calcar, also called the reduction screw. The authors utilized this reduction screw in 34 pertrochanteric fracture surgeries using a cephalomedullary nail and fracture union was acheive in all cases by a minimum one-year follow-up period without surgical complications.

Does the Helical Blade Lead to Higher Rates of Fixation Failure as Compared to Lag Screw in the Cephalomedullary Nailing Treatment of Hip Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, several studies have suggested that blade-type cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) have a higher risk of fixation failure than that of lag screws, but no clinical consensus exists. This study compared fixation failure between helical blade-type and lag screw-type CMNs with cut-out and cut-through rates as primary outcomes and degree of sliding length, time to union, and nonunion rate as secondary outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before March 4, 2020, using the PRISMA guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they directly compared helical blade and lag screw for treating hip fractures. Data could be extracted for CMN alone to avoid mixing CMN and extramedullary plate devices, such as the dynamic hip screw. DATA EXTRACTION: Two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons specializing in hip surgery independently extracted data from the selected studies, and the data collected were compared to verify agreement. DATA SYNTHESIS: All data were pooled using a random-effects model. For all comparisons, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as dichotomous data, whereas continuous data were analyzed using mean differences with 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation failure (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.09-3.23, P = 0.02), especially cut-through (OR = 5.33; 95% CI, 2.09-13.56; P < 0.01), was more common with helical blades than with lag screws, although the cut-out rate was not significantly different between both the 2 groups (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.38-1.96, P = 0.73). Surgeons should carefully select a blade-type CMN when treating hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.