Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection After Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BackgroundNeutropenia is a common complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Filgrastim may be used to treat neutropenia in LTRs, but its consequences on acute cellular rejection (ACR) remain controversial. Objective: The purpose was to examine the association between filgrastim and incidence of ACR 6 months after filgrastim administration in LTRs. Secondary outcomes included burden of ACR, infections, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and survival. Methods: This was a matched cohort study of patients transplanted between January 2010 and October 2019. LTRs who received filgrastim for neutropenia were compared to a cohort who did not. LTRs were matched on transplant indication, sex, age, and time post-transplant and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of ACR. Results: 212 patients were included in the analysis (106 in each group). 50 patients (47.2%) in the filgrastim group experienced ACR compared to 37 patients (34.9%) in the no filgrastim group (P = .070). In multivariable analysis, filgrastim use was not associated with ACR at 6 months (OR 1.409, 95% CI 0.772-2.571). Time to first ACR was shorter (P = .049) and 6-month ACR score was higher in the filgrastim group (.49 vs .33, P = .047). LTRs in the filgrastim group had higher incidence of bacterial pneumonia and 1-year mortality. Conclusions: Although not associated with increased likelihood of ACR at 6 months, our study found that filgrastim is associated with increased ACR burden and decreased time to ACR. This study can help inform clinicians of ACR risk after filgrastim use in LTRs.

Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin for Treatment of Corticosteroid Refractory Acute Cellular Rejection After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major cause of death after the first year posttransplant, with acute cellular rejection (ACR) being a major risk factor for CLAD. We evaluated the use of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) for corticosteroid refractory ACR in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 112 adult lung transplant recipients who received rATG for refractory ACR after lung transplantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ACR on follow-up transbronchial biopsy. Secondary endpoints included freedom from ACR within 1 y post-rATG, CLAD progression at 1 y post-rATG, and all-cause mortality at 1 y post-rATG. RESULTS: A complete resolution of ACR was observed in 60.2% of patients, an improvement but not complete resolution in 22.1%, and no response on follow-up biopsy in 17.8%. Mean A grade 1 y post-rATG was 0.51 in complete responders, 1.01 in partial responders, and 2.19 in nonresponders ( P < 0.001). Complete responders had significantly less new or worsening CLAD at 1 y than partial responders (17% versus 40%; P = 0.02). All-cause mortality rate was 14.9% in complete responders, 40% in partial responders, and 30% in nonresponders ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: rATG appears to be an effective treatment of refractory ACR in lung transplant recipients. Failure to respond to rATG carries an increased risk of early CLAD and death.

Donor-specific antibody characteristics, including persistence and complement-binding capacity, increase risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major complication limiting long-term survival in lung transplant recipients (LTRs), with those developing donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) previously found to have increased risk for CLAD. However, as DSA responses vary in timing of development, specificity, breadth, persistence, and complement-binding capacity, we hypothesized that these characteristics would impact CLAD and survival outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed DSA characteristics and outcomes in a single-center cohort of 582 LTRs who had serum samples collected prospectively from 2010 to 2016. Luminex-based single antigen bead assays were performed to assess DSA. RESULTS: DSAs were detected in 247 LTRs (42%), of which 124 (21.3%) were de novo DSAs and 53 (9.1%) were complement-binding (C1q+). CLAD developed in 208 LTRs (35.7%) during the follow-up period, with 67.8% determined as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome phenotype and 32.2% as restrictive allograft syndrome phenotype. We found a shorter time to CLAD in LTRs with persistent DSAs (p = 0.04) and HLA-DQ-specific DSAs (p = 0.03). LTRs who developed C1q+ DSAs had significantly shorter time to CLAD (p < 0.001), with 100% of C1q+ DSAs being persistent and no differences between CLAD phenotypes. CLAD-free survival was significantly reduced in LTRs who developed C1q+ DSAs (p = 0.001), HLA-DQ-specific DSAs (p = 0.03), and multiple DSAs (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Together, our findings demonstrate that DSA characteristics of persistence, HLA-DQ specificity, and C1q+ DSAs are associated with shorter time to CLAD. Additionally, C1q+, HLA-DQ-specific, and multiple DSAs are associated with decreased CLAD-free survival. These characteristics may improve DSA risk stratification for deleterious outcomes in LTRs.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for EBV-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and worse survival.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) is a serious complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) associated with significant mortality. We performed a single-center retrospective study to evaluate the risks for PTLD in LTRs over a 7-year period. Of 611 evaluable LTRs, we identified 28 cases of PTLD, with an incidence of 4.6%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a decreased freedom from PTLD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)-LTRs (P < .02). Using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, we found IPF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-8.21, P = .01) and alemtuzumab induction therapy (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.10-6.74, P = .03) as risk factors for PTLD, compared to EBV mismatch (HR: 34.43, 95% CI 15.57-76.09, P < .0001). Early PTLD (first year) was associated with alemtuzumab use (P = .04), whereas IPF was a predictor for late PTLD (after first year) (P = .002), after controlling for age and sex. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a shorter time to death from PTLD in IPF LTRs compared to other patients (P = .04). The use of alemtuzumab in EBV mismatch was found to particularly increase PTLD risk. Together, our findings identify IPF LTRs as a susceptible population for PTLD. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms driving PTLD in IPF LTRs and develop strategies to mitigate risk.

Aerosolization of Second-generation Triazoles: In Vitro Evaluation and Application in Therapy of Invasive Airway Aspergillosis.

BACKGROUND: A lung transplant patient with invasive aspergillosis (IA) manifested symptoms of voriconazole-induced transaminitis with systemic voriconazole and progression of IA after switching to oral posaconazole. With limited options for standard triazole therapy, aerosolized delivery with one of the second-generation triazoles was considered. METHODS: Feasibility for aerosolized delivery was evaluated using cascade impactor and analysis of physicochemical characteristics of voriconazole (10 mg/mL) and posaconazole (6, 12 mg/mL) solutions. RESULTS: Both triazoles showed favorable characteristics for aerosol delivery with mass median aerodynamic diameter, geometric standard deviation, respirable fraction (<5.4 µm) of 2.8 µm, 2.0, 86%; 3.4 µm, 2.4, 78%; and 3.0 µm, 2.3, 79% for voriconazole and 6, 12 mg/mL of posaconazole, respectively. Aspergillus fumigatus isolate from the patient was more susceptible to voriconazole, and hence aerosolized voriconazole was introduced around the third month posttransplant at 40 mg TID for 1 week, 40 mg BID for 1 week, followed by 40 mg daily thereafter, along with IV caspofungin (50 mg/d) and liposomal amphotericin B (300 mg/d). The aerosol regimen was well tolerated by the patient with undetectable trough plasma levels of voriconazole. Bronchoscopy at the fourth month revealed improvement in anastomotic plaques with reduction in bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan values (7.48-2.15 ng/mL). This consolidated aerosolized and intravenous regimen was maintained until 2.97 years posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: The intravenous solutions of both second-generation triazoles showed characteristics that were suitable for aerosol delivery. Our report further adds to the therapeutic experience with the use of aerosolized voriconazole for IA in a lung transplant patient.

Belatacept for maintenance immunosuppression in cardiothoracic transplantation: The potential frontier.

Current immunosuppressive regimens with calcineurin inhibitors have improved the management of patients after transplantation. However, their adverse effects are linked to increased morbidity and limit the long-term survival of heart and lung transplant recipients. Belatacept, a costimulation inhibitor interfering with the interaction between CD28 on T cells and the B7 ligands on antigen presenting cells, has shown success and is currently approved for use in renal transplant recipients. Furthermore, it lacks many of the cardiovascular, metabolic, neurologic, and renal adverse of effects of calcineurin inhibitors that have the largest impact on long-term survival in cardiothoracic transplant. Additionally, it requires no therapeutic drug monitoring and is only administered once a month. Limitations to belatacept use have been observed that must be considered when comparing immunosuppression options. Despite this, maintenance immunosuppression with belatacept has the potential to improve outcomes in cardiothoracic transplant recipients, as it has with kidney transplant recipients. However, no large clinical trials investigating belatacept for maintenance immunosuppression in heart and lung transplant recipients exist. There is a large need for focused research of belatacept in cardiothoracic transplantation. Belatacept is a viable treatment option for maintenance immunosuppression, and it is reasonable to pursue more evidence in cardiothoracic transplant recipients.

Increasing tacrolimus time-in-therapeutic range is associated with superior one-year outcomes in lung transplant recipients.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the backbone of traditional immunosuppressive regimens for lung transplant recipients (LTR). The CNIs are both narrow therapeutic index drugs with significant interpatient and intrapatient variability that require therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure safety and effectiveness. We hypothesized that tacrolimus time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) affects acute and chronic rejection rates in LTRs. This was a single-center, observational, cross-sectional study of 292 adult LTRs. Subjects who received tacrolimus posttransplant for the first year were included. TTR was calculated at 1 year using protocol goal ranges (12-15 mg/mL months 0-6; 10-12 mg/mL for months 7-12). The primary outcome was acute cellular rejection (ACR) burden at 1 year. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), mortality, and infection rate were assessed as secondary outcomes at 1 year. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. Increasing TTR by 10% was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of high-burden ACR at 1 year on univariable (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.54, P < .001) and multivariable (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86, P = .003) assessment, controlling for age and induction agent. Increasing TTR by 10% was also associated with lower rates of CLAD (P < .001) and mortality (P < .001) at 1 year. Prospective studies confirming these findings appear warranted.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in lung transplant recipients.

A systematic review of papers in English on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in lung transplant recipients (LTR) using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases was performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were strictly adhered to. Pooled odds ratios (pOR) were calculated from a random-effects model, and heterogeneity among studies was quantitated using I2 values. Fourteen studies published from 2005 to 2015 were included in the meta-analysis. One hundred and sixty-four lung transplant recipients were included. LTRs who received single vs bilateral were associated with a 7.67-fold risk of death after PTLD (6 studies with 64 LTRs; pOR 7.67 95% CI 1.98-29.70; P = .003). pOR of death for early onset PTLD (<1 year post-LT) vs late onset (>1 year post-LT) was not different (3 studies with 72 LTRS; pOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.20-1.86, P = .39). Standardized mean difference (SMD) in time from transplant to PTLD onset between LTRs who died vs alive was not different (9 studies with 109 LTRs; SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.48-0.53, P = .92). Survival in polymorphic vs monomorphic PTLD and extranodal vs nodal disease was similar (4 studies with 31 LTRs; pOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.08-2.51; P = .36. 6 studies with 81 LTRs; pOR 1.05 95% CI 0.31-3.52, P = .94). This meta-analysis demonstrates that single LTRs are at a higher risk of death vs bilateral LTRs after the development of PTLD.

Maintenance Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation Recipients Who Failed Calcineurin Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Traditional immunosuppressive regimens (ISR) used in lung transplantation rely on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) that occasionally cause severe adverse reactions necessitating discontinuation. Belatacept is a novel costimulation antagonist approved for use in renal transplantation which lacks data in lung transplantation. This series aims to describe the response to belatacept ISR in 11 lung transplantation recipients after CNI failure. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective medical record review of adult lung transplant recipients (LTR) before and after conversion to belatacept-based ISR. Patients were evaluated at fixed time points before and after belatacept initiation. Primary outcome was incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR). Secondary outcomes included incidence of infection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) progression, death, change in mean arterial pressure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Eleven LTRs received belatacept with a mean of 246 (91-1064) days of follow-up after conversion. Four were changed to belatacept for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, 3 for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, 2 for recurrent ACR, 1 for CLAD, and 1 for renal-sparing. ACR was not different before and after belatacept (P = 0.17). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher postbelatacept (32.53 vs 45.26, P = 0.04). Mean incidence of infections (24.4% vs 16.0%, P = 0.55) and mean arterial pressure (97.5 vs 92.1 P = 0.38) were not different. Progression of CLAD occurred in 2 patients. At the end of follow-up, 7 of 11 patients were alive. CONCLUSIONS: Belatacept-based ISR appear to produce reasonable results in LTRs who fail CNI-based ISR. Larger prospective trials appear warranted in lung transplantation.

Effect of aerosolized antipseudomonals on Pseudomonas positivity and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation.

PURPOSE: To describe the effects of aerosolized antipseudomonals (AAPs) on Pseudomonas (PS) culture positivity, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and acute cellular rejection (ACR) in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed of adult LTRs treated with either AAP for ≥28 days vs no AAP therapy or AAP therapy <28 days, indexed to a matched median date post lung transplantation (LT). Primary outcome was freedom from PS positivity by positive bronchoalveolar lavage or bronchial wash at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were freedom from BOS or BOS progression and ACR burden (defined by the novel composite rejection standardized score. Normality was assessed, and univariate and multivariate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests were used to assess baseline characteristics and outcomes, where appropriate. Freedom from events was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank conversion and risk was assigned using multivariable Cox proportional hazards (PH) modeling. RESULTS: In total, 293 LTRs (105 with AAP, 188 with no AAP) were included. Median ages in AAP and control cohorts were 51 (30-63) and 62 (54-67) years (P<.01). Median AAP duration was 198 (interquartile range 94-395) days. Time to median positive PS culture was similar between AAP (median 1.02 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.74-1.22] years) and control (median 0.96 [95% CI 0.72-1.21] years). Log-rank test for time-to-PS positivity was similar for both groups (log-rank P=.26). Incidence of PS culture positivity at 1 year was similar in APP vs controls (59.0% vs 54.8%, P=.48). In the non-cystic fibrosis (CF) subgroup, AAP use was protective against PS recurrence on univariate Cox PH model (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.83) and on multivariate Cox PH adjusting for age and induction (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83). Incidence of new-onset BOS or BOS progression in APP vs control at 1 (17.1% vs 14.9%, P=.61) and 3 (38.1% vs 37.8%, P=.96) years was similar. CRSS was similar in APP vs control group at 1 year (0.42 vs 0.33, P=.41). CONCLUSION: AAP use was not associated with less PS positivity, BOS, or ACR in all LTRs. In the non-CF subgroup analysis, treatment with AAPS was associated with protection against recurrent PS. Limitations include retrospective design, heterogeneous AAP therapy among LTRs, and potential convenience sampling of LTRs receiving AAPs for >28 days at our center. Larger assessments and better controlled analyses are required to further define efficacy of AAPs after LT.

Janus kinase inhibition for immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: Is there a role in complex immunologic challenges?

Inhibition of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway for immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation is appealing due to its specificity for immune cell function, particularly for JAK3. This is due to its unique association with only the common gamma chain (γc). The γc is an appealing immunosuppression target in transplantation because of the critically important lymphokines that act at it, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. Tofacitinib was initially purported to selectively inhibit solely JAK3, but subsequent analyses have also demonstrated its activity at the other members of the JAK family. Clinical outcomes have validated tofacitinib's pan-JAK activity in kidney transplantation after demonstrating an increased risk of infection and malignancy as compared to CNI-based regimens. After these trials, tofacitinib investigation for use in transplantation has effectively ceased. However, a post-hoc analysis has shed new light on the monitoring of tofacitinib exposure in order to predict infection and oncologic events. With new methods to monitor tofacitinib exposure, clinicians may be able to effectively reduce toxicities while providing a high level of immunosuppression. The purpose of this review to identify when, and for whom, JAK inhibitors may provide benefit in solid organ transplantation.

Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Heart and Lung Transplant Recipients.

CONTEXT: Anticoagulation therapy is common in thoracic transplant recipients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are alternatives to warfarin therapy, but characterization of their use in solid organ transplant is absent. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to describe a thoracic transplant patient population initiated on DOAC therapy. Secondary objectives were to assess adverse reactions, venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, and drug-drug interactions during DOAC therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care medical center including inpatient hospitalization and outpatient transplant clinic visits. PATIENTS: Thoracic transplant recipients who were initiated on DOACs between May 1, 2011, and March 1, 2015, at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center were included. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were included in the analysis. A majority of the patients were lung transplant recipients (86.4%) with a median age of 60.7 years. Twenty-eight patients had a history of VTE. The primary indication for DOAC initiation was VTE (86.5%). Rivaroxaban (78.4%) was the most commonly utilized agent. Dose reductions for major drug interactions (37.8%), renal insufficiency (10.8%), or both (8.1%) occurred within the study. Two patients had breakthrough VTE during DOAC therapy. Eight bleeding events were reported in the cohort, one of which was considered a major bleed. There was no difference in the incidence of bleeding in patients with drug-drug interactions and without drug-drug interactions during DOAC therapy (26.0% vs 7.1%, P = .154). CONCLUSION: Direct oral anticoagulant therapy was well tolerated by thoracic transplant recipients. Drug interactions and renal dose adjustments were common.