Key Challenges for In Vitro Testing of Tobacco Products for Regulatory Applications: Recommendations for the In Vitro Mouse Lymphoma Assay.

The Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) is sponsoring a series of workshops to develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays to assess potential toxicity within and across traditional tobacco and various tobacco and nicotine next-generation products (NGPs), including Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs) and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). This report was developed by a working group composed of attendees of the seventh IIVS workshop, 'Approaches and recommendations for conducting the mouse lymphoma gene mutation assay (MLA) and introduction to in vitro disease models', which was held virtually on 21-23 June 2022. This publication provides a background overview of the MLA, and includes the description of assay conduct and data interpretation, key challenges and recommended best practices for evaluating tobacco and nicotine products, with a focus on the evaluation of NGPs, and a summary of how the assay has been used to evaluate and compare tobacco and nicotine products.

Development of a framework for risk assessment of dietary carcinogens.

Although there are a number of guidance documents and frameworks for evaluation of carcinogenicity, none of the current methods fully reflects the state of the science. Common limitations include the absence of dose-response assessment and not considering the impact of differing exposure patterns (e.g., intermittent, high peaks vs. lower, continuous exposures). To address these issues, we have developed a framework for risk assessment of dietary carcinogens. This framework includes an enhanced approach for weight of evidence (WOE) evaluation for genetic toxicology data, with a focus on evaluating studies based on the most recent testing guidance to determine whether a chemical is a mutagen. Included alongside our framework is a discussion of resources for evaluating tissue dose and the temporal pattern of internal dose, taking into account the chemical's toxicokinetics. The framework then integrates the mode of action (MOA) and associated dose metric category with the exposure data to identify the appropriate approach(es) to low-dose extrapolation and level of concern associated with the exposure scenario. This framework provides risk managers with additional flexibility in risk management and risk communication options, beyond the binary choice of linear low-dose extrapolation vs. application of uncertainty factors.

PBPK modeling to evaluate maximum tolerated doses: A case study with 3-chloroallyl alcohol.

Introduction: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for 3-chloroallyl alcohol (3-CAA) was developed and used to evaluate the design of assays for the in vivo genotoxicity of 3-CAA. Methods: Model development was supported by read across from a published PBPK model for ethanol. Read across was motivated by the expectation that 3-CAA, which like ethanol is a primary alcohol, is metabolized largely by hepatic alcohol dehydrogenases. The PBPK model was used to evaluate how two metrics of tissue dosimetry, maximum blood concentration (Cmax; mg/L) and area under the curve (AUC; mg-hr/L) vary with dose of 3-CAA and with dose route (oral gavage, drinking water). Results: The model predicted that oral gavage results in a 6-fold higher Cmax than the same dose administered in drinking water, but in similar AUCs. Predicted Cmax provided the best correlation with severe toxicity (e.g., lethality) from 3-CAA, consistent with the production of a reactive metabolite. Therefore, drinking water administration can achieve higher sustained concentration without severe toxicity in vivo. Discussion: This evaluation is significant because cytotoxicity is a potential confounder of mutagenicity testing. The PBPK model can be used to ensure that studies meet OECD and USEPA test guidelines and that the highest dose used is not associated with severe toxicity. In addition, PBPK modeling provides assurance of target tissue (e.g., bone marrow) exposure even in the absence of laboratory data, by defining the relationship between applied dose and target tissue dose based on accepted principles of pharmacokinetics, relevant physiology and biochemistry of the dosed animals, and chemical-specific information.

Key Challenges and Recommendations for In Vitro Testing of Tobacco Products for Regulatory Applications: Consideration of Test Materials and Exposure Parameters.

The Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) is sponsoring a series of workshops to identify, discuss and develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays, to assess potential toxicity within and across tobacco and various next generation nicotine and tobacco products (NGPs), including heated tobacco products (HTPs) and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The third workshop (24-26 February 2020) summarised the key challenges and made recommendations concerning appropriate methods of test article generation and cell exposure from combustible cigarettes, HTPs and ENDS. Expert speakers provided their research, perspectives and recommendations for the three basic types of tobacco-related test articles: i) pad-collected material (PCM); ii) gas vapour phase (GVP); and iii) whole smoke/aerosol. These three types of samples can be tested individually, or the PCM and GVP can be combined. Whole smoke/aerosol can be bubbled through media or applied directly to cells at the air-liquid interface. Summaries of the speaker presentations and the recommendations developed by the workgroup are presented. Following discussion, the workshop concluded the following: that there needs to be greater standardisation in aerosol generation and collection processes; that methods for testing the NGPs need to be developed and/or optimised, since simply mirroring cigarette smoke testing approaches may be insufficient; that understanding and quantitating the applied dose is fundamental to the interpretation of data and conclusions from each study; and that whole smoke/aerosol approaches must be contextualised with regard to key information, including appropriate experimental controls, environmental conditioning, analytical monitoring, verification and performance criteria.

Key challenges for in vitro testing of tobacco products for regulatory applications: Recommendations for dosimetry.

The Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) is sponsoring a series of workshops to develop recommendations for optimal scientific and technical approaches for conducting in vitro assays to assess potential toxicity within and across tobacco and various next-generation products (NGPs) including heated tobacco products (HTPs) and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs). This publication was developed by a working group of the workshop members in conjunction with the sixth workshop in that series entitled "Dosimetry for conducting in vitro evaluations" and focuses on aerosol dosimetry for aerosol exposure to combustible cigarettes, HTP, and ENDS aerosolized tobacco products and summarizes the key challenges as well as documenting areas for future research.

A comparison of cigarette smoke test matrices and their responsiveness in the mouse lymphoma assay: A case study.

No cigarette smoke test matrix is without limitation, due to the complexity of the starting aerosol and phase to phase dynamics. It is impossible to capture all chemicals at the same level of efficiency, therefore, any test matrix will inadvertently or by design fractionate the test aerosol. This case study examines how four different test matrices derived from cigarette smoke can be directly compared. The test matrices assessed were as follows, total particulate matter (TPM), gas vapour phase (GVP), a combination of TPM + GVP and whole aerosol (WA). Here we use an example assay, the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) to demonstrate that data generated across four cigarette smoke test matrices can be compared. The results show that all test matrices were able to induce positive mutational events, but with clear differences in the biological activity (both potency and toxicity) between them. TPM was deemed the most potent test article and by extension, the particulate phase is interpreted as the main driver of genotoxic induced responses in the MLA. However, the results highlight that the vapour phase is also active. MLA appeared responsive to WA, with potentially lower potency, compared to TPM approaches. However, this observation is caveated in that the WA approaches used for comparison were made on a newly developed experimental method using dose calculations. The TPM + GVP matrix had comparable activity to TPM alone, but interestingly induced a greater number of mutational events at comparable relative total growth (RTG) and TPM-equivalent doses when compared to other test matrices. In conclusion, this case study highlights the importance of understanding test matrices in response to the biological assay being assessed and we note that not all test matrices are equal.

A critical review and meta-analysis of epidemiology studies of occupationally exposed styrene workers evaluated for chromosomal aberration incidence.

Chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of styrene exposed workers have been suggested as a potential early marker for cancer risk. We performed a critical review and abstracted data from all studies using current chromosome aberration scoring criteria and providing at least a mean and standard deviation or standard error for the exposed and comparison groups. Using these data, we conducted a meta-analysis of occupational styrene exposed workers and incidence of chromosome aberrations. Our meta-analysis used the standardized mean difference as the summary statistic since all studies assess the same outcome but use different comparison populations. The primary meta-analysis of the 20 comparisons of 505 styrene exposed workers to 532 comparison workers found a meta-mean difference of 0.361 (95 % CI -0.084 to 0.807, random effects model), but there was substantial lack of consistency across studies (I2 of 90.11, p-value <0.001, fixed effect model). Studies with higher styrene exposures had lower mean standard differences compared to studies with lower styrene exposures. While studies of styrene workers overall had a slight increase in chromosomal aberrations relative to comparison groups, the lack of consistency across studies and the absence of an exposure response and other limitations of the reviewed studies including inadequate exposure assessment, small numbers of participants per study, and poorly matched exposed and comparison workers, we find insufficient evidence to support a conclusion that styrene exposure increases chromosome aberration frequencies in styrene workers.

Revisiting the bacterial mutagenicity assays: Report by a workgroup of the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).

The International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) meets every four years to obtain consensus on unresolved issues associated with genotoxicity testing. At the 2017 IWGT meeting in Tokyo, four sub-groups addressed issues associated with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline TG471, which describes the use of bacterial reverse-mutation tests. The strains sub-group analyzed test data from >10,000 chemicals, tested additional chemicals, and concluded that some strains listed in TG471 are unnecessary because they detected fewer mutagens than other strains that the guideline describes as equivalent. Thus, they concluded that a smaller panel of strains would suffice to detect most mutagens. The laboratory proficiency sub-group recommended (a) establishing strain cell banks, (b) developing bacterial growth protocols that optimize assay sensitivity, and (c) testing "proficiency compounds" to gain assay experience and establish historical positive and control databases. The sub-group on criteria for assay evaluation recommended that laboratories (a) track positive and negative control data; (b) develop acceptability criteria for positive and negative controls; (c) optimize dose-spacing and the number of analyzable doses when there is evidence of toxicity; (d) use a combination of three criteria to evaluate results: a dose-related increase in revertants, a clear increase in revertants in at least one dose relative to the concurrent negative control, and at least one dose that produced an increase in revertants above control limits established by the laboratory from historical negative controls; and (e) establish experimental designs to resolve unclear results. The in silico sub-group summarized in silico utility as a tool in genotoxicity assessment but made no specific recommendations for TG471. Thus, the workgroup identified issues that could be addressed if TG471 is revised. The companion papers (a) provide evidence-based approaches, (b) recommend priorities, and (c) give examples of clearly defined terms to support revision of TG471.

Detection of Loss of Heterozygosity in Tk-Deficient Mutants from L5178Y Tk+/--3.7.2C Mouse Lymphoma Cells.

The mouse lymphoma assay (MLA), a forward mutation assay using the Tk+/--3.7.2C clone of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line and the Thymidine kinase (Tk) gene, has been widely used as an in vitro genetic toxicity assay for more than four decades. The MLA can evaluate the ability of mutagens to induce a wide range of genetic events including both gene mutations and chromosomal mutations and has been recommended as one component of several genotoxicity test batteries. Tk-deficient mutants often exhibit chromosomal abnormalities involving the distal end of chromosome 11 where the Tk gene is located, in mice, and the type of chromosome alteration can be analyzed using a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) approach. LOH has been considered an important event in human tumorigenesis and can result from any of the following several mechanisms: large deletions, mitotic recombination, and chromosome loss. In this chapter, the authors describe the procedures for the detection of LOH in the Tk mutants from the MLA, and apply LOH analysis for understanding the types of genetic damage that is induced by individual chemicals.

Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test).

A committee was constituted within the International Workshop on Genetic Toxicology Testing (IWGT) to evaluate the current criteria for a valid Ames test and to provide recommendations for interpretation of test results. Currently, determination of a positive vs. a negative result is made by applying various data evaluation procedures for comparing dosed plates with the concurrent solvent control plates. These evaluation procedures include a requirement for a specific fold increase (2- or 3-fold, specific to the bacterial strain), formal statistical procedures, or subjective (expert judgment) evaluation. After extensive discussion, the workgroup was not able to reach consensus recommendations in favor of any of these procedures. There was a consensus that combining additional evaluation criteria to the comparison between dosed plates and the concurrent solvent control plates improves test interpretation. The workgroup recommended using these additional criteria because the induction of mutations is a continuum of responses and there is no biological relevance to a strict dividing line between a positive (mutagenic) and not-positive (nonmutagenic) response. The most useful additional criteria identified were a concentration-response relationship and consideration of a possible increase above the concurrent control in the context of the laboratory's historical solvent control values for the particular tester strain. The workgroup also emphasized the need for additional testing to resolve weak or inconclusive responses, usually with altered experimental conditions chosen based on the initial results. Use of these multiple criteria allowed the workgroup to reach consensus on definitions of "clear positive" and "clear negative" responses which would not require a repeat test for clarification. The workgroup also reached consensus on recommendations to compare the responses of concurrent positive and negative controls to historical control distributions for assay acceptability, and the use of control charts to determine the validity of the individual test.