Effect of a Question-Building Intervention on Patient Activation in Integrated Musculoskeletal Care.

Patient activation, the propensity for patients to engage in adaptive health behaviors, is a modifiable factor associated with health outcomes and treatment compliance. The authors evaluated the effect of a question-building intervention (QBI) on patient activation among patients with musculoskeletal symptoms and a low baseline level of activation. Patients seeking treatment for musculoskeletal pain were recruited at the beginning of their outpatient clinic appointment, and they completed the Patient Activation Measure 10-item version (PAM-10) and a demographic questionnaire. Those identified as low activating, based on the initial PAM-10 scores, completed a QBI protocol before their consultation with their provider. A follow-up PAM-10 survey was administered at the end of the visit. A paired sample Student's t test was used to evaluate preintervention and postintervention PAM-10 scores. Fisher's exact test and an unpaired t test were used to assess the association between demographic variables and achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for PAM-10. Of 194 patients who consented to participate, 60 were identified as low activating and completed the QBI. A paired Student's t test showed a statistically significant increase in mean PAM-10 scores from preintervention (47.3±7.4) to postintervention (54.8±16.8; P<.001). No statistically significant differences were shown in the likelihood of achieving MCID for PAM-10 scores for the sociodemographic variables that were tested. Low-activating patients may benefit from a simple question-formulating intervention before consultation with an orthopedic provider. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(5):e661-e667.].

PROMIS PF correlates with HOOS, JR in patients with hip pain.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly integrated into reporting requirements tied to reimbursement. There may be advantages to computer adaptive tests that apply to many different anatomical regions and diseases, provided that important information is not lost. QUESTIONS: 1) Does the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) computer adaptive test correlate with the Hip injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR: a hip-specific PROM); 2) Is there any difference in the amount of variation explained by various factors (e.g. age, BMI, presence of concomitant knee pain) for both measures? METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study of 213 patients, we assessed the Pearson correlation of PROMIS PF and HOOS, JR. To investigate the variation explained by various patient-level factors, we constructed two multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: We found a large correlation between PROMIS PF and HOOS, JR (r 0.58, P < 0.001). Disabled or unemployed status was independently associated with both lower PROMIS PF and HOOS, JR scores (regression coefficient [ß] -3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.8 to -1.0; P = 0.006 and ß -11; 95% CI -17 to -5.0; P < 0.001, respectively). Private rather than public insurance was associated with both higher PROMIS PF and HOOS, JR scores (ß 4.5; 95% CI 2.2 to 6.8; P < 0.001 and ß 6.4; 95% CI 0.49 to 12; P = 0.034, respectively). No floor or ceiling effects were observed for PROMIS PF. HOOS, JR scores showed 4.2% floor and 0.5% ceiling effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the evidence that general measures of physical limitations may provide similar information as joint- or region-specific measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Pyriform Costal Cartilage Graft Improves Cleft-Side Alar Asymmetry in Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The asymmetry of a retrusive cleft-side ala positioned posterior, lateral, and inferior relative to the noncleft ala is exacerbated by ipsilateral deficiency of the pyriform aperture. We describe use of pyriform costal cartilage grafts for enhanced structural foundation and alar symmetry in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS: All pyriform aperture paranasal augmentation secondary cleft rhinoplasty cases performed between May 2013 and February 2018 were included. Clinical photos were analyzed, and these results are provided in addition to a detailed description of the augmentation technique. RESULTS: Twelve total cleft patients, 10 (83.3%) unilateral cleft lip and palate, 1 (8.3%) unilateral cleft lip, and 1 cleft palate (8.3%) were included. Age averaged 18.6 ± 6.0 years with 3 (25.0%) males and 9 (75.0%) females. Costal cartilage grafting to the pyriform aperture through the gingivobuccal sulcus was used to reposition the alar base and nasal sill to a more anatomic anterior position, thereby enhancing symmetry in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Average rib graft donor site incision was 2.5 cm. Follow-up ranged from 3.2 to 48.2 months, average 15.3 ± 14.4 months. No complications related to the pyriform cartilage graft were observed, other than one minor intraoperative breach of parietal pleura. CONCLUSIONS: We observed improvement in the anatomic contour of the cleft-side ala with costal cartilage grafting to the pyriform rim. This resulted in improved cleft-side alar form and thus overall alar symmetry. These results were obtained consistently, without significant complications. This technique is safe and provides a powerful tool to reposition the ala in secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Further studies will quantify the enhancement in nasal base symmetry.

Global Contributions to Aesthetic Surgery Journal Over the Past Decade.

BACKGROUND: The Aesthetic Surgery Journal (ASJ) is a world-renowned publication with valuable contributions from around the globe. OBJECTIVES: To better characterize the journal's evolving representation of global contributions to aesthetic surgery, the authors examined the author affiliations of all articles published in ASJ over the last decade. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed for all journal articles published in ASJ from January 2008 to August 2018. For each article, the first author's primary affiliation as indexed in MEDLINE was recorded as the source country. Data were tabulated by source country and year. The authorless errata, corrigenda, and Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1746 articles were published during this period, contributed from 49 distinct countries. All continents other than Antarctica were represented. Higher income countries where aesthetic surgery is more prevalent produced 87% of published articles. The total number of published articles in ASJ has climbed from 77 annually in 2008 to 318 in 2018 as of August. In 2008, 27.3% of articles were from non-US countries, whereas in 2018 this increased to 43.7%. In particular, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Australia, Brazil, and Italy demonstrate steady increases in contributions over the 10-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Publications in ASJ have increased in number over the past decade, and the journal has become increasingly global in its network of contributing authors. The increased global contribution to the ASJ may enhance readers' experience both in the United States and in the world beyond.