Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) vs Western Trauma Association (WTA): How a Level 1 Trauma Center Splits the Difference in Resuscitative Thoracotomy.

Background Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is performed in severe trauma cases as a final lifesaving effort. Prominent, yet differing, practice management guidelines exist from Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) and Western Trauma Association (WTA). This study evaluates all RTs performed from 2012 to 2019 at an urban Level 1 trauma center for management guideline indication and subsequent outcomes. Methods Our trauma registry was queried to identify RT cases from 2012 to 2019. Data was collected on patient demographics, prehospital presentation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requirements, and resuscitation provided. Survival to the operating room, intensive care unit, and overall were recorded. Information was compared with regard to EAST and WTA criteria. Results Eighty-seven patients who underwent RTs were included. WTA guidelines were met in 78/87 (89.7%) of cases, comparatively EAST guidelines were met in every case. Within the EAST criteria, conditional and strong recommendations were met in 70/87 (80.4%) and 17/87 (19.5%) of cases, respectively. In nine cases (10.3%) indications were discordant, each meeting conditional indication by EAST and no indication by WTA. All patients that survived to the operating room (OR), ICU admission, and overall met EAST criteria. Conclusion All RTs performed at our Level 1 trauma center met indications provided by EAST criteria. WTA guidelines were not applicable in nine salvaging encounters due to the protracted duration of CPR before proceeding to RT. Furthermore, more patients that survived to OR and ICU admission met EAST guidelines suggesting an improved potential for patient survivability. As increased data is derived, management guidelines will likely be re-established for optimized patient outcomes.

Combination of Lactate and Base Deficit Levels at Admission to Predict Mortality in Blunt Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated lactate levels are associated with increased mortality in both trauma and non-trauma patients. The relation between base deficit (BD) and mortality is less clear. Traumatologists debate the utility of elevated lactate (EL) versus BD in predicting mortality. We hypothesized that EL (2mmol/L to 5mmol/L) and BD (≤-2mmol/L) in combination could predict mortality in blunt trauma patients.  Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the trauma registry from 2012 to 2021 at a level 1 trauma center. Blunt trauma patients with admission lactate and BD values were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria were age <18, penetrating trauma, unknown mortality, and unknown lactate or BD. Logistics regression of the total 5153 charts showed 93% of the patients presented with lactate levels <5mmol/L, therefore patients with lactate >5mmol/L were excluded as outliers. The primary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4794 patients (151 non-survivors) were included in the analysis. Non-survivors had higher rates of EL + BD (35.8% vs. 14.4%, p <0.001). When comparing survivors and non-survivors, EL + BD (OR 5.69), age >65 (5.17), injury severity score (ISS) >25 (8.87), Glasgow coma scale <8 (8.51), systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 (4.2), and ICU admission (2.61) were significant predictors of mortality. Other than GCS <8 and ISS >25, EL + BD had the highest odds of predicting mortality. CONCLUSION: Elevated lactate + BD on admission in combination represents a 5.6-fold increase in mortality in blunt trauma patients and can be used to predict a patient's outcome on admission. This combination variable provides an additional early data point to identify patients at elevated risk of mortality at the moment of admission.

Increase in Motor Vehicle Crash Severity: An Unforeseen Consequence of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic led to stay-at-home (SAH) orders in Pennsylvania targeted at reducing viral transmission. Limitations in population mobility under SAH have been associated with decreased motor vehicle collisions (MVC) and related injuries, but the impact of these measures on severity of injury remains unknown. The goal of this study is to measure the incidence, severity, and outcomes of MVC-related injuries associated with SAH in Pennsylvania. MATERIALS & METHODS: We conducted a retrospective geospatial analysis of MVCs during the early COVID-19 pandemic using a state-wide trauma registry. We compared characteristics of patients with MVC-related injuries admitted to Pennsylvania trauma centers during SAH measures (March 21-July 31, 2020) with those from the corresponding periods in 2018 and 2019. We also compared incidence of MVCs for each zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) in Pennsylvania for the same time periods using geospatial mapping. RESULTS: Of 15,550 trauma patients treated during the SAH measures, 3486 (22.4%) resulted from MVCs. Compared to preceding years, MVC incidence decreased 10% under SAH measures with no change in mortality rate. However, in ZCTA where MVC incidence decreased, there was a 16% increase in MVC injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: Stay-at-home orders issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Pennsylvania were associated with significant changes in MVC incidence and severity. Identifying such changes may inform resource allocation decisions during future pandemics or SAH events.

Two Urgency Categories, Same Outcome: No Difference After "Therapeutic" vs. "Prophylactic" Fasciotomy.

OBJECTIVES: Fasciotomy to treat or prevent compartment syndromes in patients with truncal or peripheral arterial injuries is a valuable adjunct. The objective of this study was to document the current incidence, indications, and outcomes of below knee fasciotomy in patients with femoropopliteal arterial injuries. METHODS: The PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment registry of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma was utilized to identify patients undergoing two-incision four-compartment fasciotomy of the leg after repair of a femoropopliteal arterial injury. Outcomes after therapeutic versus prophylactic (surgeon label) fasciotomy were compared as was the technique of closure, that is, primary skin closure or application of a split-thickness skin graft (STSG). RESULTS: From 2013 to 2018, fasciotomy was performed in 158 patients overall, including 95.6% (151/158) at the initial operation. In the group of 139 patients who survived to discharge, fasciotomies were labeled as therapeutic in 58.3% (81/139) and prophylactic in 41.7% (58/139). There were no significant differences between the therapeutic and prophylactic groups in amputation rates (14.8% vs. 8.6%, P = .919). Primary skin closure was achieved at a median of 5.0 days vs. 11.0 days for STSG (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 55% of patients undergoing repair of an injury to a femoral or popliteal artery have a fasciotomy performed at the same operation. A "therapeutic" indication for fasciotomy continues to be more common than "prophylactic," while outcomes are identical in both groups.

More than Means to an End: Assessing Surgical Provider Familiarity with Palliative Care.

BACKGROUND: As palliative medicine concepts emerge as essential surgical education, there has been a resulting spike in surgical palliative care research. Historic surgical dogma viewed mortality and comfort-focused care as a failure of the providers' endurance, knowledge base, or technical skill. Therefore, many providers avoided consultation to a palliative medicine service until it became evident a patient could not survive or was actively dying. As the need for surgical palliative care grows, the identification of deficits in surgical providers' understanding of the scope of palliative medicine is necessary to direct further training and development efforts. METHOD: A ten-question survey was emailed to all residents, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and attending physicians in the general surgery and subspecialty surgical departments within the Einstein Healthcare Network. RESULTS: 30 non-trainees (attending surgeons, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) and 26 trainees (PGY-1 to PGY-5) completed the survey. Less than half of participants reported training in conversations regarding withdrawal of life-prolonging treatments in the setting of expected poor outcomes, 55% reported receiving training in pain management, and 64% reported receiving training in delivery of bad news. 54% report being involved in five or more end-of-life discussions in the last year with trainees reporting fewer end-of-life discussions than non-trainees; 67% of trainees reported zero to four discussions while 23% of non-trainees reported over twenty discussions (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Despite many participants training in intensive care settings, providers lack the training to carry out major discussions regarding life-limiting illness, goals of care, and end-of-life independently.

Impact of Repeat Head Computed Tomography on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients With Abbreviated Injury Score 1-2 Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) routinely undergo repeat head Computed Tomography (CT) scans with the goal of identifying progressing hemorrhage early and providing timely intervention. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) are typically used to grade the severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and triage subsequent management. However, most patients receive a repeat head CT scan within 6 hours of the initial insult, regardless of these clinical scores. We investigated the yield of a repeat CT scan for mild blunt TBI (GCS 13-15, AIS 1-2). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective chart review at a level 1 trauma center between 2009 and 2019. Our primary outcome was medical or surgical intervention directly resulted from change in CT head findings. We used multivariate regression to identify predictors of surgical and medical intervention. RESULTS: 234 mild TBI patients met inclusion criteria. 33.7% of all patients had worsening ICH. 7.7% of patients required a surgical intervention, and 27.4% received a medical intervention. Multivariate analysis found that a decline in GCS (OR 8.64), and polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >15; OR 3.32) predicted surgical intervention. Worsening ICH did not predict surgical or medical intervention. Patients requiring medical intervention were more likely to have a decline in GCS (OR 2.53, P = .02) and be older (age >65, OR 2.06, P = .02). CONCLUSION: In the population of blunt traumatic injury, worsening ICH did not predict surgical or medical intervention. Routine repeat imaging for this population is low yield, and clinical exam should guide the decision to reimage.

Better understanding the utilization of damage control laparotomy: A multi-institutional quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Rates of damage control laparotomy (DCL) vary widely and consensus on appropriate indications does not exist. The purposes of this multicenter quality improvement (QI) project were to decrease the use of DCL and to identify indications where consensus exists. METHODS: In 2016, six US Level I trauma centers performed a yearlong, QI project utilizing a single QI tool: audit and feedback. Each emergent trauma laparotomy was prospectively reviewed. Damage control laparotomy cases were adjudicated based on the majority vote of faculty members as being appropriate or potentially, in retrospect, safe for definitive laparotomy. The rate of DCL for 2 years prior (2014 and 2015) was retrospectively collected and used as a control. To account for secular trends of DCL, interrupted time series was used to effectiveness of the QI interventions. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-two emergent laparotomies were performed: 73% definitive laparotomies, 24% DCLs, and 3% intraoperative deaths. Of the 209 DCLs, 162 (78%) were voted appropriate, and 47 (22%) were voted to have been potentially safe for definitive laparotomy. Rates of DCL ranged from 16% to 34%. Common indications for DCL for which consensus existed were packing (103/115 [90%] appropriate) and hemodynamic instability (33/40 [83%] appropriate). The only common indication for which primary closure at the initial laparotomy could have been safely performed was avoiding a planned second look (16/32 [50%] appropriate). CONCLUSION: A single faceted QI intervention failed to decrease the rate of DCL at six US Level I trauma centers. However, opportunities for improvement in safely decreasing the rate of DCL were present. Second look laparotomy appears to lack consensus as an indication for DCL and may represent a target to decrease the rate of DCL after injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study with one negative criterion, level III.

Effect of damage control laparotomy on major abdominal complications and lengths of stay: A propensity score matching and Bayesian analysis.

BACKGROUND: In patients for whom surgical equipoise exists for damage control laparotomy (DCL) and definitive laparotomy (DEF), the effect of DCL and its associated resource utilization are unknown. We hypothesized that DEF would be associated with fewer abdominal complications and less resource utilization. METHODS: In 2016, six US Level I trauma centers performed a yearlong, prospective, quality improvement project with the primary aim to safely decrease the use of DCL. From this cohort of patients undergoing emergent trauma laparotomy, those who underwent DCL but were judged by majority faculty vote at each center to have been candidates for potential DEF (pDEF) were prospectively identified. These pDEF patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scoring to the DEF patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of major abdominal complications (MAC). Deaths within 5 days were excluded. Outcomes were assessed using both Bayesian generalized linear modeling and negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-two total patients were enrolled, 639 (73%) DEF and 209 (24%) DCL. Of the 209 DCLs, 44 survived 5 days and were judged to be patients who could have safely been closed at the primary laparotomy. Thirty-nine pDEF patients were matched to 39 DEF patients. There were no differences in demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, prehospital/emergency department/operating room vital signs, laboratory values, resuscitation, or procedures performed during laparotomy. There was no difference in MAC between the two groups (31% DEF vs. 21% pDEF, relative risk 0.99, 95% credible interval 0.60-1.54, posterior probability 56%). Definitive laparotomy was associated with a 72%, 77%, and 72% posterior probability of more hospital-free, intensive care unit-free, and ventilator-free days, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients for whom surgeons have equipoise for DCL versus definitive surgery, definitive abdominal closure was associated with a similar probability of MAC, but a high probability of fewer hospital-free, intensive care unit-free, and ventilator-free days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level III.