Paediatric major incident triage: UK military tool offers best performance in predicting the need for time-critical major surgical and resuscitative intervention.

BACKGROUND: Children are frequently injured during major incidents (MI), including terrorist attacks, conflict and natural disasters. Triage facilitates healthcare resource allocation in order to maximise overall survival. A critical function of MI triage tools is to identify patients needing time-critical major resuscitative and surgical intervention (Priority 1 (P1) status). This study compares the performance of 11 MI triage tools in predicting P1 status in children from the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) registry. METHODS: Patients aged <16 years within TARN (January 2008-December 2017) were included. 11 triage tools were applied to patients' first recorded pre-hospital physiology. Patients were retrospectively assigned triage categories (P1, P2, P3, Expectant or Dead) using predefined intervention-based criteria. Tools' performance in <16s were evaluated within four-yearly age subgroups, comparing tool-predicted and intervention-based priority status. FINDINGS: Amongst 4962 patients, mortality was 1.1% (n = 53); median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9 (IQR 9-16). Blunt injuries predominated (94.4%). 1343 (27.1%) met intervention-based criteria for P1, exhibiting greater intensive care requirement (60.2% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.01) and ISS (median 17 vs 9, p < 0.01) compared with P2 patients. The Battlefield Casualty Drills (BCD) Triage Sieve had greatest sensitivity (75.7%) in predicting P1 status in children <16 years, demonstrating a 38.4-49.8% improvement across all subgroups of children <12 years compared with the UK's current Paediatric Triage Tape (PTT). JumpSTART demonstrated low sensitivity in predicting P1 status in 4 to 8 year olds (35.5%) and 0 to 4 year olds (28.5%), and was outperformed by its adult counterpart START (60.6% and 59.6%). INTERPRETATION: The BCD Triage Sieve had greatest sensitivity in predicting P1 status in this paediatric trauma registry population: we recommend it replaces the PTT in UK practice. Users of JumpSTART may consider alternative tools. We recommend Lerner's triage category definitions when conducting MI evaluations.

The BCD Triage Sieve outperforms all existing major incident triage tools: Comparative analysis using the UK national trauma registry population.

BACKGROUND: Natural disasters, conflict, and terrorism are major global causes of death and disability. Central to the healthcare response is triage, vital to ensure the right care is provided to the right patient at the right time. The ideal triage tool has high sensitivity for the highest priority (P1) patients with acceptably low over-triage. This study compared the performance of major incident triage tools in predicting P1 casualty status in adults in the prospective UK Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) registry. METHODS: TARN patients aged 16+ years (January 2008-December 2017) were included. Ten existing triage tools were applied using patients' first recorded pre-hospital physiology. Patients were subsequently assigned triage categories (P1, P2, P3, Expectant or Dead) based on pre-defined, intervention-based criteria. Tool performance was assessed by comparing tool-predicted and intervention-based priority status. FINDINGS: 195,709 patients were included; mortality was 7·0% (n=13,601); median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9 (IQR 9-17); 97·1% sustained blunt injuries. 22,144 (11·3%) patients fulfilled intervention-based criteria for P1 status, exhibiting higher mortality (12·8% vs. 5·0%, p<0.001), increased intensive care requirement (52·4% vs 5·0%, p<0.001), and more severe injuries (median ISS 21 vs 9, p<0.001) compared with P2 patients.In 16-64 year olds, the highest performing tool was the Battlefield Casualty Drills (BCD) Triage Sieve (Prediction of P1 status: 70·4% sensitivity, over-triage 70·9%, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) 0·068 [95%CI 0·676-0·684]). The UK National Ambulance Resilience Unit (NARU) Triage Sieve had sensitivity of 44·9%; over-triage 56·4%; AUC 0·666 (95%CI 0·662-0·670). All tools performed poorly amongst the elderly (65+ years). INTERPRETATION: The BCD Triage Sieve performed best in this nationally representative population; we recommend it supersede the NARU Triage Sieve as the UK primary major incident triage tool. Validated triage category definitions are recommended for appraising future major incidents. FUNDING: This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre. GVG also acknowledges support from the MRC Heath Data Research UK (HDRUK/CFC/01). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or the Ministry of Defence.

Proprioception After Multiligament Knee Injury: Does Ligament Repair Lead to Better Proprioceptive Acuity Than Ligament Reconstruction?

Introduction Multiligament knee injuries are uncommon but serious injuries. There is ongoing debate on the optimal treatment of these injuries. We designed a study to establish the effects of repair or reconstruction on proprioceptive outcomes following multiligament injury to the knee. Materials and Methods A total of 34 patients were analysed by independent researchers who had no conflict of interest in the cases (23 in the repair group and 11 in the reconstruction group). Proprioception of the knee was measured using a previously validated tool to assess the reproduction of passive positioning. Functional outcome was measured using the Lysholm score. Sub-group analysis was performed. The mean time from injury to review was 83 months (range: 25-193 months). Results There were no significant differences in proprioceptive acuity between the injured (5.9±4.2°; range: 1.0-18.3°) and uninjured contralateral (control) knees (5.2±3.8°; range: 1.0-15.0°; p=0.35). Similarly, there was no significant difference in proprioceptive acuity identified between the injured knees that underwent repair (6.0±4.3°; range: 1.0-18.3°) or reconstruction (5.0±3.6°; range: 1.3-14°; p=0.53). Overall knee outcomes were good; the mean Lysholm score at final follow-up was 75.5±16.8 (range: 36-100). No significant differences were identified in any of the sub-groups. Conclusions We were unable to identify any differences in knee proprioceptive acuity between injured knees and controls nor between the types of surgical treatment, demonstrating equivocal recovery for both methods of treatment.

Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008-17.

BACKGROUND: Trauma care in England was re-organised in 2012 with ambulance bypass of local hospitals to newly designated Major Trauma Centres (MTCs). There is still controversy about the optimal way to organise health series for patients suffering severe injury. METHODS: A longitudinal series of annual cross-sectional studies of care process and outcomes from April 2008 to March 2017. Data was collected through the national clinical audit of major trauma care. The primary analysis was carried out on the 110,863 patients admitted to 35 hospitals that were 'consistent submitters' throughout the study period. The main outcome was longitudinal analysis of risk adjusted survival. FINDINGS: Major Trauma networks were associated with significant changes in (1) patient flow (with increased numbers treated in Major Trauma Centres), (2) treatment systems (more consultant led care and more rapid imaging), (3) patient factors (an increase in older trauma), and (4) clinical care (new massive transfusion policies and use of tranexamic acid). There were 10,247 (9.2%) deaths in the 110,863 patients with an ISS of 9 or more. There were no changes in unadjusted mortality. The analysis of trends in risk adjusted survival for study hospitals shows a 19% (95% CI 3%-36%) increase in the case mix adjusted odds of survival from severe injury over the 9-year study period. Interrupted time series analysis showed a significant positive change in the slope after the intervention time point of April 2012 (+ 0.08% excess survivors per quarter, p = 0.023), in other words an increase of 0.08 more survivors per 100 patients every quarter. INTERPRETATION: A whole system national change was associated with significant improvements in both the care process and outcomes of patients after severe injury. FUNDING: This analysis was carried out independently and did not receive funding. The data collection for the national clinical audit was funded by subscriptions from participating hospitals.

Acute and chronic kidney disease in elderly patients with hip fracture: prevalence, risk factors and outcome with development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is a common injury in older people with a high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. This patient group is also at high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), but little is known of the impact of kidney disease on outcome following hip fracture. METHODS: An observational cohort of consecutive patients with hip fracture in a large UK secondary care hospital. Predictive modelling of outcomes using development and validation datasets. Inclusion: all patients admitted with hip fracture with sufficient serum creatinine measurements to define acute kidney injury. Main outcome measures - development of acute kidney injury during admission; mortality (in hospital, 30-365 day and to follow-up); length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Data were available for 2848 / 2959 consecutive admissions from 2007-2011; 776 (27.2%) male. Acute kidney injury occurs in 24%; development of acute kidney injury is independently associated with male sex (OR 1.48 (1.21 to 1.80), premorbid chronic kidney disease stage 3B or worse (OR 1.52 (1.19 to 1.93)), age (OR 3.4 (2.29 to 5.2) for >85 years) and greater than one major co-morbidities (OR 1.61 (1.34 to 1.93)). Acute kidney injury of any stage is associated with an increased hazard of death, and increased length of stay (Acute kidney injury: 19.1 (IQR 13 to 31) days; no acute kidney injury 15 (11 to 23) days). A simplified predictive model containing Age, CKD stage (3B-5), two or more comorbidities, and male sex had an area under the ROC curve of 0.63 (0.60 to 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Acute kidney injury following hip fracture is common and associated with worse outcome and greater hospital length of stay. With the number of people experiencing hip fracture predicted to rise, recognition of risk factors and optimal perioperative management of acute kidney injury will become even more important.

The effect of timing of antibiotic delivery on infection rates related to open limb fractures: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the timing of delivery of intravenous antibiotics following open limb fractures has an effect on deep infection rates and other outcomes. DESIGN: We published an a priori study protocol in PROSPERO. Our search strategy combined terms for antibiotics, timing of administration and fractures. Two independent reviewers screened, selected, assessed quality and extracted data from identified studies. DATA SOURCES: We searched five electronic databases with no limits and performed grey literature searches. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised and non-randomised controlled studies, prospective and retrospective observational studies in which the effect of the timing of delivery of antibiotics on the outcome of deep infection in open fractures was considered were included. RESULTS: Eight studies were included according to the above criteria. There were no randomised or non-randomised controlled trials. None of the included studies provided data on patient reported or health-related quality of life. The overall deep infection rate ranged from 5% to 17.5%. All of the studies were at substantial risk of bias. One study reported a reduced infection rate with the delivery of antibiotics within 66 min of injury and seven studies reporting no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Sufficiently robust evidence is not available currently to determine whether the timing of delivery of intravenous antibiotics has an effect on the risk of deep infection or other outcomes following open limb fractures. There is therefore a need for a randomised controlled trial in this area before policy changes should be instigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42015016729).

Postero-medial approach for complex tibial plateau injuries with a postero-medial or postero-lateral shear fragment.

This study demonstrates the utility of a modified postero-medial surgical approach to the knee in treating a series of patients with complex tibial plateau injuries with associated postero-medial and postero-lateral shear fractures. Posterior coronal shear fractures are underappreciated and their clinical relevance has recently been characterised. Less-invasive surgery and indirect reduction techniques are inadequate for treating these coronal plane fractures. Our approach includes an inverted 'L'-shaped incision situated within the posterior flexor knee crease, followed by the retraction or incision of the medial head of the gastrocnemius tendon, while protecting the neurovascular structures. This provides a more extensile exposure, as far as the postero-lateral corner, than previously described. Our case series included eight females and eight males. The average age was 53 years. The majority of these injuries were sustained through high-energy trauma. All patients' fractures were classified as Schatzker grade 4, or above, with a postero-medial split depression. Eight patients had associated postero-lateral corner fractures. Two were open, two had vascular compromise and one had neurological injury. The average time to surgery was 6.4 days (range 0-12), operative time 142 min (range 76-300) and length of stay 17 days (range 7-46). A total of 11 patients were treated using the postero-medial approach alone and in five the treatment was combined with an antero-lateral approach. Two patients suffered a reduced range of movement requiring manipulation and physiotherapy, and three patients had a 5-degree fixed flexion deformity. Two patients developed superficial wound infections treated with antibiotics alone. Anatomical reduction and fracture union was achieved in 15 patients. These are complex fractures to treat, and our modified posterior approach allows direct reduction and optimal positioning of plates to act as buttress devices. It can be extended across the midline to the postero-lateral corner and also allows excellent exposure of the popliteal vessels should concurrent vascular repair be required.

Challenges and barriers to improving care of the musculoskeletal patient of the future - a debate article and global perspective.

BACKGROUND: With greater technological developments in the care of musculoskeletal patients, we are entering an era of rapid change in our understanding of the pathophysiology of traumatic injury; assessment and treatment of polytrauma and related disorders; and treatment outcomes. In developed countries, it is very likely that we will have algorithms for the approach to many musculoskeletal disorders as we strive for the best approach with which to evaluate treatment success. This debate article is founded on predictions of future health care needs that are solely based on the subjective inputs and opinions of the world's leading orthopedic surgeons.Hence, it functions more as a forum-based rather than a scientific-based presentation. This exposé was designed to stimulate debate about the emerging patients' needs in the future predicted by leading orthopedic surgeons that provide some hint as to the right direction for orthopedic care and outlines the important topics in this area. DISCUSSION: The authors aim to provide a general overview of orthopedic care in a typical developed country setting. However, the regional diversity of the United States and every other industrialized nation should be considered as a cofactor that may vary to some extent from our vision of improved orthopedic and trauma care of the musculoskeletal patient on an interregional level.In this forum, we will define the current and future barriers in developed countries related to musculoskeletal trauma, total joint arthroplasty, patient safety and injuries related to military conflicts, all problems that will only increase as populations age, become more mobile, and deal with political crisis. SUMMARY: It is very likely that the future will bring a more biological approach to fracture care with less invasive surgical procedures, flexible implants, and more rapid rehabilitation methods. This international consortium challenges the trauma and implants community to develop outcome registries that are managed through health care offices and to prepare effectively for the many future challenges that lie in store for those who treat musculoskeletal conditions.

Princípios AO do tratamento de fraturas / AO Principles of Fracture Treatment

Há mais de 40 anos, a AO estabelece princípios para o tratamento de fraturas por meio de diversas publicações e cursos especiais em diferentes países. Esta nova edição, atualizada e ampliada, de Princípios AO do tratamento de fraturas reúne o conhecimento de mais de cem autores, que descrevem as técnicas mais atuais do campo da traumatologia. Este livro ricamente ilustrado, que inclui um DVD-ROM com animações e videoclipes (em inglês) que auxiliam no entendimento dos conteúdos abordados, é recurso fundamental tanto para residentes como para cirurgiões experientes. No volume 2: foco no tratamento de fraturas específicas em diferentes áreas anatômicas. Para cada área há um capítulo que discute desde a avaliação das lesões, passando pela anatomia cirúrgica, o planejamento pré-operatório, o tratamento cirúrgico, bem como as complicações e o cuidado pós-operatórios

Princípios AO do tratamento de fraturas / AO Principles of Fracture Treatment

Há mais de 40 anos, a AO estabelece princípios para o tratamento de fraturas por meio de diversas publicações e cursos especiais em diferentes países. Esta nova edição, atualizada e ampliada, de Princípios AO do tratamento de fraturas reúne o conhecimento de mais de cem autores, que descrevem as técnicas mais atuais do campo da traumatologia. Este livro ricamente ilustrado, que inclui um DVD-ROM com animações e videoclipes (em inglês) que auxiliam no entendimento dos conteúdos abordados, é recurso fundamental tanto para residentes como para cirurgiões experientes

Bioelectrical impedance: a new method for measuring post-traumatic swelling.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether measurement of the bioelectrical impedance of the lower limb could be used to measure the swelling resulting from acute ankle fracture. METHODS: The impedance of each ankle was measured in 14 patients with isolated acute ankle fracture. The degree of ankle swelling was also directly assessed by measurement of the ankle circumference and diameter and by the water displacement method. A control group of 17 healthy subjects with uninjured ankles was similarly assessed. RESULTS: The impedance of the ankle was significantly reduced in patients with ankle fracture, and there was a strong inverse relationship between the degree of this reduction and the amount of swelling as directly measured. The relationship was stronger using the impedance method than the circumference and diameter methods. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that bioelectrical impedance can be used to measure ankle swelling in the presence of injury and could potentially be used both to monitor swelling clinically and as a research tool in studies of swelling management. More research is required to further define the potential role for this technique.

Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important?

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is associated with high mortality among the elderly. Most patients require surgery, but the timing of the operation remains controversial. Surgery within twenty-four hours after admission has been recommended, but evidence supporting this approach is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine whether a delay in surgery for hip fractures affects postoperative mortality among elderly patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of 2660 patients who underwent surgical treatment of a hip fracture at one university hospital. We measured mortality rates following the surgery in relation to the delay in the surgery and the acute medical comorbidities on admission. RESULTS: The mortality following the hip fracture surgery was 9% (246 of 2660) at thirty days, 19% at ninety days, and 30% at twelve months. Of the patients who had been declared fit for surgery, those operated on without delay had a thirty-day mortality of 8.7% and those for whom the surgery had been delayed between one and four days had a thirty-day mortality of 7.3%. This difference was not significant (p = 0.51). The thirty-day mortality for patients for whom the surgery had been delayed for more than four days was 10.7%, and this small group had significantly increased mortality at ninety days (hazard ratio = 2.25; p = 0.001) and one year (hazard ratio = 2.4; p = 0.001). Patients who had been admitted with an acute medical comorbidity that required treatment prior to the surgery had a thirty-day mortality of 17%, which was nearly 2.5 times greater than that for patients who had been initially considered fit for surgery (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.6 to 3.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The thirty-day mortality following surgery for a hip fracture was 9%. Patients with medical comorbidities that delayed surgery had 2.5 times the risk of death within thirty days after the surgery compared with patients without comorbidities that delayed surgery. Mortality was not increased when the surgery was delayed up to four days for patients who were otherwise fit for hip fracture surgery. However, a delay of more than four days significantly increased mortality.

The current hospital costs of treating hip fractures.

Hip fractures impact heavily on our health service resources yet there is no recent United Kingdom study detailing hospital costs for such injuries. A comprehensive analysis of 100 patients admitted with a hip fracture was performed to determine current medical expenditure incurred during acute hospitalisation for hip fracture during 2003. Costs associated with surgery (implant and theatre costs) and laboratory/radiological investigations were established from individual use. The mean stay of the study group (mean age 83 years, 77 females and 23 males) was 23 days. The mean total hospital expenditure per patient was calculated to be 12,163 pounds sterling of which ward costs contributed 84%, operative costs 9% and investigations 7%. These results emphasise the growing economic impact arising from the inpatient treatment hip fractures, most of which relate to length of hospital stay.

Results of dynamic condylar screw for subtrochanteric fractures.

A consecutive series of 58 patients, treated with the dynamic condylar screw (DCS) for subtrochanteric fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The mechanism of injury was low-energy in 47 cases and high-energy in 11 cases. Five patients died before fracture healing. Ten out of 11 young patients, (nine with high-energy injuries), united primarily. In contrast, the primary union rate in the elderly was 74%. Implant failure was seen in 11 cases (20%). Restricted weight bearing status post-operatively was associated with significantly lower incidence of implant failure (P<0.05, chi(2)-test). The use of bone graft was not related to fracture union (P>0.5). After revision surgery the overall union rate in the elderly was 90%. Using the DCS, the results were good in the young patients with high-energy injuries. However, the implant failure rate is high in elderly patients who suffer low-energy fractures. The DCS should not be used if weight bearing cannot be minimized in this group.