Non-invasive measurement of abnormal ventilatory mechanics in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated non-invasive, effort-independent measurement of ventilatory mechanics in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Ventilatory mechanics were measured by optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) in ALS patients and matched controls. Analysis determined whether OEP measurements correlated with standard clinical measures. RESULTS: ALS patients (N = 18) had lower forced vital capacity percent predicted (55.2 ± 22.0 L) compared with controls (N = 15; 104.7 ± 16.2 L) and higher ventilatory inefficiency (49.2 ± 9.0 vs. 40.0 ± 3.5, respectively; P < 0.001 for both measures). Lower tidal volumes within the diaphragm area correlated with the dyspnea subscore calculated from the ALS Functional Rating Scale-revised (P = 0.031), and paradoxical movement of the ribcage compared with the abdominal compartment was seen in the most severe cases. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of ventilatory mechanics in mild to severe ALS reveals dysfunction that is not readily detected by standard testing and ALS functional severity assessment measures. Muscle Nerve 54: 270-276, 2016.

Quantification of Improvements in Static and Dynamic Ventilatory Measures Following Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Severe COPD.

Rationale: This study quantitatively measured the effects of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on spirometry, static and dynamic lung and chest wall volume subdivision mechanics, and cardiopulmonary exercise measures. Methods: Patients with severe COPD (mean FEV1 = 23 ± 6% predicted) undergoing LVRS evaluation were recruited. Spirometry, plethysmography and exercise capacity were obtained within 6 months pre-LVRS and again within 12 months post- LVRS. Ventilatory mechanics were quantified using stationary optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) during spontaneous tidal breathing and during maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). Statistical significance was set at P< 0.05. Results:Ten consecutive patients met criteria for LVRS (5 females, 5 males, age: 62±6yrs). Post -LVRS (mean follow up 7 months ± 2 months), the group showed significant improvements in dyspnea scores (pre 4±1 versus post 2 ± 2), peak exercise workload (pre 37± 21 watts versus post 50 ± 27watts ), heart rate (pre 109±19 beats per minutes [bpm] versus post 118±19 bpm), duty cycle (pre 30.8 ± 3.8% versus post 38.0 ± 5.7%), and spirometric measurements (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] pre 23 ± 6% versus post 32 ± 13%, total lung capacity / residual lung volume pre 50 ± 8 versus 50 ± 11) . Six to 12 month changes in OEP measurements were observed in an increased percent contribution of the abdomen compartment during tidal breathing (41.2±6.2% versus 44.3±8.9%, P=0.03) and in percent contribution of the pulmonary ribcage compartment during MVV (34.5±10.3 versus 44.9±11.1%, P=0.02). Significant improvements in dynamic hyperinflation during MVV occurred, demonstrated by decreases rather than increases in end expiratory volume (EEV) in the pulmonary ribcage (pre 207.0 ± 288.2 ml versus post -85.0 ± 255.9 ml) and abdominal ribcage compartments (pre 229.1 ± 182.4 ml versus post -17.0 ± 136.2 ml) during the maneuver. Conclusions: Post-LVRS, patients with severe COPD demonstrate significant favorable changes in ventilatory mechanics, during tidal and maximal voluntary breathing. Future work is necessary to determine if these findings are clinically relevant, and extend to other environments such as exercise.

Optoelectronic plethysmography compared to spirometry during maximal exercise.

The purpose of this study was to compare simultaneous measurements of tidal volume (Vt) by optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) and spirometry during a maximal cycling exercise test to quantify possible differences between methods. Vt measured simultaneously by OEP and spirometry was collected during a maximal exercise test in thirty healthy participants. The two methods were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis at submaximal and maximal exercise. The average difference between the two methods and the mean percentage discrepancy were calculated. Submaximal exercise (SM) and maximal exercise (M) Vt measured by OEP and spirometry had very good correlation, SM R=0.963 (p<0.001), M R=0.982 (p<0.001) and high degree of common variance, SM R(2)=0.928, M R(2)=0.983. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that during SM, OEP could measure exercise Vt as much as 0.134 L above and -0.025 L below that of spirometry. OEP could measure exercise Vt as much as 0.188 L above and -0.017 L below that of spirometry. The discrepancy between measurements was -2.0 ± 7.2% at SM and -2.4 ± 3.9% at M. In conclusion, Vt measurements at during exercise by OEP and spirometry are closely correlated and the difference between measurements was insignificant.