Telemedicine medical evaluation of low-risk patients with dengue during an outbreak may be an option in reducing the need for on-site physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of telemedicine consultations during an outbreak in reducing the need for face-to-face consultations at a field hospital for patients with dengue. METHODS: We performed a retrospective unicentric study between April and May 2015 with 4626 patients (≥15 years old) who spontaneously sought care at an emergency field hospital (Sao Paulo/Brazil). A nurse initially assessed all patients with dengue through rapid diagnostic testing, automated complete blood count, and risk stratification. During overcrowded situations, a video-based telemedicine consultation was provided as an option to all low-to-moderate risk patients who tested positive. The management was carried out according to current dengue guidelines. The primary end point was a referral to immediate face-to-face medical evaluation. RESULTS: Of all patients suspected of dengue infection, 2003 presented positive testing, 1978 were classified as low-moderate risk, and 267 patients with dengue were evaluated by telemedicine. The mean age was 38.17 ± 13.7 years (54.6% female). Oral medications were recommended in 169 (63.3%), intravenous hydration or symptomatic drugs in 96 (36%), 252 (94.4%) were discharged after telemedicine assessment, and only 15 (5.6%) were referred to immediate face-to-face medical evaluation. No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine medical assessment of low-to-moderate risk patients with dengue previously screened by nursing triage is effective in replacing the face-to-face evaluation in a field hospital. Telemedicine may be reinforced in epidemiological outbreak scenarios as a cost-effective strategy for the initial assessment of acute patients.

Cross-sectional study of the ambulance transport between healthcare facilities with medical support via telemedicine: Easy, effective, and safe tool.

BACKGROUND: Feasibility and safety of ambulance transport between healthcare facilities with medical support exclusively via telemedicine are unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with a single telemedicine center reference for satellite emergency departments of the same hospital. The study population was all critically ill patients admitted to one of the peripheral units from November 2016 to May 2020 and who needed to be transferred to the main building. Telemedicine-assisted transportation was performed by an emergency specialist. The inclusion criteria included patients above the age of 15 and initial stabilization performed at the emergency department. Unstable, intubated, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and acute stroke patients were excluded. There was a double-check of safety conditions by the nurse and the remote doctor before the ambulance departure. The primary endpoint was the number of telemedicine-guided interventions during transport. RESULTS: 2840 patients were enrolled. The population was predominantly male (53.2%) with a median age of 60 years. Sepsis was the most prevalent diagnosis in 28% of patients, followed by acute coronary syndromes (8.5%), arrhythmia (6.7%), venous thromboembolism (6.1%), stroke (6.1%), acute abdomen (3.6%), respiratory distress (3.3%), and heart failure (2.5%). Only 22 (0.8%) patients required telemedicine-assisted support during transport. Administration of oxygen therapy and analgesics were the most common recommendations made by telemedicine emergency physicians. There were no communication problems in the telemedicine-assisted group. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine-assisted ambulance transportation between healthcare facilities of stabilized critically ill patients may be an option instead of an onboard physician. The frequency of clinical support requests by telemedicine is minimal, and most evaluations are of low complexity and easily and safely performed by trained nurses.

Antibiotic stewardship in direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations leads to high adherence to best practice guidelines and a low prescription rate.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the antibiotic prescription rate in low-risk patients evaluated at a telemedicine program that adopts antibiotic stewardship protocols. METHODS: Adult patients who accessed a single direct-to-consumer telemedicine center (Jan/2019-Feb/2020) were retrospectively enrolled. Diseases amenable to antimicrobial treatment were classified under five diagnostic groups: upper respiratory tract infection (URI), acute pharyngotonsillitis (PT), acute sinusitis (AS), urinary tract infection (UTI), and acute diarrhea (AD). Physicians were trained on and advised to strictly follow the current guideline recommendations supported by institutional antibiotic stewardship protocols, readily available online during consultations. We analyzed the antibiotic prescription rate among patients, referral rate, and antibiotic class through descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 2328 patients were included in the study. A total of 2085 (89·6%) patients were discharged with usual recommendations, medication (if needed), and instructions about red flags, while 243 (10·4%) were referred to a face-to-face consultation. Among the discharged patients, the antibiotic prescription rates by the diagnostic group were URI - 2·5%, PT - 35·0%, AS - 51·8%, UTI - 91.6%, and AD - 1·6%. In most cases, prescribed antibiotics were in line with institutional stewardship protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Low prescription rate of antibiotics can be achieved using antibiotic stewardship protocols at direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations, showing high adherence to international guidelines. These results reinforce telemedicine as a cost-effective and safe strategy for the initial assessment of acute non-urgent symptoms.