Strut-based accelerated partial breast irradiation: Report of treatment results for 250 consecutive patients at 5 years from a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This registry trial studied the long-term outcomes of women receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using strut-based applicators and reports on the local control, toxicity, and survival for the first 250 patients treated with this device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were treated using the strut-based brachytherapy device with conventional dose and fractionation of 34 Gy in 10 twice-daily fractions. Planning goals for the planning target volume were V90 > 90%, V150 < 50 cc, and V200 < 20 cc. Toxicity was graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Recurrence rates were also calculated. RESULTS: Median followup was 59.5 months for the 250 patients. Grade 2 or higher adverse events at any time for hyperpigmentation, induration, erythema, telangiectasia, breast pain, seroma, and fat necrosis were 0.4%, 3.0%, 3.0%, 3.0%, 3.9%, 4.8%, and 1.3%, respectively. The median V90 was 97%, V95 was 95.1%, V150 was 28.7 cc, and V200 was 14.2 cc. For those patients with a less than a 5-mm or 3-mm-skin bridge, the median skin max doses were 272 and 289 cGy, respectively. The 4-year actuarial recurrence rates for true recurrence/marginal miss and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence were 2.3% and 3.6%, respectively. The 4-year actuarial rates for overall survival, cause-specific survival, and disease-free survival were 97%, 98%, and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The strut-based applicator was designed to simplify APBI compared to interstitial brachytherapy. This report confirms excellent tumor control and survival with low toxicity and supports the evidence that brachytherapy has less normal tissue toxicity than APBI with external beam irradiation.

A consensus-based, process commissioning template for high-dose-rate gynecologic treatments.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of prescriptive, practical information for those doing the work of commissioning high-dose-rate (HDR) gynecologic (GYN) treatment equipment. The purpose of this work is to develop a vendor-neutral, consensus-based, commissioning template to improve standardization of the commissioning process. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A series of commissioning procedures and tests specific to HDR GYN treatments were compiled within one institution. The list of procedures and tests was then sent to five external reviewers at clinics engaged in HDR GYN treatments. External reviewers were asked to (1) suggest deletions, additions, and improvements/modifications to descriptions, (2) link the procedures and tests to common, severe failure modes based on their effectiveness at mitigating those failure modes, and (3) rank the procedures and tests based on perceived level of importance. RESULTS: External reviewers suggested the addition of 14 procedures and tests. The final template consists of 67 procedures and tests. "Treatment process" and "staff training" sections were identified as mitigating the highest number of commonly reported failure modes. The mean perceived importance for all procedures and tests was 4.4 of 5, and the mean for each section ranged from 3.6 to 4.8. Sections of the template that were identified as mitigating the highest number of commonly reported failure modes were not assigned the highest perceived importance. CONCLUSION: The commissioning template developed here provides a standardized approach to process and equipment commissioning. The discord between perceived importance and mitigation of the highest number of failure modes suggests that increased focus should be placed on procedures and tests in "treatment process" and "staff training" sections.