Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Life Sci Alliance ; 6(9)2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37524526

RESUMO

Among glucocorticoids (GCs), dexamethasone (Dex) is widely used in treatment of multiple myelomas. However, despite a definite benefit, all patients relapse. Moreover, the molecular basis of glucocorticoid efficacy remains elusive. To determine genomic response to Dex in myeloma cells, we generated bulk and single-cell multi-omics data and high-resolution contact maps of active enhancers and target genes. We show that a minority of glucocorticoid receptor-binding sites are associated with enhancer activity gains, increased interaction loops, and transcriptional activity. We identified and characterized a predominant enhancer enriched in cohesin (RAD21) and more accessible upon Dex exposure. Analysis of four gene-specific networks revealed the importance of the CTCF-cohesin couple and the synchronization of regulatory sequence openings for efficient transcription in response to Dex. Notably, these epigenomic changes are associated with cell-to-cell transcriptional heterogeneity, in particular, lineage-specific genes. As consequences, BCL2L11-encoding BIM critical for Dex-induced apoptosis and CXCR4 protective from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis are rather up-regulated in different cells. In summary, our work provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in Dex escape.


Assuntos
Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Dexametasona/farmacologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Glucocorticoides , Apoptose , Receptores de Glucocorticoides/genética
3.
Am J Hematol ; 96(9): 1120-1130, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062004

RESUMO

In the phase 3 BOSTON study, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after 1-3 prior regimens were randomized to once-weekly selinexor (an oral inhibitor of exportin 1 [XPO1]) plus bortezomib-dexamethasone (XVd) or twice-weekly bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd). Compared with Vd, XVd was associated with significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and lower rates of peripheral neuropathy, with trends in overall survival (OS) favoring XVd. In BOSTON, 141 (35.1%) patients had MM with high-risk (presence of del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], or ≥4 copies of amp1q21) cytogenetics (XVd, n = 70; Vd, n = 71), and 261 (64.9%) exhibited standard-risk cytogenetics (XVd, n = 125; Vd, n = 136). Among patients with high-risk MM, median PFS was 12.91 months for XVd and 8.61 months for Vd (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, (0.4673, 1.1406)], p = 0.082), and ORRs were 78.6% and 57.7%, respectively (OR 2.68; p = 0.004). In the standard-risk subgroup, median PFS was 16.62 months for XVd and 9.46 months for Vd (HR 0.61; p = 0.004), and ORRs were 75.2% and 64.7%, respectively (OR 1.65; p = 0.033). The safety profiles of XVd and Vd in both subgroups were consistent with the overall population. These data suggest that selinexor can confer benefits to patients with MM regardless of cytogenetic risk. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03110562.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Hidrazinas/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Análise Citogenética , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrazinas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/genética , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Am J Hematol ; 96(6): 708-718, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755235

RESUMO

Elderly and frail patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are more vulnerable to the toxicity of combination therapies, often resulting in treatment modifications and suboptimal outcomes. The phase 3 BOSTON study showed that once-weekly selinexor and bortezomib with low-dose dexamethasone (XVd) improved PFS and ORR compared with standard twice-weekly bortezomib and moderate-dose dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with previously treated MM. This is a retrospective subgroup analysis of the multicenter, prospective, randomized BOSTON trial. Post hoc analyses were performed to compare XVd versus Vd safety and efficacy according to age and frailty status (<65 and ≥65 years, nonfrail and frail). Patients ≥65 years with XVd had higher ORR (OR 1.77, p = .024), ≥VGPR (OR, 1.68, p = .027), PFS (HR 0.55, p = .002), and improved OS (HR 0.63, p = .030), compared with Vd. In frail patients, XVd was associated with a trend towards better PFS (HR 0.69, p = .08) and OS (HR 0.62, p = .062). Significant improvements were also observed in patients <65 (ORR and TTNT) and nonfrail patients (PFS, ORR, ≥VGPR, and TTNT). Patients treated with XVd had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy in ≥65 year-old (22% vs. 37%; p = .0060) and frail patients (15% vs. 44%; p = .0002). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were not observed more often in older compared to younger patients, nor in frail compared to nonfrail patients. XVd is safe and effective in patients <65 and ≥65 and in nonfrail and frail patients with previously treated MM.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Fragilidade/complicações , Hidrazinas/efeitos adversos , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Triazóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Hematológicas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Hidrazinas/administração & dosagem , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Triazóis/administração & dosagem
5.
Lancet ; 396(10262): 1563-1573, 2020 11 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189178

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Selinexor combined with dexamethasone has shown activity in patients with heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of oral selinexor with bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and dexamethasone induced high response rates with low rates of peripheral neuropathy, the main dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus standard bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. METHODS: This phase 3, randomised, open-label trial was done at 123 sites in 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, who had multiple myeloma, and who had previously been treated with one to three lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive selinexor (100 mg once per week), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 once per week), and dexamethasone (20 mg twice per week), or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 twice per week for the first 24 weeks and once per week thereafter) and dexamethasone (20 mg four times per week for the first 24 weeks and twice per week thereafter). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology and stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, lines of treatment, and multiple myeloma stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110562. The trial is ongoing, with 55 patients remaining on randomised therapy as of Feb 20, 2020. FINDINGS: Of 457 patients screened for eligibility, 402 were randomly allocated-195 (49%) to the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 207 (51%) to the bortezomib and dexamethasone group-and the first dose of study medication was given between June 6, 2017, and Feb 5, 2019. Median follow-up durations were 13·2 months [IQR 6·2-19·8] for the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 16·5 months [9·4-19·8] for the bortezomib and dexamethasone group. Median progression-free survival was 13·93 months (95% CI 11·73-not evaluable) with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 9·46 months (8·11-10·78) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·93], p=0·0075). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (77 [39%] of 195 patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group vs 35 [17%] of 204 in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group), fatigue (26 [13%] vs two [1%]), anaemia (31 [16%] vs 20 [10%]), and pneumonia (22 [11%] vs 22 [11%]). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above was less frequent with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (41 [21%] patients) than with bortezomib and dexamethasone (70 [34%] patients; odds ratio 0·50 [95% CI 0·32-0·79], p=0·0013). 47 (24%) patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 62 (30%) in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group died. INTERPRETATION: A once-per-week regimen of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is a novel, effective, and convenient treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma who have received one to three previous lines of therapy. FUNDING: Karyopharm Therapeutics.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Hidrazinas/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrazinas/efeitos adversos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Triazóis/efeitos adversos
6.
Leukemia ; 33(1): 159-170, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29967379

RESUMO

Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with high-risk disease are in need of new treatment strategies to improve the outcomes. Multiple clinical, cytogenetic, or gene expression features have been used to identify high-risk patients, each of which has significant weaknesses. Inclusion of molecular features into risk stratification could resolve the current challenges. In a genome-wide analysis of the largest set of molecular and clinical data established to date from NDMM, as part of the Myeloma Genome Project, we have defined DNA drivers of aggressive clinical behavior. Whole-genome and exome data from 1273 NDMM patients identified genetic factors that contribute significantly to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (cumulative R2 = 18.4% and 25.2%, respectively). Integrating DNA drivers and clinical data into a Cox model using 784 patients with ISS, age, PFS, OS, and genomic data, the model has a cumlative R2 of 34.3% for PFS and 46.5% for OS. A high-risk subgroup was defined by recursive partitioning using either a) bi-allelic TP53 inactivation or b) amplification (≥4 copies) of CKS1B (1q21) on the background of International Staging System III, comprising 6.1% of the population (median PFS = 15.4 months; OS = 20.7 months) that was validated in an independent dataset. Double-Hit patients have a dire prognosis despite modern therapies and should be considered for novel therapeutic approaches.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Genoma Humano , Genômica/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/genética , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
7.
Genome Med ; 8(1): 49, 2016 04 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27121964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia, or bloodstream infection (BSI), is a leading cause of death among patients with certain types of cancer. A previous study reported that intestinal domination, defined as occupation of at least 30 % of the microbiota by a single bacterial taxon, is associated with BSI in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. However, the impact of the intestinal microbiome before treatment initiation on the risk of subsequent BSI remains unclear. Our objective was to characterize the fecal microbiome collected before treatment to identify microbes that predict the risk of BSI. METHODS: We sampled 28 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) prior to administration of chemotherapy and characterized 16S ribosomal RNA genes using high-throughput DNA sequencing. We quantified bacterial taxa and used techniques from machine learning to identify microbial biomarkers that predicted subsequent BSI. RESULTS: We found that patients who developed subsequent BSI exhibited decreased overall diversity and decreased abundance of taxa including Barnesiellaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Faecalibacterium, Christensenella, Dehalobacterium, Desulfovibrio, and Sutterella. Using machine-learning methods, we developed a BSI risk index capable of predicting BSI incidence with a sensitivity of 90 % at a specificity of 90 % based only on the pretreatment fecal microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the gut microbiota can identify high-risk patients before HSCT and that manipulation of the gut microbiota for prevention of BSI in high-risk patients may be a useful direction for future research. This approach may inspire the development of similar microbiome-based diagnostic and prognostic models in other diseases.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bactérias/classificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Análise de Sequência de RNA/métodos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bactérias/genética , Feminino , Variação Genética , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Incidência , Linfoma não Hodgkin/microbiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Ribossômico 16S/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
8.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 7(1): 43-53, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24392968

RESUMO

Induction therapy followed by intensification with ASCT is the standard of care in younger patients with multiple myeloma. Three-drug induction regimens combining novel agents (VTD, VRD, VCD, PAD) have shown a high CR rate both, pretransplant and posttransplant. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics continues to have an inferior outcome even when treated with novel agents. The role of tandem autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is not well established, although some studies show a better outcome with tandem ASCT as compared to single auto. The high response rate obtained with novel agents also raises the question if autologous transplant has a role in front-line therapy or if it should be used as savage therapy after relapse.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Citogenética , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Indução de Remissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...