Chiropractic management of a professional hockey player with recurrent shoulder instability.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical management of recurrent shoulder instability in a professional hockey player by using chiropractic management and rehabilitation exercises. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 23-year-old professional hockey player with recurrent left shoulder pain and instability. He had two previous unsuccessful shoulder operations to correct the instability. He reported that the shoulder "slips out" in positions of abduction and external rotation or when the left arm is moved suddenly above shoulder height. The patient was still playing hockey professionally at the time of the initial visit and did not want to have to take time off for another surgery, so he chose to attempt a conservative approach. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient had undergone strength training for rehabilitation after each of the previous two shoulder operations and had very strong rotator cuff and scapular musculature. Proprioceptive testing revealed a poor response in the left shoulder compared with the right shoulder. Two subjective outcome measures were used to determine the effectiveness of the treatment protocol in reducing the symptoms of recurrent shoulder instability. Much of the treatment focused on proprioceptive training, soft tissue mobilization, and improving joint function. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the potential benefit of chiropractic management and proprioceptive exercises to decrease the symptoms of recurrent shoulder instability.

Isometric back extension endurance tests: a review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature that describes and evaluates the use of isometric back extension endurance tests. DATA COLLECTION: Relevant articles in English were retrieved through a search of MEDLINE and the Index to Chiropractic Literature. Key search terms were back muscle endurance, isometric back endurance, trunk extensors, back muscle performance, and Sorensen test. DATA SYNTHESIS: The principal criterion for inclusion was as follows: any study that discussed or tested an isometric type of back endurance extension test. Studies that were excluded did not use an isometric testing protocol. Thirty-seven of the initial studies are included in this review. RESULTS: Six different types of isometric back extension endurance testing methods were found. Three of these procedures require special testing devices. Much of the research on this topic has centered on a procedure known as the Sorensen test. Normative databases have been established for the Sorensen test and 2 other test types. Validity and reliability have been assessed for some of the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of motivation and effort exerted by the subject are limiting factors in all of the tests reviewed. These psychologic factors warrant further research. On the basis of the literature reviewed, we determined that the Sorensen is probably the most clinically useful of these tests; it is easy to perform, requires no special equipment, and enjoys the most support from the literature.

Lumbosacral transitional segments: classification, prevalence, and effect on disk height.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of lumbosacral transitional segments among chiropractic practice settings and to determine if this anomaly would affect the height of the lumbosacral disk. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of radiographs. SETTING: Los Angeles College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic and a private chiropractic office. SAMPLES: A total of 20 lumbar series with lumbosacral transitional segments from a private chiropractic office, 47 lumbar series with lumbosacral transitional segments, and 60 age- and sex-matched control series from a college clinic. RESULTS: A total of 2.3% of 882 lumbar series at the private chiropractic office and 6.5% of 786 lumbar series at the Whittier Health Center showed lumbosacral transitional segments of types II, III, or IV. The L5-S1 intervertebral disk height was significantly smaller in patients with lumbosacral transitional segments compared with those without (ie, 11% vs 19% of total lumbar disk height, respectively). When bilateral bony fusion of L5 to the sacrum was present, the L5-S1 disk height was significantly smaller than that without bony fusion (ie, 8% vs. 12% to 14% of total lumbar disk height, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the rate of occurrence of lumbosacral transitional segments is low in chiropractic practice. In the presence of lumbosacral transitional segments, especially when there was bony fusion, the lumbosacral intervertebral disk was significantly narrower than the upper lumbar disks, which should not be considered as disk degeneration or displacement. The type of lumbosacral transitional segment present also showed a significant effect on the height of the lumbosacral disk.