Risk and mitigation actions for clinical trials during COVID-19 pandemic (RiMiCOPa).

The COVID-19 virus diffusion is, nowadays, global and any clinical trial is potentially affected by the direct and indirect consequences of the COVID-19 during the pandemic. Any step, from protocol design to result's disclosure, needs to be revised to assess the impact of the COVID-19 on the study, evaluate the potential risks, and establish a mitigation plan. We have developed a series of recommendations, belonging to our experience in any aspect of clinical trials. We hope that the Risk and Mitigation actions for clinical trials during COVID-19 Pandemic (RiMiCOPa) will help all clinical trial professionals, patients, auditors, and assessors to ensure effective data management, statistics, and medical writing standards while conducting clinical trials in the pandemic.

Airway inflammatory profile is correlated with symptoms in stable COPD: A longitudinal proof-of-concept cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Symptoms negatively impact the quality of life and long-term prognosis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Little is known about the relationship linking airway inflammation and symptoms in stable COPD. In this study, we evaluated whether respiratory symptoms in COPD are related to sputum inflammatory cellular profile and whether symptom changes are associated with changes in airway inflammation. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with stable COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow obstruction were enrolled. Patients were visited weekly over 4 weeks. At each visit, patients underwent clinical assessments, lung function tests and sputum induction. Patients recorded daily dyspnoea, sputum and cough scores. RESULTS: The changes between two consecutive visits in the percent of sputum neutrophils and eosinophils were related to the changes in the cough (P < 0.001; r = 0.63) and dyspnoea scores (P < 0.001; r = 0.58) of the prior week. Furthermore, using regression analyses, we were able to demonstrate that changes in the cough score were specifically associated to the change in neutrophils, while changes in the dyspnoea score and use of rescue medications were associated with changes in eosinophils numbers. CONCLUSION: Our study showed an association between symptoms and the sputum inflammatory profile. In particular, changes in symptoms (cough and dyspnoea) were correlated with changes in the specific sputum inflammatory cell components of airway inflammation (neutrophils and eosinophils, respectively), providing novel information on the mechanisms of disease manifestation.

Long-term effects of inhaled corticosteroids on sputum bacterial and viral loads in COPD.

Inhaled corticosteroid-containing medications reduce the frequency of COPD exacerbations (mainly infectious in origin) while paradoxically increasing the risk of other respiratory infections. The aim was to determine the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on airway microbial load in COPD patients and evaluate the influence of the underlying inflammatory profile on airway colonisation and microbiome.This is a proof-of-concept prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint study. Sixty patients with stable moderate COPD were randomised to receive one inhalation twice daily of either a combination of salmeterol 50 µg plus fluticasone propionate 500 µg or salmeterol 50 µg for 12 months. The primary outcome was the change of sputum bacterial loads over the course of treatment.Compared with salmeterol, 1-year treatment with salmeterol plus fluticasone was associated with a significant increase in sputum bacterial load (p=0.005), modification of sputum microbial composition and increased airway load of potentially pathogenic bacteria. The increased bacterial load was observed only in inhaled corticosteroid-treated patients with lower baseline sputum or blood eosinophil (≤2%) levels but not in patients with higher baseline eosinophils.Long-term inhaled corticosteroid treatment affects bacterial load in stable COPD. Lower eosinophil counts are associated with increased airway bacterial load.

Regular versus as-needed budesonide and formoterol combination treatment for moderate asthma: a non-inferiority, randomised, double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for patients with moderate persistent asthma recommend regular therapy with a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a longacting ß2 agonist plus as-needed rapid-acting bronchodilators. We investigated whether symptom-driven budesonide and formoterol combination therapy administered as needed would be as effective as regular treatment with this combination plus as-needed symptom-driven terbutaline for patients with moderate asthma. METHODS: In this non-inferiority randomised clinical trial, we recruited adult patients (18-65 years of age) with stable moderate persistent asthma, according to 2006 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics of secondary and tertiary referral hospitals and university centres. After a 6-week run-in period of inhaled regular budesonide and formoterol plus as-needed terbutaline, the patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive placebo twice daily plus as-needed treatment with inhaled 160 µg budesonide and 4·5 µg formoterol (as-needed budesonide and formoterol therapy) or twice-daily 160 µg budesonide and 4·5 µg formoterol combination plus symptom-driven 500 µg terbutaline (regular budesonide/formoterol therapy) for 1 year. Randomisation was done according to a list prepared with the use of a random number generator and a balanced-block design stratified by centre. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was time to first treatment failure measured after 1 year of treatment using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and the power of the study was calculated based on the rate of treatment failure. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00849095. FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2009, and March 31, 2012, we screened 1010 patients with moderate asthma and randomly assigned 866 eligible patients to the two treatment groups (424 to as-needed budesonide and formoterol therapy and 442 to regular budenoside and formoterol therapy). Compared with regular budesonide and formoterol therapy, as-needed budesonide and formoterol treatment was associated with a lower probability of patients having no treatment failure at 1 year (Kaplan-Meier estimates 53·6% for as-needed treatment vs 64·0% for regular treatment; difference 10·3% [95% CI 3·2-17·4], at a predefined non-inferiority limit of 9%). Patients in the as-needed budesonide and formoterol group had shorter time to first treatment failure than those in the regular therapy group (11·86 weeks vs 28·00 weeks for the first quartile [ie, the time until the first 25% of patients experienced treatment failure]). The difference in treatment failures was largely attributable to nocturnal awakenings (82 patients in the as-needed treatment group vs 44 in the regular treatment group). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: In patients with moderate stable asthma, as-needed budesonide and formoterol therapy is less effective than is the guideline-recommended regular budesonide and formoterol treatment, even though the differences are small. FUNDING: Italian Medicines Agency.

Efficacy and safety of the Betamethasone valerate 0.1% plaster in mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are a versatile option for the treatment of mild-to-moderate psoriasis due to their availability in a wide range of potencies and formulations. Occlusion of the corticosteroid is a widely accepted procedure to enhance the penetration of the medication, thereby improving its effectiveness. Betamethasone valerate (BMV) is a moderately potent corticosteroid that is available as a cream, ointment, and lotion. A ready-to-use occlusive dressing, which provides a continuous sustained release of BMV, has been developed for the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new BMV 0.1% plaster compared with a BMV 0.1% cream in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicenter, phase III study. Eligible outpatients (aged ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of stable, chronic plaque psoriasis vulgaris with two to four plaques on extensor surfaces of limbs were randomized to receive BMV 0.1% plaster or BMV 0.1% cream for 3-5 weeks; patients with resolution of target plaques then entered a 3-month, treatment-free, follow-up period. The number of patients showing clearing of plaques (remission) at 3 weeks (primary endpoint) and at 5 weeks was independently evaluated from digitized images of target plaques by two blinded assessors, and also assessed by the investigator and patient. Additional endpoints were (i) change from baseline in target plaque size and in Psoriasis Global Assessment (PGA) score, as evaluated by the blinded assessors, investigator, and patient; (ii) change from baseline in symptom (itching, soreness) severity; (iii) treatment satisfaction and ease of use; (iv) clearing and relapse during the follow-up period; and (v) adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Patients (n = 231) were screened and randomized to treatment with BMV 0.1% plaster (n = 116) and BMV 0.1% cream (n = 115). Significantly more patients achieved clearing after 3 weeks' treatment with BMV plaster than with BMV cream (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, p < 0.001); this difference was maintained at 5 weeks. The total plaque area decreased to a larger extent for the BMV plaster group compared with the BMV cream group (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA] model, p = 0.017 at week 5). PGA scores were significantly lower after 3 and 5 weeks' treatment with BMV plaster (ANCOVA model, all p ≤ 0.016 vs BMV cream). Both treatments reduced itching and soreness to a similar degree, and the incidences of relapse during the follow-up period were comparable between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in AEs between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMV 0.1% plaster is more efficacious than BMV 0.1% cream in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis in a clinical setting resembling daily clinical practice.

Measuring public health officers' opinions on new vaccination programs by means of the WHO Vaccine Introduction Guidelines.

A group of public health officers and gynecologists were requested to express their opinion on whether immunization for: HPV in girls older than 12 years, varicella with combined MMRV vaccine and rotavirus (RV) should be included in the National Immunization Plan in Italy. For each of the three immunization programs, a specific questions list was prepared following the eight steps of the WHO Vaccine Introduction Guidelines flowchart. For each immunization strategy, a logistic regression model was used to identify the set of topics which, jointly considered, showed the strongest influence on the final responder's statement. Eighty-seven responders (82% of which were public health officers) out of 127 participants provided 247 evaluable questionnaires. The final statement "to introduce the vaccine" was voted by 83.5%, 77.9% and 52.4% for HPV, MMRV and RV, respectively. The public health priority, the burden of disease, the economic and financial issues and the vaccine presentation were the most relevant topics, however, the pattern was different among the three immunization strategies.

Rescue use of beclomethasone and albuterol in a single inhaler for mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines recommend the regular use of inhaled corticosteroids for patients with mild persistent asthma. We investigated whether the symptom-driven use of a combination of beclomethasone dipropionate and albuterol (also known as salbutamol) in a single inhaler would be as effective as the regular use of inhaled beclomethasone and superior to the as-needed use of inhaled albuterol. METHODS: We conducted a 6-month, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group trial. After a 4-week run-in, patients with mild asthma were randomly assigned to receive one of four inhaled treatments: placebo twice daily plus 250 microg of beclomethasone and 100 microg of albuterol in a single inhaler as needed (as-needed combination therapy); placebo twice daily plus 100 microg of albuterol as needed (as-needed albuterol therapy); 250 microg of beclomethasone twice daily and 100 microg of albuterol as needed (regular beclomethasone therapy); or 250 microg of beclomethasone and 100 microg of albuterol in a single inhaler twice daily plus 100 microg of albuterol as needed (regular combination therapy). The primary outcome was the morning peak expiratory flow rate. RESULTS: In 455 patients with mild asthma who had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 2.96 liters (88.36% of the predicted value), the morning peak expiratory flow rate during the last 2 weeks of the 6-month treatment was higher (P=0.04) and the number of exacerbations during the 6-month treatment was lower (P=0.002) in the as-needed combination therapy group than in the as-needed albuterol therapy group, but the values in the as-needed combination therapy group were not significantly different from those in the groups receiving regular beclomethasone therapy or regular combination therapy. The cumulative dose of inhaled beclomethasone was lower in the as-needed combination therapy group than in the groups receiving regular beclomethasone therapy or regular combination therapy (P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild asthma, the symptom-driven use of inhaled beclomethasone (250 microg) and albuterol (100 microg) in a single inhaler is as effective as regular use of inhaled beclomethasone (250 microg twice daily) and is associated with a lower 6-month cumulative dose of the inhaled corticosteroid. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00382889 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Effect of permeation enhancers on buccal absorption.

This paper reports an investigation on matrices based on the mucoadhesive polymers hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and sodium alginate, intended for sublingual administration of 1 mg lorazepam (LZ, 7-chloro-5-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dihydro-3-hydroxy-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one, CAS 846-49-1). The effect of different amounts of three permeation enhancers, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), polyethoxylated castor oil (PCO) and polyethylene glycol dodecyl ether (PGDE) on LZ permeation from the matrices was investigated using three models: (a) cultured monolayer of human buccal epithelial cells; (b) hamster cheek pouch mucosa in vitro, and (c) buccal administration to rabbits in vivo. In the first two models the presence of promoters, except when present at the higher concentrations, increased the drug permeation rate. The permeation-reducing effect was rationalized on the basis of micellar complexation of the drug. In the living rabbit (c) model, only CPC at the highest tested concentration was moderately active, while in the cultured cell model activity differences among the enhancers were less evident. Different effects of the promoters in the ex vivo and in vivo models were tentatively explained on the basis of the structural characteristics of the absorbing membranes. The present study, while confirming the efficacy of CPC as promoter in models involving biological membranes, does not provide conclusive data on the validity of the cultured cells model for assessment of buccal drug absorption.