Development and assessment of an ex-vivo bench model aimed at laparoscopic ureteric reconstructive techniques.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Reconstructive and ablative urologic techniques require special technical mastery, especially the intracorporeal suturing. OBJECTIVE: To report the subjective evaluation of a versatile ex-vivo model aimed to practice laparoscopic ureteric reconstructive techniques (LURT) on box-trainer. STUDY DESIGN: The model is a continuous portion of porcine urinary bladder ("dilated pelvis"), the vesico-ureteral joint ("stenosis") and healthy ureter. All 127 participants (n = 119 urologists and n = 8 paediatric surgeons) performed on the model laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty, and then, in the animal model, different LURT procedures (ureteroneocystostomy, ureteric reimplantation and/or dismembered pyeloplasty). The model was subjectively evaluated (face and content validity), through a 12 items questionnaire, based on a Likert scale (1-5 points) and a global question (1-10 points). RESULTS: The total mean rating for 11/12 items was very high (>4points). Only one was rated under 3 points. The overall total mean rating from 1 to 10 points was very high (9.19 ± 0.82 points). In 10/12 items, expert's feedback (content validity) prevailed over non-experts (face validity). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The model was highly accepted for the practice of LURT techniques. Additionally, it is cost-effective, easy to assemble, ethically considerate, and realistic.

Validation of a new artificial model for simulated training of a laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis. / Validación de un nuevo modelo de simulación inorgánica para la anastomosis uretrovesical laparoscópica.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to prove the effectiveness of a low cost, artificial model for training of a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included urologists who attended specialised courses on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) held during the period 2015 to 2017. They were divided into 2 groups according to their previous experience in laparoscopic surgery. The tasks performed on the artificial simulator were prostate resection, "task 1", and urethrovesical anastomosis, "task 2". Once these exercises were completed, the study participants filled in an anonymous questionnaire regarding their demographic data and experience level in laparoscopic surgery (LS). In addition, they gave their opinions about the didactic capacity of the artificial organ and evaluated its usefulness as a tool for LRP training. To demonstrate face and content validity, the participants judged the texture, consistency, morphology and evaluated its similarity to the real organ. The assessment was made with a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The students were divided into 2groups: 10 experts (Group E) and 12 novices (Group N). The only significant difference between the scores of novices and experts was regarding the inclusion of this tool in the training programs (Group E=5 points versus group N=4.4±0.59, P=.024). The experts' group rated all the items with higher scores than the novices' one. Regarding the general assessment of the simulation model, the novice participants gave an average score of 8.00±0.91 points out of 10, while the experts' group granted higher scores of 9.4±0,51. CONCLUSION: This artificial model has shown to have an elevated face, content and construct validity, as well being an optimal didactic tool for training in the techniques of prostate resection and laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis.