Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 71(1): 44-46, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683068

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Brief erythematous-papular skin rashes suggest the diagnosis of urticaria; However, it may be another type of dermatitis, and complementary examinations must be carried out to establish its diagnosis. CASE REPORT: 53-year-old female patient, diagnosed in 2016 with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, in complete remission. Since 2010, he has had episodes of erythematous-papular lesions lasting 24-36 hours. He received antihistamines, corticosteroids and omalizumab without clinical improvement. The ANA determination was positive (1/320), nuclear mitotic pattern. The skin biopsy was compatible with dermatitis herpetiformis. The study of celiac and locus antibodies showed positivity for HLA-DQ2 and DQ2.5 in heterozygosity. The diagnosis of dermatitis herpetiformis was established. Treatment consisted of a gluten-free diet and prescription of dapsone, with satisfactory results. CONCLUSION: It is important to establish the differential diagnosis of patients with chronic urticaria who do not respond to the reference treatment, in addition to carrying out a thorough clinical examination and physical examination before starting treatment and relying on a multidisciplinary team to establish an accurate diagnosis and treatment. appropriate. Due to the side effects of dapsone, subsequent follow-up of patients is essential.


ANTECEDENTES: Los exantemas cutáneos eritemato-papulares de breve duración sugieren el diagnóstico clínico de urticaria; no obstante, puede tratarse de otro tipo de dermatitis, y para establecer el diagnóstico deben llevarse a cabo exploraciones complementarias. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente femenina de 53 años, diagnosticada en 2016 con linfoma difuso de células B grandes, en remisión completa. Desde el 2010 manifestó episodios de lesiones eritemato-papulosas, de 24-36 horas de duración. Recibió antihistamínicos, corticoides y omalizumab sin mejoría clínica. La determinación de ANA resultó positiva (1/320), con patrón mitótico nuclear. La biopsia cutánea fue compatible con dermatitis herpetiforme. El estudio de anticuerpos de celiaquía y locus mostró positividad para HLA-DQ2 y DQ2.5 con heterocigosis. Se estableció el diagnosticó de dermatitis herpetiforme. El tratamiento consistió en dieta exenta de gluten y prescripción de dapsona, con resultados satisfactorios. CONCLUSIÓN: Es importante establecer el diagnóstico diferencial de pacientes con urticaria crónica que no responden al tratamiento de referencia, además de efectuar el examen clínico y la exploración física exhaustivos antes de iniciar el protocolo, y apoyarse de un equipo multidisciplinario para establecer el diagnóstico certero y tratamiento adecuado. Debido a los efectos secundarios de la dapsona, es imprescindible el seguimiento posterior de los pacientes.


Assuntos
Urticária Crônica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Urticária Crônica/etiologia , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária Crônica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Herpetiforme/diagnóstico , Dermatite Herpetiforme/etiologia , Dermatite Herpetiforme/complicações , Prurido/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dapsona/uso terapêutico
2.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 70(2): 107-110, 2023 Jun 28.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37566774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quinine is an alkaloid with antipyretic and anti-infective properties, and also an ingredient in tonic waters. Adverse reactions have been reported with this product, such as photosensitivity, vasculitis, and contact dermatitis. CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old male patient who, after 3-4 hours of consuming "Schweppes®" gin with tonic water, manifested ulcers on the lips and oral cavity, and a fixed erythematous lesion on the second phalanx of the hand, 24 hours later. Skin tests with aeroallergens and food were negative, and 48-hour patch tests were positive (quinine [++] and "Schweppes®" [++]). Based on the test findings, the diagnosis of an adverse reaction to quinine, contained in the tonic water, will be established. CONCLUSIONS: Quinine can be found in other types of foods or medications, so it is important to establish an accurate diagnosis and offer adequate recommendations to the patient with the consumption of this product.


ANTECEDENTES: La quinina es un alcaloide con propiedades antipiréticas, antiinfecciosas y, además, un ingrediente del agua tónica. Se han descrito reacciones adversas con este producto, como fotosensibilidad, vasculitis y dermatitis de contacto. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente masculino de 31 años, que luego de 3-4 horas de consumir ginebra con agua tónica "Schweppes®" manifestó úlceras en los labios y la cavidad bucal, y una lesión eritematosa fija en la segunda falange de la mano, 24 horas después. Las pruebas cutáneas con aeroalérgenos y alimentos resultaron negativas, y las pruebas epicutáneas de 48 horas positivas (quinina [++] y "Schweppes®" [++]). Con base en los hallazgos de las pruebas, se estableció el diagnóstico de reacción adversa por quinina, contenida en el agua tónica. CONCLUSIÓN: La quinina puede encontrarse en diferentes alimentos o medicamentos, por lo que es importante establecer el diagnóstico preciso y ofrecer recomendaciones adecuadas por el consumo de este producto.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Fotossensibilidade , Quinina , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Quinina/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Testes do Emplastro , Água
4.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 68(1): 76-79, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acrylates are plastic materials that are formed by the polymerization of monomers that are derived from acrylic or methacrylic acid; they have a wide range of applications, and they are increasingly used in medicine. CASE REPORT: We are reporting two clinical cases of contact dermatitis in the hospital environment; the first one is about a nurse (occupational exposure) and, the second one, about a patient who experienced contact dermatitis after a diagnostic procedure was performed. CONCLUSION: New sources of acrylates are identified every year due to the multiple uses of these synthetic resins; these materials are included in medical devices, both for orthopedic diagnosis or follow-up (telemetry, electrodes of electroencephalographs) and treatment (bone cement), as well as for surgery.


Antecedentes: Los acrilatos son materiales plásticos que se forman por la polimerización de monómeros derivados del ácido acrílico o metacrílico; tienen una amplia gama de aplicaciones y cada vez son más usados en el campo de la medicina. Casos clínicos: Presentamos dos casos clínicos de dermatitis de contacto en el entorno hospitalario: el primero se trata de una enfermera (exposición ocupacional) y el segundo, de un paciente a quien se le realizó un procedimiento diagnóstico. Conclusión: Cada año se identifican nuevas fuentes de acrilatos debido a las múltiples utilidades de estas resinas sintéticas; estos materiales se incluyen en dispositivos médicos, tanto para el diagnóstico o seguimiento (telemetría, electrodos de electroencefalógrafos) como para el tratamiento (cemento óseo) y cirugía ortopédica.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro
8.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(1): 265-269, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30009988

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: ß-Lactam antibiotics are the most common trigger of reactions in children with most of them being nonimmediate (85.5%), but proven allergy after the allergological workup is between 7% and 10%. There is no agreement on how to perform the provocation tests in these types of hypersensitivity reactions. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether or not repeated doses of the ß-lactams are required to reproduce a nonimmediate reaction in children. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. We included children under 14 years who were referred for a nonimmediate reaction to ß-lactams. All patients underwent a 1-day hospital provocation and were kept under observation at home during the following days for at least the time elapsed between the first dose and the symptoms of the index reaction. If no reaction was triggered, the patient resumed the provocation at home with 2 daily therapeutic doses for an equal of interval time. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included in the study. A positive reaction was recorded in 14 of them (14.4%). The short hospital provocation triggered 3 immediate reactions and 8 delayed reactions. The home rechallenge developed 1 immediate reaction and 2 delayed reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Nonimmediate reactions to ß-lactams in children may be triggered with a 1-day provocation test. We suggest to perform a 1-day provocation test followed by an observational period of at least the time interval of the index reaction. If this challenge is negative, an extended home provocation could subsequently be carried out.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Antibacterianos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , beta-Lactamas/imunologia , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Tardia , Imunização , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...