Navigating creativity within arts-based pedagogy: Implications of a constructivist grounded theory study.

BACKGROUND: Educators implement arts-based pedagogy with the hope that it will foster meaningful learning for students. However, nursing students have varied reactions to artistic assignments, and there is a need to further understand students' learning processes with this novel approach and the factors influencing their learning. This understanding could promote the more effective implementation of arts-based pedagogy into nursing education. OBJECTIVE: To develop a theoretical understanding of how and when undergraduate nursing students learn through arts-based pedagogy. DESIGN: Constructivist grounded theory. SETTINGS: Canadian baccalaureate nursing program. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty third-year undergraduate nursing students and eight of their nursing instructors. METHODS: Participants who had experienced arts-based assignments were recruited with purposive and then theoretical sampling. We collected four sources of data: a socio-demographic questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, photo/art elicitation, and field notes. The socio-demographic data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and all other data with constructivist grounded theory procedures. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that students had to navigate a creative process with arts-based assignments, which involved several iterative phases. This type of learning was unique within their program and somewhat constrained by the context of nursing education. There was notable variation in the students' experiences. Although many reported meaningful learning, approximately 20% of the students did not value the assignment. Our findings elucidated multi-level enabling and restraining factors that influenced students' engagement with and learning from this creative process. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insight into modifiable factors that influenced students' engagement and learning, and have important implications for making ABP accessible and meaningful for more students.

The arts as a catalyst for learning with undergraduate nursing students: findings from a constructivist grounded theory study.

Background: There is a growing interest in arts-based pedagogy (ABP) to promote the wide range of competencies needed for professional nursing. The aim of this study was to develop a theoretical understanding of how students learn through ABP in undergraduate nursing education. Methodology and Methods: We used a constructivist grounded theory methodology which incorporated art-elicitation interviews. Thirty nursing students and eight nurse educators shared about their ABP experiences. Data were analyzed with grounded theory procedures. Results: The arts as a catalyst for learning emerged as the core category and elucidates how the unique quality of the arts created powerful pedagogical processes for many students. When students engaged with these processes, they resulted in surprising and transformative learning outcomes for professional nursing. Conclusions: These findings provide insight into why and how students learned through ABP, and can inform the effective implementation of ABP into healthcare education.

Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To develop well rounded professional nurses, educators need diverse pedagogical approaches. There is growing interest in arts-based pedagogy (ABP) as the arts can facilitate reflection, create meaning and engage healthcare students. However, the emerging body of research about ABP needs to be systematically examined. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the best available evidence on the effectiveness of ABP in enhancing competencies and learning behaviors in undergraduate nursing education and to explore nursing students' experiences with art-based pedagogy. INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: The review considered studies that included participants who are undergraduate nursing students. TYPES OF INTERVENTION(S)/PHENOMENA OF INTEREST: The qualitative (QL) component considered studies investigating nursing students' experiences of ABP, and the quantitative (QN) component considered studies evaluating the effectiveness of ABP in undergraduate nursing education. TYPES OF STUDIES: The QL component considered QL studies including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research. The QN component considered studies that examined the effectiveness of ABP including designs such as randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, before and after studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, case series, individual case reports and descriptive cross-sectional studies. OUTCOMES: The following QN outcomes of ABP were assessed: knowledge acquisition, level of empathy, attitudes toward others, emotional states, reflective practice, self-transcendence, cognitive/ethical maturity, learning behaviors and students' perspectives of ABP. SEARCH STRATEGY: An extensive three-step search strategy was conducted for primary research studies published between January 1, 1994 and April 7, 2015. The strategy included searching CINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Art Full Text, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, A&I, and gray literature. Only studies published in English were included. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY: Two reviewers assessed all studies for methodological quality using appropriate critical appraisal checklists from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) or the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI). DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from included articles using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-QARI or JBI-MAStARI. DATA SYNTHESIS: Qualitative studies were pooled through a meta-synthesis. Data from the QN studies were combined using a narrative synthesis as a meta-analysis was not possible. The researchers used a segregated mixed methods approach to integrate the QL and QN components. RESULTS: Twenty-one QL studies of high methodological quality were included. The two synthesized findings revealed that art forms could create meaning and inspire learning in undergraduate nursing education and that ABP can develop important learner outcomes/competencies for professional nursing. These synthesized findings received a moderate ConQual rating. Fifteen experimental/quasi-experimental studies of moderate methodological quality were included. The narrative synthesis suggested that ABP improved nursing students' knowledge acquisition, level of empathy, attitude toward others, emotional states, level of reflective practice, learning behaviors and aspects of cognitive/ethical maturity. In five cross-sectional studies, the majority of students had a positive perspective of ABP. When the QL and QN findings were interpreted as a whole, ABP appeared to facilitate learning in the cognitive and affective domains and may be especially useful in addressing the affective domain. CONCLUSION: Nurse educators should consider using ABP as students found that this approach offered a meaningful way of learning and resulted in the development of important competencies for professional nursing. The QN studies provide a very low level of evidence that ABP improved students' knowledge acquisition, level of empathy, attitude toward others, emotional states, level of reflective practice, learning behaviors and aspects of cognitive/ethical maturity. Although the QN findings can inform future research, the evidence is not robust enough to demonstrate improved outcomes.