Impact of head and neck cancer on partner's sociability.

INTRODUCTION: "Sociability" is defined as the range of experiences linking the subject to others. This is the first study to focus specifically on the impact of head and neck cancer on the sociability of patients' partners. METHOD: Data were collected via a dedicated questionnaire sent to patients' partners. The main endpoint was partner's self-assessment of the impact of the patient's disease on the partner's everyday life. The impact on sociability was analyzed with respect to: the circle of friends (friendship environment), unknown environment, known outside environment, necessary environment, and solitary activities. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy partners responded. Their everyday activities were impacted by the patient's disease in 71.5% of cases. The friendship environment was badly affected in 46.4% of cases. The unknown environment was affected in 44.0% of cases. Social practices related to the known outside environment were affected in 67.8% of cases, and the necessary environment in 26.0%; the number of solitary activities increased in 35.6% of cases. Social impact on patients' partners was thus considerable.

Influence of socioeconomic environment on survival in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer: a population-based study.

The influence of social environment on survival in patients with cancer has been demonstrated in many studies, subjects living in the most deprived areas having a poorer prognosis. Geographic remoteness and limited access to specialized care centers are often associated with socioeconomic deprivation. The aim was to assess the influence of social environment and geographic remoteness on the relative survival of patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 1997 and 2004 in the department of Calvados in France. The study population, which was provided by the Calvados digestive cancer registry, included 629 patients. Relative survival was used to estimate the influence of social environment and geographic remoteness on patient survival. Five-year survival rates were 14.1%, 15.1%, 11.8%, 8.8%, and 11.4%, respectively, for patients living in the least to the most deprived areas (P= 0.39). The influence of social environment was significant after adjustment for clinical variables, patients living in the most deprived areas having the worst survival. These discrepancies cannot totally be explained by differences in access to care, cancer extension, or morphology at diagnosis. No association was observed between distance to the nearest cancer center and survival. Social environment appears to induce disparities among patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer, with a worse prognosis for patients living in the most deprived areas.

Pulmonary nodules detected by thoracic computed tomography scan after exposure to asbestos: diagnostic significance.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relationship between pulmonary nodules detected by radiologists using computed tomography and cumulative exposure to asbestos or asbestos-related pleuro-pulmonary diseases in 5662 asbestos-exposed subjects, and the relationship between pulmonary nodules and thoracic cancer, to determine whether a specific surveillance strategy based on cumulative asbestos exposure should be adopted. DESIGN: Standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR) for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma were calculated in patients with and without mention of pulmonary nodules and compared using comparative morbidity figures. RESULTS: A significant excess incidence of primary lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma was observed among subjects presenting with pulmonary nodule(s) (SIR respectively 1.95, 95%CI 1.22-2.95, and 11.88, 95%CI 3.20-30.41). However, there was no significant relationship between pulmonary nodules mentioned by radiologists and cumulative asbestos exposure or between pulmonary nodules and the presence of asbestos-related benign diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the expected excess prevalence of lung cancer in subjects presenting with pulmonary nodules according to the radiologist's report, and shows the absence of relationship between the presence of nodules and level of cumulative asbestos exposure. Our study therefore offers no argument in favour of specific surveillance modalities based on estimated cumulative asbestos exposure.

[Social and geographical determinants of cancer care management in France - colorectal cancer incidence in Calvados from 1997 to 2004]. / Déterminants socio-géographiques de la prise en charge des cancers en France - Exemple des cancers colorectaux incidents entre 1997 et 2004 dans le département du Calvados.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have underlined an important deprivation gap in survival in all industrialized countries, prognosis being constantly poorer for the most deprived patients. Beside clinical factors, the explanation of this gap in survival could be partly explained by the influence of socio-geographical environment on cancer care management. The aim of this retrospective population-based study was to investigate the influence of socio-geographical determinants on access to a reference care centre. METHODS: The study population included all colorectal cancer patients with surgical treatment diagnosed between 1/01/1997 and 31/12/2004 in Calvados (n=2318). Individual clinical data were supplied by the Calvados registry of the gastrointestinal tumors. Beside geographical variables (distance to nearest cancer center), aggregate socioeconomic data were derived from the last exhaustive census organized by the national statistics institute (INSEE) in 1999. The Townsend deprivation index was used for this study. Due to the hierarchical structure of such variables, a multilevel logistic model was used (Level 1: Patients; Level 2: IRIS2000). RESULTS: After adjustment on the individual variables, most remote patients were less frequently treated in a reference care center than those who were living near a reference care center (Odds Ratio adjust=0.20 [0.15-0.28], p-trend<0.001). Patients living in an IRIS2000 with high medical density were more likely to receive surgical treatment in a reference care centre (p-trend=0.05). Townsend Deprivation index was not associated with access to reference care center. CONCLUSION: Access to a reference care center was strongly determined by the distance to nearest care center. Dissemination of clinical guidelines and improvement in treatment in non-reference care centers are crucial in ensuring equality in health care.

Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis.

BACKGROUND: Compliance in cancer screening among socially disadvantaged persons is known to be lower than among more socially advantaged persons. However, most of the studies regarding compliance proceed via a questionnaire and are thus limited by self-reported measures of participation and by participation bias. This study aimed at investigating the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on compliance to an organised colorectal cancer screening programme on an unbiased sample based on data from the entire target population within a French geographical department, Calvados (n=180 045). METHODS: Individual data of participation and aggregate socioeconomic data, from the structure responsible for organising screening and the French census, respectively, were analysed simultaneously by a multilevel model. RESULTS: Uptake was significantly higher in women than in men (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45), and significantly lower in the youngest (50-59 years) and in the oldest (70-74 years) persons, compared with intermediate ages (60-69 years), with OR=0.70 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.77) and OR=0.82 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), respectively. Uptake fell with increasing level of deprivation. There was a significant difference of uptake probability between the least deprived and the most deprived areas (OR=0.68; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.79). No significant influence of the general practitioners density was found. CONCLUSION: Multilevel analysis allowed to detect areas of weak uptake linked to areas of strong deprivation. These results suggest that targeting populations with a risk of low compliance, as identified both socially and geographically in our study, could be adopted to minimise inequalities in screening.

Occupational asbestos exposure and digestive cancers - a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Although the role of asbestos in the genesis of mesothelioma and primary bronchopulmonary cancers has been established, results from studies focusing on the relationship between occupational exposure to asbestos and digestive cancer remain contradictory. AIM: To determine whether occupational asbestos exposure increases the incidence of digestive cancers. METHODS: Our study was a retrospective morbidity study based on 2024 subjects occupationally exposed to asbestos. The incidence of digestive cancer was calculated from 1st January 1978 to 31st December 2004 and compared with levels among the local general population using Standardized Incidence Ratios. Asbestos exposure was assessed using the company's job exposure matrix. RESULTS: Eighty-five cases of digestive cancer were observed within our cohort, for an expected number of 66.90 (SIR = 1.27 [1.01; 1.57]). A significantly elevated incidence, particularly notable among women, was observed for peritoneal mesothelioma, independently of exposure levels. A significantly elevated incidence was also noted among men for cancer of small intestine and oesophagus, for cumulative exposure indexes for asbestos above 80 fibres/mL x years. A significantly elevated incidence of cancer of the small intestine was also observed among men having been exposed to asbestos for periods in excess of 25 years and for mean exposure levels in excess of 4 fibres/mL. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the existence of a relationship between exposure to asbestos and cancer of the small intestine and of the oesophagus in men.

Performance of chest radiograph and CT scan for lung cancer screening in asbestos-exposed workers.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare, in a cohort of asbestos-exposed workers, the sensitivity and the specificity of low-radiation helical chest CT scan with chest radiograph for the biennial screening of bronchopulmonary cancer, according to the size of detected nodules. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The screening procedure consisted of biennial chest radiograph and monodetector chest CT scan, given to 972 individuals who had been highly exposed to asbestos. A total of 2555 screening procedures were performed. The study focuses on the 1230 screening procedures for which a 2-year follow-up period was available. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases of bronchopulmonary cancer were diagnosed. CT scan detected 20 cancers, 12 of which had not been detected by chest radiograph. Sensitivity of chest radiograph and CT scan were, respectively, 33% and 83%, lesions measuring over 2 mm in diameter being considered as suspect. The specificity of chest radiograph and CT scan were, respectively, 95% and 78%. Calculation of the differential false positive/true positive (FP/TP) ratio and the receiver operating characteristic curve, performed for both chest radiograph and CT scan, facilitated the determination of the best possible compromise between specificity and sensitivity, according to the diameter threshold applied for considering a nodule as suspect. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study confirms the superior sensitivity of chest CT scan compared with conventional chest radiograph, the associated loss in specificity leads to a recommended diameter of 5 mm as the threshold for considering non-calcified lesions as "suspect", for the surveillance of asbestos-exposed individuals.