PATIENT-REPORTED VISUAL FUNCTION FROM THE OCRIPLASMIN FOR TREATMENT FOR SYMPTOMATIC VITREOMACULAR ADHESION, INCLUDING MACULAR HOLE (OASIS) STUDY.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported visual function after ocriplasmin through the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction including macular hole. METHODS: This was a prespecified analysis of a secondary endpoint from the OASIS trial. Patients received a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin (0.125 mg) or sham and completed the VFQ-25 questionnaire at baseline and at Months 6, 12, and 24. Clinically meaningful (≥5-point) changes from baseline were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 220 patients enrolled, 146 received ocriplasmin and 74 received sham. At Month 24, the percentage of patients with a ≥5-point improvement from baseline in VFQ-25 composite scores was higher with ocriplasmin versus sham (51.4% vs. 30.1%, 95% confidence interval, 8.1-34.5, P = 0.003). The percentage of patients with ≥5-point worsening at Month 24 was lower with ocriplasmin versus sham (9.5% vs. 15.6%, 95% confidence interval: -15.6 to 3.5, P = 0.191). A larger percentage of patients treated with ocriplasmin versus sham experienced a ≥5-point improvement in VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores at Month 24 regardless of baseline full-thickness macular hole status. CONCLUSION: A larger percentage of patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction reported clinically meaningful improvements in self-assessed visual function with ocriplasmin than sham.

Annual cost of hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation and sick leave of anal cancer in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Literature on the economic burden of anal cancer in Germany is scarce. About 84% of these cancers are associated with human papillomavirus infection. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the annual costs of human papillomavirus-related anal cancer incurred by hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation, and sick leave in 2008 in Germany. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of five German databases covering hospital treatment, inpatient rehabilitation, and sick leave in 2008 was performed. All hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, and sick leave cases due to anal cancer in 2008 were analyzed. Associated numbers of anal cancer hospitalizations, healthcare resource use, and costs were identified and extracted using the ICD-10 code C21 as the main diagnosis. The annual cost of human papillomavirus-related anal cancer was estimated based on the percentage of anal cancer likely to be attributable to human papillomavirus. RESULTS: In 2008, there were 5774 hospitalizations (39% males, 61% females), 517 inpatient rehabilitations, and 897 sick leaves due to anal cancer representing costs of €34.11 million. The estimated annual costs associated with human papillomavirus-related anal cancer were €28.72 million, mainly attributed to females (62%). Direct costs accounted for 90% (86% for hospital treatment, 4% for inpatient rehabilitation) and indirect costs due to sick leave accounted for 10% of human papillomavirus-related costs. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of human papillomavirus-related anal cancer in 2008 in Germany is under-estimated, since costs incurred by outpatient management, outpatient chemotherapy, long-term care, premature retirement, and premature death were not included. However, this study is the first analysis to investigate the economic burden of anal cancer in Germany. The estimated annual costs of human papillomavirus-related anal cancer contribute to a significant economic burden in Germany and should be considered when assessing health and economic benefits of human papillomavirus vaccination in both genders.